Spergoy of Cuckkad
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2019
My emotional security? You’re the only one here talking to people like they’re Richard Spencer II for correlating crime and race and calling them “brainlets“ for not “studying the mechanisms behind the statistics”. You said you would explain the mysterious mechanisms behind the race/crime statistics and you still haven’t replied to my post containing them.It'd be best for you to start reading my comments instead of ferociously trying to defend your means of emotional security.
He didn’t even mention crime in this post lmao. He mentioned problems (which isn’t only crime, black people have a bad rep when it comes to other things like noise disturbance, general lack of care for property, etc) and data. The data that says black people commit 10x the murder. What part of this is inaccurate or irrational?Many people have already figured that out, and are fleeing Seattle and Minneapolis en masse, you're probably going to start seeing it in other cities that are most affected by this as well. When I decided to move to my new home in Texas, I took many factors into account, one of them being the percentage of the black population there.
I want to get along with black people, I really do, no joke, I'm not a racist, but I can't ignore the data, the more black people in your community, the more likely you are to have problems. If acknowledging that makes me a racist, then so fucking be it.
Except that the statistics literally correlate race and crime.The issue I had with what @dinoman said wasn't with him not wanting to live in a majority black neighborhood, but that he 1) used racial demographics as an inference for crime while 2) not actually researching the actual crime ratings and 3) said all this while insisting that he wasn't racist.
If he was actually racist, there'd be nothing to say. If he just wanted to live with people that looked like him, that'd be fine, regardless of the reason. If he didn't want to live in a high crime neighborhood-- really, who does? But I'm not irritated with him because of any of that, but because he can't even own up to his own racism as he details how his own evaluative method was guided by it. His racism isn't my problem-- it's his hypocrisy. Hypocrisy demonstrated by him inferring crime rate based on racial composition instead of just looking for the damn crime rate.
He didn’t say he didn’t look at the general crime rate as well, he said that demographics were part of his choice.
Low would probably be below the national average, and large would be probably 40%+.1) "Low" relative to what?
2) "Large" relative to what?
3) Of what value would giving a singular example be? You'd immediately dismiss it as an exception to the rule you've already convinced yourself of.
My “rule” is supported by statistics, and just plain reason. Example: the most dangerous cities in America are Bessemer (AL), East St. Louis (IL), and Monroe (LA). Bessemer - 70% black, East St. Louis - 98% black, Monroe - 63% black.
I challenged you to find an exception to disprove the rule that a high black population leads to a shitty and dangerous city, it’s still on the table if you can find one.