Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

There is a conspiracy theory floating around that says the Democrats have already done that.

That when WW2 broke out, FDR explicitly orchestrated a stealth genocide of conservatives by way of making sure that, out of all of the people drafted into fighting in WW2, it was young/middle aged registered Republicans that were singled out in terms of "for every Democrat drafted 4-5 Republicans were drafted" so that when the war ended, the Republican voting block would be decimated in terms of most of them dying in combat.
In Vietnam they did the same thing, only it's not a conspiracy theory and is indeed verified to be true, except instead of Republicans, it was black people and the mentally challenged. "The War of Idiots" is what they called it.
 
$100 says the series ends with her becoming President.
View attachment 1466407
The premise is “What if she never married Bill Clinton?”
We’re talking about the woman who got let go from the Watergate investigation for being hilariously unethical as well as being incompetent enough to fail the Bar Exam in DC (even Snopes backs that one up).
Without hitching her wagon to Bill she’d just be a shitty Alabama lawyer who had an illegitimate kid with the governor.
 
In Vietnam they did the same thing, only it's not a conspiracy theory and is indeed verified to be true, except instead of Republicans, it was black people and the mentally challenged. "The War of Idiots" is what they called it.
Project 100,000 or McNamara's Morons are the names you'll usually hear for it. Here's a fun fact for you though: the lowered AFQT score limit was kept until today, even though the project was deemed a failure.
 
Had she divorced Bill in the late 90s (but kept his pee-pee tapes for leverage) I think she would have been president in 2008.

Bill Clinton doesn't strike me as a "giving a fuck" about that stuff kind of guy.

They had his jizz all over an intern's dress - where she described blowing him and having him fuck her with a cigar tube and he was like "What do you mean by the word 'is'"?

There's no chance Hillary wins in 2008 unless there's an alternate reality where she isn't one of the most unlikable people on planet earth.
 
It always comes back to cartoons
1595513890039.png
 
Honestly, how fucking butthurt do you have to be about losing an election that an entire goddamn show gets made showing a "What If?" scenario?

It always comes back to cartoons
View attachment 1467706

I don't care if people call me a no-fun-stiff, being this obsessed with cartoon shit like Avatar in your fucking 30's is a surefire sign of delayed development.

I liked Avatar when I was a kid back in the 2000's but fuck me, it's been more than a decade and surely there are more important things to be concerned with and more apt comparisons to be made when talking about politics.
 
Bill Clinton doesn't strike me as a "giving a fuck" about that stuff kind of guy.

They had his jizz all over an intern's dress - where she described blowing him and having him fuck her with a cigar tube and he was like "What do you mean by the word 'is'"?

There's no chance Hillary wins in 2008 unless there's an alternate reality where she isn't one of the most unlikable people on planet earth.
Nobody would have ever given the smallest iota of a shit about Hillary Clinton if she never married Bill Clinton. She rode on his coattails all the way to the White House and she spent every second of it furious that she wasn't the one getting all of the attention. What little popularity she ever managed to glean she only acquired because she was riding shotgun to some coke-addicted sex-pervert and she's never stopped being pissed off about it.

He's the only reason she ever made it into the limelight, and the only reason she's permanently branded as "that woman with the husband who fucked someone in the Oval Office." No matter what she's done, where she's gone, what scandal or charity or politics-shaping event she's taken part in, someone will always show up and go, "lol remember that time bill blew a load on that chick's dress."
 
I eagerly await the death of Mainstream media outlets. I'm not a huge fan of Tucker, but holy shit, this is just petty horseshit that pisses on the entire idea of the free press.

@It's HK-47 I hate to bother you, but where was your post about how journalists aren't the heroes they think they are? I think it's very apropos for this situation.
Actually, in a similar vein to the whole, "The media has been fake news for a long time" narrative, do you remember that story about how Orson Welles's broadcast of War of the Worlds incited a nation-wide panic because everyone thought that the broadcast was real? That's been pretty firmly cemented in the public consciousness and there's plenty of news articles from back in the day about it.

Did you know that whole story is fake?

"Far fewer people heard the broadcast — and fewer still panicked — than most people believe today. [...] The night the program aired, the C.E. Hooper ratings service telephoned 5,000 households for its national ratings survey. 'To what program are you listening?' the service asked respondents. Only 2 percent answered a radio 'play' or 'the Orson Welles program,' or something similar indicating CBS. None said a 'news broadcast,' according to a summary published in Broadcasting. In other words, 98 percent of those surveyed were listening to something else, or nothing at all, on Oct. 30, 1938. This miniscule rating is not surprising. Welles' program was scheduled against one of the most popular national programs at the time — ventriloquist Edgar Bergen's Chase and Sanborn Hour, a comedy-variety show."

When the radio play for War of the Worlds was being broadcasted, 98% of the audience was listening to something else, and there are no records of a spike in police calls being made around October 30th, 1938. In Slate's opinion--before Slate had turned into absolute, melted dogshit-- the newspapers likely made the entire thing up in an effort to discredit the radio as a viable source of news, since they were in a heated competition with each other at the time.

Even though none of this ever happened and the papers made the entire thing up, Orson Welles was still forced to apologize.
 
Actually, in a similar vein to the whole, "The media has been fake news for a long time" narrative, do you remember that story about how Orson Welles's broadcast of War of the Worlds incited a nation-wide panic because everyone thought that the broadcast was real? That's been pretty firmly cemented in the public consciousness and there's plenty of news articles from back in the day about it.

Did you know that whole story is fake?

"Far fewer people heard the broadcast — and fewer still panicked — than most people believe today. [...] The night the program aired, the C.E. Hooper ratings service telephoned 5,000 households for its national ratings survey. 'To what program are you listening?' the service asked respondents. Only 2 percent answered a radio 'play' or 'the Orson Welles program,' or something similar indicating CBS. None said a 'news broadcast,' according to a summary published in Broadcasting. In other words, 98 percent of those surveyed were listening to something else, or nothing at all, on Oct. 30, 1938. This miniscule rating is not surprising. Welles' program was scheduled against one of the most popular national programs at the time — ventriloquist Edgar Bergen's Chase and Sanborn Hour, a comedy-variety show."

When the radio play for War of the Worlds was being broadcasted, 98% of the audience was listening to something else, and there are no records of a spike in police calls being made around October 30th, 1938. In Slate's opinion--before Slate had turned into absolute, melted dogshit-- the newspapers likely made the entire thing up in an effort to discredit the radio as a viable source of news, since they were in a heated competition with each other at the time.

Even though none of this ever happened and the papers made the entire thing up, Orson Welles was still forced to apologize.
That's really good to know actually. Turns out fake news has been a problem for more than a hundred years.
 
Trump is an absolutely awful Hitler. Here's a little breakdown of Hitlers rise to power: In January of 1933 Hitler was sworn in as Chancellor, in February of 1933 the Reichstag caught fire, in March of 1933 Hitler had Parliament pass the Enabling Act which effectively gave Hitler unlimited power. By May of 1933 Hitler forced all trade unions to dissolve. By July of 1933 Hitler had essentially banned all other political parties in Germany, leaving Germany solidly in the hands of the Nazis in all areas of government. Skipping forward a year from June 30th to July 2nd of 1934 Hitler carried out the Night of the Long Knives. In August of 1934 President Hindenburg died and the office of President was abolished by Hitler. The transition to total control of Germany was now complete.

Trump has been in office since January 20th, 2017. So far he hasn't killed or imprisoned his political rivals, burned down Congress, or even gotten a law passed to give him absolute power over the government. Hitler accomplished his goals in roughly a year or year and a half. Trump is simply absolutely awful at being a dictator compared to how quickly Hitler was able to take over Germany.

You just know the anti-Trump crowd gonna say "that's only because we keep burning down buildings and attacking anyone who isn't left of Mao. We're keeping him in check!"

All the Dems down in Demville liked mail-in ballots a lot.

But the Trump, who lived north of Demville, did not!
 
That's really good to know actually. Turns out fake news has been a problem for more than a hundred years.
There's a reason why yellow journalism should be taught at schools ( I wwas lucky they did when I was in high school). there's also a reason why Natsoc Germany labled the media as the Lugenpresse.
 
Back