Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

That's always the funniest and most bizarre part: these people only have the ability and freedom to chimp out and rail against capitalism on their iPhones and Macbooks because of....capitalism.

Also funny how a lot of these "anti-capitalists" don't live off-the-grid...no, they live in big, cosmopolitan cities in luxury apartments.
"we live in the world that is" always lol worthy, they never go out to try to build there system on the small scale.
still not as good when they claim it's approval ratings after it collapse in a few countries show it they liked communism more the capitalism (ignoring they were told it was better through propaganda since they were kids) but ignore all the people fleeing there nations as "survivorship bias"

You have to be a pathetic loser to larp as a communist in a capitalist country, that seriously makes zero sense.

I wish we can send these same American communists and Socialists to communist countries altogether and see how long they can survive, I'm betting they won't because they're spoiled cunts.
don't worry they have endless excuses for why they don't even try. they are in fact the same ones they blame the brutality of the soviet union and literally every other communist country one, "capitalist try to convince people not to be communist, so we enforce though crime laws"

and just a reminder they make bold claims about capitalism that don't work any more, the system we call capitalism has changed. The one marx made shit perditions about didn't realy exist and the one of his time in nothing like the one of today.
 
Last edited:
Screenshot_20200801-101543_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot_20200801-101559_Chrome.jpg
 
"we live in the world that is" always lol worthy, they never go out to try to build there system on the small scale.
still not as good when they claim it's approval ratings after it collapse in a few countries show it they liked communism more the capitalism (ignoring they were told it was better through propaganda since they were kids) but ignore all the people fleeing there nations as "survivorship bias"

don't worry they have endless excuses for why they don't even try. they are in fact the same ones they blame the brutality of the soviet union and literally every other communist country one, "capitalist try to convince people not to be communist, so we enforce though crime laws"

The funny thing is that they absolutely could try an "off grid" lifestyle if they had a strong desire to do it and would put in the effort. There are people who live basic lifestyles out in the bush in northern Canada or Alaska. Some religious farming communes are also quite successful.

The real reason they don't is that an off-the-grid lifestyle absolutely sucks for the vast majority of modern people. Few anti-capitalists will admit that, though. Farming without modern machinery (made by capitalists) is back-breaking labour and hunting does require some skill. Farming even with modern machinery is a gamble, as bad weather can destroy all of your crops.
 
Call me a faggot if you want to, but everyone in that thread would absolutely just talk shit but the moment their big Nazi landlord even shows the willingness to put up a fight they would crumple like paper. The nigga who got arrested may be a piece of shit but at least he had conviction to go through with it which is what all these faggy commie larpers severely lack.
While I’d argue it doesn’t much conviction to be a piece of shit, you’re spot on with these comments. They’re basically the worst of Internet tough guys combined with a-logs yet they’re supposedly the good guys.
Personally I've despised most of my landlords, but these people seem to be failing to grasp that the problem is systematic rather than just bad faith actors.
Which is weird considering these people are supposedly all about identifying systemic problems.
 
Wait, open witches lead a Unitarian church? I knew they were heretical but this is on another level.
Unitarian Universalism is basically Homeopathy: the Religion. The closest thing they have to a creed or religious standards is something called the Seven Principles.
  • The inherent worth and dignity of every person;
  • Justice, equity and compassion in human relations;
  • Acceptance of one another and encouragement to spiritual growth in our congregations;
  • A free and responsible search for truth and meaning;
  • The right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our congregations and in society at large;
  • The goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice for all;
  • Respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.
You can be anything you want as long as its vaguely spiritual and accepting and be part of the UU. Neopagan witches are just par for the course.
 
D35282C6-6C34-4354-B9DD-D34EF76AC740.jpeg
2CD277E2-2DA7-4A1E-963C-5BB8761967B2.png


I will never forget the day this guy was brought to the limelight for a book that makes the most smug race-baiting individual look like a fedora tipper on r/atheism.

Also, rate me MATI all you want, but the second pic really insults me because he’s saying this stuff while having one of the Wu-Tang Clan member’s album as their avatar.

D1675AFF-440A-4EC7-BEF4-B84CA79C4C4B.jpeg
 
View attachment 1489753View attachment 1489754

I will never forget the day this guy was brought to the limelight for a book that makes the most smug race-baiting individual look like a fedora tipper on r/atheism.

Also, rate me MATI all you want, but the second pic really insults me because he’s saying this stuff while having one of the Wu-Tang Clan member’s album as their avatar.

View attachment 1489761
Unsurprisingly Wikipedia doesn't include any of this on his page.
 
"Don't call the sex offender a sex offender, that will hurt their fee-fees!"

View attachment 1488672
The weird thing to me is that they aren't even changing the context of title. They are aren't hiding the fact a sex offender is a sex offender they are just making it more unwieldy. The implication is the same and so is the identity of the subject but they are just throwing the word person before it. The only way it changes anything is to maybe remind you that the subject in question is still a person but that's such a given that the only people that would need to be reminded of the fact are soulless automatons and sociopaths.


Normal Version: Did you hear about the new neighbor? Yeah he's a sex offender that supposedly raped two kids under the bridge leading into town.

New Friendly Version: Did you hear about the new neighbor? Yeah he's an individual who previously committed a sexual based offense where he raped two kids under the bridge leading into town.

Doesn't change anything about the sentence just takes longer to say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jhonson Jhonson
I'm down for equality, but only after ya'll call out the anti-white rhetoric. Make no mistake, BLM is not about equality, it's about black supremacy.

My sense is that, as practiced, it's an offer of a trade: start treating black middle-class men like you treat white middle-class men, and in return you can start treating white lower-class men the way you treat black lower-class men".

Honestly, society has already been evolving that way anyways; BLM-as-practiced just seems like a formalization. The most convenient aspect of the BLM packaging is that it automatically incites lower class whites to react against it - nobody, and I mean NOBODY wants to be a nigger in the US South - and then turns their reaction into justification for niggifying them. And so the zero-sum balance of power is preserved, while those minorities who have managed to demonstrate some capacity for long-term exploitation within the economic regime get to play "middle class suburbia" with all the whitebread until someone comes to steal their pensions (but hey, at least their white neighbors' pensions get stolen too, so equity is preserved!)
 
Back