U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

[Hollywood Hitler]

Celebrities go full cringe (again). Watch this and try not to kill yourself, especially Aaron Paul's acting. Take responsibility, whitey!

Imagine part 2

 

[AnaV]

Celebrities go full cringe (again). Watch this and try not to kill yourself, especially Aaron Paul's acting. Take responsibility, whitey!

Hollywood doing what they do best, pandering to the lowest common denominator, oh no wait, fucking kids, that’s what they do best.

 

[Crystal Golem]

Might be late on this, but here's a video out of Miami where people attacked the cops and their cars (one smashing it with a skateboard). Hilarity ensues and the cops aren't fucking around with them. Sperg cameraman tries to make this a George Floyd sequel with his commentary near the end lmao. It's timestamped for when the real action starts but the whole two minute video is worth a watch.

Just archiving this.

 

[Bakarina]

Celebrities go full cringe (again). Watch this and try not to kill yourself, especially Aaron Paul's acting. Take responsibility, whitey!

Must be nice to lecture the "common folk" from ivory towers.

 

[NoYinT76]

You've felt the sentiment in the air, huh? They're losing steam and they're losing quiet support. Most companies already pushed out their boilerplates. Week three? or so, and a lot of cities can't muster up more marches and protests, which have moved out to the quieter places where you're more likely to find an honest politician than a single black livin' there. Sure, the weekend will bring up more steam, and in some of the bigger cities, you've still got some gesturing here and there - but it's audibly deflating. And Trump is still president, and he didn't deploy the military.

So the time is ticking to capitalize on it. But they've never been very good at messaging, now, have they? I mean, we've seen the media attempt the EXACT same schtick thousands of times on those undesirables, and so rarely does it stick - well, seems like businesses are still eager to fire people so the ashes haven't totally gone out, so it's time to trot out joey b and try that same song and dance again.

Are people here talking about that "CHAZ Autonomous Zone"? It's fucking hillarious how they tried to make "their own little nation", but after 3 days they're already without food nor water. lmao

Dont forget the rise of a warlord who’s a soundcloud rapper/landlord.

 

[Green Man]

These women are just visual reasons as why not to race mix

Wouldn't be so bad if she hadn't made her body look like a public bathroom at the Flying J truckstop. She'd still look like a mong but at least she wouldn't look like a bunch of bored middle school kids stole a pack of sharpies from the Walmart store.

 

[Iron Hamster]

View attachment 1369245
https://archive.ph/BN5OO

Spoiler: Document

View attachment 1369247
View attachment 1369248

View attachment 1369251
View attachment 1369256
Tweet: https://archive.vn/D1TDP
Article: https://archive.ph/qL1za
It's getting real red out here.

Does the mob run the port out there like they do in NJ/NY? If so, that won't end well.

 

[GenericReviewerDraco]

Edgy name (Lilith is a demon), "Thank Satan", hates white people, autistic tatoos.
That's a man.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNzrem4U298

I'm now reminded of that cringy anti-SJW "based troon" LilithLovett.

 

[OwO What's This?]

Dont forget the rise of a warlord who’s a soundcloud rapper/landlord.

freeing it from tyrants who tried to build a wall

 

[Cast Iron Pan]

Robert Gebelhoff, clinically braindead

No police reforms would be complete without gun reforms - The Washing…

archived 11 Jun 2020 19:22:46 UTC

archive.is

No police reforms would be complete without gun reforms

You can talk about expanding the use of body cameras for police officers. You can talk about better training and reforming police culture to root out bad actors. You can talk about improving diversity in police ranks. These are all worthy proposals to address racism in law enforcement. But fixing the systemic problems of policing should also mean reforming our gun laws.


You’d be forgiven if, in the past few weeks of social unrest, you haven’t thought much about gun violence generally. After all, a gun wasn’t used to kill George Floyd. The image of an officer’s knee on Floyd’s neck was proof enough that a deeper problem continues to afflict our nation’s law enforcement.

But it would be a mistake to try to resolve the problems with police behavior without also acknowledging and addressing America’s epidemic of gun violence. Police reform and gun reform go hand in hand. Reducing the easy availability of guns would not eliminate the problems with policing in America nor end unwarranted killings, but it would help.


Start with the fact that the United States doesn’t necessarily have more crime than other rich countries. What it has is off-the-charts homicide rates. Why? Because the prevalence of guns makes our violent crimes far more lethal. And that fundamentally changes how police officers behave.
Simply put, police are more likely to use lethal force when they believe lethal force might be used against them. We’ve seen the tragic results: Police fatally shooting scores of people, including children, because they mistake their toy guns for real weapons. Or shooting an adult man because he’s holding a cellphone. Or a hammer. Or a pipe. Or a lighter.
Of course, these incidents can be explained at least in part by a racist tendency to see people of color as more of a threat. But they might also be the result of fear. Indeed, American police officers are more likely to die in the line of duty than their counterparts in other rich countries. This reality is embedded into the psyche of many American officers. As one former officer put it:

Cops tweet, retweet, post on Facebook, text each other, and talk about line of duty deaths whenever they happen. I had a partner who began every shift by checking the Officer Down Memorial Page website that maintains an updated list of law enforcement and prison officers killed in the line of duty. He did this every shift. That’s what he was absorbing immediately before going out on the street to interact with civilians.

It’s certainly true that there can be brutal police behavior, and unwarranted shootings by police officers, in jurisdictions with strict gun-control laws. Yet there is substantial evidence that an abundance of guns on the streets is correlated with a tendency to shoot suspects. A 2018 study by Harvard researchers found that states with the highest gun ownership rates had a rate of fatal shootings by police 3.6 times higher than the states with fewer guns. A 2017 study found that state-level firearm laws — such as stronger background checks, restrictions on gun trafficking and restrictions on more dangerous weapons — were significantly associated with lower rates of fatal police shootings.

None of this is to suggest that gun reforms will solve our problems in policing. They must be paired with overdue structural and cultural changes needed to excise the bad behavior in law enforcement. That should include the demilitarization of police, a greater investment in local social services and a national reconciliation effort in communities plagued with officer-involved violence.

But more stringent gun laws would also represent an important step to reduce police shootings and to make communities safer overall. There are a number of remedies available — from mandating safe storage of firearms to requiring licenses for ownership, many of which states have already implemented — that can reduce gun deaths without violating Second Amendment rights.


As a practical matter, adding such proposals into the current mix could complicate ongoing campaigns for police reform. Gun legislation has been stuck in the muddy trenches of partisan warfare for years. No one should have any illusions that federal lawmakers are any more likely to mobilize behind gun reforms now.
Even still, the force with which the public is demanding change offers reason for hope. There’s a sense that this moment is different — that lawmakers cannot ignore these cries for a better America. Gun violence is a crucial piece of the puzzle; we cannot let it be left out of the conversation.

You know how your communities were looted, burned, and your people stalked, assaulted, and murdered when the police were removed from those areas recently? Yeah, not only are the police not going to help you, but we're going to need your guns, too. It'll be safer this way, trust me. Don't make me call you racist, you know if I do that you'll kneel and offer up whatever we ask for. Do better.

We'll be back a 9AM sharp to pick up your 22 rifle, you fucking nazi. Take this time to reflect.

 

[AnOminous]

Are people here talking about that "CHAZ Autonomous Zone"? It's fucking hillarious how they tried to make "their own little nation", but after 3 days they're already without food nor water. lmao

I just find it amazing they couldn't go a full day without showing why Communism and starvation are nearly instantly causally related.

No police reforms would be complete without gun reforms

"shall not be infringed" bitch.

 

[OwO What's This?]

View attachment 1369287
Robert Gebelhoff, clinically braindead

https://archive.md/7MjpW

No police reforms would be complete without gun reforms

You know how your communities were looted, burned, and your people stalked, assaulted, and murdered when the police were removed from those areas recently? Yeah, not only are the police not going to help you, but we're going to need your guns, too. It'll be safer this way, trust me.

stronger background checks = less guns in the hands of black people = this man is a secret racist

 

[Bakarina]

View attachment 1369287
Robert Gebelhoff, clinically braindead

https://archive.md/7MjpW

No police reforms would be complete without gun reforms

You know how your communities were looted, burned, and your people stalked, assaulted, and murdered when the police were removed from those areas recently? Yeah, not only are the police not going to help you, but we're going to need your guns, too. It'll be safer this way, trust me.

Are his organs at least going to go to a good cause via helping other people or are they going to rot as the family keeps the body on life support

 

[bippu_as_fuck_ls400]

https://twitter.com/AntonioSabatoJr/status/1271169713360506882 (https://archive.vn/IAdCo)

 

[Harvey Danger]

there's a reason why BLM is so aggressive when anyone tries to change the subject, the biggest perpetrator is their own allies

I've tried arguing this with locals I know who were doing actual peaceful good-faith protests. Told them they need to regulate their movement and kick out agitators, otherwise they'll get taken over and protests under the BLM brand get tainted.

Their argument is "but we are peacefully protesting and we all mean it, so it's OK!" They have no concept of actual organizing, they just believe that their own righteousness and good-faith is what matters. "We aren't throwing rocks when we go out, I don't know why those dumb conservatives conflate the rioters with the protests!"

It's the same problem as yesterday's People's Assembly in CHAZ. When your ideology says everybody's opinion is equally valid and you can't shut them up, then you get stoned hobos on mics rambling about Nixon. And unions hijacking your chants to excuse them striking.

 

[DumbDude42]

stronger background checks = less guns in the hands of black people = this man is a secret racist

nah let's be serious here for a minute: the hoodrats shooting each other on a daily basis over gang turf are already using black market glocks anywway
the point of more background checks is to inconvenience and annoy regular gun owners. if buying a gun takes half a year of time and costs hundreds of dollars in additional fees, then fewer people will buy guns, that's their reasoning behind shit like this.

 

[The Last Stand]

View attachment 1367150

REPORT IN

How do I rank with this scale? I'm confused.

 

[OwO What's This?]

nah let's be serious here for a minute: the hoodrats shooting each other on a daily basis over gang turf are already using black market glocks anywway
the point of more background checks is to inconvenience and annoy regular gun owners. if buying a gun takes half a year of time and costs hundreds of dollars in additional fees, then fewer people will buy guns, that's their reasoning behind shit like this.

you can't buy guns illegally, that's illegal

 

[Кот Бегемот]

View attachment 1369287
Robert Gebelhoff, clinically braindead

https://archive.md/7MjpW

No police reforms would be complete without gun reforms

You know how your communities were looted, burned, and your people stalked, assaulted, and murdered when the police were removed from those areas recently? Yeah, not only are the police not going to help you, but we're going to need your guns, too. It'll be safer this way, trust me. Don't make me call you racist, you know if I do that you'll kneel and offer up whatever we ask for. Do better.

We'll be back a 9AM sharp to pick up your 22 rifle, you fucking nazi. Take this time to reflect.

that scum are relentless faggots, I got this earlier today, "far right extremists" are the problem

 

[Yeeted Teet]

The charges won't be enough untill all four are charged with 1st degree and most of the evidence got burned. The main cop may get shipped down the river but the other three won't get the same punishment and that will piss the mob off.

There are people who wouldn't be happy with anything less than a North Korea style 3 generations of punishment for everyone involved.