U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
I mean, sort of related, but you have China's whole concept of the Mandate of Heaven. They should be aware of that, as people have been talking about them losing it in the wake of all the disasters hitting them.

Plenty of China has absolutely no regard for the concept of the Mandate of Heaven anymore - it was a theological and imperial concept that the Cultural Revolution sought to banish; a lot of rural Chinese still cling to the deification of the Mandate of Heaven throughout Chinese folk history but otherwise no one in power gives a fuck about it anymore.

Like I said, time to call up Hong Xiuquan. YELLOW TURBANS NOW.
 
Eventually, someone in power's going to seethe so hard that they spaz out and accidentally hit the launch button, nuking something in a fit of autistic rage.
China seems like it'd fit the bill, but they also care about stripping natural resources from wherever they attack, so probably not.
Maybe the first country to fire off nukes will actually be India after all.
MAD works on "No body wants to be the one to kill off humanity"
If any country is going to spaz out, North Korea will be the first (assuming all nucular powers stay in tact)
 
Granted, I also think it's completely possible we'll witness a breakdown at some point that will incur limited nuclear warfare between nations - total warfare, no; the age of total war is dead.

India/Pakistan seems the most likely for that kind of exchange. Any larger powers being involved and we're still talking end of civilization shit. But Pakistan is just fucked enough to let insane Muslims get a hold of one or more of their nukes.
 
The city of Seattle held a training session for white employees called “Interrupting Internalized Racial Superiority and Whiteness.”. It's exactly as stupid as you'd expect.


View attachment 1432041 View attachment 1432043 View attachment 1432045 View attachment 1432046 View attachment 1432058 View attachment 1432059 View attachment 1432060 View attachment 1432061 View attachment 1432064 View attachment 1432065 View attachment 1432066

It looks like they count Jews (presumably only the Ashkenazim?) and Armenians as white.

I'm not sure if there's any truth to this tweet but Karen's claims sound plausible:View attachment 1432103
White people keep the system going
:thinking:
gotta love how it's always "unlearning" and not learning even more. Washington and Jefferson can't be great men who were also a product of their time and community with flaws, like all great men. They have to just be "slave owners"
Jesus was a Jew who was crucified by White pagan Romans. Deal with it.
The whole Volcano Demon thing is dumb, but the Bible is pretty clear that the Romans were kinda ambivalent about the whole Jesus thing and didn't really want to do anything to him but bowed to the mob. Similarly, Jews are only "God's Chosen" insofar as God chose to have himself born into them via Mary. You'd have to be insanely ideological to think otherwise.
 
Kiwi Farms needs to have a containment thread for people who sperg about Jews. All Jew sperging posts would be moved there to avoid contaminating other threads.

If you haven't seen Benjamin Boyce's YouTube channel, you got to check it out. He is an Evergreen alumnus who did a series of videos on the struggle sessions mania there.

He also covered this meeting:
(edit: link fixed)

And followed up with an interview of the victim:

I archived the interview and the meeting here.

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/u-s-riots-of-may-2020-over-george-floyd.70231/post-6862390
 
Plenty of China has absolutely no regard for the concept of the Mandate of Heaven anymore - it was a theological and imperial concept that the Cultural Revolution sought to banish; a lot of rural Chinese still cling to the deification of the Mandate of Heaven throughout Chinese folk history but otherwise no one in power gives a fuck about it anymore.

Like I said, time to call up Hong Xiuquan. YELLOW TURBANS NOW.
But it still existed as a concept, like Manifest Destiny. I don't think many people in the US believe in a divine backing to our expansion either. Sure, maybe there's no where left to go and it could swing back really hard in a space era where we go taming Mars,.

People were still referencing it in wake of all the disasters though, so even people who didn't have the benefit of learning about Chinese politics through Dynasty Warriors could have seen the concept recently on twitter trends.
 
India/Pakistan seems the most likely for that kind of exchange. Any larger powers being involved and we're still talking end of civilization shit. But Pakistan is just fucked enough to let insane Muslims get a hold of one or more of their nukes.

Agreed, although some sort of strange collapse in North Korean reason is possible but extremely unlikely with how locked in stasis they are - they're engaged in this weird ass stasis of Hollywood fascination and diplomatic sabre-rattling that they know affords their continued existence and duarchy with ROK; there's a couple of relatively "minor" powers out there that are major regional players that have access to nuclear stockpiles, aging or modern, that would be the most likely to start some shit.

Superpowers wouldn't dare start the apocalypse on their own, that's just fucking psychosis.

well you can have a situation like the fall of the USSR that results in readjustment to the status and territory of a great power. areas like ukraine and kazakhstan were formerly part of a nuclear power and thus untouchable to any other force, but now they are no longer that and thus in theory could be targeted by other powers for conventional war again.
maybe a similar decay will happen to other nuclear players? if america breaks into different warring factions, which factions will inherit the US nuclear arsenal? what if the same were to happen in china? those are interesting hypotheticals, but in my opinion it does not challenge the concept of MAD as such - the nuclear powers themselves may undergo changes over time, but as long as they remain nuclear powers they are effectively immune to any threat of conventional military action.

also, "limited warfare" and "nuclear warfare" do not go together at all. the only 'limited warfare' we're seeing right now is the great powers (US, russia) playing proxy war in places like syria, and even that is only "limited" from the perspective of those outside powers. for the syrians themselves it is all-out total war.

I think when I said 'limited', I meant an example incurring something like India and Pakistan, where I believe an eventual nuclear exchange is entirely possible - major powers won't outright fire their stockpiles but I have no doubts that Pakistan firing warheads is completely fucking possible, especially when looking at how deep they've dove into ultraconservative Islamism and anti-India sentiment in the past 10 years; otherwise, you're completely right - as for the rest of your post, I think a situation like the 'break-up' of imperiums is pretty much inevitable but I'm not sure that multiple American states will sustain themselves for very long without someone eventually reacquiring much of the country themselves; I guess total warfare still seems possible on a localized scale, but that's it.
 
MAD works on "No body wants to be the one to kill off humanity"
If any country is going to spaz out, North Korea will be the first (assuming all nucular powers stay in tact)
I'm not so sure about NK, ever since Lil' Kimmy kicked the bucket and his sister took over, it's become more and more like a Chink puppet state.
If they do anything, it'll likely be at the discretion of the CCP.
 
We thought the same back in the 30’s. Then some Carriers showed up to ruin everybody's Hawaiian vacation and things went to hell.
Actually there were Admirals who warned the government about the fact that Pearl Habor was wide open to enemy air attacks as early as 1932.
During the 1932's Army/Navy Grand Joint Exercise 4 Admiral Harry E. Yarnell was tasked to attack Pearl Harbor and while everybody expected him to attack with his Battelships he left them behind and made a mock up attack on Pearl Harbor coming from the same way as the Japs did roughly 9 years later. Pressured by the War Department, the umpires reversed their decision and declared that the defenders had won the exercise. The Navy and its "battleship admirals" ignored Yarnell's contention that Pearl Harbor was extremly vulnerable to an attack by naval air power.
From his short biography:
"The expectation was that Yarnell would attack with battleships, but instead he left his battleships behind and proceeded only with his carriers to the north of Hawaii where it was less likely he would be detected. With a storm as cover, at dawn on Sunday, 7 February, Yarnell’s 152 planes attacked the harbor from the northeast, just as the Japanese would ten years later. The army airfields were first put out of commission after which Battleship Row was attacked, with multiple hits on navy ships. No defending aircraft were able to launch. The Navy’s war-game umpires declared the attack a total success, prompting Yarnell to strenuously warn of the Japanese threat."

Only one month later during Fleet Problem XIII the Department of the Navy also made sure that the defenders won the excercise. The "battleship guys" simply didn't want to listen, until it was too late.

The then CinCPac Admiral James O. Richardson also was one of them, he warned FDR about a possibility of an naval air attack on Pearl Harbor as early as 1937 and nobody did listen to him either, he also predicted almost exactly how the attack would be done by The Japanese Navy, and guess what, he was replaced by Admiral Kimmel in February 1941 as the new Commander in Chief Pacific Fleet (CinCPac).
Also worth mentioning is that the first exercise attack on Hawaii was already done during Fleet Problem V in 1927 with almost the same outcome as it was done in 1932.
The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was a backstabbing act by the Japanese no doubt about it, but it was only a surprise attack because nobody did listen to the guys who knew what they were talking about.
 
Oh you know me, I love them jews.

Would those happen to be the same white Romans who later realized that their monotheistic super-god Sol Invictus was one and the same as the monotheistic christian god?

Well that is the key difference between thousands of years ago and now. Unless you consider molestation to be how homosexuals sire their heirs.

And the others?

God abandoned Israel. That's what the second covenant is all about. They killed his messiah and lie to him every time they flick the light-switch on a Saturday.
Christian fundamentalism has created a lot of these problems we see manifesting today in America. Remember probation the war on drugs?
 
Actually there were Admirals who warned the government about the fact that Pearl Habor was wide open to enemy air attacks as early as 1932.
During the 1932's Army/Navy Grand Joint Exercise 4 Admiral Harry E. Yarnell was tasked to attack Pearl Harbor and while everybody expected him to attack with his Battelships he left them behind and made a mock up attack on Pearl Harbor coming from the same way as the Japs did roughly 9 years later. Pressured by the War Department, the umpires reversed their decision and declared that the defenders had won the exercise. The Navy and its "battleship admirals" ignored Yarnell's contention that Pearl Harbor was extremly vulnerable to an attack by naval air power.
From his short biography:
"The expectation was that Yarnell would attack with battleships, but instead he left his battleships behind and proceeded only with his carriers to the north of Hawaii where it was less likely he would be detected. With a storm as cover, at dawn on Sunday, 7 February, Yarnell’s 152 planes attacked the harbor from the northeast, just as the Japanese would ten years later. The army airfields were first put out of commission after which Battleship Row was attacked, with multiple hits on navy ships. No defending aircraft were able to launch. The Navy’s war-game umpires declared the attack a total success, prompting Yarnell to strenuously warn of the Japanese threat."

Only one month later during Fleet Problem XIII the Department of the Navy also made sure that the defenders won the excercise. The "battleship guys" simply didn't want to listen, until it was too late.

The then CinCPac Admiral James O. Richardson also was one of them, he warned FDR about a possibility of an naval air attack on Pearl Harbor as early as 1937 and nobody did listen to him either, he also predicted almost exactly how the attack would be done by The Japanese Navy, and guess what, he was replaced by Admiral Kimmel in February 1941 as the new Commander in Chief Pacific Fleet (CinCPac).
Also worth mentioning is that the first exercise attack on Hawaii was already done during Fleet Problem V in 1927 with almost the same outcome as it was done in 1932.
The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was a backstabbing act by the Japanese no doubt about it, but it was only a surprise attack because nobody did listen to the guys who knew what they were talking about.
911 was like that as well the feds were warned for at lest a decade and choose to ignore the possibility of such an attack.
 
Eventually, someone in power's going to seethe so hard that they spaz out and accidentally hit the launch button, nuking something in a fit of autistic rage.
China seems like it'd fit the bill, but they also care about stripping natural resources from wherever they attack, so probably not.
Maybe the first country to fire off nukes will actually be India after all.
it'll be pakistan who does that.
 
They're gonna have riots over that dangerhair now? Gonna go ahead and say it, I'll bet she accomplished absolutely nothing in her life that she shortened by making stupid decisions. I'll bet the guy driving the car has done more with his life than she did. Even George Floyd probably did more with his life. She was probably just another perpetual child crystallized in teenage angst like so many of them, stuck in development. Much like George Floyd and Rayshard Brooks, she made a retarded decision that resulted in consequences, when you're playing on the interstate often the consequence is death. But we had a whole month and more of 'rage' for George Floyd, I guess she can get one night of 'rage'. Really it sums up their entire movement, if it can even be called that. Relentless, senseless rage with no plan and no real goal, absolutely devoid of any logic and remarkably indicative of their lack of knowledge of the world. They're stupid. Dumb. Borderline retarded. That's really all I can call it.

These fucking morons think they want a civil war or a revolution, but they haven't read enough about history to know that these things aren't really wanted by anyone. Not even the people who fire the first shots. It's done out of desperation, no options left. How desperate are these people? Most of whom just got out of college, their parents paid for it, they live with someone and probably don't pay any bills or rent, the biggest problem of their day is deciding which garish color to dye their hair. They've been comfortable too long, they've become soft. They don't even know what real problems are but if they keep it up they soon might. So they invent problems, they come up with shit to be pissed off about and they'll always take the path of least resistance, go tear down a statue or burn down a precinct after it's been abandoned of any defense. If they knew actual struggle, if they knew what a revolution entailed, they'd be backpedaling furiously trying to avoid it with all they have. But they're fucking stupid, so they won't. They'll just keep accelerating toward that cliff. And the media and their corporate enablers and their allies in government will keep encouraging it.

At this point I don't see how it can end without violence, or at the very least, a purge in the form of mass arrests, and even then incarceration would just further radicalize them. They're so dead-set on being martyrs that they don't give a shit what they die for, as long as they die for something. They'll view them getting gently herded into a paddy-wagon [whereupon they shit and piss themselves because they're fuckin' nasty] the same way others see the Gestapo herding Jews into the camps. They'll come out of even more radical in all likelihood. These people aren't just going to go away and in the past weeks they've proven themselves wholly incapable of integration in civilized society. I don't know what the solution is but I know it isn't another 'night of rage' for some worthless dangerhair that got ripped out of existence by her own stupidity. These people have grown and been indoctrinated into a society that coddles them and spares them consequences for their actions, at least, serious consequences. When that's the status quo you can't really expect peace and harmony and functional people to come out of it.

I've been quoting this a lot lately:

Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.” -Michael Hopf
 
That was just a rumor though. Kim Jong Un has appeared in public since then.

Mind you I do agree that NK is a CCP puppet state.
Question is how long will the Chinese cover for the bullshit little fatso is pulling off. Sooner or later even the Chinese will be fed up with these morons in Pyonyang.
Also noteworthy: There's only one North Korean account on STEAM, hm, whose account could that be? 🤔
 
Question is how long will the Chinese cover for the bullshit little fatso is pulling off. Sooner or later even the Chinese will be fed up with these morons in Pyonyang.

I don't think NK does anything the CCP doesn't want them to do. The missile launches are useful to China because it gives them a chance to observe US ABM radars.

You can tell China approves because they've done things like ship TEL vehicles to NK.
 
I was just approaching the statement form a political philosophy angle. Warfare (as we know it, not anarchy) is said to bring out the best and worst of humanity. And yes warfare has had it place in advancement of civilization, including ironically life saving medicine from what were weapons of death (the mustard gas of WW1 ended up being the first chemo treatments for cancer, as an example).

I can also apprechate the irony of "most peaceful time on earth, yet internal conflict is at its highest in a long time"
War creates nationalism and unity.
Peace drives revolution and crime.
 
Yahweh was the patron god of the kikes and Jesus was a Jew who was crucified by White pagan Romans. Deal with it.

You don't have to believe in either to recognize that reconciling Christianity with anti-semitism isn't impossible. To end yet another gay tangent (afaik this thread is about China now anyway, but w/e):

According to Christianity, Jesus was the son of God preaching the word of God, not some random Jew on a stick spreading chicken soup for the Saul. His genetics don't matter, as he was/is divine. For a non-Christian who believes Christianity was just a collection of legends Semites used to explain the world around them instead of the truth of the universe, your remark holds, but not for a Christian.

Even if Jesus was just a dead Jew on a stick after all, Christianity has valuable moral foundations and is a key part of Western Civ, so a traditionalist has no reason to reject it just like they'd have no reason to reject other beneficial things like paper, algebra, or Arabic numerals. According to the traditionalist anti-semite, the West derived a lot of its strength from Christianity and (((secularism))) is a large part of the (((plan))) to weaken the West.

Pilate and the Romans who crucified Jesus were most likely also Semites (they weren't David Bowie looking MFs).
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back