Dax Herrera / Dick Masterson / Daxipad / Juju The Cow / Wolfie / The Dick Show (TDS), The Biggest Problem in the Universe (TBPITU) / New Project 2 - Balding least funny contrarian paedophile defender in the universe, "women are fat" jokes virtuoso, e-daddy of Sektards, chaser and cross-species roleplay sodomy enthusiast. Roleplays as a cow named Juju while he gets fucked in the anus by women. Fat.

How many pushups can Juju do?

  • 0

    Votes: 69 51.5%
  • 1

    Votes: 36 26.9%
  • >1

    Votes: 29 21.6%

  • Total voters
    134
Dick won't be disavowing Null over Vordrak or anything he says lol. At most he'll laugh/cringe over anything he's shown like with digibro, but considering the null stuff is so old and the state of Josh's current stances, Dick won't particularly be giving two fucks. Hell, I'll give you good odds that if anything, he tries to make content out of it for his show and invites Vordrak and Null on.
 
HEY! wasn't there that time Josh got pissed off about some open-source coder getting arrested for pedophilia, because he's work was so much more important than those kid's assholes? yet we still shouldn't use Zoom's verified information.)
I assume you are referring to when Cody Wilson of Defense Distributed who was arrested for statutory rape on a 17 year old girl who lied about her age. The was a political action and set up by the US Federal Government against a 2nd Amendment advocate.
 
More-or-less, I know he's compiled a lot more compelling evidence for Josh being a pedophile than I've ever seen compiled against Zoom, who we aren't even supposed to talk about because he's just such a pedophile (even though we constantly talk about other pedophiles, HEY! wasn't there that time Josh got pissed off about some open-source coder getting arrested for pedophilia, because he's work was so much more important than those kid's assholes? yet we still shouldn't use Zoom's verified information.)

Just seems like it's a bit too common for Josh and his fans to just scream "NO U" and ignore the allegations against Josh. Especially when there are screenshots like this floating around:

View attachment 1339362

Oh wowwatch me get banned for having bad opinions and blockland screenshots.
Anyone who trusts Sam is an idiot. They are well known liar. I take it you don't care that Sam stalked an under age girl for years all because he didn't get modded on some shitty forum? Or how he always goes after women? There's a good reason why Sam never uses archived posts and just uses screenshots. Screenshots can easily be doctored.
 
Dick stands by Joosh = Vordrak going after him (losing patreon), IRL people like Dispatch and [censored] fucking with him IRL
Dick disavows Joosh = Vordrak leaving him alone, IRL people like [censored] and Dispatch fucking with Dick and [censored] will pick up the slack of Vordrak because [censored] hates Ralph, Joosh will turn on Dick and possibly release any emails confirming suspicions.
Dick half disavows half doesn't to weasle around the issue= ALL parties go at him, Joosh just might not go as hard.
Dick pays Joosh to delete everything for the clean up crew= Striesand effect

This is a hell of a dark time line
I reckon Dick may be able to manage expectations with Jersh.
I doubt janitor in chief wants to be seen to create a precedent where he releases things people have given him under a legitimate trust, just because they upset him.
It will be all about the delivery though.

Anyway, it will be interesting to see how this plays out.
fisherman jew meme.jpg
 
Every time somebody makes a misogynist joke on the internet, they incur a debt to the sisterhood. Sooner or later, they send me to collect.
So was all this apart of your plan?
 
Ngl, when I saw a clip of how slow the chat moves in his live premium youtube streams, yet he still gets 20k a month on patreon, the laundering question went through my mind for a moment
Have a look at the top earners on patreon (at least the ones who are public about it), you'll find a lot of them have relatively small audiences, but the audience they do have is willing to pay.

I used to subscribe the War Nerd podcast, and before they stopped displaying their patreon totals, I think they were making around 30k a month. So Dick isn't unique.

Building an audience of people willing to just set up a regular $5 payment, has got to be preferable to acting like a dancing monkey for superchats.
 
Dont know if this is ⏰ but Jesse tweeted this video https://youtu.be/9p6ysvidK4E

This guy goes over the background of Podawful vs Dick which probably many are familiar. It's a decent explainer, and the guy is pretty listenable.

As someone who never really listened to TBPITU I gotta say... everyone who was saying Dick and Maddox sounded alike was selling it short. Was one of them imitating the other in some sort of primate bonding ritual? I think Maddox sounds different now in the short clips he puts out, but maybe that's his monologue voice as opposed to his conversational one. Regardless, I dont think I would have been able to consume this in audio format, if they paused to listen to a caller I dont think I would be able to tell who was talking when they started back up.

EDIT: Even though I said many probably know this stuff, I thought I did but I learned quite a few details I had no idea about, he did a lot of research. Also he does a pretty good job of being objective, I get the impression he actually came into this neutral.
 
Last edited:
Dont know if this is ⏰ but Jesse tweeted this video https://youtu.be/9p6ysvidK4E

This guy goes over the background of Podawful vs Dick which probably many are familiar. It's a decent explainer, and the guy is pretty listenable.

As someone who never really listened to TBPITU I gotta say... everyone who was saying Dick and Maddox sounded alike was selling it short. Was one of them imitating the other in some sort of primate bonding ritual? I think Maddox sounds different now in the short clips he puts out, but maybe that's his monologue voice as opposed to his conversational one. Regardless, I dont think I would have been able to consume this in audio format, if they paused to listen to a caller I dont think I would be able to tell who was talking when they started back up.

EDIT: Even though I said many probably know this stuff, I thought I did but I learned quite a few details I had no idea about, he did a lot of research. Also he does a pretty good job of being objective, I get the impression he actually came into this neutral.

I think there's a good summary and some good points in there. But it's difficult to take the objectivity or neutrality serious when, in the first minute, he says to "go watch the Jesse or PPP video if you're confused" (looking for background or context). If you're explaining a story with two sides, pointing to one side and saying "go to them for information" is the opposite of going into something neutral. You can make good points regardless and I don't think the video maker tries to put himself as a neutral party.

Did people say they sounded alike in TBPITU? In terms of speech patterns they were wildly different - Maddox would ramble/rant for long stretches. Dick typically poked him with a leading question and Maddox would continue to talk and explain. I listened to a fair bit of it, TBPITU was enjoyable to listen to because you had a good contrast in approach and ideas.
 
Did people say they sounded alike in TBPITU? In terms of speech patterns they were wildly different - Maddox would ramble/rant for long stretches. Dick typically poked him with a leading question and Maddox would continue to talk and explain. I listened to a fair bit of it, TBPITU was enjoyable to listen to because you had a good contrast in approach and ideas.

Yeah, people on here said they sounded alike early on. In the clips he played for this video, I couldn't tell the difference without the context of their opinions.

You can make good points regardless and I don't think the video maker tries to put himself as a neutral party.

I dont think he ended up neutral but I got the impression he started out thinking it was weird Jesse got dogpile and wanting to dig in. At the very least he clearly approached all parties involved. Maybe neutral is the wrong word, but fair and thoughtful. Beige Frequency temperament.
 
If you're explaining a story with two sides, pointing to one side and saying "go to them for information" is the opposite of going into something neutral.
That would normally be an easy standard to agree to, except the problem is that Dax hasn't ever gone on air to give a competing account to all this. The bulk of what you hear from him is tacit acknowledgement that the events recounted by others are true but are instead signs that he's some kind of chad somehow. His proxies speak for him, saying "so what" and "why do you care". There's no actual denials.

Dax has been feeling pressure because of this drama for a long time now. If there was another side of the story that could be told to help diffuse it then he could've done it by now. He could easily present it with the usual performative Dick swagger he applies to everything, so it wouldn't have had to look like capitulation to the mob. Nothing even resembling that has happened, and that tells me he has no meaningful side to tell.
 
I will also point out at this juncture that Dispatch fucking with people IRL usually heralds whatever drama that's attached to hitting its peak and fizzling out because it starts being really fucking gay.
Well the peak is approaching, and things are officially getting really fucking gay as we have the anglo menace wildin out and PPP/Godwinson humoring him.
 
Dispatch, Reverse Flash, Vordrak, and even KoP (who actually seems to be making level headed and decent posts surprisingly) all somehow got involved in this mess that originated on whether Dick is a cuckolded simp. I think this is directly correlated with the civil unrest and viral pandemics accelerating.

Anyone who trusts Sam is an idiot. They are well known liar. I take it you don't care that Sam stalked an under age girl for years all because he didn't get modded on some shitty forum? Or how he always goes after women? There's a good reason why Sam never uses archived posts and just uses screenshots. Screenshots can easily be doctored.
I mean fuck i dont know anything about him either but my first impression is he is an insane weirdo who keeps robotically repeating "illegal" in odd contexts just because he really really wants to spite one particular person
 
I don't know enough about Vordrak, but he seems to be fairly articulate. Is what he's saying accurate?
Not really. He’s the lunatic that got Null’s mom fired, called in a bomb threat, and destroyed his relationship woth his family as the Gunt was harping on in last week’s TDS episode.
The only person less trustworthy is Zoom.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Pissmaster
Dispatch, Reverse Flash, Vordrak, and even KoP (who actually seems to be making level headed and decent posts surprisingly) all somehow got involved in this mess that originated on whether Dick is a cuckolded simp.
Vodrak hates Null and may have more bad blood with Dick than he is letting on. Keep in mind he warned Dick not to have Null on his show, Dick refused then they covered his embarrassing story. He may just be pretending to not have bad blood.
Dispatch is an attention whore who clings to drama and most likely is fucking with Dick cause of Ralph. I don't know much about him other than he's mostly why Stream.me is dead.
"Reverse Flash" has a hate boner for Null and Ralph, and sees attacking Dick as a way to insert himself into covered drama and attack Josh with the same old claims.
KoP???? When has he gotten involved in this? I know him and Null have had spats but I'm not up on the lore here.

I think this is directly correlated with the civil unrest and viral pandemics accelerating.
It's put this whole situation inside of a pressure cooker. It's not just these 1337 super h4xorz who have problems with Dick. In a weird way, they would have the least of a problem with him despite being far more dangerous than the people who have real problems. Lots of old "friends of the show" or "contract artists" or "ex-fans" have a massive list of personal issues. Dick has been fucking up for a long while.

EDIT:

Uh oh.... https://twitter.com/Romans5_4/with_replies
Looks like some Karen complained to manager.... then again I'm more shocked it stayed up as long as it did with that one tweet.
 
Last edited:
KoP???? When has he gotten involved in this? I know him and Null have had spats but I'm not up on the lore here.
I cheated a little there he just makes ok posts about it, its just funny to me that trying to brush this off as nothing in various ways of varying intelligence has led to Dick and Ralph and Josh being dragged into each others years long feuds and i needed just one more to make it seem Mayan 2012 tier stuff

Uh oh.... https://twitter.com/Romans5_4/with_replies
Looks like some Karen complained to manager.... then again I'm more shocked it stayed up as long as it did with that one tweet.
Account suspended for offending Dick via Ethan
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tokolosh
Vordrak was brought on specifically to irritate Null cause I'm sure they're all very aware how he has been reacting to Trump's EO and i feel all shade given to LeoPirate from Godwinson and 3P is all kayfabe.

Sucking Sam's cock is even dumber than sucking Zoom's cock. Anyone who does it will get what they deserve.
 
If you were not very likely to be this person, I would simply say so.
I don't think it's him. It's a wild shot in the dark that Dax took in a blind rage.
I got curious about these allegations and decided to dig into them since I didn't see much public information about them either way.

To start here's Dick accusing Ben of being @George Cuckzunian, mentioning that Ben has been posting identical shit on Discord, and clarifying that BenGarrisonDidNothingWrong is the Discord account he suspects:

Modern Medusa confirming that she's still dating Ben:

Modern Medusa's podcast with Ben where she links to his Twitter account
@JohnJosemos:
ModernMedusaStreamWithBenAKAJohnJosemos.jpg

Ben subtweeting Modern Medusa some sappy shit. There's one like on the tweet and it's from her, so we know this is the right Ben:

Tweet from Ben back in October 2019 that contains a larger version of @George Cuckzunian's old avatar:
GeorgeCuckzunianAvatarTweetedByJohnJosemos.jpg

I can't find any record of that image being posted or used anywhere else. To my knowledge the only place it's ever appeared is in that @JohnJosemos tweet and as @George Cuckzunian's avatar on Kiwi Farms. Not necessarily definitive, but highly suspicious. But it gets worse.

Here are archives showing @George Cuckzunian using that avatar May 23-24:
BenAvatar1.jpg

If you look back at Dick's original accusation you'll see that tweet was from May 25. Shortly after that tweet, @George Cuckzunian changed his avatar to a naked man laying face down on a boat. The screenshot in this post confirms that it had been changed by May 26th, though IIRC it happened sooner than that:
BenAvatar2.jpg

And by May 27 he had switched to his current Uncle Ben's avatar:
BenAvatar3.jpg

So to recap, @George Cuckzunian's avatar on Kiwi Farms was an image that Ben posted to Twitter in October 2019, and that image appears to be original content that hasn't been posted or used anywhere else. Less than 24 hours after Dick accused Ben of being @George Cuckzunian, he changed his avatar to some random shit, then changed it to his current "Uncle Ben's" avatar a day later.

It'd take a pretty unbelievable string of coincidences for all those things to happen if @George Cuckzunian isn't Ben. He'd have to have:
  1. Seen Ben's tweet.
  2. Decided to use Ben's image as his Kiwi Farms avatar.
  3. Seen Dick's accusation and known that the "Ben" he talking about was @JohnJosemos.
  4. Remembered that the image he was using as his Kiwi Farms avatar came from @JohnJosemos and decided to change it to some throwaway avatar for a single day before finding a new one.

But if @George Cuckzunian is Ben, it all makes perfect sense:
  1. Ben used his own image as his Kiwi Farms avatar.
  2. Ben saw Dick's tweet and knew he'd been exposed.
  3. Ben realized that the image he'd tweeted could be linked back to his Kiwi Farms account and hastily changed it to something else.
  4. Ben changed to the "Uncle Ben's" avatar a day later in an attempt to deflect the accusations with memes.

But wait, there's more! Remember the BenGarrisonDidNothingWrong account that Dick said was posting identical shit in his Discord? Here's Ben tweeting a screenshot of some Discord DMs between him and Riley that unintentionally confirm his Discord account is BenGarrisonDidNothingWrong:
JohnJosemosIsBenGarrisonDidNothingWrong.jpg

But why? Turns out Baby Ben is assblasted that Dick didn't want to have his girlfriend back on the show because she was too high last time she came on. He blames Riley for not explaining in advance that she shouldn't get too high to read the news before she comes on to read the news. For context I believe the "unavailable" tweets are from Dick (he periodically deletes his old tweets) whereas the tweets from a suspended account were made by Riley:
JohnJosemosTwitterSperg1.jpg
JohnJosemosTwitterSperg2.jpg
JohnJosemosTwitterSperg3.jpg
JohnJosemosTwitterSperg4.jpg
Archive that covers all the tweets:

Original tweets:

Some loose tweets & archives:



Ben made those tweets on 01/24/2020 and had been on a three month hiatus from Kiwi Farms at the time:
BenKiwiFarmsHiatus1.jpg
He returned three days later on 01/27/2020 to sperg about Riley and Mint in that "prediction" he's so proud of (quote is clipped, the original is much longer):
How big a stink Dick made over defending Riley and Mint is like nothing before. Don't get me wrong he's stuck up for show people before, but usually he leaves it at "Yeah, well I like em." and let people keep doing what they want to shit on them. Dick is now blocking people and rushing in to comments that don't mention Dick at all to defend them, and has wasted 3 shows already doing nothing but talking about these people refusing to accept people find them annoying and trying to spin it into "everyone is just jealous and is a hater." Now he's sperging and willfully ignoring the streisand effect he's causing.

He followed up with another lengthy post complaining about how Dick runs the show and treats the people he works with:
He then went on another hiatus from the farms until the recent drama inferno gave him an excuse to ragepost about Dick with impunity:
BenKiwiFarmsHiatus2.jpg
During his second hiatus Ben occupied himself by tweeting about how much he hates Riley:

Except purposefully spreading misinformation harms the site so it's not allowed. Why can't you prove what you're saying?
I have multiple examples of Ben spreading objectively false claims in this thread. While I can't prove they were intentional, I find it hard to believe they're all honest mistakes given their quantity and content:
So Marie Valenzuela is not HulaGirl86?

No, it's been proven that she does use this screen name in her private life.
This hasn't been proven by any credible source and no evidence was to provided to establish it. It's a rumor that has largely been perpetuated by Jesse Powell-Stroud, a known A-Log who has assisted Maddox in gay ops including calling Asterios' former employer trying to get him fired.
While this isn't the most unique screen name, there has been a clear obvious effort to scrub all history from this screen name.

Scrubbing internet history is not anything to be suspicious of, however Dick is the one who claimed she never used the screen name and challenged the internet to bring proof.
The "evidence" provided to establish the claims of account scrubbing actually doesn't prove that at all:
Those screenshots are from a single query on instantusername.com, a website that checks whether or not a particular username is currently available on various sites. It doesn't provide any historical information that would allow you to determine if an account has been deleted or otherwise changed. It also doesn't provide any account details that would allow you to determine if the accounts belong to the same person or different people. It simply doesn't have any of the information you'd need to show that an account had been "scrubbed," ergo it is not actually evidence of his claims.
So I did more Digging.... and about HulaGirl86 being Marie Valenzuela I think I may of found something when I google imaged searched Hulagirl86 but still inconclusive
View attachment 1314001
Let's take a look at that profile he's talking about:
HulaGirl86Instagram1.jpg
HulaGirl86Instagram2.jpg

It would've taken him 10 seconds to click through to that HulaGirl86 Instagram profile and confirm that it isn't hers. It's so obviously not hers that you can tell just from the thumbnails alone. He probably spent more time writing your post and uploading a screenshot about his baseless speculation than it would've taken him to just check the account.

Speaking of which, if he was trying to dig up dirt on Marie then why didn't he check out that account? Are we supposed to believe that he went out digging for buried treasure, dug up what he thought was a treasure chest, and just didn't open it? Really? Even if he didn't have time to sort through it, I find it hard to believe he wouldn't have taken a peek if he really thought it was hers. It's literally the kind of thing he was looking for, and he clearly thought it was worth posting about. Why wouldn't he want to see what was on there? This becomes even more suspicious when you look at his response to someone saying it isn't her Instagram:
Yeah I believe it was inconclusive. The "Dickerson" thing was odd to me and that is a delted picture, but I can't say if it's her. I personally think the account was changed to be a red herring but I have 0 proof and sound crazy talking about my theories there.
As I've said, it's not inconclusive. It's definitively not hers and that's easy to confirm. The picture he's talking about hasn't been deleted, you can see it right here:
While he admits that he has no evidence for his ridiculous red herring theory, given the rest of his bullshit regarding this account I find it hard to believe that he wasn't saying it just to stir the pot. Again, even a cursory glance at the account would confirm it isn't hers.

Oh, just a reminder, Dick gave Randy lee Harper money for special treatment on twitter. The Simpsperacy is just Dick doing the same thing with a payment processor and edgelords
He's just making shit up here. Dick responded to that thread and provided a plausible explanation for what he did:
DickMastersonRandiHarperDonationRebuttal.jpg
Ben's accusation appears to be based on an exceptional and unevidenced Reddit conspiracy theory, and he provided no further evidence to support it.

Also, why is HulaGirl86@gmail.com in the restraining order court docs if it's not her?
This email address isn't in the restraining order. In fact, the restraining order doesn't list an email address for Marie at all. I've attached a PDF of the full restraining order that proves this. Here's an image of the first page:
MarieValenzuelaVsJessicaBlumPage1.jpg
Marie also likes Hula and has even taken Dick to her Hula classes and facebook messages from Maries mom verfy Marie is a "HulaGirl"
Ben is misrepresenting evidence that he didn't include in his post, presumably because he was doing it deliberately and didn't want anyone to call him on it. Here are the Facebook posts in question:
MarieValenzuelaMomFacebook1.jpg
MarieValenzuelaMomFacebook2.jpg
Her mom said she had a wonderful time with the "hula girls" on her birthday. She never specified who those "hula girls" were, she didn't mention Marie by name, and she never said "HulaGirl" like Ben claimed. Looking at her other post you'll notice that she mentions an ambiguous group of "Hula Ladies" and mentions two hula songs that they're "working on." Sounds to me like she's addressing some sort of hula dancing group who were working on learning/choreographing hula dances to some specific songs. I don't see how any literate person acting in good faith could possibly interpret these the way Ben did.

Keep in mind these are just the claims that I can objectively demonstrate are false. He's made tons more that are incredibly dubious and/or attempt to imply unevidenced conclusions without stating them outright. I'm not even sure I covered everything that can be disproved.

As it stands I think there's enough circumstantial evidence to establish that @George Cuckzunian is very likely to be Ben, that Ben has a motive to run gay ops against Dick, and that @George Cuckzunian has made enough objectively false claims to suspect him of deliberately spreading misinformation. On the off chance it isn't deliberate, he's still an assblasted A-Log who's so obsessed with taking Dick down that he'll post schizophenic conspiracy theories without evidence to back them up. Obviously it's up to @Null what to do from here, I just wanted to post my findings publicly since there's been a lot of bullshit flying around.
 

Attachments

Back