Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[TamarYaelBatYah]

She gets Marshall to come on and threaten people, as well as boast about his violent assaults and military and martial arts training, and then she turns around and plays the 'Tee-hee, who says that was Marshall? And who says I'm Melinda?" card. It's dishonest and pathetic. I'm leaving aside the nature of Marshall's threats and boasting, which is also dishonest and definitely pathetic.

Incorrect. Refer to comment #5557 where I explicitly said that Marshall did not have my permission to make YouTube videos directed at KiwiFarms and/or The Stalker but chose to anyway

Again, if anyone here is falls under cyberstalking, it’s you.
None of us keep track of your location. You willingly share it with us.
No one keeps track of your location to harm you.
No one uses your location to threaten, harass, or intimidate you.
While speculations about you have occurred on this forum, that is not the same as libel.

Spoiler: 18 U.S.C. § 2261A:

Title 18, United States Code, Section 2261A is the federal stalking statute. Section 2261A(1) covers in-person stalking and Section 2261A(2) covers cyberstalking— stalking that occurs using Internet or telephones—as well as stalking that occurs using the mail. Section 2261(2), originally enacted as part of the Violence Against Women Act of 2005, has two main provisions—Subsections (A) and (B):
• Both provisions require that the defendant act with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person.
• Both provisions also require the use of the mail, any interactive computer service or electronic communication service or electronic communication system of interstate commerce, or any other facility of interstate or foreign commerce. Usually this element is met with the use of the Internet.
• Both provisions also require that the defendant engaged in a course of conduct, meaning more than one act.
Subsection (A) further requires that the course of conduct places the victim in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to, the victim, the victim’s spouse or intimate partner, or to an immediate family member of the victim. Subsection (B) requires instead that the course of conduct causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to the victim or the victim’s immediate family.

You, on the other hand:

-Claimed you had all of our locations on a wall or other vertical structure with the intent to install fear, create uncertainty surrounding our safety, and harass us.
-Threatened to dox us and hire someone to find our IPs with the intent to install fear and/or harm us.
-Claim to have our IPs and use such information in a manor to attempt to threaten, harm, create uncertainty around safety, install emotional distress, or manipulate us.
(For example, you have expressed to me that you “know where I work and know where I live.”)
-Told someone in this thread that you were going to find them and show up at their door.

Somethings that may not fall under cyberstalking but most likely cyberthreats:

-Explained in detail how Marshall is going to “beat us black and blue,” or how he will hurt us in general.
-Threatened to sue, SWAT, and /or other forms of government interference without proper cause.
-Threatened us with supposed screenshots and/or other bits of information. (I.e. claiming you gave screenshots of everything bad we’ve said/done in an attempt to install fear and/or extort us later.

Melinda, I’ve read through the thread several Like @Burmese Rice Farmer said, people lurk here before posting.

There’s no context needed for what you’ve said and done. You’ve done it unprovoked, constantly. It does not matter if someone here made fun of you, you move on. That’s not an excuse to then threaten, harass, or intimidate people.

Here are some other points:
-Marshall doxed you guys first. In his YouTube video, he flashed around a court/legal document that had your address.
-You’ve threatened people throughout this thread unprovoked. You’ve even admitted to having fantasies of killing null.
-You’ve always been obsessed with finding IP addresses and threatening people.
-You've always used Marshall as a pawn and a way to threaten the physical safety of users here.
-No one ‘declared war on your family.’ You started this thread with your own actions of continuous lawsuits and lack of understanding that people were here to make fun of the Stalker, not you. Instead, you flipped out and started threatening KF users, all of which you didn’t even know. Marshall also had videos of him admitting that he was going to send a mob of people after Null, at an address that didn’t even belong to Null.

I should also add that your actions of cyberstalking do not come in self defense, like you’re arguing. They come with malicious intent.

Also, I joined April 16th, not 15th.

Ok, time to expose your absolute stupidity! You really can't find POINT A correctly. Basic intelligence skills which you lack. Don't ever try to be a laywer, judge, DA, or investigator. You suck at digging up facts and putting them in the right order

Hun, The Stalker doxxed me first, followed by KiwiFarms while I was living my life minding my own fuxking business. This doxxing included revealing my county of residence FIRST. KiwiFarms posted, without government permission, lawsuits I had been involved in. That's provocation. THEN this thread was created. Especially after some social abuse occurred as a result of KiwiFarms. You don't have to like me, but I will NOT be anyone's doormat to socially abuse me.

I made statements about finding IP addresses AFTER threats were made at me. NEWSFLASH DUMMY: It's legal to hunt down IPs for lawsuits, which I have just cause for.

I made no statements about Marshall hurting anyone or anyone showing up at anyone's house. You're a liar. I offered a duel of legally sanctioned "mutual combat". Any other idiotic things you want to say Princess of Gaslighting?

MAN, if this is The Stalker, FUCK OFF. You type just like him

YOU KNOW WHAT, I'M DONE WITH YOU FUXKERS. YOU CAN TALK TO THE FBI!

 

[White Baby]

Incorrect. Refer to comment #5557 where I explicitly said that Marshall did not have my permission to make YouTube videos directed at KiwiFarms and/or The Stalker but chose to anyway






Ok, time to expose your absolute stupidity! You really can't find POINT A correctly. Basic intelligence skills which you lack. Don't ever try to be a laywer, judge, DA, or investigator. You suck at digging up facts and putting them in the right order

Hun, The Stalker doxxed me first, followed by KiwiFarms while I was living my life minding my own fuxking business. This doxxing included revealing my county of residence FIRST. KiwiFarms posted, without government permission, lawsuits I had been involved in. That's provocation. THEN this thread was created. Especially after some social abuse occurred as a result of KiwiFarms. You don't have to like me, but I will NOT be anyone's doormat to socially abuse me.

I made statements about finding IP addresses AFTER threats were made at me. NEWSFLASH DUMMY: It's legal to hunt down IPs for lawsuits, which I have just cause for.

I made no statements about Marshall hurting anyone or anyone showing up at anyone's house. You're a liar. I offered a duel of legally sanctioned "mutual combat". Any other idiotic things you want to say Princess of Gaslighting?

MAN, if this is The Stalker, FUCK OFF. You type just like him

YOU KNOW WHAT, I'M DONE WITH YOU FUXKERS. YOU CAN TALK TO THE FBI!

It's the internet, you can say "fuck"

See you next week when you need to take your anger at life out on smth other than your kids

 

[lamp]

I guess I scared her off — she doesn’t want to be charged with cyberstalking, because she knows that what she did was a crime, regardless of context. In your own words, Melinda, I’ve got screenshots! Message me, I’ll send them.


Also, @xtamarlover, I know you read this thread. If I’m you, please react with “.”
If I’m not you, react with “.”

I’ll also get mods to verify me if you’d like, Melinda


>says I’m the Stalker
>in the same post, uses ‘Princess’ to signify that I am, in fact, a female

Princess of Gaslighting

 

[Karl der Grosse]

KiwiFarms posted, without government permission, lawsuits I had been involved in. That's provocation.

You'll be laughed out of every courtroom in the county if you try to suggest to a judge that posting publicly available documents is a provocation or anything other than completely legal.

No one needs permission from the government to post publicly available documents in this country, Melinda. You sure do like appealing to governmental authority, though. Every day you threaten us with one or another law enforcement agencies or court system. They're empty threats, of course, but it shows how Melinda continually tries to run to Big Daddy to tattle on us, always trying to borrow Big Daddy's authority to punish her enemies. Same thing as her constant "Elohim will smite you all in answer to my prayers!" ranting, really.

 

[Kosher Salt]

YOU KNOW WHAT, I'M DONE WITH YOU FUXKERS. YOU CAN TALK TO THE FBI!

Okay piglinda, see you in a few hours. If you were less of a disgusting pig you'd take the time away from Kiwi Farms to bathe, but you're you, oink oink. We're just lucky we can't smell you from here.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

YOU KNOW WHAT, I'M DONE WITH YOU FUXKERS. YOU CAN TALK TO THE FBI!

 

[totallynotPaulPogba]

Incorrect. Refer to comment #5557 where I explicitly said that Marshall did not have my permission to make YouTube videos directed at KiwiFarms and/or The Stalker but chose to anyway






Ok, time to expose your absolute stupidity! You really can't find POINT A correctly. Basic intelligence skills which you lack. Don't ever try to be a laywer, judge, DA, or investigator. You suck at digging up facts and putting them in the right order

Hun, The Stalker doxxed me first, followed by KiwiFarms while I was living my life minding my own fuxking business. This doxxing included revealing my county of residence FIRST. KiwiFarms posted, without government permission, lawsuits I had been involved in. That's provocation. THEN this thread was created. Especially after some social abuse occurred as a result of KiwiFarms. You don't have to like me, but I will NOT be anyone's doormat to socially abuse me.

I made statements about finding IP addresses AFTER threats were made at me. NEWSFLASH DUMMY: It's legal to hunt down IPs for lawsuits, which I have just cause for.

I made no statements about Marshall hurting anyone or anyone showing up at anyone's house. You're a liar. I offered a duel of legally sanctioned "mutual combat". Any other idiotic things you want to say Princess of Gaslighting?

MAN, if this is The Stalker, FUCK OFF. You type just like him

YOU KNOW WHAT, I'M DONE WITH YOU FUXKERS. YOU CAN TALK TO THE FBI!

Fucking finally, 466 pages later she finally broke. Cheers lads.

I guess I scared her off — she doesn’t want to be charged with cyberstalking, because she knows that what she did was a crime, regardless of context. In your own words, Melinda, I’ve got screenshots! Message me, I’ll send them.


Also, @xtamarlover, I know you read this thread. If I’m you, please react with “.”
If I’m not you, react with “.”

I’ll also get mods to verify me if you’d like, Melinda


>says I’m the Stalker
>in the same post, uses ‘Princess’ to signify that I am, in fact, a female

I mean, you're reading her book. That is undeniable proof of stalking.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Fucking finally, 466 pages later she finally broke. Cheers lads.

It's only about the dozenth time she's promised that she's leaving forever and she totally means it this time.

Don't worry, she'll be back. She needs the attention.

 

[redcent]

This comment shows your ignorance

Have you ever taken the time to even read the Cyberstalking statute?

Judging by your response, NO.

yeah, but generally speaking we don't to.uch the po.op. We're not ringing you up on your phone saying we're batman or interfering with you irl. The only exception maybe rafals cps call and that was due to genuine concern over the safety if your kids

You come here of your own volition

I'm not a sick fuxk like you all. I don't talk like a morally depraved person and don't play your games

nah we laugh at autists maybe that's twisted but you promote spousal abuse and spousal rape, which is far more depraved. You have yet to see how depraved you are if you had one bit of self awareness

Don't forget the mixture of rancid BO and essential oils.

her essential oils are probably getting broken down by the bacteria in her unwashed cooch what's the point shower first

I never condoned sexual assault by random strangers

"A recent study suggests that rape fantasies are most prevalent among women who are the most erotically open and adventurous, who feel most comfortable daydreaming about sexual situations way beyond what they’d ever want to experience"

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/all-about-sex/201508/why-do-women-have-rape-fantasies

rape fantasy is very different from spousal rape. You do rape play you set out limits with your partner you trust and if things get rough if you say stop or no your parter will stop.

Spousal rape has none of this. If your husband decides to tie you up and stick a coke bottle from the gutter up your cooch you have no say in it no matter how you cry. It's very scarring and horrible how do you not know the difference between rape play and spousal rape omg you're dumb

 

[A Cardboard Box]

This comment shows your ignorance

Have you ever taken the time to even read the Cyberstalking statute?

Judging by your response, NO.





I'm not a sick fuxk like you all. I don't talk like a morally depraved person and don't play your games

Here's the part that's allegedly relevant to you.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/donate




223

• U.S. Code
• Notes

prev | next
(a)Prohibited acts generallyWhoever—
(1)in interstate or foreign communications—
(A)by means of a telecommunicationsdevice knowingly—
(i)
makes, creates, or solicits, and
(ii)
initiates the transmission of,
any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication which is obscene or child pornography, with intent to abuse, threaten, or harass another person;
(B)by means of a telecommunicationsdevice knowingly—
(i)
makes, creates, or solicits, and
(ii)
initiates the transmission of,
any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication which is obscene or child pornography, knowing that the recipient of the communication is under 18 years of age, regardless of whether the maker of such communication placed the call or initiated the communication;
(C)
makes a telephone call or utilizes a telecommunications device, whether or not conversation or communication ensues, without disclosing his identity and with intent to abuse, threaten, or harass any specific person;
(D)
makes or causes the telephone of another repeatedly or continuously to ring, with intent to harass any person at the called number; or
(E)
makes repeated telephone calls or repeatedly initiates communication with a telecommunications device, during which conversation or communication ensues, solely to harass any specific person; or
(2)
knowingly permits any telecommunications facility under his control to be used for any activity prohibited by paragraph (1) with the intent that it be used for such activity,
shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

Case law exists that more clearly defines these parts of the statute. Courts have ruled that postings on a public forum don't count. It specifically requires someone to contact your device specifically for the sole purpose of harrassment. The court has determined that for things like this, you can just not come to the forum. The account is an account on a public forum and you've taken absolutely no action to remedy your "harrassment." It is not someone harassing you with phone calls from a spoofer, sending you large amounts of denigrating speak mail from multiple addresses, or anything else the courts have ruled to be harassing behavior.

The feds are concerned with actual serious business. Look up case law for convictions, most of them revolve around attempted rapes or sexual exploitation. Not mean words on a public forum.

 

[redcent]

Oh yes, I'm "dumb" for dueling back with people who declared war on my family March 13, 2017

DID YOU CATCH MY SARCASM SLOW ONE?

Lol How is making fun of your fucking habits declaring war on you thin skinned pussy lol

You thought jumping dwarf was your hubby's ex I bet you thought this was a chance to get at her but instead you have a forum full of autists calling you a retard your revenge fantasy crumbled

 

[LoverofPi]

Hun, The Stalker doxxed me first, followed by KiwiFarms while I was living my life minding my own fuxking business. This doxxing included revealing my county of residence FIRST.

Your county. Not your address. Your county. Okay, sure. Not a big deal.

KiwiFarms posted, without government permission, lawsuits I had been involved in.

We do not need permission. They are public documents.

That's provocation.

It is not.

THEN this thread was created. Especially after some social abuse occurred as a result of KiwiFarms. You don't have to like me, but I will NOT be anyone's doormat to socially abuse me.

Hadn't you sued the site and failed by the time your thread got made?

I made statements about finding IP addresses AFTER threats were made at me. NEWSFLASH DUMMY: It's legal to hunt down IPs for lawsuits, which I have just cause for.

It's also legal to post public court documents and other information of public record. Which we have done here.

MAN, if this is The Stalker, FUCK OFF. You type just like him

YOU KNOW WHAT, I'M DONE WITH YOU FUXKERS. YOU CAN TALK TO THE FBI!

One, You are pretty bad at reading how people type if you think Palm and Andrew type the same.

Two, what will we talk about? Your inability to let well enough alone? Your almost scripted response to certain stimuli? Oh, maybe the way you project all your insecurities onto other people and insult them for what you know slash fear is true about yourself? That would be fun.

 

[AnOminous]

Oh yes, I'm "dumb" for dueling back with people who declared war on my family March 13, 2017

DID YOU CATCH MY SARCASM SLOW ONE?

Stupid cunt kill yourself.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

Incorrect. Refer to comment #5557 where I explicitly said that Marshall did not have my permission to make YouTube videos directed at KiwiFarms and/or The Stalker but chose to anyway






Ok, time to expose your absolute stupidity! You really can't find POINT A correctly. Basic intelligence skills which you lack. Don't ever try to be a laywer, judge, DA, or investigator. You suck at digging up facts and putting them in the right order

Hun, The Stalker doxxed me first, followed by KiwiFarms while I was living my life minding my own fuxking business. This doxxing included revealing my county of residence FIRST. KiwiFarms posted, without government permission, lawsuits I had been involved in. That's provocation. THEN this thread was created. Especially after some social abuse occurred as a result of KiwiFarms. You don't have to like me, but I will NOT be anyone's doormat to socially abuse me.

I made statements about finding IP addresses AFTER threats were made at me. NEWSFLASH DUMMY: It's legal to hunt down IPs for lawsuits, which I have just cause for.

I made no statements about Marshall hurting anyone or anyone showing up at anyone's house. You're a liar. I offered a duel of legally sanctioned "mutual combat". Any other idiotic things you want to say Princess of Gaslighting?

MAN, if this is The Stalker, FUCK OFF. You type just like him

YOU KNOW WHAT, I'M DONE WITH YOU FUXKERS. YOU CAN TALK TO THE FBI!

Consequences will truly never be the same.

 

[lamp]

I find it funny that she accuses me/us of gaslighting when she herself is the one doing it.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I find it funny that she accuses me/us of gaslighting when she herself is the one doing it.

It's not like she understands what that term means, or many terms for that matter.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

@TamarYaelBatYah No one on here has committed a crime and you don't know who any of us are, and even if you did it wouldn't matter because no one has committed a crime. Change my mind.

View attachment 1466616

She keeps talking about IPs, but federal court has said several times that IP's are not enough to determine identity. Not to mention in sure most people here use a proxy service.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

She keeps talking about IPs, but federal court has said several times that IP's are not enough to determine identity. Not to mention in sure most people here use a proxy service.

In case this idiot doesn't believe us.

https://www.techspot.com/news/76190-us-court-appeals-ip-address-isnt-enough-identify.html

This isn't limited to just copyright either.

 

[Deadpool]

In case this idiot doesn't believe us.

https://www.techspot.com/news/76190-us-court-appeals-ip-address-isnt-enough-identify.html

This isn't limited to just copyright either.

It really is clown world when a pirated Adam Sandler movie leads to an important court ruling.

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

She finally figured out that she was outclassed. Perhaps a moment of clarity...