Twitter Hides POTUS Tweet

[ddlloo]

Dilbertman has gone a bit loopy in a lot of ways, mostly because like most boomers he is terrified of death (no joke for years he has been saying that the reason he does so many interviews and periscopes etc is so that there is enough samples and data about his positions/behavior/thoughts that in the future they can essentially replicate him) but one thing he is usually pretty insightful on is persuasion techniques. Now these days he ignores a lot of Trump's flubs and covers for him which quite annoys me, but I've still taken a few of his lessons to heart. In this instance I think Trump is genuinely using a few of those innate techniques he has.

Specifically he has conditioned us to the idea there will be change in the social media landscape. A lot of us are, thanks to how increasingly frequent and intense his tweeting and message has become, fearing how far he will go. We are 'past the sale', we expect change now.

He's now also 'Going big then small'. Saying we should do a massive change, but then enacting a smaller one (compare his EO to saying repeal 230, and a year from now compare the actual changes to the wording of the EO) which everyone agrees is much much better than what he originally said (and is closer to what he actually wanted to achieve).

I mean, sure he could just be a big giant sperg, but he's used these types of techniques a bunch in the past to achieve things, and if it wasn't for the democrats, media, and RINOs he would have achieved a lot more legitimately good policy with those techniques.

*shrug*

 

[Marco Fucko]

Do I still get the shirt?

Aren't the real shirts the e-friends we made along the way?

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

Is today's MATI stream just gonna be two hours of the Keemstar remix?

 

[Dante Alighieri]

Aren't the real shirts the e-friends we made along the way?

No fuck you all, you're all faggots.

 

[MadDamon]

Lol at the people who is licking Null's boot for saying Tump censorship is bad but say I'm crazy when I said that.

 

[Jack Awful]

Doesn't 230 have to be repealed by Congress?

They couldn't even repeal Obamacare

Still, a lot of Trump's base are elderly who are tech illiterate while also seeing Trump's words as the literal will of god.

Just by saying 230 should be banned, a large chunk of Trump's base now believe that 230 must be destroyed and will unquestioningly do everything in their power to make it happen.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

READ THE FUCKING LAW

Section 230 or the EO?

 

[CatchFire]

I believe this is the right Executive Order correct me if I'm wrong
Link
(Archive)

 

[Null]

Lol at the people who is licking Null's boot for saying Tump censorship is bad but say I'm crazy when I said that.

the people defending this kike shit are going to all get what they fucking deserve

 

[Exelxi]

The white house just tweeted this, lol. Trump using alt accounts to avoid suspensions

https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1266342941649506304

 

[Bob Barker]

The law you're asking for would have to be written in such a delicate, precise way to not have huge, far-reaching implications for all American websites. You're asking CONGRESS. Our CONGRESS. To do surgery.

And you know what they would do? They would create an executive branch agency responsible for it and then it would fall to the appointed officials of whoever gets elected as president. So even if it works are first we could get some democrat in who redefines things in a way that makes them worse than what they are right now.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

Someone shop Josh's face into the Joker now!

 

[Forgetful Kiwi]

The blackpills keep on coming.

 

[Distant Stare]

Maybe this will be oka-
View attachment 1330078

I think we broke him this time

 

[Ivan Shatov]

Or!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

FIX
THE
BANKS


The law you're asking for would have to be written in such a delicate, precise way to not have huge, far-reaching implications for all American websites. You're asking CONGRESS. Our CONGRESS. To do surgery.

Congress has nothing to do with it. He's asking the FCC for clarification of the meaning of a term, which is within its power given the original language of the CDA.

The decision would come from a committee consisting of 2 Democrats, 2 Republicans, and Ajit Pai. While maybe that doesn't give you a lot of confidence, Pai's the person responsible for revoking net neutrality. He has a strong interest in not sinking the boat or pissing off the entire world.

Try to remember all the hype about how the Internet was going to become a metered service, similar to cable. That never happened. He's capable of delivering a workable solution that achieves policy goals without invoking some radical, transformative shift from the broader landscape.

 

[Queen Elizabeth II]

Land of the free lmao.

Home of the brave lmao.

Ya'll should have just left the tea alone.

 

[Null]

He's asking

Pai's the person responsible for revoking net neutrality. He has a strong interest in not sinking the boat or pissing off the entire world.

WHICH WAS ALSO A TERRIBLE FUCKING IDEA

 

[Mimic]

Goddammit. God-fucking-dammit. Even I can't be optimistic about this shit, but I suppose it was naive to be optimistic in clown world to begin with. I'll put my rainbow wig on now.

Should things go irreversibly awry for our Shitposting Democratic Republic of Kiwi, it's been nothing less of an honor to shitpost with all of you.

 

[Cryonic Haunted Bullets]

i dont know anything about this law but i like orange man. orange man good. orange man could shit in my mouth and it would be an epic political subversion on his part. what a fucking gebius.

 

[nya001]

even if he could repeal whatever he wants, he can't apply it to a server located outside the US - .md or .pl or .za or whatever. It's easy to open a company online (and sometimes it's free) in many countries, have it owned by bearer shares if you want, it's simple and doesn't take a genius lawyer. He's doing things for show imho.