U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Looks like the mayor had to send the cops in to save the statue just in the nick of time. Imagine if Donald Trump's direct inspiration was taken down in the very capital? He'd go apeshit!
I was hoping the statue would magically spring to life and beat the shit out of people trying to destroy it, but we can't always get what we want :(

Some more NYC firework antics while NYPD drive by doing nothing.

View attachment 1399024
Dudes, these upcoming week until the 4th of July might be a fucking shitshow :stress:
 
Wew, withing 2 mins it popped up. around 6:05 PST.

"Pulling down their statues had nothing to do with the Civil War, at least not the first Civil War..." . Well holy shit, I didn't think anyone in the MSM would get that spicy.

It makes me wonder if the left would actually win the Boogaloo. They have most of the young people, and as the Volksturm proves old people can't fight for shit. That's probably why Trump doesn't want to escalate things. Sure the younguns on the right would come from families with stronger military tradition, but the Confederacy had that same advantage with a similar demographic imbalance and they got thrashed in 4 years.
 
I don't know why all of these fucking people seem to treat police instructions as a cute suggestion. It's not a recommendation, a suggestion, a reminder or advice. It's a god damn order and if you don't comply you're not going to like what happens next.

"Please disperse."

Teehee I'm not going anywhere! ACAB!

"This is an unlawful assembly, if you don't disperse, you will be subject to use of force and arrest."

FUCK YOU PIGS ACAB! HANDS UP DON'T SHOOT! [hurls object at police]

"This is your final warning, disperse now."

OMG TEARGAS HURTS LIKE WHY DID YOU DO THAT???? OH NO I DON'T WANNA GO TO JAIL!

Cause and effect.

Gangs of new york had the right idea


Use of force or refusal to comply should be met with immediate force of sufficient strength to put the riot down on the spot
 
I don't know why beating the fuck out of someone is the standard response or considered acceptable after being called a derogatory name. Among civilized people it typically stops at an argument and someone being told to fuck off.

"He said the N-word! That meant it was absolutely necessary for a group of us to immediately run over and beat the fuck out of him!"

Maybe in fucking Somalia that's acceptable but we're kinda trying to have a civilization over here.
 
I don't know why beating the fuck out of someone is the standard response or considered acceptable after being called a derogatory name. Among civilized people it typically stops at an argument and someone being told to fuck off.

"He said the N-word! That meant it was absolutely necessary for a group of us to immediately run over and beat the fuck out of him!"

Maybe in fucking Somalia that's acceptable but we're kinda trying to have a civilization over here.

It's black fragility. Sufferers cherish it. It's why they'll never accept the idea of self-actualization or independence. If they are a victim, they always have someone to blame for their actions. If they are treated as equals, they are burdened with responsibilities they are psychologically unable to bear.
 
If our roles were reversed I get the feeling that none of these particular black people would risk life and limb to try to save me and my people and stop injustice. They look like they quite enjoy being slave masters.

Enslaving White people is their ENTIRE goal. And nothing less.
 
I don't know why beating the fuck out of someone is the standard response or considered acceptable after being called a derogatory name. Among civilized people it typically stops at an argument and someone being told to fuck off.

"He said the N-word! That meant it was absolutely necessary for a group of us to immediately run over and beat the fuck out of him!"

Maybe in fucking Somalia that's acceptable but we're kinda trying to have a civilization over here.
Because rap music is our culture.
 
That's some legitimate thunk provoking stuff. I will say I didn't grow up in the ridiculous Bible anti-science side of screeching
I didn't either, but since the latest anti-Christian run happened so much online I've seen a lot of the remnants. Someone mentioned earlier that Reddit fedora athiests are the last vestige of that transitory time, which is right. The whole "Athiesm+" debacle is rarely mentioned, but basically laid the structural groundwork for current SJWs, complete with some thot claiming a guy raped her because he hit on her and she didn't like it.

About psychiatry, it's also good to read actual history surrounding LGB rights, instead of listening to modern queer theory-type faggots. Turing being trannified by a court of law for instance is genuinely one of the most horrifying civil rights violations in the developed world, and was a direct result of puritan "decency" laws and fundamentalists beginning to infest the medical system to attempt shit like "curing homosexuality" in the first place.
Ironically, Christian powers have historically been pro-tranny, since they 'proved' the theories about gays being biologically backwards. I.E. "This woman used to be a gay man, but look! We fixed him to be a straight 'she'!"
Lumping T into LGB was a result of both that and people confusing transvestites (who the T is ACTUALLY for) with sufferers of neurological gender disorders.

To pivot back towards race, religious fanaticists have also routinely used race as bait, when it's been a hot social topic. The best, most extreme example is probably Mormons genuinely believing niggers are black because they're full of spiritual sin, which, on top of being hilarious, is the only time I'm aware a Christian sect has ingrained at-the-time-modern race relations into their actual beliefs.
Sometimes they've said blacks are more easily possessed by demons, or have more sin because their genetic roots in African paganism, and must be saved through work for the Church. Most Christian powers over the last century, consequently, have tried instead to recruit blacks as their own voterbase. Obviously, it didn't work, but they really did try.
A good, concrete example is how, in the 1970's, there was a very astroturfed push for "hippy Christianism" while the tide was turning toward 80's conservatism. Not much media was produced around it because that's, as mentioned, generally not how fundies in power do things, but the musicals "Godspell" and "Joseph and the Amazing Technicolour Dreamcoat" came out around then; to show those civil rights types that Jesus was a hep cat who was all for the equality, my man. This is where "rappin' for Jesus" style autism generally comes from, and it had a slight revival in the 90's with the rise of sanitized hiphop.
This kind of stuff is also, ironically, where most SJW talking points about "JESUS WAS A BLACK MAN" and "JESUS WAS AN ACTIVIST" come from: Christians trying to make belief fashionable to convert the progressive youth. A big push is often that Jesus and God are in the eye of the beholder, so there's lots of great 1970's paintings of Black Jeezus out there if you look for them.

What all of this is to say, is that we're obviously on the very cusp of the tide shifting again. In 2036, we'll probably all be sitting here bitching about Pastor-Judges trying to ban Animal Crossing because players can draw upside-down crosses on their clotes, and the new sect of Christianity with all-tradwife tranny priests that depicts Jesus as the Rarest Pepe Of Them All.
Meanwhile Punk will actually become counterculture again, and all the Marvel movies will be about saving black kids from being dipped in bleach to make them white and cleanse them of sin. It'll be hilarious and I'm excited for the sequel to that Mormon creationist cartoon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back