Ron Toye AMA - Sheepdog avoids answering your questions

Hey Ron, how about your other ex wife?
Marcie? I am not sure. We do not speak, understandably, I was a jerk to her. I wish her well, I stay in touch with some of her family members. It was a long time ago. She moved on, I moved on, etc. You could ask my current girlfriend how I treat her or her friends. They wouldn't lie. :) I know it frustrated a lot of people to see so many of them come out to defend me but that is what happens when you put in the work to be a better person and people see the fruit of that labor. Plus Monica and I have been together longer than any relationship I have ever been in and I am proud to say it has been magical. We do not fight, we have a fantastic partnership, we are a great team, and have a ton of fun.
 
Marcie? I am not sure. We do not speak, understandably, I was a jerk to her. I wish her well, I stay in touch with some of her family members. It was a long time ago. She moved on, I moved on, etc. You could ask my current girlfriend how I treat her or her friends. They wouldn't lie. :) I know it frustrated a lot of people to see so many of them come out to defend me but that is what happens when you put in the work to be a better person and people see the fruit of that labor. Plus Monica and I have been together longer than any relationship I have ever been in and I am proud to say it has been magical. We do not fight, we have a fantastic partnership, we are a great team, and have a ton of fun.
Then why did she never tell you about the time when Vic attempted to "rape" her? Why did you learn that only through Nick?

They might not lie, but you sure will.
 
Oh, @Ron Toye ...I don`t have to "assume" anything. :) Your behaviour and speech is laid out by yourself for all to see to prove that these "assumptions" I`m making are blatantly true. Aggressively stating that you can "say what you want when you want" TWICE proves my point that you have little control over your emotional and mental capabilities.
Furthermore, your tweets, your deposition, your Yelp reviews, your Facebook posts and your responses here on KiwiFarms have you doing the documentation for us to prove how underhanded, devious, dishonest and disingenuous you truly are.

Why come to the Farms saying you have all this proof and evidence and "can`t say anything yet" even though you are fully within your rights to do so? What specifically is holding you back from disclosing these receipts since you "won 17-0"? Shouldn`t you be doing your victory lap and showing the information you keep promising? You can`t back up arguments with nothing. Do YOU have anything original to bring to the table?

It feels great being a repeater of Nick`s words, honestly. Because he`s RIGHT. :)

Lastly, well, being boring is a LOT more fun than being a pathological liar with zero self-awareness anyway. :)
Can you point to how right he has been? LOL. He can't even work through what a reply or a response is never mind how a defamation lawsuit works. Here, I will make it easier for you, what type of receipt will you accept?

@Ron Toye

You still haven't answered my question .
Sorry, there are a ton of pages, I might have missed yours, what was your question?
 
. You could ask my current girlfriend how I treat her or her friends. They wouldn't lie.

Did you just downgrade your fiancé to girlfriend?

Now, you said that Monica and you have a great relationship and she tells you everything. And since the jellybean story was part of the Funimation investigation, but you said in your deposition testimony that you first heard about that on Nick Rekieta’s stream.

I am sure that such an egregious act that warranted an investigation by their employer would be something that your “fiancé” would have told you about, wouldn’t it?
 
Can you point to how right he has been? LOL. He can't even work through what a reply or a response is never mind how a defamation lawsuit works. Here, I will make it easier for you, what type of receipt will you accept?
The ones you've been tooting and hollering about for the past year, ones that ARENT in any filings, which they should be in filings cause thats just silly they arent.
 
They wouldn't lie. :)

We have volumes that show otherwise, but you're too willingly obtuse to read because they undermine the false narrative you have constructed in your mind.

And no one came out to defend you. You're a fifth wheel. You aren't even allowed in the propaganda photoshoots because it undermines the disingenuous narrative your legal team attempted to craft with the Dallas Morning News.
 
Hey @Ron Toye why do you keep minimalizing the abuse you enacted upon your ex-wife? A us court found that beyond a reasonable doubt that you were a threat to your wife and child and so unhinged that you threatened the court over it, proving that you the possibility that you would continue such abuse was too likely. However this is never your fault is it? Why are the actions you perform upon others always the fault of toxic masculinity or another person or environment?

No such court in the US or elsewhere has found Vic guilty of any of the crimes you've accused him of. Yes, you've accused of crimes (multiple) and no, the TCPA denying the procedure of his defamation case against you does not prove that Vic actually performed any of the crimes you've accused him of. There isn't even a police record that's been produced. So why should we believe that Vic HAS done these things when the reveal of your receipts (much like your never-wedding with your personal fiance) keeps getting pushed back?

What I'm saying Ron is that I think you're disgusting abusive troglodyte and a hypocrite. But you can change that! Produce those receipts! Then I'll stop thinking you're a hypocrite and start thinking that "Vic bad"
A court did not find me guilty of anything. I was not prosecuted for the stuff mentioned in my civil case. This is just bs Nick pushes. I didn't argue with the judge about my actions, the judge put a protective order out while i completed anger management and co-parenting classes, once completed that was removed. No police were involved, no police reports, etc. That is why law twitter posted that those claims were dismissed against me but you all like to ignore that, right ;) This lawsuit was never about proving Vic innocent, he wasn't on trial. he was just the moron who listened to bigger morons who convinced him the plan to sue was the only option. Well, that failed miserably and now he will never work in the industry again. He might get back to small cons but major ones wont touch him because he is a liability. They will have to notify their insurance carrier if they do decide to bring him out because if something did happen now their is court records pointing out that he is a problem and they ignored it. They would be liable. The only people to blame for his situation is Vic, Nick, and Ty. My past has nothing to do with Vic's decision to sue. My past has no effect on this lawsuit. It does point to a person who wasn't always a great dude who changed his life and is now respected and successful. Something Vic could have done if he let himself get taken advantage of by Nick and Ty. He should sue the life out of both of them and he would win. The only reason he wouldn't sue them is if they have something on him and he is afraid. There is no other reason why he wouldn't sue for malpractice and for the referral to Ty.

Once again --

Did you just used your trauma with your mom to admit that you're a physically abusive dick?
Not to justify any of my past actions. But, in the past, I was a dick a few times. No excuses.
 
What it means is that he couldn't prove what we said was false, meaning, it wasn't a lie. He was a moron to bring the lawsuit especially after confessing to most of the things he sued over LOL
Hello Ron. You keep saying Vic admitted or confessed to things.

Please refer to this post and please answer it.

Also, let's take a look at Monica's hotel assault story.

In yours and Monica's TCPA motion to dismiss, page 246 and 247, she decribes her encounter as such:

1590366523161.png


1590366547053.png

In this story

On 10-4-2007, Monica claims Vic ate dinner with her and Stan Dahlin. Vic later invited Monica to his hotel room to watch Fullmetal Fantasy. Once there, Vic grabbed her, threw her on the bed, and aggressively kissed her. When Dahlin came by, Monica fled the room in distress, with Dahlin asking her if she was okay. Vic then somehow forced Monica to return to his room to talk to Michelle Specht.

in Vic's deposition, he says:

Page 2010
1590367033343.png

He has no memory of kissing Monica in his hotel room.

Also on page 210
1590367127754.png

Lemoine is describing the hotel assault incident.

Page 211
1590367194035.png

Vic says not only did this not happen, but he's sure it didn't happen.

Further on 211
1590366960570.png

Vic does not recall.

Spilling over to page 212:
1590367295387.png

Vic does not recall forcing Monica to speak with Specht.

He further says this in his Second Amended Petition, page 100
1590367480244.png


Much like Jamie's accusation, Vic seems to be denying all points of the hotel story. From what logical path do you conclude that Vic admitted to Monica's hotel story?
 
Last edited:
Not to justify any of my past actions. But, in the past, I was a dick a few times. No excuses.
You love to justify and defend your past actions against your other Ex that hasn't spoken to you after your divorce, you and Monica blamed her for YOUR abuse. Quit lying Ron, you're the same asshole you were then, you just put some cheap dollar tree paint over it.
 
Hello Ron. You keep saying Vic admitted or confessed to things.

Please refer to [this post](https://kiwifarms.net/threads/ron-toye-ama.69992/post-6525966) and please answer it.

Also, let's take a look at Monica's hotel assault story.

In yours and Monica's TCPA motion to dismiss, page 246 and 247, she decribes her encounter as such:

View attachment 1318816

View attachment 1318817
In this story

On 10-4-2007, Monica claims Vic ate dinner with her and Stan Dahlin. Vic later invited Monica to his hotel room to watch Fullmetal Fantasy. Once there, Vic grabbed her, threw her on the bed, and aggressively kissed her. When Dahlin came by, Monica fled the room in distress, with Dahlin asking her if she was okay. Vic then somehow forced Monica to return to his room to talk to Michelle Specht.

in Vic's deposition, he says:

Page 2010
View attachment 1318837
He has no memory of kissing Monica in his hotel room.

Also on page 210
View attachment 1318840
Lemoine is describing the hotel assault incident.

Page 211
View attachment 1318842
Vic says not only did this not happen, but he's sure it didn't happen.

Further on 211
View attachment 1318832
Vic does not recall.

Spilling over to page 212:
View attachment 1318845
Vic does not recall forcing Monica to speak with Specht.

He further says this in his Second Amended Petition, page 100
View attachment 1318852

Much like Jamie's accusation, Vic seems to be denying all points of the hotel story. From what logical path do you conclude that Vic admitted to Monica's hotel story?
"Does Not Recall" Remember what you all said about me saying those words? Also, have you reviewed the takedown letter? He admits to kissing her he just assumed it was consensual. He is hiding behind the fact he did the stuff he just feels it was consensual. He doesn't get to determine that. I can post the screenshot here if you would like. Did you find the place about him Not recalling why he was fired from his first job out of college?
 
"Does Not Recall" Remember what you all said about me saying those words? Also, have you reviewed the takedown letter? He admits to kissing her he just assumed it was consensual. He is hiding behind the fact he did the stuff he just feels it was consensual. He doesn't get to determine that. I can post the screenshot here if you would like. Did you find the place about him Not recalling why he was fired from his first job out of college?
He can't recall things that were 20 to 30 years ago, you couldn't recall tweets that happened a couple months before your terrible deposition, there's a difference.

Edit: answer the questions Ron, you're not answering, quit asking questions to "answer" the question. Your manipulative sides showing a lot now, not like it wasn't before.
 
Never seen the show.
LANoireDoubt.jpeg

But in case you're sincere and to give other people here some context: Dance in the Vampire Bund is a fanservice show where the main character, voiced by Monica, is an underage looking vampire loli that gets heavily sexualized. It's literally "No officer, she's actually a 700 year old vampire!" as an anime series.

On a personal note I must admit that the fact that Monica was willing to voice the main character in a coomer show that was obviously meant to pander to unironic pedophiles, makes her having a period over some lame jelly bean dad joke kind of funny in hindsight.
 
"Does Not Recall" Remember what you all said about me saying those words? Also, have you reviewed the takedown letter? He admits to kissing her he just assumed it was consensual. He is hiding behind the fact he did the stuff he just feels it was consensual. He doesn't get to determine that. I can post the screenshot here if you would like. Did you find the place about him Not recalling why he was fired from his first job out of college?
You mean that fake ass Michelle garbage where those two weren't even in the same state? The liar desperate enough to photoshop crap just in false hopes someone takes her seriously? The fact you never used her image in your court documents is proof enough that story is too fake for your agenda.
 
A court did not find me guilty of anything. I was not prosecuted for the stuff mentioned in my civil case. This is just bs Nick pushes. I didn't argue with the judge about my actions, the judge put a protective order out while i completed anger management and co-parenting classes, once completed that was removed. No police were involved, no police reports, etc. That is why law twitter posted that those claims were dismissed against me but you all like to ignore that, right ;) This lawsuit was never about proving Vic innocent, he wasn't on trial. he was just the moron who listened to bigger morons who convinced him the plan to sue was the only option. Well, that failed miserably and now he will never work in the industry again. He might get back to small cons but major ones wont touch him because he is a liability. They will have to notify their insurance carrier if they do decide to bring him out because if something did happen now their is court records pointing out that he is a problem and they ignored it. They would be liable. The only people to blame for his situation is Vic, Nick, and Ty. My past has nothing to do with Vic's decision to sue. My past has no effect on this lawsuit. It does point to a person who wasn't always a great dude who changed his life and is now respected and successful. Something Vic could have done if he let himself get taken advantage of by Nick and Ty. He should sue the life out of both of them and he would win. The only reason he wouldn't sue them is if they have something on him and he is afraid. There is no other reason why he wouldn't sue for malpractice and for the referral to Ty.
Hey stinky refer to my original post that you quoted please. I understand you have a very limited script to read from and you find me bringing up your divorce where a court ORDERED you to take mental health classes (that clearly didn't work) because you were a danger to yourself and others not at all frustrating.

Post the receipts, pretty please!
 
@Ron Toye why did you get involved with Shane Holmberg and how long did it take for you to work out he was a creepy Monica superfan with no influence and penchant for eating footwear?

Also a follow up question: how do you feel about some of the more "colourful" characters involved on the "kickvic" side of things? People such as Shane "my young damaged wife gives the beet head" Holmberg or Jennifer Lynn Hunt with her crazy rantings and constant imagined gaslighting.
 
Back