Twitter Hides POTUS Tweet

Ah yes kiwi farms used to be full of super cool guys, back in the old days of 2019.
No kidding-- this place couldn't have been ""cool"" since at least January 17, 2017.
In reality, this place couldn't have been "cool" since 2013 when all of the old ones focused only on Chris.
 
Not defending him, but it’s not like the UK is in any better shape than America.
Eh, debatable. Our leader is still a moron but on the scale of moron he at least doesn't measure up to Trump. What amuses and riles me in equal measure about BOTH our nations politics is that supporting your political party has become like supporting a sports team. You stick by them no matter how badly they fuck up and support them regardless which misses the point really. I love threads like these, you dip in, make some counter arguments, somebody WILL start frothing and getting all twisty nickered about it and then you duck out again.
 
View attachment 1333372
“After the live-streamed mass shooting in Christchurch, New Zealand last spring, Democratic lawmakers sought changes to 230 as a method of ensuring that terrorist content is removed from platforms. They’ve responded to Facebook’s refusal to remove misinformation peddled by politicians in digital ads with threats to carve holes in the law as well.
...”

https://www.theverge.com/platform/a...section-230-communications-decency-act-revoke

The other guy literally wants repeal § 230, specifically for the purpose of targeting you.
Both Guys Bad, just like always. Voting is so cool and definitely matters.
 
You can't come in here already with rabies and claim that everyone else is frothing at the mouth.
If you infect them you can.

1590858008644.png
 
Null's been wigging out so hard that it almost seems like he's going to need his own thread at this point.
He who laughs at lolcows should should look to it that he himself does not become a lolcow.

But he is right any damage that repealing 230 would do to sites like twitter or facebook would do ten times the damage to smaller sites like KF or 4chan, it would be crazy that sites like these that survived so much bullshit would be sank by an idiot that probably most of the users supported.
 
He who laughs at lolcows should should look to it that he himself does not become a lolcow.

But he is right any damage that repealing 230 would do to sites like twitter or facebook would do ten times the damage to smaller sites like KF or 4chan, it would be crazy that sites like these that survived so much bullshit would be sank by an idiot that probably most of the users supported.

I said this months ago, and y'all laughed.

Well, who's laughing now?

...
I guess nobody in particular is laughing or not laughing. I wasn't dogpiled for that comment.
 
I already said I think this will just be another episode of Trump idiocy * if the Democrats weren't currently ID POL obsessed authoritarian fuckwits they could destroy Trump on this shit *. Doesn't mean I can't also think the people cheer leading this authoritarian tantrum he's having aren't massive dumbasses and hypocrites. Or express annoyance that the guys claiming to be all for free speech and anti censorship are constantly trying to destroy the internet's safe harbor laws.

I fell out with the mainstream Democrats when they became the hurt feefee police and pro censorship party after championing freedom of expression and personal liberty for two-three decades. Why the fuck should I be happy when Conservatives do that shit while lying to my face about it?


Yeah the EO is typical toothless Trump posturing and dick swinging. It's his autistic screeching over repealing 230 out of asshurt Twitter-senpai laughed at him and his fanboys defending it that's pissing me off.
It's amazing how Trump's internet schultzstaffel are 100% okay with every stupid thing he does, even when it will definitely, personally, affect their well-being and blow up in their face. Can't make this shit up. It's clear most of you support him because he's chaos incarnate, and not because you believe in his policies and principles, and you won't even listen when your ability to shittalk and shittake is put on the line.
Do the people who write this kind of shit think anyone who is supporting the repealing of Section 230 is even "in the know" about Section 230 as is?
To the people trying to rationalize away Trump's statements, I have a question, how else could you possibly interpret "REPEAL 230!" as anything other than literal? In what way could it be ironic or figurative? I see no room for ambiguity in such a statement.

There's no guarantee that Trump even recognizes this as a possibility.
The statement is literal, and likely comes from incredibly bad advice he's been given.

I don't think Trump even heard of something as relatively specific as Section 230 on his own.
 
Back