Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

translation: you lost. you got no response.
All you got is shitty 1990s talking points and they don't help you deal with the new situations that either SJWs or Alt-Right present.
That's why I keep saying, you're just stuck in the past. You gotta make a choice, either join the SJWs or join us. Those are the only 2 options. Stay in 1999 is not an option.

That was a perfectly rational response by your own logic, but since you have small brain, I'll explain why.

You brought your bullshit where it was not wanted, you made impossible demands that involve others denying their own dignity and opinions to serve your personal interest, you made an absolute ass of yourself when you got pushback, you've victim blamed, and you still think you deserve more than to be dissed for being an asshole.

You're the digital equivalent of the animals who rioted and looted, and I shall regard you appropriately.
 
Who is "us" in this context?
Presumably the voices in his head (not the one that tells him to lust for surreptitious crotch shots, obviously), he certainly hasn't demonstrated any other support... For all his talk of debating on other fora, he's never posted screenshots of him winning anyone over. Perhaps he's getting his shit pushed in on those platforms, too?
 
Presumably the voices in his head (not the one that tells him to lust for surreptitious crotch shots, obviously), he certainly hasn't demonstrated any other support... For all his talk of debating on other fora, he's never posted screenshots of him winning anyone over. Perhaps he's getting his shit pushed in on those platforms, too?
He jumped on a fandom, took it up as an identity and think that he is a member of a group because of it.
Sad.
 
Who is "us" in this context?
white nationalists, alt-right, dissident right, everyone that has realized diversity is a horrible mistake and there is no way to fight against the social justice warriors if you accept their religion: discrimination bad, equality good, etc. We're really close to going IRL. Spencer really set us back but that's a different story.

Princip was a Yugoslav nationalist, not a race-baiting freedom fighter.
Yugoslavian nationalist = racist.
He didn't want to co-exist with the Austro-Hungarians.
100% intolerant, total bigot.
He needed to be more inclusive.
 
white nationalists, alt-right, dissident right, everyone that has realized diversity is a horrible mistake and there is no way to fight against the social justice warriors if you accept their religion: discrimination bad, equality good, etc. We're really close to going IRL. Spencer really set us back but that's a different story.
Using social Justice Warriors... such obsolete jargon.
What do you mean by going IRL? What is your plan Bane?
 
white nationalists, alt-right, dissident right, everyone that has realized diversity is a horrible mistake and there is no way to fight against the social justice warriors if you accept their religion: discrimination bad, equality good, etc. We're really close to going IRL. Spencer really set us back but that's a different story.

Yet you couldn't muster any of them to assist you here?
If this was your leadership trial, I'm pretty sure you flunked. Shocking, I know...
Never mind, perhaps you can stay on with the White Nationalists, keeping their toilets as white and clean as the future they're hoping for. Or their cocks, whatever suits your abilities best. It's totally cocks, dude.
 
Yugoslavian nationalist = racist.
He didn't want to co-exist with the Austro-Hungarians.
100% intolerant, total bigot.
He needed to be more inclusive.

Absolutely wrong. Princip didn't give a shit about race, he was a nationalist through and through. If he was the racist you claim he was, he would have stated himself to be purely a Slavic nationalist instead of promoting an independent Yugoslav state in his own trial.
 
Absolutely wrong. Princip didn't give a shit about race, he was a nationalist through and through. If he was the racist you claim he was, he would have stated himself to be purely a Slavic nationalist instead of promoting an independent Yugoslav state in his own trial.

Garcia doesn't understand history either. Imagine my surprise
 
Absolutely wrong. Princip didn't give a shit about race, he was a nationalist through and through. If he was the racist you claim he was, he would have stated himself to be purely a Slavic nationalist instead of promoting an independent Yugoslav state in his own trial.
Technically correct. He would be an ethnicist, not a racist. but these words are generally used interchangeably so this is arguing semantics. The point is diversity will have people that cause terrorist attacks to incite a race war. If you want to promote diversity, you gotta acknowledge this downside.

On the other hand, I am sure I know more about this alt-right/dissident right business than you do
doubt it.
and frankly I have no idea what would you do when going IRL.
university tour.
most people think we're just hateful bigots that hate other people because of the color of their skin because of CNN and ADL propaganda.

1. We gotta put forth our vision for America and explain why diversity will never work.
I think most people, including most of you guys are ignorant regarding our/my talking points.

2. We gotta be able to debate the SJWs, CRAs and Libertarians and win. All 3 of these groups will try to cuck us. That's why I am in this debate thread, getting practice.
 
white nationalists, alt-right, dissident right, everyone that has realized diversity is a horrible mistake and there is no way to fight against the social justice warriors if you accept their religion: discrimination bad, equality good, etc. We're really close to going IRL. Spencer really set us back but that's a different story.


Yugoslavian nationalist = racist.
He didn't want to co-exist with the Austro-Hungarians.
100% intolerant, total bigot.
He needed to be more inclusive.
How can Princip be racist against Austo-Hungatians, when he's white as well?
 
Technically correct. He would be an ethnicist, not a racist. but these words are generally used interchangeably so this is arguing semantics. The point is diversity will have people that cause terrorist attacks to incite a race war. If you want to promote diversity, you gotta acknowledge this downside.


doubt it.

university tour.
most people think we're just hateful bigots that hate other people because of the color of their skin because of CNN and ADL propaganda.

1. We gotta put forth our vision for America and explain why diversity will never work.
I think most people, including most of you guys are ignorant regarding our/my talking points.

2. We gotta be able to debate the SJWs, CRAs and Libertarians and win. All 3 of these groups will try to cuck us. That's why I am in this debate thread, getting practice.
How do you expect to ever do a university tour when it's too much effort to post a picture of your thumb?
 
That's why I am in this debate thread, getting practice.
Well, when they shove your shit far enough in that you can taste it, you'll get a wave of nostalgia for your days on the farms, no doubt. Stop it with the "we" or show us something empirical that ties you to someone, anyone who is actually adopting the same position and standing with you. Fucking poser.
 
Back