Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Is there some detail I'm missing here? Clearing the protest out by military force for a photo-op seems rather questionable, and enabled the media to kneecap the reassurance gained from it. Would the country really have spiralled into irrevocable chaos if it weren't for that one symbolic picture of Trump standing by the damaged church with Bible in hand, as if to say " I'm here to hold things together in these dark times" ? I guess it works in a "Freikorps voran-die Grenze Brennt! Fur eine zerbrochene Welt" kind of way.

("Free Corps ahead, the borders burn! [We fight] for a broken world." is the literal translation according to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3EfLouZiUs).

People were practically begging Trump to make a speech of some sort to say things would be alright and the attempt at burning down the church was deranged. Plus there were already plans to clear out the area so Trump wasn’t clearing the area for himself.

The media just convinced people that the gesture was meaningless by calling it a photo op, even tho most any public appearance by a politician could be considered a photo op. Alternative would be sitting back after the place was cleared and continuing to make statements from the White House that get ignored unless they’re tweets.
 
Any speech Trump gave would have been called a racist call to violence, and whatever location he chose to give it in would have been labeled an empty and meaningless gesture, no matter what. This is just the basic rules under which mass media now operates. Anything Trump says is always a racist (or sexist, or homophobic) call to violence, and every move he makes is an empty and meaningless gesture. It's really going to ramp up until his rallies start back up. They're deliberately trying to force Trump to cancel campaign rallies through astro-turfing a public outcry against them. The only way Biden can possibly compete with Trump is if neither are allowed to publicly campaign. It probably would have worked on a typical Republican, but it won't work on Trump. He doesn't give a shit what the media and their masters want, they are his open and declared enemies.
 
https://twitter.com/hashtag/GaysForTrump Is quite the shitshow right now. Leftists and democrats letting their mask slip again, attacking any gay that dares form their own opinion and isn't part of the farm animals in their fences area. Some people going as far as comparing it to slavery and Hitler, or they're bots from RUSSIA.

Here's a furry telling you can't be conservative if you're gay because it "simply doesn't work." Which before he does, makes sure to attack any gay that doesn't share the same beliefs.
2842.jpg

On a plus side, there are gays standing up to all the bullshit. Here's a Hispanic guy who basically calls bullshit on pride month and a racist black person tries to label him white. The guy angers the retard more asking if seeing his other gay minority friends upsets him:
 
Last edited:
https://twitter.com/hashtag/GaysForTrump Is quite the shitshow right now. Leftists and democrats letting their mask slip again, attacking any gay that dares form their own opinion and isn't part of the farm animals in their fences area. Some people going as far as comparing it to slavery and Hitler, or they're bots from RUSSIA.

Here's a furry telling you can't be conservative if you're gay because it "simply doesn't work." Which before he does, makes sure to attack any gay that doesn't share the same beliefs.
View attachment 1373189

People need to start replying to these kinds of tweets with "HOLY SHIT! A TALKING DOG!"
 
The media just convinced people that the gesture was meaningless by calling it a photo op, even tho most any public appearance by a politician could be considered a photo op. Alternative would be sitting back after the place was cleared and continuing to make statements from the White House that get ignored unless they’re tweets.

If he shows up in public, it's a photo op.

If he doesn't, he's "hiding in his bunker"

Everything he does is wrong, always, forever, 220%

The media lurches on....
 
Ran into this when I saw #gaysfortrump trending on Twitter. Don't worry, as soon as I scrolled over it, it instantly vanished since twitter was trying to censor it. Had to search the phrase to find the censored tweet again.

View attachment 1372925
Absolutely nothing fucking happened.


Are these guys any good for news fact checking? I really appreciate this format instead of “no he didn’t do that, moving on” because it actually gives me something to debate someone with
 
I was just browsing the Daily Mail, and just for today here's all the Trump stories.

View attachment 1372980
Anyone else remember the Daily Mail swinging more conservative-ish tabloid rather than TDS? If so, I can see two explanations for the pivot:

1) Vast newish conspiracy to push anti-Trump talking points (I'm being mostly tongue in cheek here).

2) DM has always sold extreme sensationalism, and the demographic they pander to hates Trump.

Has anyone else noticed/thought about this?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: polyester
Anyone else remember the Daily Mail swinging more conservative-ish tabloid rather than TDS? If so, I can see two explanations for the pivot:

1) Vast newish conspiracy to push anti-Trump talking points (I'm being mostly tongue in cheek here).

2) DM has always sold extreme sensationalism, and the demographic they pander to hates Trump.

Has anyone else noticed/thought about this?
Not really, because I'm not a brit.

If I had to guess, nevertrumper weak pussy conservatives. And as highlighted by many Euros, "Conservative" there is still pretty left barring the less developed nations in the South and the Eastern regions.
 
Not really, because I'm not a brit.

If I had to guess, nevertrumper weak pussy conservatives. And as highlighted by many Euros, "Conservative" there is still pretty left barring the less developed nations in the South and the Eastern regions.
Well, in the Great Realm of Enlightened Europe, "less developed" really just means "less cucked to Brussels and the EU, and made to suffer for it".
 

You know what Maher also has? No nuts.
Whenever he sounds off about something stupid his Democrat masters are doing, they yank on his leesh and tell him to behave or he'll be sleeping with the peasants tonight. For every good point he has, he makes ten bad/crazy ones that overshadow it. It's tiresome. He looks and sounds like a weasel. Or a pterodactyl. 🚬
 
In a sense.

What Maher is actually saying is: "you're making it too plain what you're doing if you say defund, say divert so that stupid people don't realize it."

Once again, he's right but will be pilloried by the left because of his "impurity" to the cause. Mahr's another 90's leftist who didn't migrate to the far left and is trying to keep all his allies from walking off a cliff, and they won't listen to him.
 
Once again, he's right but will be pilloried by the left because of his "impurity" to the cause. Mahr's another 90's leftist who didn't migrate to the far left and is trying to keep all his allies from walking off a cliff, and they won't listen to him.
He's one of those elites who sees a pogrom on the horizon and wants to pump the brakes to start boiling the frog slowly again.
 
Anyone else remember the Daily Mail swinging more conservative-ish tabloid rather than TDS? If so, I can see two explanations for the pivot:

1) Vast newish conspiracy to push anti-Trump talking points (I'm being mostly tongue in cheek here).

2) DM has always sold extreme sensationalism, and the demographic they pander to hates Trump.

Has anyone else noticed/thought about this?

I would imagine most new agencies outside the US look to American news organizations like CNN, New York Times, and Washington Post as unbiased news sources to help shape how they'd see American politics. Wouldn't be surprised if the fact the US has such weak libel laws was completely unknown to people in Europe and how it allows for a lot of false or intensely misleading reporting.
 
Back