U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
I found a picture of that umbrella
Interesting. Here is a link that has video and blurred images from the "white supremicist biker gang incident". The implication being someone who was involved and may have been pictured here was the "umbrella man". Yet the person hasn't been arrested and isn't named...


I found a picture of that umbrella guy:

1595963324346.png
 
that's the beauty of kiwifarms all kinds of hatred can flourish. Free speech doesn't mean everything will be nice.

nigga Nazi Germany was just a watered down version of communism ran by a self hating jew who was mad he couldn't go to art school. that bitch was doomed to fail.
Citations needed - private property thrived, companies like I.G. Farben were given state grants to work on private projects alongside public projects - the antithesis of Communism is private property, do you not understand Marxist dialectics? You're literally saying the nazis wanted to erase national identity, erase private property, erase wage difference, and establish a basis for class warfare even though the entire core ethic of fascism is class cooperation as opposed to class warfare, which Marxism is socially based off of? Need I remind you that Capitalism thrived in Nazi Germany, considering even the old Prussian oligarch class, entirely consistent of old wealthy military men, donors, and inheritors, were essentially implicated as the center of German culture - the Prussian class were the most antithetical thing to the 'proletariat' you could imagine; did the Bolsheviks NOT round up the rich and execute them, did the Chinese NOT round up Republicans and monarchists and execute them? They did, in every Communist revolution and state they do but yet the nazis allowed the rich to exist and exalted their ability to work? Wow, that's real fucking Marxist.

The economic miracle we witnessed that took place in Germany under Hitler after the Weimar period did so under an aspect of Corporatist economics, using Keynesian platforms to boost public projects like the autobahn and reduce unemployment via meritocratic distribution - if you can name the actual socialist economic policy that took place beyond bandying together forms of society into mutualized institutions like support groups, which is socialization, and the nationalization of certain industries like the rare metal-raw resource industry as pertaining to Wehrmacht production, I'll listen.

If your ENTIRE method of speech is 'fascists were inspired by socialists', you can fuck right off into that abyss of autism because that has no relevance to theory.

Do you know what military Keynesianism is? Nazism had no prevailing economic theory, fascism is not an economic theory - Communism is a socioeconomic theory preaching reducing everyone to the same bland shade of tone, making everyone equal through impracticality, removal of all private property, and the erasure of national identity.

I want to debate you in a DM.
 
Last edited:
IQ not high enough for real STEM and garbage schools. I can see why this buffoon is a YouTube lawyer (with apologies to Nick).

View attachment 1480030

There's a reason why Youtube and Twitter lawyers are generally from less prestigious schools. The whole field of law is very highly dependent on the prestige of the school to which lawyers went. Not that a lawyer from Widener or wherever is inherently bad, but you can look at the list of where SCOTUS justices were schooled to see just how it works at an elite level. The people at the top law schools are going to make tons of money in a real field if they want to/if they do well enough, so it leaves this niche open for others who want to capitalize on being internet lawyers. No Harvard educated lawyer is going to stoop to being an internet lawyer to get in fights with people they would laugh about in real life. Without power leveling, I can tell you for certain that's 100% the truth. I guess it's elitist, but that's just how the industry works unfortunately. It leaves people who go to law schools that just teach to the Bar to get invested in internet videos and catfight discussions. But do you think this guy even knows what Glanvill or Littleton's Tenures are, or from which field of law depositions came? No. Those guys and gals are making 200k a year laughing to the bank.
 
Did anyone else watch the Attorney General Barr testimony today in the Judiciary committee?

Huge farce. Everytime a Democrat had a turn to speak, they would make sweeping accusations and generalizations, ask hugely leading questions, and then give Barr about 7 words to respond before interrupting and "reclaiming my time." It wasn't even an effective struggle sessions, it just made them look angry and vindictive.
 
Citations needed - private property thrived, companies like I.G. Farben were given state grants to work on private projects alongside public projects - the antithesis of Communism is private property, do you not understand Marxist dialectics? You're literally saying the nazis wanted to erase national identity, erase private property, erase wage difference, and establish a basis for
...
I want to debate you in a DM.

I would love to see this debate happen in a public thread so I can read along!
 
Basically:
View attachment 1479995
I hate how this essentially forces people to support the Republican party, as flawed and selfish it can often be at times.

But it's not peoples' fault for staying true to the values that the Democrats drifted away from.
I know the stickers are there to deter low quality posts, like this, but I have to say this image is me right now. I would save this and share it, but my friends would murder "remedy" me before I could cast that vote. Plus, don't want to leave clues to my farming.

It really is a strange choice to be given. Cake or death. I mean, the cake might make you fat and lead to your death later, but we have time to counterbalance that.
 
Did anyone else watch the Attorney General Barr testimony today in the Judiciary committee?

Huge farce. Everytime a Democrat had a turn to speak, they would make sweeping accusations and generalizations, ask hugely leading questions, and then give Barr about 7 words to respond before interrupting and "reclaiming my time." It wasn't even an effective struggle sessions, it just made them look angry and vindictive.


Some of the most maddening shit i've seen in awhile.
 
Did anyone else watch the Attorney General Barr testimony today in the Judiciary committee?

Huge farce. Everytime a Democrat had a turn to speak, they would make sweeping accusations and generalizations, ask hugely leading questions, and then give Barr about 7 words to respond before interrupting and "reclaiming my time." It wasn't even an effective struggle sessions, it just made them look angry and vindictive.
That's because you are sane. I was listening to it from another room for about 30 minutes at my buddies earlier. His gf is the typical brainless progtard, and that type eats it up. She was on speakerphone with one of her friends and they were watching it. Every time she'd bark like a seal about how they were destroying Barr, my buddy just rolled his eyes and looked annoyed. I don't think my friend even knows why hes still with that nutter. Maybe hes afraid she would kill his dogs, Not gonna ask, ya'know?
 
I would love to see this debate happen in a public thread so I can read along!

Anyone's invited - I'll detest the claim of a 'self-hating Jew' too, historians have cast doubt on that for years and as recently as last fucking year went into an entire encyclical as to why that just seems a bit goofy; the claim originates from Hans Frank's claim that Adolf Hitler's maternal grandmother was impregnated by a Jewish shopkeeper in Graz, a part of Germany that owned literally no Jewish diaspora at all up until maybe 1850, itself being a small community of settlers according to the only archival information relating to that community - this is 14 long years after the days of Alois.

Primary historians debunking that claim are Jewish themselves ironically, people like Ian Kershaw. Pseudo-scientific bullshit and misreading of history is no better than Marxist revisionism.
 
The saddest realization is that there will be riots at the end of this trial in all likelihood no matter what. A celebratory riot will do less damage, probably, than a riot spun out from a mob whose bloodlust remains unsated, baying for their pound of flesh. We find ourselves in a game we can't truly win, we just have to prepare for a bunch of terrible outcomes to hope to mitigate the blow.
The "win" is giving them what they claim to want but clearly don't: have the police stand down, not just in the ghetto but in the gentrified gayborhoods and other rich "progressive" enclaves.

When the vegans and cat ladies desperately trying to Faceberg themselves being "oppressed" lose the restraint and implicit protection of the police, and get to experience African violence levels on their doorstep, you'll get an awakening. Right now they love the curated Disney+ version of diversity they watch safely from miles away.
 
Ben Shapiro, "I don't give a damn about the browning of America."

His structure of debate isn't even...there, he just hurls as many nicely-wrapped ad hominems as he can meshed with facts at teenage leftists and University liberals, some of the most moronic fucking people on Earth. Ben Shapiro is nice to listen to sometimes by himself but his debates are just fucking funny to watch - he's just stumbling over his own words as he's talking so fucking fast half the time but the people he's debating are far too politically illiterate to oppose it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back