There's an interesting thread to be pulled on about how being 'performative', like acting 'in bad faith', are such horrible concepts to SJWs. How much of their time is spent on questioning motives, doubting behaviours, requiring conditions for acceptability from 'allies' that are impossible. How, because they demand knowledge of the thoughts and feelings of a person, but don't trust the words of the person themselves, they give themselves carte blanche to decide how everybody else
really feels, in effect giving themselves the power to define someone else's thoughts and emotions for them.
How the power they want to have over other people is not just in their actions and words, but in deciding what they really mean, how they really feel, they want the power to redefine any other person in whatever manner they choose. How closely that aligns with certain very negative personality disorders and ways of seeing the world.
This could be a source of a
@Jaimas-style essay about the sociopathy of the indignant left. Or I could just have a headache and be annoyed at all the REEEEEEing. But I still think it's extremely telling that the worst crime for them is thoughtcrime, and how much that is because they can accuse anything of being a thoughtcrime and it can't be disproved.