Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

Since Labelle hasn't been posting comics or even posters masquerading as comics since the states is sad so the canadian living in finland can't work surrounded by such chaos, I wanna address a classic that I've seen make a resurgence on some feeds:
View attachment 1392745

Every one who reads here knows that Labelle and their ilk loves to push the idea that not wanting to date a trans person makes you transphobic, that's not even a debate anymore.
It's gotten to the point where, after being called out on it they don't even deny it, they just belittle the people who pointed it out (once again attempting to use shame to pressure you into accepting something sexual that you're not comfortable with.

View attachment 1392802

View attachment 1392803

View attachment 1392804

View attachment 1392805

View attachment 1392807

(He's saying he's gay, Labelle, and that he's not into women. You had a dick and look like a dude, he's respecting your gender despite the fact that you clearly don't pass, you slug.)

I've ranted about my hatred for predators using social pressure and shaming to guilt people into sexual situations they're not comfortable with, so don't worry, this won't just be a rehash of that.

What I want to do today is give people the tools to fight against this kind of "logic" when faced with it without risking their status as an open minded individual.

I know most of us here don't have to worry about it, but sometimes when confronted head on it's easy to get flustered and going in to life prepared to protect your body and sense of comfort is paramount.

SO!

The original argument that came forward was pretty simple (but stupid)
"If you say you like women, that includes trans women, if you like men then also trans men, you're a transphobe otherwise."

That's how we got to the "discussion" about preferences, which even Sophie "Too straight to ever date a woman" Labelle couldn't even backtrack out of. The solution was obvious though, having preferences is now transphobic.

View attachment 1392851

(actually a lot of people who want to have kids in their future do...)

This of course is very illogical and confusing since transwomen in particular are trying to argue that lesbians should just accept their dicks, which is very scary and homophobic.
For more information on this revolting phenomena, look up the term "cotton ceiling" which was coined by transwomen to make themselves feel victimized by lesbians not wanting a hard dicking.



Oh look, they out and out admit that they're victimized specifically because you won't have sex with them.
Oppressed because women won't sleep with them, my god, why does that sound so familiar?


View attachment 1392890

History lesson over, so what do you do when faced with this?

Smart money says get new friends, yours are obviously insane but internet culture sometimes leaks into our real lives and can have real consequences if you're not prepared.
You tell them you don't find transpeople attractive then you're screeched at "that you can't even tell a transwoman from a cis woman" refusing to believe that just because there are exceptions to every rule, doesn't mean the rule is moot.

But I've finally found, and tested, an answer that seems to let us slide through these tricky minefields. See, they're playing a game you're not supposed to be able to win, since they have the trump card of just calling you a bigot and then twisting everything in retellings of the convo until it evolves into you literally stabbing them in the throat while misgendering everyone in the room.
The trick is to forget about all the concrete stuff that makes us attractive to one another, don't talk about looks or dicks or fat content or anything. You need to keep it nebulous. You need to talk about how you wouldn't date someone fat/homeless/trans/whatever you're not attracted to because they'd be incompatible with you lifestyle.

"I would never date a transperson because I just don't think I'm stable enough to give them the support and attention they deserve."
"I would never date a transperson because I'm afraid my own body dismorphia would be too constantly triggering for them and I'd make them miserable."
"I would never date a transperson because I'm constantly questioning my own gender but not ready to explore it and I'm afraid I'd become hateful towards how out and brave and beautiful they are."
"I would never date a trans person because my family is incredibly toxic and unaccepting and the idea of dragging someone I love into that situation would be too much for me to bear, but I could never ditch my fam because love them, as flawed as they are."
"I would never date a transperson because I'm not brave enough to face the world like they are, I'm not strong enough to survive in this transphobic world and they deserve someone who can stand strong by their side."

Imagine what a DICK someone would have to be to try and counter that shit? And if they do they'd have to pull out some wild hypothetical about you meeting the most stable, passing transperson in the entire world who lifts you above all else and is a paragon of love blah blah blah. Try to resit rolling your eyes and saying "well yeah and if I won the lotto I'd buy a fucking castle but let's talk odds here." and instead, again, massage that ego
"Oh I could never go out with someone that perfect, it'd be too intimidating. I'm pretty flawed and can really only be comfortable with compatibly flawed people."
Or some such shit.
And this works for all of Labelle's dumb shit "preferences are for bigots" crap.
Fat? "My place would be way too small for her to be comfortable in, it wouldn't be fair." or "I'd never want to restrict his lifestyle but having the kinds of foods he likes when we're together would just trigger my past eating disorder."
Wrong Genitals? Try to resist pointing out that no, those oozing, bleeding, malformed neo-vaginas and those permanently semi-erect horror hotdogs are not attractive to you, since that is also somehow transphobic (although somehow also stating you wouldn't date a cis-person with unnatural looking breasts due to enhancements isn't discrimination because fixing their body dismorphia was an "option" for them) and instead say that you need a fertile partner since having you and your partner share in creating a life is hella important to you and the adoption or fertility routes are just too expensive, long and painful for you to endure.
Or if you're gay, tell them that you've tried alternatives to your preferred for of pleasure (since they'll no doubt bring up sex toy alternatives) and you just don't get any pleasure from it, no matter how much you care about your partner, and that you're too selfish to live a life abstaining, even in the face of true love.

Trust me, when you make it personal and about "lifestyle" you'll quickly find your detractors giving you a pass, especially if you can work in something about money or mental health, since those aren't issues a good SJW will suggest you just "get over" to suck some lady cock.

Rate me autistic, I'm okay with that but if this helps even one cornered person out of a tumbler induced social panic or painfully uncomfortable forced/pressured sexual situation it will be worth it.

Literally just tell them to fuck off, say you don't like them because you think they're ugly. Why play into the passive aggressive mindgames? Do you think that playing their game will make them stop? They're inherently manipulative people, they'll find a way to get in no matter what. Their method of attack is based on convoluted mind tricks, the only way to excise them is a firm and confident "no, fuck off".
 
Do you know JK Rowling is a TERF?
View attachment 1405521
And JK is a troon too!
View attachment 1405527
In denial
View attachment 1405533
View attachment 1405536
Can you imagine if JK trooned out?
All her sins would be forgiven for this people
 
Can you imagine if JK trooned out?
All her sins would be forgiven for this people
That would make her evil white man so no. If she went all non binary, maybe, but realistically no even then. This group actually all about purity and power. JK has shown none believe and she wasn't willing to beg forgivenes immediately publically so she cannot ever be pure again. Giving mercy to her after this isn't allowed so nothing will make this better outside them finding a new victim to crucify.
 
I mean I'm a guy so it might be different for women but if someone tells you they're interested in you and you turn them down it's awkward enough and they generally don't push it after you've made it clear.

Literally just tell them to fuck off, say you don't like them because you think they're ugly. Why play into the passive aggressive mindgames? Do you think that playing their game will make them stop? They're inherently manipulative people, they'll find a way to get in no matter what. Their method of attack is based on convoluted mind tricks, the only way to excise them is a firm and confident "no, fuck off".

Honestly, I wish everyone could just say no and it's the end but sadly we live in a world where rejecting unbalanced men can lead to harassment or even death.

tumblr_inline_ppstpyruDT1r6jgnt_500.png


If you've ever heard Chris Chan talk about the "infinitely high boyfriend factor" that causes all the pretty girls to be taken, it's because "I have a boyfriend" is actually the safest way to say no to a man. And yes, there are some guys out there that can just take a "no" and walk away, there are a TON that demand to know why you don't want to "give them a chance" and without a suitable line, well, every link above is unique so you can see the results for yourself.

Couple this with the fact that we live in a world where anything that an undefined group of people deem "transphobic" can get your called out, cancelled or even fired from your job, sometimes people just can't say "fuck off".

So I just want to be able to give people options for when they're cornered by trans logic they can walk away safely.

I don't like it, and I totally agree with you guys that anyone should be able to say fuck off without risking their job, their safety or their reputation but very sadly it's just not the world we live in right now.
 
Honestly, I wish everyone could just say no and it's the end but sadly we live in a world where rejecting unbalanced men can lead to harassment or even death.

View attachment 1408751

If you've ever heard Chris Chan talk about the "infinitely high boyfriend factor" that causes all the pretty girls to be taken, it's because "I have a boyfriend" is actually the safest way to say no to a man. And yes, there are some guys out there that can just take a "no" and walk away, there are a TON that demand to know why you don't want to "give them a chance" and without a suitable line, well, every link above is unique so you can see the results for yourself.

Couple this with the fact that we live in a world where anything that an undefined group of people deem "transphobic" can get your called out, cancelled or even fired from your job, sometimes people just can't say "fuck off".

So I just want to be able to give people options for when they're cornered by trans logic they can walk away safely.

I don't like it, and I totally agree with you guys that anyone should be able to say fuck off without risking their job, their safety or their reputation but very sadly it's just not the world we live in right now.

So...why not just use that line for all situations instead of making a completely new one? It seem like a lot less effort than whatever you where going for earlier. Which was basically just its-not-you-its-me anyway.
 
So...why not just use that line for all situations instead of making a completely new one? It seem like a lot less effort than whatever you where going for earlier. Which was basically just its-not-you-its-me anyway.

I don't really want to continue this conversation too far since it's getting pretty deep off topic but it's a bluff that only really works with strangers who have no means to find out otherwise and that you'll never run into again whereas these kinds of "arguments" tend to pop up on social media, where your martial status can be verified and wrong think can get your crucified.
It's actually really great that you guys can question the need for such excuses because it means you've never been in that situation and/or can't forsee a time when you'd need it.
And maybe no one will! That would actually be fantastic!
But in case anyone does, it's there.

Now to get us back on track, who wants to bet we never actually find out what happens to Granny Covid?
This is a reminder of that, uh, "plot line" from well over a month ago. Talk about cliff hangers!

97788090_1444658589049734_1339827602176606208_o.jpg
 
Now to get us back on track, who wants to bet we never actually find out what happens to Granny Covid?
This is a reminder of that, uh, "plot line" from well over a month ago. Talk about cliff hangers!

View attachment 1409144
Knowing Labelle’s unwillingness to actually write anything other than propaganda, the character dies off the page.and we’ll learn about this in the comments section of an unrelated Facebook post. Maybe Ciel will casually mention his grandma’s funeral in a strip.
 
Now to get us back on track, who wants to bet we never actually find out what happens to Granny Covid?
This is a reminder of that, uh, "plot line" from well over a month ago. Talk about cliff hangers!

View attachment 1409144
Ciel’s brother in this comic fucking kills me.
Panel one: Dad wants to talk, better crawl over to him like a stripper.
Panel two: Time to sit down in papa’s lap.
Panel three: Oops, papa’s getting a stiffy so better hop off his lap.
Panel four: Well okay, maybe just a little footjob... Wait, what? I was too busy writhing around in your lap like a spastic to listen to what you were saying. Grandma’s cool, right?
 
Ciel’s brother in this comic fucking kills me.
Panel one: Dad wants to talk, better crawl over to him like a stripper.
Panel two: Time to sit down in papa’s lap.
Panel three: Oops, papa’s getting a stiffy so better hop off his lap.
Panel four: Well okay, maybe just a little footjob... Wait, what? I was too busy writhing around in your lap like a spastic to listen to what you were saying. Grandma’s cool, right?
And Ciel is increasingly horrified at what his brother is doing.
 
If you've ever heard Chris Chan talk about the "infinitely high boyfriend factor" that causes all the pretty girls to be taken, it's because "I have a boyfriend" is actually the safest way to say no to a man.
Only someone completely autistic would take it at face value rather than a polite turn down.
If she wants you, she won't mention the boyfriend.
 
Those "disability alternative metaphors" are retarded. No one with any of those disabilities are offended by those terms. Like my blind friend. If I placated to him like that or posted shit like that he would stop talking to me. The fact I call him a blind bastard and laugh when he cant find my house when it's dark out makes us better friends honestly, love the guy.

And Sophie trying to explain in French how the name "Karen" isnt offensive or mysogynistic because it only signifies how white women have a special defined place in white supremacy is also hilarious.
 

Poorly timed? That is classism.
Wild? You mean the synonym for "uncivilized"? A term used by colonialism to describe the "wild Indian", the "wild African"? How white supremacist of you.
Incapacitate? To make something incapable? Are you implying that differently abled people arn't just as capable as everyone else?

I can't believe this racist, classiest, abalist nonsense being thrown around on facebook without getting taken down.

Where's your boyfriend?
View attachment 1414081

Why so much rants today? Is it Walautism Night?

I like how the infographic has one of the stick figure's crotches Xed out to represent 5%
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Norman B. Normal
I like how the infographic has one of the stick figure's crotches Xed out to represent 5%
Ohhhh is THAT what that is supposed to show? I read it three times and stared at the graphic and couldn't work out what the fuck. It looks like 8 men and 2 women, and all of the men and one of the women are marked "no genitals for you!" and the last woman is too socialized nice to say no. Bet she'll regret it after, though.
 

I really don't understand the point of, uh, "studies" like these. What's the actual goal of pointing out that no one wants to have sex with a certain fetish group other than to try and "raise awareness" aka validate victim hood and increase the ability to guilt others?
Yes, how you choose to dress, talk, act, conform to gender stereotypes, what you eat, how much you work out, where you live, what your job is and what you do in your free time will all effect who will or will not be interested in you sexually and romantically.
And yes it is always a choice, even if it's one compelled by dysmorphia or OCD. Your mental disorders may not be your fault but they are your responsibility and if you treat it with pills, routine or stealing your mom's underwear and heels will effect how you are seen and treated by others. It's not unfair that the person you like doesn't like you back because you let your dick swing out from under your skirt anymore than it's unfair that someone won't date you because you're not in the same country. You may not have chosen to be born and stuck in France while the person you like is in China, but if you're not willing to move there, to make the changes that would make you a partner worth considering, it's completely stupid to get angry at them for it or for not meeting you half way, especially since they're not interested in you in the first place.
And calling them racist for it just makes you look even stupider.
The same thing happens when you have a dick and want to date women. You can take off the wigs and stuffed bras and find a straight woman, or you can keep your ill fitting dresses and adam's apple covering chokers and
try to find and partner in the significantly smaller pool of women who are actually interested in "girl dick".
Going back to our distance example, You accept that you, in France, will have to find someone in China who wants a long distance relationship even if that significantly reduces your dating pool. It's not any form of "phobic" if they don't conform their preferences to your life choices.

I mean, how nuts would you have to be to want to actively punish people for not wanting to sex you because of how you were born?

download.jpg
 
Back