Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

2020-05-31 (4).png

 
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, HIVidaBoheme, Dededon't and 25 others
Sekirodiealot said:
"Which doesn't exist" isn't passive aggressive at all/s. The fuck you mean they don't exist? They're symbol is damn near everywhere, the media endorse them and they tag their symbols everywhere. Fuck outta here trying to deflect.
Click to expand...
Because Antifa doesn't have a centralised hierarchy it technically doesn't exist as a single organisation. The Left loves their hair-splitting and weasel words.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, AnotherPleb, Sexyphobe and 16 others
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, 1984-RaSeC-2019, Jub-Jub and 37 others
HomerSimpson said:
"Laughing at you and Sleepy Joe"? Does he mean Biden, cause last I checked, biden isn't president. Biden also didn't threaten to destroy the internet over having hurt feelings because of twitter. Non americans are laughing at trump because he is such an inept retard that thinks his inaction reflects others actions.
Click to expand...
We need a bait rating for weak posts like this
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, 1984-RaSeC-2019, Jub-Jub and 35 others
JambledUpWords said:
We need a bait rating for weak posts like this
Click to expand...
I just rate them dumb, because anyone who falls for it is in the single digit IQ range.
Jarolleon said:
Because Antifa doesn't have a centralised hierarchy it technically doesn't exist as a single organisation. The Left loves their hair-splitting and weasel words.
Click to expand...
It actually does have organization! Not only does Antifa operate local cells, like "Rose City Antifa" and others, but national activities are coordinated by what can best be described as a DSA steering committee. They have the same relationship to the DSA as the Weathermen had to the SDS. One is a feeder of resources, targets, and personnel to the other, which operates with a veneer of separation.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Flaming Insignias, Squidbot and 17 others
Sekirodiealot said:
View attachment 1337396
Click to expand...

Since when has trump tried to block the Muller report. Wasn't release pretty much unredacted, as much as they could. The Government couldn't release a full version of the report since what was redacted was done so in relations to other pending government investigations going on. And when has Trump ever said he's going to the SC to prevent it the report from getting released in full?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, Squidbot, spiritofamermaid and 15 others
tehpope said:
Since when has trump tried to block the Muller report. Wasn't release pretty much unredacted, as much as they could. The Government couldn't release a full redacted version since what was redacted was done so in relations to other government investigations going on while it was released. And when has Trump ever said he's going to the SC to prevent it the report from getting released in full?
Click to expand...
This is some fiction they have in their heads that CNN made up. After Mueller was forced to exonerate him due to lack of evidence, they claimed that they needed the "full unredacted" report to REALLY get him for crimes, or whatever. Ignoring that he's been releasing damning declassifications of Obamagate material constantly, which is where the Mueller info comes from.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, spiritofamermaid, Flaming Insignias and 14 others
tehpope said:
Since when has trump tried to block the Muller report. Wasn't release pretty much unredacted, as much as they could. The Government couldn't release a full redacted version since what was redacted was done so in relations to other government investigations going on while it was released. And when has Trump ever said he's going to the SC to prevent it the report from getting released in full?
Click to expand...
Ya know, whatever happened to mueller after all that impeachment jargon?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, Squidbot, spiritofamermaid and 2 others
Had some personal cows tell me today, "Yeah well the property destruction is bad but that's at the bottom of my priority list. These protests are a symptom of much deeper problems." Oh I agree 100%. Let's start with universities teaching these spoiled upper class kids that they live in an oppressive capitalist patriarchy that deserves to be razed to ashes at the first opportunity. That sounds like a contributing factor to this kind of, uh, "protest".
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, spiritofamermaid, Flaming Insignias and 13 others
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, spiritofamermaid, Flaming Insignias and 25 others
Tismguide said:
lol wut https://kiwifarms.net/threads/battle-for-section-230.70375/
Click to expand...
Holy shit lol. I actually didn't know that. I take my statment back then. But still, trump doesn't want to do it because it's a bad thing or anything like that. He did it because twitter censored a tweet. All he had to do was put out a single tweet saying "since twitter is choosing to editorialize tweets, it will now be judged based on everything it doesn't editorialize on it's site". Then just start throwing tweets that are illegal at them and they will need to bend a knee still. Same outcome, using the bills and laws in place, rather than kicking and screaming threatening to destroy the entire internet.
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, Flaming Insignias, PrincessHomura and 11 others
HomerSimpson said:
Holy shit lol. I actually didn't know that. I take my statment back then. But still, trump doesn't want to do it because it's a bad thing or anything like that. He did it because twitter censored a tweet. All he had to do was put out a single tweet saying "since twitter is choosing to editorialize tweets, it will now be judged based on everything it doesn't editorialize on it's site". Then just start throwing tweets that are illegal at them and they will need to bend a knee still. Same outcome, using the bills and laws in place, rather than kicking and screaming threatening to destroy the entire internet.
Click to expand...
We've already discussed this in the thread before, so I'll just link back to a relevant post that explains it well:
Kacho said:
Some people are calling this a threat, some are calling it chicken, intimidation, whatever. But really it's a negotiation. It's what Trump has been doing his entire career, and he has done it a million times in the past 5 years. Think back to the campaign and all the blustery propositions Trump made. A impenetrable concrete wall that just got ten feet higher, Mexico is going to pay for everything, we're going to stop all immigration and travel from specific places, we're going to cut and reform taxes to an insane degree. Did any of this happen exactly as he said it? No, but he got them all done in one way or another. The result is always somewhere in the middle, and in a better place than it would have been if he hadn't been so brash with his opening bid. This is how negotiation works, your opening bid isn't what you actually want, it's beyond what you want and you haggle down to something closer to the ideal. The wilder your opening bid is, the more you shift the conversation and expand the spectrum of possibilities.

The only possibility before all of this was that Twitter gets to keep doing whatever they want to people under the full protection of the law. Now the realm of possibility extends all the way to a repeal of 230. You can see in the main thread about this, people are now offering more moderate solutions and more helpful ideas left and right. Trump has coaxed them into it and they don't even realize it. Anything that actually happens will likely be closer to those ideas than what we're currently dealing with in reality or what Trump is saying theoretically.

This is why Trump keeps winning. He has his enemies convinced he's a bumbling idiot but in the end he controls everything they think about and how they think about it. They've had 5 years of exposure to him to recognize the patterns and learn his tactics and they've failed to do so. He literally commissioned a book that details negotiation and dealmaking, they could pirate a pdf or ebook of it today and learn what he's doing and they don't. Sun Tzu, know your enemy. They've been shadow boxing for 5 years because they refuse to accept what Trump really is and they refuse to study anything he does. They just convince themselves Trump is dumb and then can't understand why they keep losing. Anyway I'm getting off on a rant here and probably shouldn't say this much because a few of the smarter ones might read this and start to catch on.
Click to expand...
I think Trump is smart enough to know the damage that repealing Section 230 would actually cause, but he entertains that as a possibility to get the social media giants to the negotiating table. Trump wants them to abide by the existing rules, and he intends on scaring them straight. It's why Zuckerberg was going on about how social media shouldn't be the arbiter of truth just a few days prior to the Twitter kerfuffle; he can see where the winds are blowing and doesn't want to be caught with his pants down. Jack Dorsey, meanwhile, is an idiot who keeps tilting at windmills because he thinks he's some great crusader.

It's a win-win either way for me. Either Twitter shapes up and stops censoring conservative accounts, or they go down in flames and nothing of value is lost. Same for all social media, honestly. The worst invention of the 21st century, in my opinion.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, spiritofamermaid, Flaming Insignias and 22 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back