- Joined
- Aug 19, 2019
Check your “health regulations” white people! Obviously melanated individuals are strong enough to handle whatever viruses and bacterial infections they may get from these nasty ribs
U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers
- Thread starter snailslime
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Status
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2020
Okay, any faith I had in humanity is gone now. We've gone too far.View attachment 1478614
View attachment 1478613
Ohio man in custody after kneeling on crying White child's neck, praising Black Lives Matter
An Ohio man who was out on parole has been thrown in jail and awaits new felony charges after a photo circulated on social media showed him with his knee to the neck of a crying white two-year-old boy alongside a message referencing Black Lives Matter.www.foxnews.com
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2016
TMZ is calling them "Refund Girls" and framing the Putt Putt as being in the wrong. Of course.
"Memphis Putt-Putt Center Wants to Pursue Charges Against Refund Girls"
Memphis Putt-Putt Center Wants to Pursue Charges Against Refund Girls
archived 28 Jul 2020 00:58:42 UTC
Positive that is happening though.
This is what happens when you tolerate certain behaviours from one set of people. They now see it as open season for whatever imaginary grievances they have. It will be very hard to get these people to act anything close to civilised for a long time.
It's peak Black Fragility and Black Entitlement, but I'm sure it's "someone else's fault". Allowing riots and looting to occur over one dead negro has caused this. Nice job! Just "giving them space to destroy". Funny no other race needs "space to destroy".
---
Some more context to this mass chimpout.
Wild Video Of 300 Kids Destroying A Putt Putt In Memphis, Tennessee |…
archived 28 Jul 2020 00:46:33 UTC
Apparently they also carried their chimpout to the outside.
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2020
But if you white people insist on not cowering in your homes from the coof (at least until November), you're LITERALLY stacking Black bodies because Blacks are more vulnerable to the Rona!
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2018
If the place really did refused to give a refund for services not rendered (including broken machines be it vending or amusement) I would say both sides are wrong.TMZ is calling them "Refund Girls" and framing the Putt Putt as being in the wrong. Of course.
"Memphis Putt-Putt Center Wants to Pursue Charges Against Refund Girls"
Memphis Putt-Putt Center Wants to Pursue Charges Against Refund Girls
archived 28 Jul 2020 00:58:42 UTCarchive.vn
Positive that is happening though.
This is what happens when you tolerate certain behaviours from one set of people. They now see it as open season for whatever imaginary grievances they have. It will be very hard to get these people to act anything close to civilised for a long time.
It's peak Black Fragility and Black Entitlement, but I'm sure it's "someone else's fault". Allowing riots and looting to occur over one dead negro has caused this. Nice job! Just "giving them space to destroy". Funny no other race needs "space to destroy".
---
Some more context to this mass chimpout.
Wild Video Of 300 Kids Destroying A Putt Putt In Memphis, Tennessee |…
archived 28 Jul 2020 00:46:33 UTCarchive.vn
Apparently they also carried their chimpout to the outside.
View attachment 1478620
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2020
REEEEEEEE BOTHSIDESISM
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2015
ARE YOU TRYING TO BE RATIONAL, AND TRYING TO SEE BOTH SIDES?
FUCKING CENTRISTS REEEE I BET YOU THINK YOURE SMART REEEEEEEE!!!
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2018
The only thing I know, is that I know nothing.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2019
I am reading this shit and it is all just "expand program, new program, new entitlement, Obama-Biden era rollback, free tranny surgery, increase estate taxes, repeal racial discrimination laws, come get 'dem programs."
I am only in the gun control part where they are talking about about a new imaginary "Charleston loophole" and I want some white supremacists to come hit me with a car already.
Rohan Davey
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
Chad Loder, age 43, CEO of Habitu8 (a cybersecurity firm).
Address: 3846 Tiffany Ln, Torrance, CA, 90505
Of course this asshole lives in a million-dollar house.
Ex-wife: Stephanie Foley, age 45.
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2019
Riot Ribs is no more. Rest in (rancid, rat-nibbled) pepperoni.
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2020
Every word of their gun control proposals is a lie, right down to "a", "an", and "the".
Wow, dumbasses didn't get the memo that the safeword is "Minecraft".
- Joined
- May 31, 2020
The Charleston loophole is the gun show loophole but even more politicized.
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2018
I had this on my computer back when the first BLM Protest was in Japan, apparently some japs weren't happy about BLM causing a ruckus in their country. Late by a couple months but better late than never.
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2016
That's an autistic and myopic hot take.
1. They were over capacity for corona restrictions and had to close. Then.
2. The children said that the machines weren't working. They wouldn't allow the workers to check the machines. They demanded refunds then and there, for the machines. It's often not even in the wheelhouse of the venue to do that. *
3. Why did they get dropped off en masse? Like a flash mob?
4. Why did the parents (supposedly) describe the centre as the "New Daycare Putt Putt" prior to the flash mob drop off of 300+ teens?
5. Why did they have fireworks on hand?
6. If this were over "refunds", does that give them the right to behave like this? This is pure anti-socialist behaviour.
I'm all for the "both sides" argument, if the impetus meets the gravity of the reaction. This did not. You don't chimp out like that over refunds, period, never mind all those ^ unanswered questions that were pertinent to the situation.
*From what I could see on FB, it seems like the "youths" were getting rowdy and violent prior to demanding refunds from machines they claimed are broken. They were told to cool it and started to chimp. The refunds were not the impetus.
From hearing from family who went down there at the time, there were a lot of Chinese down there too.
But the Africans in Tokyo (they cluster around Roppongi of a night), were out en masse too. They've been causing problems for people for as long as they've been there.
I think I posted some pictures before of what they do to alleyways near where they live.... They shit in the alleyways, block it off with trash and generally make a mess.
Last edited:
MrJokerRager
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
schizoid PD
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
The children are there to be used as tools for sympathetic videos and photos, to play with your emotions. Sometimes they bring the child to the front after failing to disperse so they get hit by the pepper spray. Film the girl afterward. Instant clicks and emotional driven opinion change. Same thing with bringing Moms to the front, or Vets to the front.
benutz
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2020
Why read when you can listen?
The Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn 1 of 7
The Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn 1 of 7
My Favorite audiobook , I read it over 3x it is so good..
www.youtube.com
This reading is over 10 hours long.
And then there are the other 6 parts included in the playlist.
....
If they did read it, they would cease to be commies.
And Solzhenitsyn would never be allowed in public schools, because he said unflattering things about Jews and their relationship to the bolsheviks in 200 Years Together (which has never been published in English).
Oregon politicians have bent over backwards to legitimize this insurrection. What makes you think arson and littering will be the changing moment?
There is an English Translation, but it was done by /pol/ apparently as a community effort, so it lacks veracity.
You can download it here if you want to check it out for yourself:
It's virus free. I've downloaded it and scanned it to my own high standards. Use your own methods as well.
It's true that 200 years together has not been translated in to English yet. But the work is continuing though no deadline or date for release has been given. I think the /pol/ version is plausible. It's almost impossible to take a work like that and 'jig' it to your own propaganda, in such a short time. It's enough work to just work out what the fucking translation is. Still, it's all we have. As far as English translations go. The work being worked on before is The Red Wheel. It is available on amazon so I would assume it is the most recently done English tranlsation of his work, and 200 years together won't be too far off.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn Center — The Red Wheel
Solzhenitsyn’s historical epic on the 1917 Russian Revolution, his “chief artistic design” and major life work.
www.solzhenitsyncenter.org
As for 200 Years Together:
There is an authorised French and German translation though so if you speak Frog or Kraut, fill yer boots...
With respect to an English edition—to recapitulate the above—an authorized translation of the full work is firmly in the plans, but awaits the completion of English publication of The Red Wheel. Therefore, no information is yet available regarding a specific publication timeline.
Meanwhile, readers need to be forewarned that any and all English versions available on the Internet (with two important exceptions listed below) are illegal, pirated, and/or entirely unauthorized; often poorly and loosely translated; and redact passages, and indeed whole chapters, that apparently do not support the prejudices of those behind these illegal editions.
======================================
but awaits the completion of English publication of The Red Wheel.
=========================================
I looked for the Red Wheel on amazon and it's there with reviews, kindle version in English, so I guess the Solz site is maybe a little out of date?
Whatevers.
Now, about those two English translations.
You can get them here:
These are the official files linked to above. I just added them for clarity and expedience.
This is my own initial reading to get some clarity and bearing with what I was dealing with. This is a two volume work remember. It's massive. And not completely translated. Below is official partial translations. This might help you get your bearings too. I've linked them above - they are from the official Solz site.
Two Hundred Years Together
After meeting with Solzhenitsyn in the spring of 2001, the Israelistatesman Shimon Peres announced the stunning news that theNobel laureate had completed a major historical work on Russia’s“Jewish question.” As Solzhenitsyn himself declared, this was a sub-ject he would have preferred to avoid. It had given rise to “mutualreproaches” and fierce polemics on both the Russian and Jewishsides. Many Jewish commentators reduced the essence of Russianhistory to a particularly virulent form of anti-Semitism, while ex-treme Russian nationalists blamed Jews for all the calamities thatafflicted their homeland in the twentieth century. And some ofSolzhenitsyn’s fevered critics were all too eager to confuse his pa-triotism and Orthodox faith with a badly concealed anti-Semitism.But Solzhenitsyn’s work on The Red Wheel had convincedhim that the “Jewish question,” however difficult to navigate, wasa topic that could not remain taboo and should not be left to thedistortions of irresponsible extremists. He had only touched uponthis question in The Red Wheel because he wanted to avoid givingany encouragement to fringe elements who blamed the Russianrevolutions of 1905 and 1917 on the conspiratorial machinationsof Jews. But since no fair-minded historian had jumped into thebreach, Solzhenitsyn felt obliged to embark on this monumentalproject. Instead of “ever-increasing reproaches and accusations,”there needed to be a “quest for all points of understanding, andall possible paths into the future, cleansed from the acrimony ofthe past.” Tw o H u n d re d Ye a rs To ge t h e r aims to understand the pastaccurately, equitably, while paving the way toward mutual un-derstanding and full reconciliation between Russians and Jews.
....
Introduction
Approaching the Theme
Through a half-century of work on the history of the Russian Revolu-tion, I repeatedly came face to face with the question of Russian-Jewishinterrelations. Time and again it would enter as a sharp wedge into events,into people’s psychology, and arouse blistering passions.I never lost hope that there would come, before me, a writer who mightillumine for us all this searing wedge, generously and equitably. More often,alas, we meet one-sided rebukes, either pertaining to Russians’ culpabilitytoward Jews, and even the primordial depravity of the Russian people (thereis quite a profusion of such views)—or, from those Russians who did writeabout this mutual dilemma, mostly agitated tendentious accounts that refuseto see any merit on the other side.It’s not that there is a paucity of public commentators—in Russia theJewish side, especially, abounds in them, more so than the Russian side. But,despite this dazzling array of minds and ideas, there still has not appearedsuch an exposition or elucidation of our common history as might meetwith understanding from both sides.Ye t w e m u s t l e a r n n o t t o t a u t e n t h e s e t e n s e , i n t e r w ove n s t r i n g s t o t h e i rbreaking point.I would be glad not to test my strength in such a thorny thicket, but Ibelieve that this history, and attempts to study it, must not remain “forbid- den.”The history of the “Jewish question” in Russia (and not only in Russia) is,first and foremost, a rich one. To write a bout it means to hear new voices andto convey them to the reader. (In this book Jewish voices will sound far morefrequently than Russian ones.)But because of the atmosphere surrounding this theme, writing about itturns out, in fact, to be like walking a razor’s edge. One feels from two sides
all manner of possible, impossible, and ever-increasing reproaches and ac-cusations.Ye t w h a t l e a d s m e t h r o u g h t h i s n a r r a t ive o f t h e t w o - h u n d r e d - ye a r - l o n gcohabitation of the Russian and Jewish peoples is a quest for all points ofcommon understanding and all possible paths into the future, cleansed fromthe acrimony of the past.The Jewish people—like all other peoples and like all per sons—is bothan active subject of history and its anguished object. Furthermore, Jews of-ten carried out, perhaps unconsciously, major tasks allotted them by His-tory. The “Jewish question” has been treated from numerous angles, alwayswith passion but also, oftentimes, with self-delusion. And yet the events thatbefall any people in the course of History are sometimes determined not bythat people alone, but also by the other peoples who surround it.An exaggerated hotheadedness on either side is humiliating to both. Therecannot be a question upon earth that is unsuited for contemplative discourseamong people. To converse broadly and openly is more honest—and in ourcase it is also indispensable. Alas, mutual grievances have accumulated inboth our people’s memories, but if we repress the past, how can we healthem? Until the collective psyche of a people finds its clear outlet in thewritten word, it can rumble indistinctly or, worse, menacingly.We cannot shut the door on the last two hundred years; and in any case,our planet has shrunk, and, no matter how one parses it, we become neigh-bors again.Fo r m a ny ye a r s I p o s t p o n e d t h i s wo r k a n d wo u l d s t i l l n ow b e p l e a s e d t oavert the burden of writing it. But my years are nearing their end, and I feelI must take up this task.I have never conceded to anyone the right to conceal that which was.Equally, I cannot call for an understanding based on an unjust portrayal of
the past. Instead, I call both sides—the Russian and the Jewish—to patientmutual comprehension, to the avowal of their own share of the blame. Yetisn’t it so easy to turn away from it, saying, “That wasn’t really us. . . ”? Iearnestly have tried to understand both sides of a historic conflict. To dothis, I delve into events, not polemics. I try to show, taking up an argumentonly in those unavoidable cases where the truth has been enveloped in layerupon layer of falsehood. I dare anticipate that this book will not be met withthe anger of implacable extremists, but instead will serve the cause of har-mony. I hope to find benevolent collocutors among both Jews and Russians.I conceive of my ultimate aim as discerning, to the best of my ability,mutually agreeable and fruitful pathways for the future development ofRussian-Jewish relations.
After meeting with Solzhenitsyn in the spring of 2001, the Israelistatesman Shimon Peres announced the stunning news that theNobel laureate had completed a major historical work on Russia’s“Jewish question.” As Solzhenitsyn himself declared, this was a sub-ject he would have preferred to avoid. It had given rise to “mutualreproaches” and fierce polemics on both the Russian and Jewishsides. Many Jewish commentators reduced the essence of Russianhistory to a particularly virulent form of anti-Semitism, while ex-treme Russian nationalists blamed Jews for all the calamities thatafflicted their homeland in the twentieth century. And some ofSolzhenitsyn’s fevered critics were all too eager to confuse his pa-triotism and Orthodox faith with a badly concealed anti-Semitism.But Solzhenitsyn’s work on The Red Wheel had convincedhim that the “Jewish question,” however difficult to navigate, wasa topic that could not remain taboo and should not be left to thedistortions of irresponsible extremists. He had only touched uponthis question in The Red Wheel because he wanted to avoid givingany encouragement to fringe elements who blamed the Russianrevolutions of 1905 and 1917 on the conspiratorial machinationsof Jews. But since no fair-minded historian had jumped into thebreach, Solzhenitsyn felt obliged to embark on this monumentalproject. Instead of “ever-increasing reproaches and accusations,”there needed to be a “quest for all points of understanding, andall possible paths into the future, cleansed from the acrimony ofthe past.” Tw o H u n d re d Ye a rs To ge t h e r aims to understand the pastaccurately, equitably, while paving the way toward mutual un-derstanding and full reconciliation between Russians and Jews.
....
Introduction
Approaching the Theme
Through a half-century of work on the history of the Russian Revolu-tion, I repeatedly came face to face with the question of Russian-Jewishinterrelations. Time and again it would enter as a sharp wedge into events,into people’s psychology, and arouse blistering passions.I never lost hope that there would come, before me, a writer who mightillumine for us all this searing wedge, generously and equitably. More often,alas, we meet one-sided rebukes, either pertaining to Russians’ culpabilitytoward Jews, and even the primordial depravity of the Russian people (thereis quite a profusion of such views)—or, from those Russians who did writeabout this mutual dilemma, mostly agitated tendentious accounts that refuseto see any merit on the other side.It’s not that there is a paucity of public commentators—in Russia theJewish side, especially, abounds in them, more so than the Russian side. But,despite this dazzling array of minds and ideas, there still has not appearedsuch an exposition or elucidation of our common history as might meetwith understanding from both sides.Ye t w e m u s t l e a r n n o t t o t a u t e n t h e s e t e n s e , i n t e r w ove n s t r i n g s t o t h e i rbreaking point.I would be glad not to test my strength in such a thorny thicket, but Ibelieve that this history, and attempts to study it, must not remain “forbid- den.”The history of the “Jewish question” in Russia (and not only in Russia) is,first and foremost, a rich one. To write a bout it means to hear new voices andto convey them to the reader. (In this book Jewish voices will sound far morefrequently than Russian ones.)But because of the atmosphere surrounding this theme, writing about itturns out, in fact, to be like walking a razor’s edge. One feels from two sides
all manner of possible, impossible, and ever-increasing reproaches and ac-cusations.Ye t w h a t l e a d s m e t h r o u g h t h i s n a r r a t ive o f t h e t w o - h u n d r e d - ye a r - l o n gcohabitation of the Russian and Jewish peoples is a quest for all points ofcommon understanding and all possible paths into the future, cleansed fromthe acrimony of the past.The Jewish people—like all other peoples and like all per sons—is bothan active subject of history and its anguished object. Furthermore, Jews of-ten carried out, perhaps unconsciously, major tasks allotted them by His-tory. The “Jewish question” has been treated from numerous angles, alwayswith passion but also, oftentimes, with self-delusion. And yet the events thatbefall any people in the course of History are sometimes determined not bythat people alone, but also by the other peoples who surround it.An exaggerated hotheadedness on either side is humiliating to both. Therecannot be a question upon earth that is unsuited for contemplative discourseamong people. To converse broadly and openly is more honest—and in ourcase it is also indispensable. Alas, mutual grievances have accumulated inboth our people’s memories, but if we repress the past, how can we healthem? Until the collective psyche of a people finds its clear outlet in thewritten word, it can rumble indistinctly or, worse, menacingly.We cannot shut the door on the last two hundred years; and in any case,our planet has shrunk, and, no matter how one parses it, we become neigh-bors again.Fo r m a ny ye a r s I p o s t p o n e d t h i s wo r k a n d wo u l d s t i l l n ow b e p l e a s e d t oavert the burden of writing it. But my years are nearing their end, and I feelI must take up this task.I have never conceded to anyone the right to conceal that which was.Equally, I cannot call for an understanding based on an unjust portrayal of
the past. Instead, I call both sides—the Russian and the Jewish—to patientmutual comprehension, to the avowal of their own share of the blame. Yetisn’t it so easy to turn away from it, saying, “That wasn’t really us. . . ”? Iearnestly have tried to understand both sides of a historic conflict. To dothis, I delve into events, not polemics. I try to show, taking up an argumentonly in those unavoidable cases where the truth has been enveloped in layerupon layer of falsehood. I dare anticipate that this book will not be met withthe anger of implacable extremists, but instead will serve the cause of har-mony. I hope to find benevolent collocutors among both Jews and Russians.I conceive of my ultimate aim as discerning, to the best of my ability,mutually agreeable and fruitful pathways for the future development ofRussian-Jewish relations.
Forgive me, I've just hacked together that .pdf shit as best as I can parse it right now.
The work is there.
I suggest you start with the introductions and then the conclusions from the authorised works linked from the official Solz site.
Work out from there and venture forth if you want to check out the /pol/ version.
he said unflattering things about Jews and their relationship to the bolsheviks in 200 Years Together
Maybe so, but also said very unflattering things about 'other' people around that time.
It sounds to me that 200 years together is a very neutral and scholarly work, as much as anything can be. I've only skimmed the official English translations so far, and only the introductions and conclusions, at that. But Solz doesn't sound like a man with an axe to grind. He sounds like someone desperately trying to get information across to the other side - the ignorant. People like us.
I might be wrong, but if people are looking for Pure Jew Hatred or a one sided argument here, they aren't going to find it in this work. But I haven't read it, so what do I Know.
Solz seems very measured and calm, as if he has something gravely important to impart on his listeners/readers.
I think this may be a more agreeable work than a divisive one. Please read my spoilered selections from this work, or read the whole authorised work yourself (what little there is of it in English) or by all means have at the /pol/ translation (which looks pretty good to me so far).
I'm an idiot. Don't listen to me.
You have the links. This is as good as it gets. You can work the rest out for yourselves.
Btw, that Gulag shit on youtube is great! One of the best audio books around.
Thanks to the mighty Weev, for the link to that!
The ol' Solz really does weave a very tangled web, that's for sure.
"Oh, what a tangled web we weev"
...
TL-DR; 200 years together -
Two Hundred Years Together aims to understand the past accurately, equitably, while paving the way toward mutual un-derstanding and full reconciliation between Russians and Jews.
He had only touched uponthis question in The Red Wheel because he wanted to avoid giving any encouragement to fringe elements who blamed the Russian revolutions of 1905 and 1917 on the conspiratorial machinations of Jews. But since no fair-minded historian had jumped into thebreach, Solzhenitsyn felt obliged to embark on this monumental project. Instead of “ever-increasing reproaches and accusations,”there needed to be a “quest for all points of understanding, and all possible paths into the future, cleansed from the acrimony ofthe past.” Tw o H u n d re d Ye a rs To ge t h e r aims to understand the past accurately, equitably, while paving the way toward mutual un-derstanding and full reconciliation between Russians and Jews.
MrJokerRager
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
George Carlin was spot on about rights which is to google "Japanese American 1945".
Whites have no rights to do anything. Only will and the current generation of whites have no will.
The World Wars devastated Europe in many ways and this will be a interesting future study, does war turn your population into servile cuckolds or at what percentage do they turn into servile cuckolds.
JohnnyG
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2020
- Status