Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

Outright refusing service against people because of their sexual orientation is not "liberating." Not to mention it's still expensive.

InB4 "Chop the dick, bigot."

Hilary might have covered up the whole virus. She would have signed TPP and been chummy with China. China would obviously want it covered up. And Hilary would be more than willing to do so. The media would've ran interference with the WH, saying there's nothing going on. The media would also say if you think something is going on, you're a conspiracy theorist. The rumors would spread from china to Social Media. Once covid reached america, the same types of videos we saw in china would appear. The Social Media platforms would try and censor these posts. Tons of people would have died. Hilary would only admit there's something to the rumors when bodies are starting to pile up and its too big to ignore.

Might of being the keyword. We really don't know what exactly would have been done.

All deaths from COVID are just blamed on America's private healthcare system, giving Empress Hillary the green light to let unelected bureaucrat swamp creatures into healthcare.

 

[ditto]

Then, they all got big fucking heads because Obama effectively used them to help himself win the election. They almost immediately went from being comedians to being propagandists.

Went from shitting on President Bush to shitting on the house minority leader for not doing enough for Obama.

They tepidly supported Occupy and Assange but hated the Tea Party with a vengeance, even doing that parody Tea Party event "Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear" which was basically a DNC rally to help Obama keep the house in 2010.

 

[Juan's Sombrero]

Up to 74 comments now. I see someone from KF is also on reddit, since they used my "Imagine being so arrogant..." (And got hit with a warning for violating civil discourse for it!)

This is one reason the world is in the position it's in: not being able to speak truth because it hurts people's feelings. Telling someone the world doesn't revolve around them should not be considered a violation of civil discourse.

I did like one new comment though.

Edit: Lol the mods there deleted this comment.

It's like Trump deliberately does what he does to get a rise out of them and make them crazier. Crazy, I know!

 

[Sekirodiealot]

Some random progressive mulled the idea of voting third party because he didn't like Trump or Biden. The result was the phrase "No, you're" trending.

View attachment 1376340View attachment 1376341

A wild Kurt Eichenwald appears!

View attachment 1376342

I found this

These assholes wonder why Trump gets more supporters at his rallies

 

[Slap47]

I found this
View attachment 1377522
View attachment 1377546
View attachment 1377549
These assholes wonder why Trump gets more supporters at his rallies

It's almost as though America is a nation filled with idealists...

 

[MrJokerRager]

I found this
View attachment 1377522
View attachment 1377546
View attachment 1377549
These assholes wonder why Trump gets more supporters at his rallies

The democrats are really imbeciles when it comes to long term planning. They passed posse comitatus which fucked Obama from trying to use the military to carry out his wishes. Ross Perot helped Bill Clinton defeat Bush and yet they conspired with the Republicans to fuck 3rd party candidates over and we saw it in 2016 where the 3rd parties played a role in helping Trump out. They were just a while ago trying to astroturf some RINO and failed miserably. All it did was greatly the levels of votes Trump is getting in the primaries. I would convince this person to vote third party because the vote is not going towards orangemanbad either. All this shit did is maybe swing some independents towards Trump out of spite.

Although I saw this crazy story on r/stupidpol a while ago where some Neoliberal Karen bullied her sickly son into voting for Biden over Bernie in the primaries. That is how bad shit is with these Biden cultists who are giving the MAGAtards a run for their money.

 

[The Last Stand]

We need a third party President. I'd vote third party too based on principle alone.

 

[Jarolleon]

I think people not losing their shit about 230 got to him, While most of us subconciousley know the internet is doomed, that censorship is inevitable and that removing 230 was M.A.D. Where we are just used to losing sites the Farms was his baby and he saw our acceptance of it's death as a betrayal.

Or maybe his priorities are different from yours. In part of his "I'm too old for this shit" he directly laments that most of the 2019 joiners would gladly sacrifice the Farms for the ability to call Obama a nigger on Twitter, and quite strongly implying that such political fanaticism, this extension of Total War to the culture war, is the cancer that's killing the Farms and the internet in general. Reminds me of this clip for some reason.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5_Yi-A8tWc

Are we turning into the internet equivalent of General Ripper?

Puts on tin foil hat

Nah, that filthy kike Kubrick created the character to discredit the only way in which the right wing could win, all but assuring their transformation into cringy pushovers like William F. Buckley and Bill Kristol. Becoming Ripper is a good thing, it is exactly what the Jew fears most!

 

[Adamska]

Or maybe his priorities are different from yours. In part of his "I'm too old for this shit" he directly laments that most of the 2019 joiners would gladly sacrifice the Farms for the ability to call Obama a nigger on Twitter, and quite strongly implying that such political fanaticism, this extension of Total War to the culture war, is the cancer that's killing the Farms and the internet in general. Reminds me of this clip for some reason.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5_Yi-A8tWc

Are we turning into the internet equivalent of General Ripper?

Puts on tin foil hat

Nah, that filthy kike Kubrick created the character to discredit the only way in which the right wing could win, all but assuring their transformation into cringy pushovers like William F. Buckley and Bill Kristol. Becoming Ripper is a good thing, it is exactly what the Jew fears most!

Or he's reminded based on how miserable he is at this moment that the site is in a similar spot to SomethingAwful, but with him as Lowtax, and with /pol/tards who unironically jewpost instead of idiot SJW catladies who bigotpost.

Now him chimping to the point he posted on the main site about the evils of revoking 230 twice was embarrassing, but that point I listed right there does have value. You do need some balance in life, and sometimes just need to walk out of the chamber to rebalance and focus on life.

Also the fact this thread got noticeably unfunnier is an issue too what with the dooming, the "I am using this as a refugee place as my idiot family drink the DNC Koolaid" posting, and less of the laughing at the screaming tard who says shit like "Vote for Biden even if he rapes".

 

[SouthernBitchBob]

Also the fact this thread got noticeably unfunnier is an issue too what with the dooming, the "I am using this as a refugee place as my idiot family drink the DNC Koolaid" posting, and less of the laughing at the screaming tard who says shit like "Vote for Biden even if he rapes".

I think that's a trap that comes with making fun of politics TBH. Funny is super easy when everyone's laughing at some screwy fat bitch from Tumblr. When you pull the scope back far enough and try making fun of people/groups that are actually powerful enough to affect your life, funny is a lot less...straightforward.

 

[trent]

Some random progressive mulled the idea of voting third party because he didn't like Trump or Biden. The result was the phrase "No, you're" trending.

View attachment 1376340View attachment 1376341

A wild Kurt Eichenwald appears!

View attachment 1376342

Ah yes, talking down to people.

A tactic that worked so well in the 2016 election.

 

[Adamska]

I think that's a trap that comes with making fun of politics TBH. Funny is super easy when everyone's laughing at some screwy fat bitch from Tumblr. When you pull the scope back far enough and try making fun of people/groups that are actually powerful enough to affect your life, funny is a lot less...straightforward.

Or you just unironically lose your ability to focus on the funny and start taking shit seriously.

Comedy and seriousness usually fails to mix since the latter is like chocolate to dogs; it kills in large doses. This is especially the case if you're pissed and/or scared. Pissed and/or scared people tend to suck at comedy.

 

[Maamtis]

Pickle Rick tattoos are more offensive in my opinion. Anyone that willingly brands themselves with it has no shame. It’s also a very dead meme, so it will only get worse over time.

Local EB was selling 2 tees for 15 dollars. A fair few Rick & Morty tees in the bunch. Seems like the show has cooled off considerably in the past few years.

Ah yes, talking down to people.

A tactic that worked so well in the 2016 election.

The world: Well lads, what's the plan for 2020?
The left: We're gonna do the same thing as 2016 but worse with a dud of a candidate on the back end of 4 years of throwing a tantrum over not winning.
The world: Oh... (pencils in Trump victory)

 

[Cast Iron Pan]

The American Press Is Destroying Itself
A flurry of newsroom revolts has transformed the American press

The American Press Is Destroying Itself

A flurry of newsroom revolts has transformed the American press

taibbi.substack.com

Our brave truth-tellers make great shows of shaking fists at our parody president, but not one of them will talk honestly about the fear running through their own newsrooms. People depend on us to tell them what we see, not what we think. What good are we if we’re afraid to do it?

Being able to type so much egomanical gibberish during a bout of autofellatio is indeed an admirable skill.

We need a third party President. I'd vote third party too based on principle alone.

roll with the tuck

 

[Super-Chevy454]

A wild Kurt Eichenwald appears!

View attachment 1376342

Time to ask Kurt Eichenwald if he still enjoy to see anime tentacles. That'll keep his mouth shut.

 

[McGregor]

Let me see if I can get this straight. Trump kills. Its selfish not to do everything to remove Trump. But what does it mean when someone says 'Trump kills.' He isn't going up to the White House roof and snagging a secret service riffle and shooting people at random on Pennsylvania Avenue... So obviously this means the presidency kills.

Quick questions, assuming the presidency kills:
Must the presidency kill?
Does it kill more then its absence?
Does it save lives?
Does the occupant of the office make a significant difference in terms of lives lost/saved?

Well if the presidency can be assumed to represent order, surely the homicidal chaos of the recent major and ongoing race riots, and the abhorrent conditions in the CHAZ are a testament to the absence of order and its grim ramifications. So I think some form of order seems necessary. So obviously the problem isn't that Trump kills, its that you don't like what Trump does. Because people are going to die regardless of what regulations if any or laws are influenced by the President of the United States.

But by all means! Go off all bug eyed and call people you don't know and won't hear out: idiots complicit in murder. That's really doing wonders at changing minds or lending you even the slightest credibility. When you care just enough to not be willing to do what it takes to win; Democrats 2020.

 

[The Last Stand]

With all that's happened the past four years, my perceptions went from Fuck Trump, to Damn Trump to indifferent Trump.

 

[Fuck Y'all]

Let me see if I can get this straight. Trump kills. Its selfish not to do everything to remove Trump. But what does it mean when someone says 'Trump kills.' He isn't going up to the White House roof and snagging a secret service riffle and shooting people at random on Pennsylvania Avenue... So obviously this means the presidency kills.

Quick questions, assuming the presidency kills:
Must the presidency kill?
Does it kill more then its absence?
Does it save lives?
Does the occupant of the office make a significant difference in terms of lives lost/saved?

Well if the presidency can be assumed to represent order, surely the homicidal chaos of the recent major and ongoing race riots, and the abhorrent conditions in the CHAZ are a testament to the absence of order and its grim ramifications. So I think some form of order seems necessary. So obviously the problem isn't that Trump kills, its that you don't like what Trump does. Because people are going to die regardless of what regulations if any or laws are influenced by the President of the United States.

But by all means! Go off all bug eyed and call people you don't know and won't hear out: idiots complicit in murder. That's really doing wonders at changing minds or lending you even the slightest credibility. When you care just enough to not be willing to do what it takes to win; Democrats 2020.

for them every right of them is Evil embodient, dude

 

[Private Pyle]

We need a third party President. I'd vote third party too based on principle alone.

It’s not a terrible idea to implement a third party president but voting for it simply because of principle is kind of how we end up with “vote blue no matter who”.
The focus should always be on the person not the party and what they bring to the table. More parties should just mean more ideas and values to bring in.

With all that's happened the past four years, my perceptions went from Fuck Trump, to Damn Trump to indifferent Trump.

I wonder how true this is for other people. I wonder how their attitudes will change in the next four years.

 

[The Last Stand]

The focus should always be on the person not the party and what they bring to the table. More parties should just mean more ideas and values to bring in.

A person would pick a party based on their beliefs. At least that's how it used to be, and beliefs and values would change over time.

It’s not a terrible idea to implement a third party president but voting for it simply because of principle is kind of how we end up with “vote blue no matter who”.

The principle in theory would be I don't agree with either party candidate, but I see your point.

I wonder how true this is for other people. I wonder how their attitudes will change in the next four years.

Assuming Trump follows through with riot control, I'd say his reception would be modestly well.