Megathread TERFs / Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists / Gender Critical Feminists - ft. r/GenderCritical & related reddits, Mancheeze, Cathy Brennan, GCDad, RadFHarva, Jamie Shupe, etc; "Gender Critical Feminism is Homophobic" - Cathy Brennan, 2019.

I did a bunch of my own research going through Amy past tweets and there is a LOT that GCDetective left out of their overview thread.

Going through Amy's past tweets, it became clear to me that the main reason she was upset that the UK TERFs was because of Posie Parker. Amy can't stand Posie or the prominent position she appears to have in UK TERFdom. Amy was angered after discovering that Posie had fans in US TERFdom as well. Amy went after one of the WoLF laywers, Kara Dansky, as well as radical environmentalist feminist Lierre Keith for wearing those "Woman = adult human female" t-shirts that Posie Parker's organization was selling:

Creepy fact: Dansky was wearing her Posie Parker “woman” shirt at the panel. So was Lierre Keith in the back. She’s the person who escalated the tension in the video. You can see them proudly wearing the shirts in the panel. Why were they hiding here?

Here are some other tweets where Amy expressed her opposition to Posie Parker and also Meghan Murphy having such a prominent profile in UK TERFdom:

AmyDyessMeghanMurphyPosieParker.jpg


They’re promoting Posie Parker with this flag, not women. This is her brand. The recent “trans sticker hoax” is likely related.
Gender critics continue to suffer from PP’s influence, and while I know there are good GCs, the loudest ones are leading the movement off a cliff.

I have to wonder, what was Amy expecting to happen if she went to the UK and had to actually meet Posie Parker there IRL? A lot of UK TERFs just adore Posie Parker, she's like their Milo Yiannopoulos. Love her or hate her, you practically can't get around Posie Parker when it comes to UK TERFdom.

Posie wasn't the only TERF that Amy had a problem with. Here's Amy going after Youtuber Arielle Scarcella back in Feb when Arielle put out that video saying she was quitting the left:

Are you trying out for FOX News now? Gonna campaign for Trump next? You’re setting a bad example.

Arielle is irresponsible and selfish with this move in a presidential election year. I don’t think she can come back from it, but if she wants to become a conservative YouTuber then it’s a free country. My rights are on the line, so I have the right to criticize. I don’t like it.

I believe it’s fair. She sounds like a FOX News anchor. Real F’ing Talk.

Same-sex couples can’t even adopt in some states, Mars. Trump is anti-LGBT rights and plenty of regressive legislation has been passed under him. Arielle is an obvious opportunist with money to even dream of pulling the move she just did. She lost ALL credibility.

I’m not radical. I’m a moderate. But the left is the only side that believes in women’s and LGBT rights. Full stop.

You can walk away, but choices have consequences. She has no right to expect any LGBT people to support her for hurting our community and choosing to walk away from both the LGBT and our rights. Real Talk. Arielle is proof the GC movement is conservative and regressive

"Arielle is proof the GC movement is conservative and regressive". Starting to see a pattern here? Every time a lesbian wasn't sufficiently leftwing for Amy's taste, she would go after that lesbian and purity-police her for not being leftwing enough. Classic SJW tactics in other words.

I also managed to find all the tweets between Amy and Terri Strange from 2018-2019. March 2019 was the last month they tweeted at each other. I guess they broke up after that.

In these tweets Amy and Terri talk about Youtuber Leah Tverly and allude to wanting to turn Leah into a lesbian: "
Leah isn't a lesbian.... yet."


AmyTerriLeahIsntALesbianYet.jpg


LMAO, speaking of "cult recruitment", is Amy willing to talk about this particular exchange, which most certainly smacks of recruitment? Instead of discussing how she and Terri were cozying up to angry women who had #peaktransed like Leah Tverly to turn them into lesbians, Amy claims that she was hersef recruited by a recruiter telling her that lesbians were under attack:

June 2018 is when I got active with GCs, though my circle at the time was calling it lesbian rights. I remember you tweeted some things that helped my recruiter back up her claims that lesbians were under attack. We were both so angry and afraid back then.

Here are all the tweets that Amy and Terri exchanged over 2018-2019:



As you will see, Amy said in the above tweet that she "got active with GCs in June of 2018", and she began tweeting at Terri Strange a month later, on the 9th of August 2018. In other words, Terri Strange was one of Amy's first targets when Amy herself actively sought out TERFs online. As soon as Amy became social with the TERFs online, within two months she began trying to date them. Again, who is the person that Terri Strange claimed was trying to become her girlfriend, that made Terri think she was being subjected to COINTELPRO? Was that person Amy or someone else? Terri has a LOT of explaining to do.


Terri said in one of her Livestreams that she was going to make a bunch of her past videos on gender private. I wonder whether this was because she knew Amy was coming for her. Perhaps Amy had threatened Terri with doxxing in private before taking her hard luck bullshit story to Pink News and Autostraddle? I consider Amy exactly the type of fame-hungry media whore who would sell out an ex in public for the sake of notoriety.

A month later Amy had a public fall-out with F2M Youtuber Mars from TrahBruh podcast who had posted a Livestream interview with Amy:

I’m blocked by Amy. I don’t even consider myself gender critical. I’m just assumed to be that based on SOME agreements. Some of y’all are becoming quite unhinged. Let’s correct the mistake BUT wait...fuck you, blocked. Neat solution.

@_Mars_F I blocked you for an hour for gaslighting me. Where’s that follow up tweet? The only person I’ve seen unhinged lately is you. You didn’t even know that we can be fired in 26/50 states, and yet you you’re pro Trump and nonsense like that. Take a hard look at yourself.

Throughout her time on Twitter Amy repeatedly solicited doxx from others on various organizations:

AmyIamGatheringReceipts.jpg


Amy was practically obsessed with gathering receipts and was trying to obtain receipts pertaining to all sorts of people, organizations and incidents. She was like a one-woman-KiwiFarms in other words:

AmyDyessReceiptsReceiptsReceipts.jpg


Amy eventually solicited doxx on GCs, presumably this means she wanted doxx on Posie Parker, Meghan Murphy, the WoLF lawyers and other prominent TERFs:

There are a lot of corrupt, powerful GCs (gender critics) trying to shut me down for standing up for lesbian and #LGBTQ rights. They’ve attacked me far more than so-called “TRAs” ever did. If you’re GC, ask yourself why they want to silence a lesbian speaking truth to power.

She was responding to TERFs on Twitter saying that after the pandemic TERFs were going to get exposed in the media. I guess she couldn't wait until after the lockdown so she rushed that exposé:

Gender critics are anti-LGBT rights, and you know that. Have fun with all the major media coming out after the pandemic to expose your hate movement.

I think this was the tweet where she openly broke with GCs:

I’m coming out as against Gender Critics. They don’t value butches. They talk over us and throw us under the bus. If you’re GC and have solid receipts, let’s talk. Otherwise, it looks like this GC movement is both anti-LGBT and anti-women’s rights. Let’s correct that mistake!

Here Amy claims that the cabal of lesbians placed her on a blacklist of bad lesbos - obviously not because she was loose cannon attacking everything and everyone:

I’m on some kind of list of “bad” lesbians. A foreign lesbian friend told me about it, and she asked me to clarify my position on some things.
I’m under fire for something I wrote about same-gender attraction the other day. My critics also say I’m soft on TRAs.

Amy on her past history with abuse. What this has to do with AllianceLGB is beyond me:

A woman attempted to rape and murder me when I was just twenty. I’ve had gender critics try to invalidate that trauma since 2018, and not a single one has tried to comfort or support me when it comes to discussing violence women do to other women.
@AllianceLGB is hateful.

That doesn’t matter. Real GCs should care about all abuse and not turn away just because women are abusers. That’s ALL I’ve seen from GCs. It’s rampant and disgusting to me. Where are the mainstream GC voices calling this out? Oh yeah, none are. Just me!

It is shocking since the backwards USA even acknowledges women as rapists and prosecutes them for it. I’ve been informed there are archaic anti-women laws that support lesbian and bi stats not being recorded. It’s absolutely sickening the @AllianceLGB promotes this hate

They’re saying women can’t rape other women, and you already know that. Why are you pretending otherwise? Instead of showing me how GCs fail, why not impress me instead? Sigh. Homophobes!

I guess Amy is referring to that UK law about how only men can rape? Honey, that's just another fluke in UK law, their laws in the UK are absolute horseshit top to bottom. Wait til you see the rest of their bullshit legal system in the UK, they literally have no free speech and until recently their lawyers in UK were running a global libel tourism industry. That's UK law for ya, their shitty rape law is just the tip of the iceberg. The fact that something like gender self-ID is given serious consideration in the UK is just the latest example of the sorry state of their legal system. Did Amy know a thing about the country she was planning to permanently move to? I guess not.

Later Amy alluded to wanting to talk to UK TERFs about being raped by a woman, but someone in the AllianceLGB supposedly told Amy not to bring it up?

AmyGCsToldMeNotToTalkAboutWonWRape.jpg


The more I am looking into this, the more I am starting to think that Amy basically wanted to use TERFdom as her personal emotional and financial support group. Amy expected TERFdom to serve her instead of the other way around, she wanted to be coddled and catered to by TERFs, she expected UK TERFs to import her into their country make her their movement leader, but when Amy realized that the TERFs already had their own Alpha Female leaders and opinion-makers who weren't sufficiently leftwing - in fact some of whom were were quitting the left - her ego was bruised, her illusions shattered and she lashed out. Amy didn't want to talk about trannies, she wanted to talk about herself and her own life.


Amy's most recent exploit is that she posted the metaphorical dickpic for the TERFs. It started with this tweet by asshole TRAs CursedE hilariously claiming that "most cis women would be OK if they woke up with a dick":

"80% keep their penis, not womanly"

the tenuous basis for this statistic aside...i dunno every cis woman ive ever asked has said if they woke up a dick theyd be p chill about it.

As for "the tenuous basis for this statistic":

In the most robust survey to date, 25% of TGNB respondents report having undergone some form of GCS. Other smaller studies report slightly higher ranges (up to 35%), though these are typically carried out in healthcare settings, selecting for those who are accessing care (7,8).

Genital GCS is generally less common than chest surgery, with prevalence rates of about 25–50% for transgender men and 5–10% for transgender women (7,9,32). For transgender women, genital GCS comprises a number of procedures, including vaginoplasty (most commonly intestinal or penile inversion) with labiaplasty and/or clitoroplasty, penectomy, and orchiectomy. Transgender women report bottom surgery at rates between 5–13% (7-9,32). Even more transgender women desire bottom surgery in the future: between 45–54% (7,9). Among non-binary people assigned male at birth, 1% have had vaginoplasty or labiaplasty, and 11% desire these in the future (7).


As you can see, "Transgender women report bottom surgery at rates between 5–13%", but don't expect mr Tucute/"You don't have to transition to be trans" to admit that most TIMs have kept their dicks and everyone already knows this. The latter part of this tweet is classic TRA bullshit. "Every cis woman I've ever asked", what, like 2 or 3 at the bar who were drunk and just humoring you? Pretty sure if I held a survey and asked women about waking up with a dick between their legs they'd mostly say they'd freak out about it.

Someone I know made a short film about that concept, where a group of women take a chemical that gives them penises for 24 hours. What do they do with them? HUNG (2005) explores:

I left Graham and the GCs a little video since they’re so obsessed with women with penises.

Amy indirectly admits she herself definitely doesn't want to be showering next to a girldick:

That sounds awful. I think communal showers and changing rooms are outdated. Most of us have been traumatized by them at some point in our lives. They’re uncomfortable.

The funny thing is, Amy basically knows about ROGD and even gave an example of adult ROGD (since TERFs always like to claim that only young people are susceptible to ROGD) but now that she's joined the SJW TRA cult she's going to have to renounce all her previous statement and say that she doesn't believe in ROGD:

Yeah. Now I’d rather they not have it at all. And remember that Max is responsible for a lot of our current problems. My butch lesbian friends transitioned after Max did on The L Word. It was a social thing. Life imitates art. It’s a program.

I didn’t like Max because of the transitioning, and I’m not hesitant to say that. Why? Because The L Word told butch lesbians we don’t belong in the lesbian world. We have to be men because there’s no place for us at the women’s table.

If the show had had at least ONE other butch lesbian character then Max would’ve never been a problem. But that character directly resulted in butch lesbians mass transitioning. It happened to my friends. The L Word obviously hates butch lesbians and real lesbians in general.

It was all basically softcore porn marketed to straight men. Some lesbian musicians got some recognition, but again most of them weren’t that great (at least to me). The L Word wasn’t for lesbians.

It was all awful, and I was sleeping with one of the actresses... and I still say that.

Yes, lesbians apparently really like to stick their dicks into crazies like you. No other way of putting it.

We talked about it when it was all happening. She’s also critical. She wanted butch characters, for example. Chaiken really screwed up the lesbian community with her sadistic propaganda. That’s my official take.

So The L Word was "sadistic propaganda" but Amy still wanted to bang one of the actresses on the show, LMAO. I think this incident pretty much sums up the kind of person Amy is. She infiltrates popular lesbian communities - whether it's a film community around a lesbian TV show or a lesbian activist movement like the TERFs - in order to fuck some semi-prominent person there - whether it's fucking an actress on The L Word or fucking a semi-well-known Youtuber like Terri Strange - only to later come out denouncing everything and everyone. Perhaps in a couple of months Amy will tweet out the following: "The TERF movement was awful, and I was sleeping with a prominent TERF Youtuber... and I still say that."

FakeAmyDyessTweetJustForTehLulz.jpg

(For those of you who don't recognize the avatar I used for Amy in the above fake tweet, here's a hint.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: aquariumwater
Besides hating all men and wanting to collectively punish them, what exactly is the end goal of radical feminism? How does it line up with other leftist bullshit like social justice and communism? I really don't understand why they think have a female-run or all-female society would somehow be magically better.
their goal is endlessly indulging in their victim complex and mentally masturbating to the feeling of having the moral high ground

everything they do is purely theoretical ivory tower hugboxing, all their ideas about feminist-structured society are laughably absurd, and if applied to reality would quickly result in complete societal collapse and/or permanent human extinction
 
Another scalding hot take from our terfy friends

View attachment 1325599
wow that's a great idea! i'm gonna become a callboy and get paid lots of money to have lots of sex with lots of girls!
brilliant thought! also, someone give this woman an award for single-handedly finding an easy solution to the entire incel problem!
 
Another scalding hot take from our terfy friends

View attachment 1325599

Comrade, I think you've found it. "Straight men don't engage in sex work because they know it's degrading" may actually be the stupidest possible take on human affairs. The search for which Reddit and Twitter were made is at an end!
 
I think it's safe to assume no TERF has ever studied economics. Or basic cause and effect.

Men love money and men love sex. Men love money in order to get sex. Even as far back as Caveman Oog collecting shiny rocks to impress cavewomen, and as recently as spray-tanned politicians, money grabs pussy.

(And besides, would those TERFs pay a straight man to come soothe their bone-dry cunts with a good, hard, traditional heterosexual dicking? Didn't think so. Since they don't add to the demand for callboys, they're clearly part of the problem.)
 
Comrade, I think you've found it. "Straight men don't engage in sex work because they know it's degrading" may actually be the stupidest possible take on human affairs. The search for which Reddit and Twitter were made is at an end!

Well it is degrading because if you're a man the main form of prostitution available will involve sucking cock and taking it up the ass.

When men can get a job in sex work or in porn that actually involves fucking hot chicks, being a gigolo, or being the dude in gay porn who gets his cock sucked, then they'll go for it just fine. For obvious reasons, this shit doesn't pay anywhere near as well as what women, or dudes taking it up the ass get.
 
Radical Feminists are usually staunch anti-natalists.

There are arguments that hetero women can't be true rad fems, because they'll argue that all men suck but not their Nigel. He's the one good chap. He's a good, feminist, non-porn watching man blah blah. That also applies to women who have managed to be the only woman who have socialized their male spawn successful to rad fem ways. That's why the term "Not my Nigel" came about, to kinda make fun of women who still make excuses for the men in their lives.

Honestly, I don't know how it works. I know that there is a schism between lesbians and straights. That's why some straight women become pretend lesbians aka 'political lesbians'. A lot of it is unspoken but it's the reality. You can't be a separatist with a male partner or male kids, so there is always a lot of defensive straight women and mothers, who for whatever reason feel a kinship with man haters who honestly see them as second class feminists. There's a lot of masochism inherent in straight women or mom's who hang out with the rad fem crews.

The gold standard for radical feminists is to be a childless dyke who is a separatist. Some will argue you can't be a radical feminist with a male intimate in your life be it a sexual partner or child. Others will argue it's possible but much harder.

I dunno, I'm just an observer.

Feminist separtists are 100% as autistic and exceptional as MGTOW separtists, and they should all be encourage to fuck off into the distance, but stay just near enough to the internet, so we can enjoy the tard cum.
 
Next episode in the Amy Dyess public meltdown shitshow, where Amy claims to have had a lesbian recruiter who was working at the website AfterEllen. Amy claims this woman stoked her up on the idea that the trannies were coming for the lesbians.
Amy claims in her most recent tweets that she got radicalized by the online lesbo website AfterEllen, claiming that it was one of their writers who "recruited [Amy] to write for AE" and supposedly she was the one who "organized an international group of lesbian leaders":

While reviewing these 30K screenshots from my time working with GCs, I now realize AfterEllen had a lot to do with my radicalization. One of their writers actually recruited me to write for AE, and she organized an international group of lesbian leaders. I have the screenshots.

I’ll expand on details in my upcoming piece, but this group of lesbians made an impact. After my TERF piece was published in Oct 2018, I started to see a shift from lesbian rights to “GC” (gender critical). I’d become a major name to them at that point, and...

"I started to see a shift from lesbian rights to “GC” (gender critical)", wow this woman is beyond delusional. This dispute between radical feminist lesbians and transwomen has been about lesbian rights ever since the 1970s, ever since The Transsexual Empire laid out why transwomen were a problem to radical separatist lesbian collective identity. God, this woman is such a solipsist, she literally has no idea of the actual timeline of any of this shit. She thinks this all started in 2018 just because that's when she discovered this shit.

... that’s when things started to get intense.
Behind the scenes, and in the open, there was talk of a desire for organizations like what would become the LGB Alliance. Many projects were discussed privately. Some happened; others didn’t.

My piece will show how I got into this, how LGBT people are being recruited, what major players I worked with, and how I got out.
It’s shocking to see myself from 2018 and 2019. The receipts have been illuminating. I got so much wrong, all based on misrepresentations by GCs.

For me the most shocking thing is that so many TERFs apparently trusted this kook. TERFs have no discernment when it comes to assessing people. Tells me all I need to know about TERFs and their supposedly superior feminine emotional quotient, LMAO. You just can't tell a gutter rat when you see one, do you TERFs.

Never trust anyone who does a 180 and denounces everything they were before. Ideological breaks in life are never that cleancut and neat unless someone is easily brainwashed because they have no personality or strong personal values. People who do that sudden 180 flip are disingenuous and/or just don't know themselves. They just hop like a frog for leaf to leaf, from cause to cause, from ideology to ideology because they are utterly lost and empty inside.

Here's an earlier where Amy mentioned her alleged lesbo recruiter at AfterEllen. I also found some tweets from 2019 when Amy was still a fan of AfterEllen and was tweeting: "AfterEllen is the only mainstream publication defending lesbians", "All mainstream LGBT media except AfterEllen is now anti-gay.". Amy even referred to herself as a "AfterEllen writer"

Yes. Thank you. I was recruited by a writer at AfterEllen, who made me believe lesbians were under attack. I was involved with all that for a little over a year, and I’m speaking to journalists about what happened. I’ll likely write a book about it. It’s... a lot.

That’s because you think it’s wrong for lesbians to be lesbians and gay men to be gay men. Deal with your homophobia. AfterEllen is the only publication fighting the anti-gay Q rhetoric.

AfterEllen is the only mainstream publication defending lesbians. Out is homophobic vitriol, and everyone knows it.

I’m proud to be one of those @afterellen writers who speaks up for the lesbian community. Right now most of our former organizations and media have been hijacked. They’re now homophobic and are trying to erase lesbians. I’m standing up to that.

There’s a lot you misunderstand. All mainstream LGBT media except AfterEllen is now anti-gay. They’re persecuting my people and saying it’s not OK to be homosexuals anymore. That’s the real story. AE chose to be brave and stand up for lesbians. That’s not extreme. It’s righteous.

And here's Amy tweet back in 2018 about Autostraddle, the very website she went to in order to denounce GCs:

Yeah. Autostraddle is for lesbian erasure and porn. They’re worse than MRAs because they should know better.

Oh, and speaking of finding Amy a wife:

I moved to Seattle to find a wife. Still working on that. But I’ve never felt more normal than here.

In 2018 Amy was tweeting a lot at an AfterEllen author by the name of @JuliaDRobertson

Well done, Julia! I like that you started with “Dear Lesbians,” which ties in with the whole letter/message joke. Gadsby’s Netflix special is the bravest thing I’ve seen performed. The parts about lesbians being pressured to become transmen and how Gadsby doesn’t mind...

Amy was tweeting at Julia continuously throughout 2018-2019:


Amy began tweeting at @afterellen within a month after she first began tweeting at Julia in June of 2016:

(First tweet @afterellen is on the 20th of July, 2018.)


So, is Julia the alleged recruiter at AfterEllen? The last tweet from Amy at Julia was on the 3rd of March of this year.

That same month, March of 2020, Amy begins tweeting at random GCs on Twitter telling them that she was going to expose their movement.

Prove it. It’s fair criticism of your hate group. Put up or shut up. Renounce all that’s wrong with GCs now.

I’m a person, a butch standing up for myself. Who are you to dare to degrade me? You prove your entire movement is nothing but hate. The mainstream will expose you soon for what you are, bigot.

Something must've happened between the last tweet at Julia on the 3rd of March and Amy deciding to come out against GCs on the 11th of March:

I’m coming out as against Gender Critics. They don’t value butches. They talk over us and throw us under the bus. If you’re GC and have solid receipts, let’s talk. Otherwise, it looks like this GC movement is both anti-LGBT and anti-women’s rights. Let’s correct that mistake!

Amy basically did a 180 on GCs literally within a week.

I also found this tweet from 15 Dec 2019, which I think is the earliest indication that Amy disagreed with the Alpha Females in TERFdom:

Radical feminists & gender critics applaud this kind of story today. This is why I openly criticize them. I’m for LGBT rights, dignity, & visibility. I’m against Sheila Jeffreys, GTLOUK, WoLF, Posie Parker, & anyone opposing marriage equality & lesbian rights. Stand up!
 
Besides hating all men and wanting to collectively punish them, what exactly is the end goal of radical feminism?
One theory is that women have an instinctive fear of men imprinted on them through thousands of years of evolution because men are much stronger and can impregnate / kill on a whim.
And if you get enough sufficiently paranoid women together into a political movement, their goals become
1. De-masculinizing society so men become weak and ineffective and therefor (hopefully) incapable of hurting women.
2. Eliding the need for strong men by replacing them with "strong" women esp. in politics and the economy.

Although like most extremists, they don't generally realize that's what they are doing or why.
The fact that "rape" and "diversity" are the only two things that feminists ever talk about is a clue though.

For many feminists, troons are a welcome progression because what could be less threatening than a man with no dick trying to live as a woman. Others recognize that many troons are far from harmless and by giving them equal or more diversity points than real women you also undermine point 2. The second group are terfs basically.

How does it line up with other leftist bullshit like social justice and communism?
Feminists depend heavily on the diversity and oppression cards to achieve point 2 because women can't realistically beat out men on merit in some areas e.g. STEM. That's the tie in with "Social Justice". And the whole hierarchy inversion ideology that Social Justice depends on comes straight from Marxism. The communist boogieman is The Rich and the feminist boogieman is The Patriarchy so there's also some overlap there. As someone else pointed out, money is basically a prerequisite for men to get sex so they're slightly more motivated to work, cheat and steal for it.

I really don't understand why they think have a female-run or all-female society would somehow be magically better.
You can try reading The Left Hand of Darkness if you really want to know (and enjoy throwing up). The cognitive dissonance between we need men but men are dangerous resolves itself with the "gender fluid" meme. Basically men temporarily become men when it's convenient (like there's a dangerous situation or it's yaoi time) and the rest of the time are transformed into safe, passive and non-threatening eunuchs.
 
AmyDyess now claims she has been "threatened": "every day there's been a new attack"

Update on my upcoming story: It will likely take another week to get this piece out since I still have one year of screenshot receipts left to review. I’ve been processing a lot, and every day there’s been a new attack. I’ve faced sexual harassment and actual threats.

I’m staying safe, getting legal advice, and practicing self-care. All of these attacks prove that some bad people will do anything they can to silence me from exposing a culture of abuse. I’m going to tell this story while protecting myself.

I’m going to publish. It will be powerful. But I’ve been threatened and have to proceed wisely.

That's funny, I've been reading all the tweets people have been sending her and I haven't seen a single threat come by. Also, aren't threats against Twitter's ToS? Pretty sure all the TERFs just had a laugh about this and have since moved on.

Attention whore WuzzaGC Amy Dyess is in the midst of a warzone:

I don’t want things to go back to “normal.” I want accountability and major police reform so this senseless violence ends. They’re supposed to protect and serve, not terrorize. Major American cities look like war zones right now.

But despite her city burning to the ground, she still finds time to bitch about GCs as she strolls amongst the smouldering ruins:

Yep. It really sums up how out of touch their movement is. They should care more about strengthening women instead of vilifying trans people. They live in a fantasy world while real life is happening.

Agreed. So much GC energy and money are wasted on fighting a “war” based on misrepresentations. It’s sad for everyone, and it’s directly harmful for the trans community. They act like this is a game. How privileged.

And here comes the big gender reveal tweet: Amy, who if you will recall was dating Terri Strange, actually knew Julia Beck, the Baltimore lesbian that Terri Strange had plagiarized her work word for word:

Julia Beck was on the verge of telling me she made a mistake in 2019. She felt she was used by GCs and her life has been made worse because of them. A mutual friend says she’s an outcast in Baltimore now. I believe she was used. I knew her. I don’t agree with her views, though.

When Terri Strange did those Livestreams claiming COINTELPRO, Julie Beck was one of the people she specifically mentioned as running a Zerseztung campaign against her... yet here you have Terri's own ex Amy defending Julia Beck but deflect with a formulaic "I don't agree with with her views".

Yes. She was wrong. I hear you. I’m just saying this is complicated. She isn’t admitting to her mistakes right now. I’m just saying I think there’s hope in the long run. I’m telling a fully fleshed story that involves her, and I hear your criticism. I share it!

"I’m telling a fully fleshed story that involves her[Julia Beck]"... See? I knew Amy was gonna throw Terri Strange under the bus for the asspats from the TRAs. I bet a lot of those 30k screengrabs are Amy's DMs with Terri Strange, Leah Tverly and the rest of the gang in Portland. Bitches, you got played sooo hard by this nut. I bet you thought she was totally trustworthy and #OneOfUs because she's a real lesbian unlike you political/pretend ones, LMAO.

I know for a fact that GCs organized attacks on Ruth Hunt, Linda Riley, and so many more... just for being trans allies. They have 24/hr chats around the globe to harass both trans people and allies. I’ve been looking over the receipts of that and processing it all.

"organized attacks" makes it sound more dramatic than it actually is. What she probably means is they dogpiled these people in the social media and wrote angry blog articles about them. That's what TERFs do all day because they can't do shit else.

Amy wants a blue checkmark:

Whenever I speak truth to power, GCs (gender critics) attempt to lock me out of my account. I use 2-step verification. They’re trying to intimidate me but they can’t. Their pathetic attempts to silence me only prove all points. It motivates me to keep talking.


But Amy, didn't you know that blue checkmarks are a dogwhistle?

BlueCheckmarkPedosDogwhistle.jpg


Karens are running the GC movement:

I was noticing that when I deal with g.c women or radical feminists is that the vast majority (I want to say all), are white, educated, well off women. I have never dealt with accounts of color, marginalized women or women with (admitted) disabilities. Most are named "Karen".

There are some poor women being exploited and run into the ground. Then there are the Karens. The Karens constantly feed propaganda to the poor, throwing them some dollars here and there but never actually helping. From my experience I can say both are happening. It’s horrible.

"or women with (admitted) disabilities", TERF Saint Magdalen Burns had terminal brain cancer but I guess that's not a "disability" when you're a TRA, mainly because troons are themselves sick in the head while claiming "it's not a mental illness". I love these TRAs putting out this "TERFs are just lilly white nerds" bullshit on Twitter. Funny, I know for a fact that several of the American Youtube TERFs are women of colour or at least mixed race. Dworkin's Ghost is Latina, Terri I think is part Latina, one the accounts posting video memes mocking ContraPoints is a black woman. I myself have posted videos from black TERFs in this thread, mainly because they are so much more fun than the glum white TERFs. Wasn't that TERF lawyer in the UK (the one who was question by the cops) also Indian or mixed race/part Indian?
 
AmyDyess now claims she has been "threatened": "every day there's been a new attack"



That's funny, I've been reading all the tweets people have been sending her and I haven't seen a single threat come by. Also, aren't threats against Twitter's ToS? Pretty sure all the TERFs just had a laugh about this and have since moved on.

Attention whore WuzzaGC Amy Dyess is in the midst of a warzone:



But despite her city burning to the ground, she still finds time to bitch about GCs as she strolls amongst the smouldering ruins:



And here comes the big gender reveal tweet: Amy, who if you will recall was dating Terri Strange, actually knew Julia Beck, the Baltimore lesbian that Terri Strange had plagiarized her work word for word:


When Terri Strange did those Livestreams claiming COINTELPRO, Julie Beck was one of the people she specifically mentioned as running a Zerseztung campaign against her... yet here you have Terri's own ex Amy defending Julia Beck but deflect with a formulaic "I don't agree with with her views".



"I’m telling a fully fleshed story that involves her[Julia Beck]"... See? I knew Amy was gonna throw Terri Strange under the bus for the asspats from the TRAs. I bet a lot of those 30k screengrabs are Amy's DMs with Terri Strange, Leah Tverly and the rest of the gang in Portland. Bitches, you got played sooo hard by this nut. I bet you thought she was totally trustworthy and #OneOfUs because she's a real lesbian unlike you political/pretend ones, LMAO.



"organized attacks" makes it sound more dramatic than it actually is. What she probably means is they dogpiled these people in the social media and wrote angry blog articles about them. That's what TERFs do all day because they can't do shit else.

Amy wants a blue checkmark:



But Amy, didn't you know that blue checkmarks are a dogwhistle?

View attachment 1342638

Karens are running the GC movement:



"or women with (admitted) disabilities", TERF Saint Magdalen Burns had terminal brain cancer but I guess that's not a "disability" when you're a TRA, mainly because troons are themselves sick in the head while claiming "it's not a mental illness". I love these TRAs putting out this "TERFs are just lilly white nerds" bullshit on Twitter. Funny, I know for a fact that several of the American Youtube TERFs are women of colour or at least mixed race. Dworkin's Ghost is Latina, Terri I think is part Latina, one the accounts posting video memes mocking ContraPoints is a black woman. I myself have posted videos from black TERFs in this thread, mainly because they are so much more fun than the glum white TERFs. Wasn't that TERF lawyer in the UK (the one who was question by the cops) also Indian or mixed race/part Indian?
And sekhmet she owl is a black TERF incelbian too.
 
“Black” “woman” lectures white TERFs, white TERFs refuse to commit to throwing themselves bodily between black men and cops at riots and point out they hate black men as much as they hate white men and all other men so sure the fuck aren’t going to cape for males of any race. Hilarity ensues.

 
“Black” “woman” lectures white TERFs, white TERFs refuse to commit to throwing themselves bodily between black men and cops at riots and point out they hate black men as much as they hate white men and all other men so sure the fuck aren’t going to cape for males of any race. Hilarity ensues.

Removeddit link with deleted text:
 
Exceptional insight Archive into TERF bitchfights. Farmer @Dr Louise Moody is again the main object of this uncompromising sperging.
Whatever the merits it does highlight two aspects of Tervan behaviour that is repeated again and again:
Their inability to keep their fucking mouths shut on every social media platform going.
And their flawed belief that they are great writers with great insights. Witness this Bullshit from deranged Farmer @Joani Walsh and this mongish rant From the insane @LisaMuggeridge .
Fact ladies - you can’t write and what you do manage to expectorate from your poison pens is tedious bile.
(Late reply, i know.)
Although I’ve been aware of radical feminism for over a decade, I only started following the terf wars 2 years ago after getting into some troon lowcows. And I read one of those Medium terf “articles” that was genuinely well-written. Started with idpol “if you’re a MAN and you’re WHITE” nonsense and some sad rapey stuff, but quickly got into the typical terf talking points. I couldn’t tell if the author was one of the radfems or just got lost in some libright beliefs, but I tried to find it recently and seems she’s DTFA. They really do make it hard for anyone to side with them and stick around when they act so batshit. I agree with everything they say about the trannies and a few of the feminist points- in that social dynamics in that area are sex-based and that’s shaped a lot of oppression (my views diverge here but wont sperge). But wtf is their point? What’s their solution to the problems they see? I just see right-leaning young women get drawn in then leave when they realise how insane the other women are, and those women are all either lesbians with issues stemming from their sexuality, and/or women who’ve been through sexual abuse/domestic violence. It’s more of a lunatic asylum than a political movement. Also since I’ve been browsing here it seems ex-strippers/prostitutes/“sex workers” sign up for a while in some sort of healing process until they realise they’re in cult territory.

Men looking at pictures of women is concerning. Someone get her a burka.

View attachment 1352670

And honestly I think some of them are just commies
 
Back