U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
LOL a black guy just told the protesters in KY "part of being organized is to not be in the park at 11pm, part of being organized is not to illegally block the streets every night, stop coming to the cops to being arrested"
A bit of powerlevel, but not everyone from kentucky is a fucking idiot. I swear. We tricked most of the niggers and liberals into moving into the cities and we have all the rural lakes and rivers and just wide open spaces to ourselves!
 
Most of the lesbians I've met are ugly man-hating bull dykes who try to pretend to be men, or they're 'weekend lesbians' that can't decide who they want to bump against any given day. The former are obviously unattractive and unlikable, the latter are usually obnoxious as fuck, mostly 'dyke out' for attention from their parents or bar-room patrons, and for some reason they're always named Crystal, Samantha or Stephanie. Don't know why on that last part but those names dramatically increase the likelihood of them appearing on the Springer Show or Maury Povich. Usually their face also looks like they got in a heated battle with a tackle box and lost.

Any time I've encountered a lesbian I've always noticed how god damned miserable they look. They always look like someone shit in their lunch pail. Even obnoxious camp gay guys are a delight compared to lesbians.
Some random jogger was on Fox News a few minutes ago debating about getting rid of July 4th in favor of Juneteenth with Horace Cooper and laughed at him, then told Horace to “learn his history.” Horace is a fellow at a think tank, multiple time author, and former constitutional law professor. That jogger knows better than him though! :story:

ETA: They‘re calling it a “birth of a new nation”.
View attachment 1424360
They can't even get a fucking semiquaver the right way round. I hope to fucking god - and as someone with loved ones who work frontline healthcare, I do not say this lightly - thet catch the virus take it home to their retard families and die in droves in the coming weeks
 
Why do you need a professor to tell you what to think about what you read?

Why does an electrician need to apprentice under a master electrician?
At one point in time professors could be guide and could give perspective. They could relate their own experiences in engaging with concepts and help you figure out what your approach should be.

It's true that, more often than not now, they want to lift your skull lid and pour their own opinions in. It shouldn't be that way, and it didn't use to be that way - not to the extent it is that way now, anyway.
 
Last edited:
Why does an electrician need to apprentice under a master electrician?
At one point in time professors could be guide and good give perspective. They could relate their own experiences in engaging with concepts and help you figure out what your approach should be.

It's true that, more often than not now, they want to lift your skull lid and pour their own opinions in. It shouldn't be that way, and it didn't use to be that way - not to the extent it is that way now, anyway.
I even had poli sci professors say "Okay so I am left leaning, if you think I am becoming too biased or think what Im saying is bullshit feel free to call me out"
 
Why does an electrician need to apprentice under a master electrician?
At one point in time professors could be guide and good give perspective. They could relate their own experiences in engaging with concepts and help you figure out what your approach should be.

It's true that, more often than not now, they want to lift your skull lid and pour their own opinions in. It shouldn't be that way, and it didn't use to be that way - not to the extent it is that way now, anyway.
There's a right way to wire a house for safety. There isn't a right way to think about the Iliad.
 
There's a right way to wire a house for safety. There isn't a right way to think about the Iliad.
Not totally true, there are people both college educated and not who will some how try to turn it in to some feminist anti man thing.
Like how "To Kill a Mockingbird" is now about "a white man who defends a rapist and humiliates a rape survivor in the court of law"
even though that is not what is about at all, and how you need to question accusations to find the truth and do the right thing even if it is at great risk to you.
 
I even had poli sci professors say "Okay so I am left leaning, if you think I am becoming too biased or think what Im saying is bullshit feel free to call me out"
I had, of all classes, a sociology professor who didn't buy all that field's SJW lunacy. She would acknowledge all opinions and seemed truly fair and unbiased.
For example, on the question on women in traditionally-male professions such as firefighters, she even said "discriminating between is not necessarily discriminating against".

EDIT: now that I remember, she's the one who redpilled me on the Trayvon Martin shitshow, how the news reported on ZimZam saying "he's black" while concealing the fact that he said that on response to the police dispatcher asking for a description.
 
Last edited:
Not totally true, there are people both college educated and not who will some how try to turn it in to some feminist anti man thing.
Like how "To Kill a Mockingbird" is now about "a white man who defends a rapist and humiliates a rape survivor in the court of law"
even though that is not what is about at all, and how you need to question accusations to find the truth and do the right thing even if it is at great risk to you.
disagree. I'm a big proponent of "death of the artist." Also, you'd have to be too stupid to teach to believe that interpretation of a kids book about the dignity of all humans
 
There's a right way to wire a house for safety. There isn't a right way to think about the Iliad.

True, but it's valuable to know what others have thought in the past. That's why the Western canon isn't dispensable. There are some thorough autodidacts out there, but most people need a guide.

After all, an apprentice could just read manuals and codes books, right? If there's just one right way to wire a house it shouldn't be too difficult to specify it in writing.
 
Why does an electrician need to apprentice under a master electrician?
At one point in time professors could be guide and good give perspective. They could relate their own experiences in engaging with concepts and help you figure out what your approach should be.

It's true that, more often than not now, they want to lift your skull lid and pour their own opinions in. It shouldn't be that way, and it didn't use to be that way - not to the extent it is that way now, anyway.
That is very true, in the past it used to be about teaching a subject as best as possible to your students, so that one day they can pass on the knowledge that you were given, and have at-least, one of them presume your own field, with there own ideas.

Modern Professors are corrupt in that the only thing they want to pass on, is there political and often radical and weird ideas, and its really hurting Colleges and Universities.
 
True, but it's valuable to know what others have thought in the past. That's why the Western canon isn't dispensable. There are some thorough autodidacts out there, but most people need a guide.

After all, an apprentice could just read manuals and codes books, right? If there's just one right way to wire a house it shouldn't be too difficult to specify it in writing.
If you were able to follow the manuals and codes perfectly that would be fine, but people can't do that.
There are books analyzing classics. Also, there is no issue with people being inspired by classics or philosophy in divergent ways.
 
There's a right way to wire a house for safety. There isn't a right way to think about the Iliad.
To a point there is. If you are discussing literature, you need to at least know the synopsis and key characters. You can’t make that stuff up. When it comes to the rest, a good professor will judge your reasoning skills and how well you back up your claims (it’s pretty much training in rhetoric, which is important if you want to do law and/or politics). That said, some professors get caught up in “what to think” rather than “how to think”. If a professor is more interested in you learning new ways of thinking rather than pushing their opinions onto you, they are of good quality. Training in reading literature (especially old literature) can be quite difficult and it requires some skills that may not be as obvious to others.
 
Jews often don't know whether they qualify as white because Ashkenazim look white and have significant amounts of European ancestry. Even goyim can't agree on whether they count as white.
View attachment 1424125
And that's not getting into the fact that even Jews can't agree on what counts as a Jew.. there are groups that say you're not a Jew if your Jew ancestry comes from your father's side of the family, for instance. It's very confusing for everyone.
And that is why it is stupid to even give a fuck about shit like skin color, race, religion.

It is confusing, tiring and takes to much time to figure out who is what. There is plenty of reasons to hate everyone without having to go through the hoops of "MUH JEWS"
 
The guy is now lecturing them on what "unlawful assembly is"
I like this guy.

https://www.facebook.com/chris.rocc/videos/3144470638946943/ has the guy on stream.
He and some other organizers also encouraged protesters to gather in groups of three and practice social distancing to avoid violating state pandemic and anti-riot laws. Clever. Of course, these efforts were met with some asshole yelling about how pointless it all was and how the cops would fuck them all up anyway, but it was a nice try. We'll see as the night goes on how successful they are at keeping the peace.
 
There are books analyzing classics. Also, there is no issue with people being inspired by classics or philosophy in divergent ways.
Some times those books are bullshit, there have been books written about history, the classics, etc that were 100% pure bullshit, much like some college profs.

The thing is some people engage and learn more when in an active discussion between student and teacher then just reading.
 
And that is why it is stupid to even give a fuck about shit like skin color, race, religion.

It is confusing, tiring and takes to much time to figure out who is what. There is plenty of reasons to hate everyone without having to go through the hoops of "MUH JEWS"
They go to it, cause its the easiest thing to hate, something about someone is different and its something all of us are kinda hard wired to react to something weird with mostly hostility or fear, so they don't even bother and just point and say, "cause there jews" and thats it.
 

1593746344821.png


That's a DSA front organization. One of several running in LA that are dedicated to squatting and the removal of property rights for landlords.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back