Monica Rial / Monica Jean Rial / Rialisms & Ron Toye / Ronald Toye III / rontoye3 - 5th Bulma and Ron "Pick Up the Phone or You'll Find Your Dog Dead When You Get Home" Toye

So realizing that Ron is a pure bitch for what's he's saying to rape victim we go back to Stan Dahlin calling out RonView attachment 1492869
If I read it correctly,
Stan is saying here that Monica had an agreement for the con to pay for her trip and that she expected the con to pay for Ron's trip too...
So Ron and Monica are mad at Stan because the con didn't consider Ron's ticket to be part of Monica's travel fees?
And another evidence those two morons are entitled little brats...
 
Last edited:
If I read it correctly,
Stan is saying here that Monica had an agreement for the con to pay for her trip and that she expected the con to pay for Ron's trip too...
So Ron and Monica are mad at Stan because the con didn't consider Ron's ticket to be part of Monica's travel fees?
And another evidence those two morons are entitled little brats...
How on earth did Stan expect Monica to appear unless the con provided room and board for her emotional support sheepdog?
 
20200804_114806.jpg

 
Methinks someone let it slip that Ron's odds of getting past appeals are very low and he's now working overtime to try "winning" in the court of public opinion. Too bad that Ron's ability to read a room is on par with Ron's ability to pleasure a woman (nonexistent).
Someone should tell this soy-faced fuck that maybe sperging on Twitter, the same website that got him into the mess, while this case is still going through appeals is probably not the best idea.
 
If I read it correctly,
Stan is saying here that Monica had an agreement for the con to pay for her trip and that she expected the con to pay for Ron's trip too...
So Ron and Monica are mad at Stan because the con didn't consider Ron's ticket to be part of Monica's travel fees?
And another evidence those two morons are entitled little brats...

Why the fuck would anyone inviting Monica to a con want some weaselly pedophile looking cuck? Why would they pay to have him? What is he doing other than potentially molesting random underage people? Nobody wants Ron anywhere, and they certainly wouldn't pay to have some weird creepy dude who looks like a pedo hanging around.

If Monica wants to have yet another questionable boyfriend of hers, like the confirmed pedophile Illich Guardiola, or Ron Toye, she can pay to have this creepy fucker there herself. Why would the con pay to have this weirdo around? He contributes nothing.
 
If I read it correctly,
Stan is saying here that Monica had an agreement for the con to pay for her trip and that she expected the con to pay for Ron's trip too...
So Ron and Monica are mad at Stan because the con didn't consider Ron's ticket to be part of Monica's travel fees?
And another evidence those two morons are entitled little brats...

Isn't it actually commonplace for conventions to not pay for another person's ticket if they're not invited by the con owner/in the industry themselves? Think it was Stan or the guy from HawaiiCon (or is it the same guy?) on Nick's show who brought it up once he had someone tell him they'll go to his convention only if they could pay for their spouse/fiancé/whoever as well, and he said they couldn't.
 
Creepy Ron continues his shitty behavior towards Crumb, who has come out swinging today.
Screenshot_20200804-145605.png
Screenshot_20200804-145618.png
Screenshot_20200804-145744.png
Screenshot_20200804-145844.png
Screenshot_20200804-145906.png
From here on I ask that you excuse the lack of images. My powers out and internet is spotty unfortunately. Here's Creepy Ron displaying that he believes his abuse is a joke
Screenshot_20200804-151611.png
The image:
20200804_152649.jpg
This disgusting animal loves knowing be 'got away' with hitting and abusing his wife.
Screenshot_20200804-151635.png
Screenshot_20200804-151708.png
Screenshot_20200804-151731.png
The only thing of note here is that he says 'we' in one of his statements:
Screenshot_20200804-151836.png
Who's 'we'? I thought there was no conspiracy and no joint action in this suit?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20200804-145823.png
    Screenshot_20200804-145823.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 76
After watching the clip from Nick's stream in Nontransferable's post from yesterday I was curious and made a quick Google search for "arguing with narcissists". First hit was this article:
"6 Toxic Arguing Techniques Used by Narcissists and Manipulators"

I found it a quite interesting read and although I expected it, it nonetheless boggled my mind how well Ron fits all the bullet points from his Ronversations with Nick and the Canuckleheads alone.

Here're some snippets from the article's summary:

In a social interaction, discussion, or argument, regular, well-meaning people treat others with curiosity, empathy, and good faith. A narcissist, on the other hand, sees interaction as a win-lose situation. To “win,” they try to dominate, bully, deceive, demean, humiliate, and hurt others.

For that, they use certain common and predictable tactics that include but are not limited to arguing in bad faith, lying, denying, deflecting and attacking, gaslighting, and intimidating. If and when they feel they have lost or were wronged, they will try to intimidate you further and manipulate others in order to hurt you personally and socially. Sometimes while accusing you of it at the same time.

[..] They don’t care about sound arguments, honesty, empathy, curiosity, or win-win resolutions. They might claim that they are all about that, but if you look at how they act it’s evident that they are not. [..]
 
Some stuff I just missed including randos coming to bat for Ronnie boy
Screenshot_20200804-154905.png
Screenshot_20200804-154750.png
Screenshot_20200804-154557.png
Screenshot_20200804-154440.png
Screenshot_20200804-154426.png
Screenshot_20200804-154408.png
This baby snark retard really believes everything in the affidavits lmao. They also make regular reference to "Vic luring minors away from their parents for 'private photo shoots' appearing in the affidavits." I've read the affidavits and seen the bold (and evidenceless) claims and I think I would've remembered that. Anyone know what this psycho is talking about?
ETA: Apparently this person was talking about the Lynn Hunt and Whitney Alba affidavits, which both basically boil down to "Vic was trying to molest little girls at these cons but we did not actually witness ourselves and only heard about and have no one to corroborate our stories. Also he's a big mean diva."
Lynn's affidavit is also the famous "he was banned from this con in '04 [even tho he would be back in '05 and '07 and I was just a pleb and had no reason to be savvy to the inner knowings of the invites]"
 
Last edited:
Some stuff I just missed including randos coming to bat for Ronnie boy
View attachment 1495468
View attachment 1495469
View attachment 1495471
View attachment 1495472
View attachment 1495474
View attachment 1495475
This baby snark retard really believes everything in the affidavits lmao. They also make regular reference to "Vic luring minors away from their parents for 'private photo shoots' appearing in the affidavits." I've read the affidavits and seen the bold (and evidenceless) claims and I think I would've remembered that. Anyone know what this psycho is talking about?
Most likely the Tekkoshocon(? Whatever it's called) that manjaw and 2 others submitted affidavits for, including him apparently being found alone with teenage girls near/in his hotel room.
 
At some point probably with the old PULL site, people were writing their own "horrible Vic" stories and making up whatever trash and twisting truths to unrecognizable drugged up realities.
One girl wanted to sue Vic for "Having nightmares he attacked her as she slept."
Total fabrications of bullshit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ConSluttant
Back