Dr. Disrespect permanently banned from Twitch - Turns out he was a groomer

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think if it was a #MeToo, then we'd have heard as much by now. Everyone being so hush-hush and not giving out any information does seem to indicate that there's a legal component to all this. Will be interesting to see what, if anything, comes out on Monday.

Exactly my thought, if it was a #MeToo thing someone would be cashing in on a metric shitton of victim points right now. Getting diddled by a top streamer would be an automatic podium finish in the oppression olympics.
 
People betting he's getting MeToo'd are retarded.
This guy raised and donated $50k to BLM just last week. He's not getting blapped by a metoo; he's a woke hypocrite who lauds the plight of the jogger while living in a gated community after joggers shot at his houses' windows, twice.
Plus he makes the spergs at Twitch and Amazon solid money and is one of the top streamers on the platform; Bezos is not giving that up just to please some troon.
Also, a MeToo is basically a struggle session; Twitch admins would've gone to social media and claimed the whys and hows of his ban and who he victimized. Them being silent strongly suggests this is a legal issue as Twitch's Jew Squad prepares to ruin Guy.

I doubt it's a criminal issue either; he would've been visited by the feds already.

The theory that he tried to undermine twitch and join up with other notable Streaming bigwigs while being under contract and thus violating his contract makes more sense.

However, the odd thing is that discord and several sponsors also distanced themselves from him. Perhaps it was done to prevent the anger of the Twitch soys?

I know why but I cannot say
What an attention-seeking faggot.
 
I bet there was no reason beyond "Someone at Twitch didn't like him."
I think there could be a reason, it's money.
He signed a new contract recently for Twatch and now the nice guys are coming back (Shroud and NInja), so that's the bestway to re-negotiate a contract.
Fire the guy and after a few days send in the contract lawyers.
So, that's my consiracy theory, yeah, I know it's not really a good one but still better than anything Quarterpounder came up with so far.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Moths and Draza
However, the odd thing is that discord and several sponsors also distanced themselves from him. Perhaps it was done to prevent the anger of the Twitch soys?

Discord and Twitch (allegedly) have a strong partnership. If a ban happens on Twitch, they'll be removed from the Discord affiliate program too.

Also worth noting that the ban was handed down by higher ups at Twitch, not their "Trust and Safety" crew that does the normal, day-to-day bans for TOS issues and the like. I believe this indicates that there's something much bigger going on.
 
I think if it was a #MeToo, then we'd have heard as much by now. Everyone being so hush-hush and not giving out any information does seem to indicate that there's a legal component to all this. Will be interesting to see what, if anything, comes out on Monday.

Exactly. If this involved sexual misconduct in any shape or form, the accuser would have taken to the Twitters first and foremost before any bans had taken place. In fact, the permaban would be a result of the supposed MeToo after it was declared by his victim.
 
I don't know why I give a shit about this but I do. I wonder if Beahm v Twitch shit will be filed tomorrow.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Basic Block
My nutcase mega-tism theory is this was a strategic move to distract from the allegations against Hassan. If that Vio chick can substantiate even 10% of what she alleged to have happened, Twitch is in seriously deep shit given she's alleging systemic violations of privacy and confidentiality, atop the sexual abuse and power abuse shit. That right there opens the doors to legal hell for Twitch, and a volcano of fuck on the PR front, all of which would be horrendously costly to fix even for an Amazon subsidy. Amazon doesn't fuck around when it comes to its fiscal bottom line, and they'd be more likely to go scorched earth on Twitch's staff and then some.

And if Hassan and his buddies go, so do the special protections for the Twitch thots. The thots may not have million-plus sub counts like the biggest streamers, but on the other hand they bring in enough bacon for Twitch that to enforce the rules would mean a monstrous hit to Twitch's revenue. And they go where they should have been all along -- camwhore sites -- taking their traffic and ad revenue with them, another big hit to Twitch's bottom line.

Remember what I said about Amazon not fucking around with its fiscal bottom line? that would be enough to get suits in Seattle asking some really uncomfortable questions about exactly what it is that goes on behind closed doors at one of their subsidies, let alone in the post-SESTA/FOSTA, post-COPPA ruling, internet content regulatory landscape. Not too many ways for a PR department even powerful as Amazon's can polish a turd that turtle heads with "legal minors can watch topless streamers".

So, enter our favorite streaming Richard Petty lookalike. He's already on multiple politically expedient shit lists, and does shady and edgelord shit that skirts if not runs afoul of the TOS all the time. Building a case he has violated TOS enough to constitute material breach of contract would be trivial for a legal team with the combined might of a trillion-dollar megacorp behind it. That's a trigger Twitch could pull at literally any time they wanted, so why now?

Even if ol' Herschel here fought it in civil court and by some miracle won, his payday would still be less than what Twitch stands to lose from having to deal with fallout from the Hassan shit. Meanwhile, this becomes the gaming news story of the week, and Hassan's allegations get quickly, quietly, and conveniently memory holed.
 
He's making a streaming service, it's a merger between two with a small companies called N1 Games/Generation Entertainment Recording Studios
I honestly think that he got banned from twitch because he may of signed a contract with a non conpeate clause with Amazon and that Amazon may of found out about the breach of contract, but that's just speculation.
 
My nutcase mega-tism theory is this was a strategic move to distract from the allegations against Hassan. If that Vio chick can substantiate even 10% of what she alleged to have happened, Twitch is in seriously deep shit given she's alleging systemic violations of privacy and confidentiality, atop the sexual abuse and power abuse shit. That right there opens the doors to legal hell for Twitch, and a volcano of fuck on the PR front, all of which would be horrendously costly to fix even for an Amazon subsidy. Amazon doesn't fuck around when it comes to its fiscal bottom line, and they'd be more likely to go scorched earth on Twitch's staff and then some.

And if Hassan and his buddies go, so do the special protections for the Twitch thots. The thots may not have million-plus sub counts like the biggest streamers, but on the other hand they bring in enough bacon for Twitch that to enforce the rules would mean a monstrous hit to Twitch's revenue. And they go where they should have been all along -- camwhore sites -- taking their traffic and ad revenue with them, another big hit to Twitch's bottom line.

Remember what I said about Amazon not fucking around with its fiscal bottom line? that would be enough to get suits in Seattle asking some really uncomfortable questions about exactly what it is that goes on behind closed doors at one of their subsidies, let alone in the post-SESTA/FOSTA, post-COPPA ruling, internet content regulatory landscape. Not too many ways for a PR department even powerful as Amazon's can polish a turd that turtle heads with "legal minors can watch topless streamers".

So, enter our favorite streaming Richard Petty lookalike. He's already on multiple politically expedient shit lists, and does shady and edgelord shit that skirts if not runs afoul of the TOS all the time. Building a case he has violated TOS enough to constitute material breach of contract would be trivial for a legal team with the combined might of a trillion-dollar megacorp behind it. That's a trigger Twitch could pull at literally any time they wanted, so why now?

Even if ol' Herschel here fought it in civil court and by some miracle won, his payday would still be less than what Twitch stands to lose from having to deal with fallout from the Hassan shit. Meanwhile, this becomes the gaming news story of the week, and Hassan's allegations get quickly, quietly, and conveniently memory holed.
What allegations against Hassan?
Also, who is Hassan?
lol
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Michael Jacks0n
We're building a new streaming platform, you in kid?
EbkEmV4UEAUviuf.jpg

also lmao at fucking hassan getting nailed, couldnt happen to a more deserving cuck
 
What allegations against Hassan?
Also, who is Hassan?
lol
Hassan Bokhari, he's a partner accounts manager/director/handler type guy at Twitch. Known creeper/stalker of women Twitch streamers, it's an open secret he's "the guy" for Twitch thots who need problems to go away, and it's long suspected he takes payment in trade if you know what I mean. Basically one of those people who it was only a matter of time before allegations surfaced, and time ran out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back