🐱 Conservatives flock to Parler—but its terms of service are just as strict at Twitter’s - “It’s a private business” etc

CatParty

Parler, a self-described anti-censorship social media platform, is growing in popularity among conservatives as an alternative to Twitter.


Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Thursday became Parler’s newest high-profile user and cited alleged political bias among the internet’s most prominent social media sites as his reason for joining.


“These are some of the most visited sites in the world. They’re run by left-wing Silicon Valley billionaires,” Cruz said on Twitter. “They have an unparalleled ability to shape what Americans see and hear and ultimately think. And they use that power to silence conservatives and promote their radical left-wing agenda.”

Parler bills itself as an “unbiased” service “which enables free expression without violence and a lack of censorship.”


Everyone from Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) to popular conservative commentator Dan Bongino have joined the site’s ranks in the past several days, prompted in part by Twitter taking action on President Donald Trump’s tweets.

But is Parler truly the bastion of free speech it claims to be?


That’s the question some are asking. A quick glance at Parler’s user agreement indicates the platform to be just as strict as any other.


For starters, Parler states that it reserves the right to delete any user’s content or entire profile at any time even if the terms of service have not been violated.


The site also explicitly bars the use of language or visuals “that describe or show sexual organs or activity.” Even content that is merely “sexual in nature” is listed as a violation. Likewise, any language or visuals deemed “morbid or degrading” are also prohibited.


Parler further states that it “never shares your personal data” while simultaneously noting that it “may share any information we receive with vendors and service providers.”


Even though platforms generally cannot be held liable for the content their users post under federal law, Parler lets its members know that they could end up footing the bill if the site is sued for something they post.

The Daily Dot reached out to Parler to inquire about its terms of service but did not receive a reply by publication time.


Another prominent user to recently join Parler is Logan Cook, formally known on Twitter as @CarpeDonktum.

Cook, a right-wing meme creator often retweeted by President Donald Trump, was permanently suspended from Twitter on Tuesday.


Conservatives cited the instance as yet another example of Twitter’s political bias. A Twitter spokesperson confirmed to the Daily Dot at the time that Cook’s removal was linked to a history of frequent copyright abuses.

While Cook has found a new home on Parler, the social media site also explicitly states that it will enforce copyright laws. Although Cook has argued that his creations are exempt due to fair use, it remains unclear how Parler will react to takedown notices.

Given its infancy, only time will tell whether Parler is able to fulfill its promise and bring users the free speech mecca they’re hoping for.
 
The thing is, if Trump did leave Twitter and joined another site, thousands of people would be forced to follow him. How many journalists built their careers around reporting on what he posts? How many people hang on every post he makes so they can jump in with some snotty quip? They live to hate him. They can't live without him. Trump is too big and outrageous to just ignore.
At first all of his reply guys would cheer then they’d follow because they need that catharsis they get from being able to make snotty replies to someone who won’t reply back or block them.
 

Free speech app Parler is already banning leftists
In the wake of several tech companies’ decision to crack down on President Donald Trump’s most controversial posts, conservatives are pivoting to free-speech app Parler.

Hoping to keep the site from becoming a right-wing echo chamber, CEO John Matze recently pleaded with liberals to hop on the app as well, plugging how it was free from censorship.

“We’re a community town square, an open town square, with no censorship,” Matze told CNBC. “If you can say it on the street of New York, you can say it on Parler.”

Unfortunately that appears not to be the case. Left-wingers who have joined the site in recent days are claiming they’ve already been banned.

Thor Benson a journalist (who, full disclosure, has written for the Daily Dot), made a parody account calling himself the Federalist. He got the boot.


A quick search on Twitter for “Parler banned” shows numerous others who said their accounts were deleted after signing up.

A popular account that pokes fun at Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), said they were banned as well.

Nunes himself has a Parler account.


Others online have similarly said they’ve been banned for both criticizing Parler and making parody accounts.


All of this should be of no surprise to anyone. Parler’s terms of service allow it to ban any user for any reason it wants.


While that’s well within its rights as a private company—something a number of conservatives miss when they criticize other tech giants—it doesn’t make it the free speech utopia it promises to be for all its users.
 
No Twitter alternative will really take off unless all the normies get fed up with Twitter. The first people to flock to these alternatives are the ones who are "too extreme" for Twitter. The user base becomes made up of mostly people like this so when your average person sees it full of people posting about the "jews" and what not, they are just gonna avoid it.
Even if we ignore the fact they collect your SIN if you become an ''influencer'', want an actual cell number, and the draconian TOS - If they get popular because of people bitching about "da joooz", its gonna get the bitchute issue where few will want to use it if they know their video could be posted on the front page between a reptilian conspiracy video and a video with a swastika thumbnail.

I'm calling it now though. This is just a honeypot designed to get people charged with ''hate speech''.
 
Yeah. That is not a good sign. Another good sign was them demanding a phone number to sign up. That is not going to happen guys.
Its pretty normal to ban people for stupid bitching and for faking Accounts. the Phone number is stupid, but every page tries that. there are free services for that.

They are trying very hard to be a less toxic twitter.
 
Ebw-2ORUYAQr8jd.png


lmao nah im good thanks
 
Leave it to boomers to pick quite possibly the worst alternative that will just be the same shit as Twitter, except with a slightly different demographic they pander to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CatParty

Free speech app Parler is already banning leftists
In the wake of several tech companies’ decision to crack down on President Donald Trump’s most controversial posts, conservatives are pivoting to free-speech app Parler.

Hoping to keep the site from becoming a right-wing echo chamber, CEO John Matze recently pleaded with liberals to hop on the app as well, plugging how it was free from censorship.

“We’re a community town square, an open town square, with no censorship,” Matze told CNBC. “If you can say it on the street of New York, you can say it on Parler.”

Unfortunately that appears not to be the case. Left-wingers who have joined the site in recent days are claiming they’ve already been banned.

Thor Benson a journalist (who, full disclosure, has written for the Daily Dot), made a parody account calling himself the Federalist. He got the boot.


A quick search on Twitter for “Parler banned” shows numerous others who said their accounts were deleted after signing up.

A popular account that pokes fun at Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), said they were banned as well.

Nunes himself has a Parler account.


Others online have similarly said they’ve been banned for both criticizing Parler and making parody accounts.


All of this should be of no surprise to anyone. Parler’s terms of service allow it to ban any user for any reason it wants.


While that’s well within its rights as a private company—something a number of conservatives miss when they criticize other tech giants—it doesn’t make it the free speech utopia it promises to be for all its users.
This site sounds like glownigger data mining shit. Ironically that's also likely why some of the retarded journos are getting banned for "parody accounts" since their account doesn't match their real IDs. Anyone would be retarded for going on that site, especially since it just looks like a glownigger knockoff of Minds.
 
I wish everyone bitching about Twitter would ditch twitter and go literally anywhere else, so twitter would die, but they're all too much of an egotist.

FTFY

And go figure that these idiots would run right into a new hellhole.
 

Free speech app Parler is already banning leftists
In the wake of several tech companies’ decision to crack down on President Donald Trump’s most controversial posts, conservatives are pivoting to free-speech app Parler.

Hoping to keep the site from becoming a right-wing echo chamber, CEO John Matze recently pleaded with liberals to hop on the app as well, plugging how it was free from censorship.

“We’re a community town square, an open town square, with no censorship,” Matze told CNBC. “If you can say it on the street of New York, you can say it on Parler.”

Unfortunately that appears not to be the case. Left-wingers who have joined the site in recent days are claiming they’ve already been banned.

Thor Benson a journalist (who, full disclosure, has written for the Daily Dot), made a parody account calling himself the Federalist. He got the boot.


A quick search on Twitter for “Parler banned” shows numerous others who said their accounts were deleted after signing up.

A popular account that pokes fun at Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), said they were banned as well.

Nunes himself has a Parler account.


Others online have similarly said they’ve been banned for both criticizing Parler and making parody accounts.


All of this should be of no surprise to anyone. Parler’s terms of service allow it to ban any user for any reason it wants.


While that’s well within its rights as a private company—something a number of conservatives miss when they criticize other tech giants—it doesn’t make it the free speech utopia it promises to be for all its users.
Seems like they found their core demographic.
 
Back