Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

I'm fine with them regulating the Q conspitards, but I wish they would give the same energy with the doxxers, Antifa, and BLM Marxists. Twitter is a toxic cesspool that needs to be contained.

Yeah well at the near certainty of sounding like a "conspiritard", the fact that they're mobilizing to shut these rantings down indicates there's probably at least something to them. And considering the sheer number of "wacko conspiracy theories" that have more and more parts of them confirmed every month this year, the fact that twitter would try to blow away the smoke is a pretty good indication there's a fire of some size at its source.
 
Raw_Video_Teen_suspect_faces_line_of_firefighters_as_he_s_walked_YouTube.png
 
Yeah well at the near certainty of sounding like a "conspiritard", the fact that they're mobilizing to shut these rantings down indicates there's probably at least something to them. And considering the sheer number of "wacko conspiracy theories" that have more and more parts of them confirmed every month this year, the fact that twitter would try to blow away the smoke is a pretty good indication there's a fire of some size at its source.
This is a testbed for a similar ban that will be imposed on Trump supporters and right-wing dissidents closer to the general election. It's part of Big Tech's election interference strategy which was partly outlined by one of Google's VPs (I think he was a VP?) in their post-2016-election internal conference.
 
That, and they are now polesmoking Dubya, Mattis, and McCain when as little as 15 years ago they were vilifying all three of them as Nazi warmongers.

Or when they try to use their "vet cred" to shill for gun control, as if wearing a uniform makes you an authority on guns (and 99% of the time they turn out to be a POG/chairborne ranger that did PowerPoint).
Every vet I've met who shills for gun control has been, without exception, the most insufferable faggot ever and was probably hated by everyone on the entire post and probably in the entire theater.

I've met a couple of infantry and one snake eater who shilled for gun control, but all of them were the type that just likes the idea of people not being able to fight back and dislike the idea of getting pushed back against.

The snake eater literally said: "I don't want to have to worry if the guy I'm confronting in the street is packing heat or not."

Well, how about you quit acting like an asshole?
 
I'm fine with them regulating the Q conspitards, but I wish they would give the same energy with the doxxers, Antifa, and BLM Marxists. Twitter is a toxic cesspool that needs to be contained.
While I don't agree with any social media site "regulating" anything beyond what is literally illegal under US law, I would otherwise state that they either "regulate" fairly, evenly, impartially, and transparently, or not "regulate" at all.

The idea that multinational providers of platform services should be allowed to curate information or content for you on blatantly partisan political grounds because "muh private companies" continues to be some of the dumbest shit that I've ever read.
 
Last edited:
I'm fine with them regulating the Q conspitards, but I wish they would give the same energy with the doxxers, Antifa, and BLM Marxists. Twitter is a toxic cesspool that needs to be contained.

As people have started mentioning, Twitter banned the Qanon stuff, but won't ban the MAPs, the literal arabic pedophiles trading CP on the site, the Zoophiles, et cetera.

Priorities.
 
I'm fine with them regulating the Q conspitards, but I wish they would give the same energy with the doxxers, Antifa, and BLM Marxists. Twitter is a toxic cesspool that needs to be contained.
I mean fuck Twitter, but in general its not that the Antifa and BLM'ers need to be silenced - its that every other "wrongthink" group deserves the same space to shout their insane shit freely.

It's not that we should ban people who say "Black Lives Matter", its that we need to stop banning people who say "All Lives Matter".
 
The biggest irony of all is that these self-proclaimed protectors of minorities and their mentality are so white American centered (and European centered) they think applying their world view to the entire world works, and they don't see anything wrong with assuming every person with the same skin tone, no matter where they're from, shares the same beliefs and worldview.

That might work for the general population of America or other countries with a lot of immigrants, because for better or for worse the "melting pot" part means children of those immigrants will grow up on that environment, apart from the culture their family comes from and the innate biases it has. But people that are from those countries originally? Good fucking luck with that.

Asians generally do not like people from a different Asian country due to the teeny tiny detail of those countries being at each others' throats for centuries, and insinuating they are all the same is offensive. That and nobody but the Han Chinese and big corporations likes China. Africans have many problems with other Africans and think quite poorly of African-Americans to boot. No matter how many Latinx in the US screech about fully automated luxury gay space communism, people from Latin American countries who actually lived through those governments will have a very different opinion about it.

That was probably the biggest headscratcher for me coming from Hawaii. Literally nobody I knew was like "oh, you tryna be white or something?" I mean I sorta understand where they're coming from given Asians in general are a minority everywhere else and mainlander Asians got screwed over in the past by whitey, but trying to shove every Asian under one umbrella worldview? Yeah, not happenin', braddah. Sure, Hawaii local culture blends quite a lot of cultures together via pidgin and food, but outside of that it's so so very different in terms of family values, religion, parties, etc. Japanese time (usually always on time or early) is not the same as Filipino time (usually always late). Some ethnicities lean heavily towards Christianity while others heavily lean Buddhism. I don't know another language/ethnicity besides Chinese that has unique terms for every single combination of person possible in the family tree.

I really got concerned about how bad and insane things were getting when the pushers of IDPOL told people, say, black people, whose personal experiences didn't match the perceived experiences of their ethnic group (as defined from the outside) weren't "Real" black people or whatever, or had "internalized racism" so they couldn't SEE it happening... and nobody called them on it at all.

-All black people suffer "X", "Y" and "Z"!

-Wait a sec, I'm black, an though I've suffered "X" sparingly, I've never had "Y" or "Z" happen to me

-Then you aren't PAYING ATTENTION! IT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME!

-I'm honestly trying to recall when something like that happened, and I'm telling you, honestly, I don't recall it...

-FUCK OFF RACE TRAITOR, IF YOU DON'T AGREE WITH MY ANALYSIS OF YOUR LIFE, YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM! HEY! THIS GUY OVER HERE! HE'S WILLINGLY PERPETUATING NEGATIVE STEREOTYPES THAT BLACKS DON'T SUFFER! GET HIM! THE UNCLE TOM!!!!

I don't remember exactly where or when I saw it, but, when I saw this very "logical" chain being spread up and down the line from academia up to the editorial page, and you weren't allowed to question it, that's when I knew things were going to get much much worse because they were impervious to reason, and a person impervious to reason eventually attacks reality itself when it won't conform to what they KNOW is "right".

Hasn't personally happened to me yet, but I'm so overdue for one of these soon. I hear so much oppression this and whiteness that and xenophobia blah blah blah and I'm thinking "...da fak deez haole people talkin about?" Yeah, you get stereotyped a few times a year, yeah I'm aware of the occasional violence that is actually racially-based, but people think it's like the 1940s anti-Japanese-American sentiment all over again or something.
 
Skipped a minute in and watched maybe 30 seconds and can already see the lies, specifically blaming Trump for the HIV council dissolving.

Flashback: Six members of President Trump’s advisory council on HIV/AIDS have resigned
Trump got rid of the HIV/AIDS council after most of them had quit. Trump had tried a variety of councils like the business one involving heads of various major companies, where several ended up quitting after a few weeks after media pressure so the council couldn't really do anything.

The HIV council in particular had complaints about Trump daring be against Obamacare, so it was obviously just a bullshit politicized group rather than one trying for genuine solutions, like the one Trump's White House rolled out last year called Ready, Set, PrEP for giving HIV prevention medication out for free.

It's such a weird thing to attack Trump on, since he even had made a point of talking about HIV in his 2019 state of the union address, apparently at the urging of Dr. Fauci. Giving further evidence that Trump has been listening closely to the guy for a long while.
 
That's one of the few things that will wind me the fuck up in person. Some fucking limp wristed dick sucking liberal faggot who spent since the 1960's or when they were shit out by some fucking hippy's stink ditch, whichever came later, tries to throw "DRUMPH DODGED MUH VIETNAM!" out as a fucking insult.

The Left spent 60 fucking YEARS demonizing vets, active duty military, screaming that every war was going to be another Vietnam while furiously masturbating over the thought of war crimes and dead civilians to the point where if they couldn't find a war crime, they manufactured them (The insurgent with a grenade that got shot before he could pull the pin or the Marine kicking the prisoner in the face who came up with a pistol and the guys running for the RPGs and SAMs in the truck that were all altered by the press, including trying to make it look like skipping children in the SAM video) or changed the definition (GW1 Highway to Hell and Highway of Death are supposedly War Crimes to limp wristed faggots who ignore that the Iraqi's were doing a FIGHTING RETREAT, not throwing down their weapons and surrendering like ass kissing journos claim)

They held protests, they consistently lied, they fucking celebrate when American soldiers get killed, they fucking make every third movie with "Evil military that is evil for the sake of being evil", and in general treated the military like shit.

Vietnam was a HUGE fucking cluster fuck. Even the fuckery and SNAFU-Express of the GWOT has nothing on The Nam for totally fucked up, and EVERYONE FUCKING KNOWS IT.

But they act like Trump having bone spurs to get a deferment (Unlike rock stars who masturbated with their own shit or otherwise pulled strings) is TREASON! (Ignoring the fact that he would have washed out of Basic Training due to being unable to march for any length of time while carrying a Vietnam Era basic load)

NOBODY who was drafted wanted to go to Vietnam. If they wanted to go to Vietnam they signed up, or, like John Lee Pedamore said: "They draft the white trash first round here" and just join up.

Movie after movie after movie about how The Nam was bad, how people shouldn't have had to go, that created an entire generation of broke brain faggots whining about baby killers and muh war crimes, and they expect Vets to look at the shit-show and then at Trump and go "No, he totally should have let himself be conscripted to die in a rice patty with a fucking gook bayonet in his guts" like the rest of these smooth brained soy guzzling dipshits.

Usually you can bust their fucking rhetoric with "Would you have volunteered for Vietnam? Did you volunteer for the GWOT?" and even if they start spouting "Muh Diss-Aye-Billy-Tees!" you just tell them that it's no excuse, they're just dodging military service and that's treason.

Fucking leftist faggots.


The left going after right wingers who draft dodged/exploited loopholes/had their daddy bribe people to keep their son out of the military in Vietnam, is due to two things:

1. The right's hypocrisy where they condemned the left wing's draft dodging/exploiting loopholes/parents bribing to keep their sons out of the war, but did the exact same thing

2. The left calling out the right's love of war while the people calling for it being people who moved heaven and earth to avoid having to fight in it

Its something of a running joke culturally in the last 50+ years since the Vietnam War: that both the left and right are hypocritical with regards to wanting war but not wanting to fight in said wars, but at least the left own their cowardice and hypocrisy while the right don't.
 
The left going after right wingers who draft dodged/exploited loopholes/had their daddy bribe people to keep their son out of the military in Vietnam, is due to two things:

1. The right's hypocrisy where they condemned the left wing's draft dodging/exploiting loopholes/parents bribing to keep their sons out of the war, but did the exact same thing

2. The left calling out the right's love of war while the people calling for it being people who moved heaven and earth to avoid having to fight in it

Its something of a running joke culturally in the last 50+ years since the Vietnam War: that both the left and right are hypocritical with regards to wanting war but not wanting to fight in said wars, but at least the left own their cowardice and hypocrisy while the right don't.
Wouldn't be surprised if the next draft fodder were allotted based on who voted for which party.
 
Back