- Joined
- May 18, 2014
Slightly off topic question but who do you think was the Jeb of the democratic primaries? I would think Bloomberg for just how much fucking money he pumped into his campaign to no avail
Beta O Rourke
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Slightly off topic question but who do you think was the Jeb of the democratic primaries? I would think Bloomberg for just how much fucking money he pumped into his campaign to no avail
I don't know who Jeb is. I do know who Jeb! is though.Slightly off topic question but who do you think was the Jeb of the democratic primaries? I would think Bloomberg for just how much fucking money he pumped into his campaign to no avail
That second one actually sounds tantalizing. Never really thought about it that way.Honestly this
>Trump win
People radicalize further after Trump squeaks out a win and you get 2016-2020 on steroids; Massive backlash in 2024 leads to the 8 years of pent up rage being inflicted on America causing the country to start self-cannibalizing.
>Biden win
Neoliberals try and fail to get their mob under control and the country starts self-cannibalizing even faster than with the Trump Victory, though only by 4 years and for all I know that is being optimistic about the results of a Trump victory.
Either way, the ultimate result is the same.
I don't know who Jeb is. I do know who Jeb! is though.
I would say the Jeb! of the Dem primaries was Kamala. Establishment backed politician, initially well funded but blew through it quickly, dropped out early, murdered on the debate stage.
Nah, they were never quite this batshit crazy. Remember, those people are still around. Nancy Pelosi would have been 29 during Woodstock.
Looks like Biden isn't consolidating in New York either. He's actually doing worse than in Pennsylvania.The only silver lining is that Biden is not winning unanimously even with Bernie endorsing him.
With all the Progressive wins last night (thankfully the Republicans held their seats), can we consider that support is not quite consolidating behind 'moderate' Biden, and that the Democrats are still fractured?Looks like Biden isn't consolidating in New York either. He's actually doing worse than in Pennsylvania.
Why WOULD moderate Dems be energised this time? To a moderate, getting excited for the Democrats means getting excited for your heritage revoked, your towns on fire, and riotous college students telling you that you suck (and going unpunished).With all the Progressive wins last night (thankfully the Republicans held their seats), can we consider that support is not quite consolidating behind 'moderate' Biden, and that the Democrats are still fractured?
It's clear that even if elected, Biden would be backed with a progressive Democratic Congress that we’d need to deal with- a Trojan horse scenario.
Brad Parscale is only there because he is a yes man. Only Trump can win this election based on his personality and economy at this stage. I just learned there are new smaller websites being created in response to Big Tech fucking over conservatives each passing day from this website. So there are some still willing to fight. As for the Bernie Bros, either they stay home or vote for Trump out of spite because as much as they hate Trump, they hate the neo shitliberals and Biden even harder. And Kamala Harris is heavily hated by them. Trump needs the independent vote in his favor for the win or hope there is depression in the vote.Recent polls- Biden still ahead by a lot in the popular vote, beyond the white male contingent Trump has. That being said, polls are only as good as the day they're taken on, and I definitely still think there's a 'shy Trump' contingent out there.
Takeaway- most normies are still consooming legacy media (very few on Twitter), and have only seen recent events from the establishment's preferred viewpoint- they aren't really see the true extent of the degeneracy on Twitter. Economy is still in the dumps, and the national mood is dour from recent events.
Trump doesn't have the ability of surprise in 2020, as an incumbent, and as liberal tech has progressively strangled off conservative voices. A voter contingent of deranged anti-Trump voters has also formed, which will need to be considered. Trump has around 5 months to get the economy up and running and to restart his electoral machine.
Biden, on the other hand, might as well be considered the 'generic Democratic candidate' considering his handlers' strategy of hiding him away- if he emerges and shoots off his mouth once more, his numbers could very much drop. Biden still also has the VP consideration to utilize, though I strongly believe that it'll be Kamala Harris to target swing states, suburban women, and blacks.
Trump needs to be fighting as if he's 20 points behind, and devise a mail-in ballot strategy + an EC strategy. I wonder if any of his 2016 strategists are working with him again, beyond Parscale? There are also the debates to be looking forward towards, but I think they'll try to get Biden out of those using Coronavirus as an excuse.
View attachment 1402912
Basically got to keep the secret ballot alive and stop mail in voting for scenario 2 to work.The polls right now are a weird thing to read because they need context that depends on the eye test and on feel.
Scenario 1: Trump has badly mishandled the pandemic response, race relations and civil unrest, causing everyone on the margins to turn against him. The country would truly rather have a demented Biden controlled by unknown DNC operatives and lobbyists.
Result: Dip in Trump's approval and matchup numbers against Biden.
Scenario 2: The left is showing their inner fascism and authoritarianism by setting their own cities on fire, general lawlessness, cultural overreach and attacks on anyone who has even a neutral opinion of Trump. People on the margins, who unlike staunch Trump supporters, are unwilling to publicly voice their objections and subject themselves to harassment for a guy they generally feel ambivalent about. Though they are appalled at what they see from the Democrats, they go along and say the socially desirable things.
Result: Dip in Trump's approval and matchup numbers against Biden.
The end results of both scenarios look the same. So how do you know which one you're dealing with? You really don't know for sure. You're going in blind and have to go on feel. Do people blame Trump for shootings in CHAZ or Democrats?, etc. But the people in scenario 2 are not going to vote to give power to the people who would subject them to said harassment, and in the privacy of the voting booth will vote for Trump.
I know this risks sounding like the left where failures are actually signs of success, like with the trope, 'But we won the argument!' But right now you just can't take anything on its face.
I think we're in scenario 2. But if America is in fact in scenario 1, well then there are much, much bigger problems than Biden being elected.
I do agree that Trump actually needs to work to win the election, but I don't believe this poll frankly, the latest poll out of Michigan says something very different, for example. https://twitter.com/RobertCahaly/status/1275225950373007366Recent polls- Biden still ahead by a lot in the popular vote, beyond the white male contingent Trump has. That being said, polls are only as good as the day they're taken on, and I definitely still think there's a 'shy Trump' contingent out there who fears 'cancelling'.
Surface-level Takeaway- many normies are still consooming legacy media (Twitter still has a low penetration in the US), and have only seen recent events from the establishment's preferred viewpoint- they aren't really see the true extent of the degeneracy happening. Economy is still in the dumps, and the national mood is dour from recent events.
Trump doesn't have the ability of surprise in 2020, as an incumbent, and as liberal tech has progressively strangled off conservative voices. A voter contingent of deranged anti-Trump voters has also formed, which will need to be considered. Trump has around 5 months to get the economy up and running and to restart his electoral machine.
Biden, on the other hand, might as well be considered the 'generic Democratic candidate' considering his handlers' strategy of hiding him away- if he emerges and shoots off his mouth once more, his numbers could very much drop. Biden still also has the VP consideration to utilize, though I strongly believe that it'll be Kamala Harris to target swing states, suburban women, and blacks.
Trump needs to be fighting as if he's 20 points behind, and devise a mail-in ballot strategy + an EC strategy. This election will be fought out of the swing states. I wonder if any of his 2016 strategists are working with him again, beyond Parscale? There are also the debates to be looking forward towards, but I think they'll try to get Biden out of those using Coronavirus as an excuse.
View attachment 1402912
Biden's lead is likely being overestimated, by how much is unclear.But some pollsters, especially the relatively few who conduct surveys in battleground states, are still grappling with the problems that plagued those polls four years ago. In fact, most pollsters believe that, on balance, state polls are overstating the scale of Biden’s advantage.
That was precisely the problem in 2016: The national polls were largely accurate, to within the margin of error. But there were too few state polls, and many of those that were conducted failed to collect accurate data, especially from white voters without college degrees in key swing states.
And those issues haven’t been fixed.
“I would say that most, if not all, of the concerns that we expressed still hold — some to a lesser degree,” said Courtney Kennedy, director of research at the Pew Research Center and lead author of the polling industry’s post-2016 autopsy. “But I think some of the fundamental, structural challenges that came to a head in 2016 are still in place in 2020.”
Is there any incentive ever to be truthful to a pollster? Especially in this climate of cancelling people over the tiniest bullshit?I do agree that Trump actually needs to work to win the election, but I don't believe this poll frankly, the latest poll out of Michigan says something very different, for example. https://twitter.com/RobertCahaly/status/1275225950373007366
Moreover, I have no fucking idea what methodology the quoted poll is using either, what turnout level is being assumed, what the weighting is, whether it's a poll of registered voters or likely voters.
Unless its a anonymous poll, I would say no. Only poll I would be truthful on is the polls sent to me from the GOP directly if I will vote or not and other stuff, since I have registered with them and have a interest in them getting elected over all these fucktards.Is there any incentive ever to be truthful to a pollster? Especially in this climate of cancelling people over the tiniest bullshit?
Agree on this point, but I think the situation is a bit fuzzier, and contain elements of both scenarios- hence the difficulty of making an accurate call.The polls right now are a weird thing to read because they need context that depends on the eye test and on feel.
Scenario 1: Trump has badly mishandled the pandemic response, race relations and civil unrest, causing everyone on the margins to turn against him. The country would truly rather have a demented Biden controlled by unknown DNC operatives and lobbyists.
Result: Dip in Trump's approval and matchup numbers against Biden.
Scenario 2: The left is showing their inner fascism and authoritarianism by setting their own cities on fire, general lawlessness, cultural overreach and attacks on anyone who has even a neutral opinion of Trump. People on the margins, who unlike staunch Trump supporters, are unwilling to publicly voice their objections and subject themselves to harassment for a guy they generally feel ambivalent about. Though they are appalled at what they see from the Democrats, they go along and say the socially desirable things.
Result: Dip in Trump's approval and matchup numbers against Biden.
The end results of both scenarios look the same. So how do you know which one you're dealing with? You really don't know for sure. You're going in blind and have to go on feel. Do people blame Trump for shootings in CHAZ or Democrats?, etc. But the people in scenario 2 are not going to vote to give power to the people who would subject them to said harassment, and in the privacy of the voting booth will vote for Trump.
I know this risks sounding like the left where failures are actually signs of success, like with the trope, 'But we won the argument!' But right now you just can't take anything on its face.
I think we're in scenario 2. But if America is in fact in scenario 1, well then there are much, much bigger problems than Biden being elected.