Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

There's more than meet the eyes. Some saw then even overcovering the riots and taking the wrong side didn't nothing to stop the ratings collapsing.
Oh, I recall seeing one of their HQ buildings getting jogged on from the Happenings thread. I'm shocked they're admitting it rather than [N]-toupling down on it like normal.

Now, granted, the original message came from CNN International, and I'm not really sure what that changes, if anything. But that brief moment of clarity is still shocking.
 
I meant it is pretty important, this is basically the only place on the internet that you can have a sensible discussion about what the rioters are doing.
Kiwi Farms becoming critical infrastructure is maybe the most surprising 2020 plot twist.

Same right here. Hell, I KNOW what the military intervening will look like, and I still want it.
I want him to crack some eggs to make some omelets too but I sometimes have to stop and remind myself that he's got to thread a needle that we don't sitting at home.

Also I have to stop and think that if I'd be more aggressive than Trump, maybe I should dail it down a notch.
 
Kiwi Farms becoming critical infrastructure is maybe the most surprising 2020 plot twist.



I want him to crack some eggs to make some omelets too but I sometimes have to stop and remind myself that he's got to thread a needle that we don't sitting at home.

Also I have to stop and think that if I'd be more aggressive than Trump, maybe I should dail it down a notch.
I think it became critical when Null foiled the Great Tarrant Coverup.
 
Kiwi Farms becoming critical infrastructure is maybe the most surprising 2020 plot twist.



I want him to crack some eggs to make some omelets too but I sometimes have to stop and remind myself that he's got to thread a needle that we don't sitting at home.

Also I have to stop and think that if I'd be more aggressive than Trump, maybe I should dail it down a notch.

I don't want Trump to just go all Kent State on them (except in the darkest depths of my id). I disagree with reasons given, but if a march is peaceful they should be allowed to peacefully march.

But theres a lot of decidely non-peaceful activity happening and people & blacks are escaping any sort of punishment, and I think if you're walking out of a burning target with a TV, light them the fuck up and restore some order and dignity to these neighborhoods.


I meant it is pretty important, this is basically the only place on the internet that you can have a sensible discussion about what the rioters are doing. Without places like this the narrative the media is trying to spin about the rioters would be nigh-impervious, and we would all just agree that we should just pay the ransom to make our cities safe until the next chimpout.

Democrats have been the party of "Vote for us, we're the only ones who can keep these wild niggers under control so you stay safe" since the 1860s.
 
One of the reasons we have such an enormous culture clash in the last decade (aside from Wokeism and Orange Hitler) is the breakdown of the State part of The United States of America. Each state is supposed to act relatively independently from the federal level. The rednecks fucked off to Alabama and formed a culture; the Mormons fucked off to Utah and fornicated a culture, and drillers fucked off to Oklahoma and formed a culture. Each State is supposed to largely operate as a smaller country. It's why crossing state lines is such a big deal; it's similar to going from Poland to Germany to murder someone: more jurisdictions at risk.

It's also why Trump had to give the States time to deal with the riots. He's not Plan A, B, or C.

I'm not saying country-wide cohesiveness is a bad thing but all of the frictions between different cultures are becoming because we are highlighting and brandishing the differences. People like Zuby, Eric D July, and Morgan Freeman have the right idea.

"I happen to be black, so what?"
You make an excellent point. I truly wish that the federal government was simply an umbrella to promise security and disperse a single flat rate tax. Wouldnt it be great if we stuck to the original blueprint for this country, and everyone found their own niche in 50 different zones of opportunity? I abhor the idea of Californians moving to havens like Texas, turning them into the very environment they left behind. I could go into the whole mess with illegal immigration having caused a great deal of this, but the gist is basically that, because we are unable to account for and direct the flow of illegals, they are all ending up in just a few border states.

You come here. you should follow the laws and not expect everyone else to change for you. Most states have a good thing going for them. Making them all the same is tearing us apart as a nation.

And to be honest, I just want to be left alone. I have to live in a suburb of a city because of work, but the moment I consolidate enough money, I'm buying several hundred acres of wasteland and jumping off the grid to raise horse-sized dogs

It just pisses me off that my fucking taxes are going to be going toward fixing these messes, but meanwhile they don't lay a dime because they have a free check coming every month. Instead of actual community improvements, funding for animal shelters and libraries, millions will be spent so that we can sweep this unholy tantrum under the table.

I support any and all forms of protesting, dont get me wrong. I dont care if its white conservatives or black liberals toting AKs on the state capital's steps. But the minute you break the law, you forfeit a lot of those rights.

Setting a curfew does nothing if you are not going to enforce it. Ample, ample time was given to leave the protests and go to their homes. They had been out all day doing it, it wasn't like they had to wait to get out of work. So despite many of these remaining peaceful, they are not following the curfew and that in itself is grounds for action to be taken. You cant just say you are enforcing something, yet take no action.

They are forcing trump's hand to take the reigns and appear like a dictator. Because they are enabling these protests. Deflecting blame on trump puts pressure on him, but also gives their own base some delusional notions that this is a fucking revolution.

I was getting into it with someone about the 2nd amendment today, and upon mentioning that it was to "maintain a regulated militia" , they honestly said "and what is a militia for? See? That's what's happening."

But this isnt militia fighting. This is just needless violence. When these properly organized militia are activated tostand up to an actual tyrannical government, they declare their demands preemptively. But this is no rebellion. We dont even fucking know what these people want.

The cops are going to get prosecuted. Yeah, it sucks it happened and it wasn't right. But no one is saying they should get off. No one is delaying justice.

White people get murdered by cops too, yet you dont see this reaction. If anything, it is being construed as a race issue, when it really is an issue with police protocol and their relationship with the citizens they serve.

But if they realized that, then it would no longer be about trump. It would no longer be about rising against a tyrannical government, per the 2nd amendment. They want a villain so badly. The thing is, they have one in these individual officers who abuse power. Yet they refuse to let their leading villain be anyone other than trump.

If this was really a fucking dictatorship, you wouldn't be able to protest. There would be no dissenting opinions. And it is not like the police and NG arent well equipped to decimate this thing by force if they wanted to.

They are so badly wanting to justify some sort of coup, wanting to be the heroes in this story, fighting for freedom, staging photo ops so that they will be in our next generation's textbooks. But they fail to see that nearly every "bad guy" has never gone into a situation not thinking they were a hero for fighting for their opinions. The nazis portrayed themselves as a benevolent and righteous sort of people.

The phrase "wrong side of history" is overused by the left, but it is times like these where I can absolutely see people looking back and asking how the hell anyone tolerated this. How any of this was even relevant. This isnt rodney king. The cops are being punished.

Why do they have to punish everyone else? Why must I be forced to join a cause like this? Why must we be shamed for calling out the protestors, with our aggressors somehow coming to the conclusion that we are racist because we dont want to march in the streets?

Police killings are worldwide. No one in the world but this community chimps out when this happens. Grow up. Get over it.

If you want to take one thing from my post, let it be this: there is no endgame for these people. Aside from Trump being strung up like Mussolini, they are not going to be satisfied with anything we do.

I wish that reparations were all that was needed to get them to stfu. But you make that concession and you are basically admitting to guilt that is not your own, and retribution that is not theirs.
 
I'd vote for him in a heartbeat. He has principles, and while I find his level of stock republican to be boring as shit... after 2020, I kinda want a boring as shit president.

He's way different from a stock republican. He's practically the new Father Coughlin. He has people on calling for immigration moratoriums. He has the balls to out shadowy figures like Paul Singer. He's suggested taking money from university endowments to fuck up SJW college admins and put an end to the college debt issue at the same time. He's the boldest Nationalist out there. Sean Hannity's a boring cutout though.

Word on the street was Fox News was going to cancel Tucker despite high ratings because the GOP Establishment didn't like his message. They wanted to replace him with one of Shapiro's weasals or the Jewish midget himself. But Tucker's too big to cancel. If Fox News cancelled him he'd go full mask off and take his viewers with him away from the GOP plantation.

He'll be like Huey Long and Julius Caesar combined.
 
He's way different from a stock republican. He's practically the new Father Coughlin. He has people on calling for immigration moratoriums. He has the balls to out shadowy figures like Paul Singer. He's suggested taking money from university endowments to fuck up SJW college admins and put an end to the college debt issue at the same time. He's the boldest Nationalist out there. Sean Hannity's a boring cutout though.

Word on the street was Fox News was going to cancel Tucker despite high ratings because the GOP Establishment didn't like his message. They wanted to replace him with one of Shapiro's weasals or the Jewish midget himself. But Tucker's too big to cancel. If Fox News cancelled him he'd go full mask off and take his viewers with him away from the GOP plantation.

He'll be like Huey Long and Julius Caesar combined.
I should be more specific on what I mean, since I think my terminology was to vague and lead to a misunderstanding.

By "Stock Republican" I don't mean "Stock Politician" or "Not Clever", I mean his policies line pretty much dead center with what the Republican voting base wants.
 
By "Stock Republican" I don't mean "Stock Politician" or "Not Clever", I mean his policies line pretty much dead center with what the Republican voting base wants.

He supports what the Republican base and Independents want and what the DNC and GOP Establishment hate.

I'm on the Dissident Right. His ideas circulate in our circles and always move up to his. If you want to hear Tucker's best takes first then go read Steve Sailer.
 
Since Trump listens to Tucker a lot, think this will have an impact? Dude talked him into / out of stuff before.
I'm fairly sure Trump uses Tucker as a Bellwether. He doesn't... guide Trump, so much as indicate to Trump where the Republican base wants to go. Its probably why Trump has such a solid floor for his approval. If Tucker gets heated for or against something, Trump uses that as a sign to look into it with his advisors.
 
Legit praise from me for Trump: The man uses advisors, and uses his VP, PROPERLY.

Advisors ideally fill in the role of informing someone on stuff they don't know in depth. For a president, they should have broad knowledge over the country, but none of it should be too in depth unless they obtained that knowledge prior to office. This lets them weigh, judge, and decide with a broad picture view. The role of Presidential Advisors then is to be experts in a specific fields and able to best provide a deep well of knowledge to then allow the broad knowledge of the president to fit the pieces into a final decision.

This should all seem fairly obvious.

Yet... Bush was RUN by his advisors and VP, he was an empty suit with everyone's hand up his ass.

Obama was the exact opposite, his 'advisors' existed to kiss his ass and worship at his feet. A good advisor needs to be able to disagree.

And then we get to the VPs... The Vice President needs to be able to take office if the President should ever die, but their role is supposed to go beyond that. They can act in the President's stead, can help win over people the president has trouble with, and are generally good as a foil to the president. You want different but complimentary skills.

Cheney? Man was De Facto president.
Biden? Barely fucking existed.

Now, look at Trump. His advisors pull from the top experts he could get, he even tried to get Democrats on board specifically to disagree with him. Any successful CEO will tell you, you need a No Man. Someone you can look to to NEVER kiss your ass. Even if everyone in the room is golden and is kissing ass, if that person disagrees you need to be able to convince them above all the others. Trump has a few, he tried to have more, democrats pissed that away not him.

And his VP? Pence was a fantastic choice for more than just bringing on the evengelicals. What are the things you think of, when you think of Trump? Loud, Bombastic, boastful, arrogant, womanizing, brazen, etc. Pence is the exact opposite of all of these. And Trump USES that.

Watch carefully, and a pattern emerges. Trump makes a threat, or boasts, or does something to rile up the crowd. Then pence appears, talking to key figures, and suddenly those figures are all happy and on board. Whether foreign policy with North Korea, or Internal policy with Mitch McConnel, it always happens like clockwork. Trump is the brute force hammer, Pence is his Scalpel. A smooth, solid operator and they work together, using very complimentary but utterly opposite styles. Its like the biggest game of Good Cop bad Cop.
 
Back