Inactive Richard "Lowtax" Kyanka - Deadbeat (emphasis on "Dead") founder of Something Awful, forced out of his own community, on his second divorce, stuck his dick in crazy, "Birth Giver"

Pointless Pedant said:
There's a link between autism and troonery that probably explains it, but troons are basically 13/52 for online autism. They're less than 1% of the population but they're everywhere online. Even this site has a small handful of them, though not so many because it's right leaning.
Click to expand...

I strongly suspect many of these troons are online only and rarely if ever troon it up in public.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Humpty hump, tantric_depressive, I don't like jews and 12 others
These are Lowtax's messages to Mandy. They never seem to have been uploaded here so I will do it:

1593810733048.png 1593810749197.png 1593810767028.png1593810778656.png1593810799386.png

1593810651971.png1593810689090.png
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: some racist username, JT Marlin, Gaius Cumulus and 27 others
  • Agree
Reactions: Orange Rhymer, AnOminous and Sir Wesley Tailpipe
Vivacious said:
These are Lowtax's messages to Mandy. They never seem to have been uploaded here so I will do it:

View attachment 1425699 View attachment 1425701 View attachment 1425703View attachment 1425704View attachment 1425705

View attachment 1425693View attachment 1425695
Click to expand...
Wow, he texted her totally out of the blue at 3 am his time. That’s not creepy, nor is preceding to discuss how they were both total victims of the evil Schmorky.

Lowtax being a innocent victim of all the toxic people in his life seems to be some weird unfathomable pattern.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Stalovna, BOLDYSPICY!, Law and 2 others
One thing I've learned is that if you meet someone who says some variation of "Everyone I get close to ends up betraying me for some reason" you need to run far, far away because that person is almost certainly the cause of all their own problems. The "betrayals" are usually something like calling them out on their shit, cutting the crazy person out of their life, or just disagreeing with them about something. Then the Cluster B kicks in and that former best friend is now ultra-Satan and needs to be sent death threats.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: BScCollateral, Person Man, Cpl. Long Dong Silver and 16 others
Vivacious said:
To make this list complete, I'd like to know:
  • When Lowtax moved back to MO, the last time he moved in his life
  • When he bought and sold his infamous original McMansion
Click to expand...

And here's where I come in.

Original McMansion purchased May 2003. If you wonder why "asp" is written in the deed, it just means "a single person." This was later sold June 2008 to a Joshua B. Maggart and his sister Jessica Kyanka. I've attached the original deed.

Edit: Oh yeah, if any of you want to know what Rich's signature looks like:

1593815058644.png
 

Attachments

  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Humpty hump, MidUSA, Captain Hastings Official and 14 others
Croco said:
Nothing is ever, ever his fault. Dude got a seriously fucked up personality.
Click to expand...
That's how all the guys sound in court ordered abuser classes, they sit around talking about how their wives and girlfriends ruined their lives by getting them arrested. There is always a long list of people they blame for everything else that is wrong. The point of court appointed classes is to help them unfuck their twisted, dishonest thinking. The crazy thing is that they can all see exactly what is wrong with the other guys thinking but all have difficulty applying it to their own situation. Only a minority of guys who do the classes ever change, but there isn't any other treatment for being a batterer. I hope they make richard go to such a class after the court date in september.

Spunt said:
One thing I've learned is that if you meet someone who says some variation of "Everyone I get close to ends up betraying me for some reason" you need to run far, far away because that person is almost certainly the cause of all their own problems. The "betrayals" are usually something like calling them out on their shit, cutting the crazy person out of their life, or just disagreeing with them about something. Then the Cluster B kicks in and that former best friend is now ultra-Satan and needs to be sent death threats.
Click to expand...
Sometimes it really is true, but because the perpetual victim chooses the worst people to be around, over and over again. Once you've been victimized your chances of it happening again goes way up, abusive people know how to test the boundaries and find someone who knows how to take their bullshit without too many complaints. I agree to avoid people with that narrative regardless of if they are in the victim role or abuser or a weird mix of both, its never good news. Very hard to tell what role a person occupied in the relationship without some corroboration.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Cryin RN, Spedestrian, Army Burger and 3 others
Harbinger of Kali Yuga said:
And here's where I come in.

Original McMansion purchased May 2003. If you wonder why "asp" is written in the deed, it just means "a single person." This was later sold June 2008 to a Joshua B. Maggart and his sister Jessica Kyanka. I've attached the original deed.
Click to expand...

Thanks. Are you saying he lived in CA before he bought the house?
 
Anyone can be the victim of an abusive relationship (romantic or otherwise) one or maybe twice and be totally blameless. If you're inexperienced or naive you can be completely blindsided by crazy and not see it coming.

What you do when that happens to you is you learn from it and learn to recognise red flags in the people who enter your life. I'm quite good at keeping nutters out of my life now, but that's only because I learned to recognise them the hard way.

But if it happens to you over and over, at best you're not learning from your mistakes. At worst, you are wrongly conflating blame with agency. Yes, people shouldn't rob you. But the fact is that people do, so maybe don't walk in the bad part of town with a roll of banknotes stuffed in your pocket. And certainly don't do it a second time.

This is a really aggravating thing about the way morals seem to be taught to people, especially by the more extreme feminists and their allies. No, it is never right for a man to beat up his girlfriend and never the girlfriend's fault when it happens. But that doesn't mean that women don't need to consider the possible consequences of dating a guy with a known drinking problem and a history of well-documented domestic violence accusations against them.

I've even seen some feminists argue that it's wrong for women to carry weapons or rape alarms because it somehow means that it's womens' responsibility not to get raped rather than for men not to rape. Fuck that, anything that stops rapes, however it works, is worth doing because - and I'm amazed that this isn't obvious to some people - the aim of rape prevention is less rapes.

Just because someone wronged you and you are a victim, doesn't mean you shouldn't protect yourself or learn to keep yourself safe.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: sick_hypnotic, Scribbler, Humpty hump and 11 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back