- Joined
- Aug 8, 2019
Do it if you want, I dont do super chats.
Nick Rekieta's Weeb Wars videos & livestreams - MULTIPLE SLURS
- Thread starter damian
- Start date
- Status
Do it if you want, I dont do super chats.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2019
I have two complaints.
1. Typos obviously.
2. The fact that they waited until basically the end of everything to bring up the whole thing about them charging for the deposition prep while both Ron and Monica said on the record that they weren't prepped.
I would have brought that up sooner because that's one of the clearest examples of something not adding up and by mentioning it earlier it puts the thought into the mind of whoever's reading so even if they're basically sleeping through the whole paper, the connotation of a deposition prep snafu will stand out each time the deposition is mentioned (even without pointing out that there was a snafu) which makes it more likely to be scrutinized further and not overlooked.
That's more of a personal thing though because when I'm writing documents I try to purposefully structure them in a way that an assertive statement stands out.
This is probably a shitty example of what I'm trying to explain but I look at it this way.
You want to present an idea the first time around as strongly as possible because even the most thorough of readers will likely gloss over parts without meaning to, so if you want something to stick you present it as a statement at first and then return to elaborate and the elaboration sticks because your reader is already interested in the subject and is anticipating what's coming.
1. Typos obviously.
2. The fact that they waited until basically the end of everything to bring up the whole thing about them charging for the deposition prep while both Ron and Monica said on the record that they weren't prepped.
I would have brought that up sooner because that's one of the clearest examples of something not adding up and by mentioning it earlier it puts the thought into the mind of whoever's reading so even if they're basically sleeping through the whole paper, the connotation of a deposition prep snafu will stand out each time the deposition is mentioned (even without pointing out that there was a snafu) which makes it more likely to be scrutinized further and not overlooked.
That's more of a personal thing though because when I'm writing documents I try to purposefully structure them in a way that an assertive statement stands out.
This is probably a shitty example of what I'm trying to explain but I look at it this way.
You want to present an idea the first time around as strongly as possible because even the most thorough of readers will likely gloss over parts without meaning to, so if you want something to stick you present it as a statement at first and then return to elaborate and the elaboration sticks because your reader is already interested in the subject and is anticipating what's coming.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2018
Superchatting faggots I hate:
1.) Nick, please take a drink for <insert pet name>/<insert relative no one cares about>. Assholes like you take the stream and do a fucking pity party, and your ass should be thrown into he ground under the casket.
2.) Sing this song in <insert person's name here>. You're not funny, kys.
3.) "In Lemoine voice" superchats. You're not funny, kys.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
2 and 3 were funny the first time. They weren't funny the 150th time.
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
I mean, they're not really that funny anymore, but the fact that people get so mad is still kinda funny. It's really a wash.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
I hate the ones who want their kick pay me for their dying/dead relatives plugged.
- Joined
- May 12, 2019
Will you give him $20 for every time he would have accepted one of these superchats? Pretty much our only option is to use that one browser extension that Null uses to report every time Jim Sterling inserts his pro-wrestling footage into his videos, and cut it out for subsequent viewers.
I guess this is a pretty good option too. If you guys are willing to put up the $20s to turn this retarded pity party shit, and the Lemoine voice into a meme, then people will be too embarrassed to contribute.
It's kind of like how the Chinese will sometimes hire strippers to increase the attendance at a family funeral.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2018
Or the ones that super chat, "If you want QUALITY content on X then hit up my channel with less than 25 subscribers!"
Steve Smyff
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2019
Doesn't this firm - Martinez Hsu have experience before these judges?
I would feel the same but I must continually remind myself I'm a layperson and a furriner ... Ty's deficient notarizations merited all of one sentence from Chupp, when I thought it would be way worse.
I would feel the same but I must continually remind myself I'm a layperson and a furriner ... Ty's deficient notarizations merited all of one sentence from Chupp, when I thought it would be way worse.
Steve Smyff
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2019
I still find them funny.
If I were ever awake at that time I might superchat
"flight of the bumblebee, a capella, in Lemoine voice".
or there used to be this cartoon from way back ...
in Lemoine voice
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2018
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Appeals aren't really like trial court. Trial lawyers are likely to spend months with the same judge, maybe hours at a time. Oral arguments are a one time thing in a case and very brief, usually an hour or even less. For instance, in an appeal of the church case (where Chupp got mandamus'd earlier in the case) also to the Second District, oral argument lasted only 39 minutes. That was arguably an even trickier case raising serious constitutional issues.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
With how things are going. I'm surprised they haven't dragged out the Blackface Lawyer thing again.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2020
Think they ran" Blackface Lawyer" into the ground then didnt Nick use it somehow and turn the tables on them?
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2019
When Nick didn't bend the knee begging for forgiveness at being "called out" for the blackface they gave up real quick.
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2019
It'll be brought back up again by the next batch of SJWs in some movement/controversy that Nick is commenting on.
Maddox's fans did, Anti-ComicsGate (the SJWs, not the CG apostates) did, and KickVic did.
I'm surprised Montagraph didn't and I can't remember if the Mountain Jews or Lillee Jean did, though.
Laundui_or_douchette?
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2019
The best part of Nick and the Drexel cosplay is that he owned it. He didn’t apologise, he laughed at them, asked why they found it to be racist and then brought on the guy who he cosplayed as and then he laughed at it.
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
"Never fucking apologize"
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2018
Any plug requests are so dumb. Especially for GoFundMes. He really should have a policy of not promoting stuff, IDK.
I also hate the autists who super chat a really dumb obscure reference to some nerd shit as if Nick is supposed to know it.
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
- Status