What a lot of you might not understand is that "Whiteness" and "Blackness" exists on more than just the level of skin color. The left has this crypto-racial ideology they never outwardly state but Whiteness is just all the bad things in the world and Blackness is the good things.
When I took Black Studies, and boy that was an experience, you had them basically draw a table with the "White European worldview" and "African Black Worldview" or something roughly along those lines. Well, guess what fell under where on the table? Altruism, cooperation, matrilineal family lines, gender equality, SOCIALISM, etc. Whiteness as cold harsh wintery survival of the fittest, capitalism, warfare, etc etc. Feminists do the same thing with Male worldview and Female worldview, or did at once point.
To them Whiteness originates or derives from white heritage or skin but is an entire edifice of evil.
Most of you have a good grasp of this stuff of course but I don't think many of you realize just how deep and kooky this ideology goes, and like scientology, the deeper people fall the weirder the beliefs get, to the point where the real inner academic brainwork is completely looney tunes while the footsoldier doing their bidding may not personally believe the same scripture as the higher ups formulating the theory and doing the ideological groundwork do. An example of this is the outward rejection of science, specifically empiricism (and this was literally another thing associated with Whiteness on the above-mentioned sheet--intuition and tradition being the African worldview!) and science, to the point where they will reject the entire institution of science as a White institution that must be "decolonized," e.g., totally modified to destroy empiricism and the centuries-long work of (supposedly) white philosophers that privileged the "White" perspective. (So if you are a black man promoting this stuff you are still an embodiment of Whiteness).
I really need to make a big long effort post about it or something. Nobody had really revealed the entirety of the monster, and those that have seen it have underestimated it. The Sokal Hoax was sort of fun but that kind of stuff isn't actually delving into the ideology of these people at its most fundamental.
Want to see what I mean? I'm going to add more to this post in a longer effort post, for now here's the first result I found on Google:
Note, string theory is itself controversial, and they don't accurately represent it and many scientists have made this very criticism of it, which they are trying to imply that scientists are not always using empiricism--which means surely it's not really empiricism, right? They are trying to say the claims of black women deserve less scrutiny because "white" empirical science's scrutiny devalues the claims of the black women--nevermind that the claims of a person or even a group are solid evidence of anything, interpretation of an event is not the same thing as understanding, and seeing is not the same thing as knowing. Just look at Einsteinian Relativity.
A few random articles and tidbits:
ABSTRACT. Colonization and decolonization are common concepts within the discourse of Indigenous scholars and show significance within the recently emerging Na
academic.oup.com
(transcribed by me)
The debate regarding the relationship between science and development, and the role of indigenous knowledges in Africa is very controversial. Arguments for or against the use of indigenous knowledge...
link.springer.com
So yeah, they're content to mislead and lie about statistics and science and such. Give it a bit longer and we won't be even having THAT discussion.
In summary, does social justice at its little core after being unwrapped reject science? Absolutely. This is the Xenu OTIII level of social justice and it's scary. There's so much more to be said, to get into, to understand than this big post in a big thread that people will pass over. None of the heroes, be it Peter Boghossian or Alan Sokal or anyone else has really delved into their bullshit deep and publicly expose the assumptions and mentality at the core of the social justice movement. If any of you want to help, have a keen head on your shoulders, and some academic background and want to go through their shit to get some real expose put out there please PM me.
