Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

A knife to the back as soon as the war is over.

It's a funny thing but most of the left political stuff I'm involved in we refer to one another as comrades and work on the assumption of simular aims and objectives. I think it speaks depths that Sjw's refer to people who arnt them as Allies then lay a list of demands on you.


1596622961598.png
 
There's an interesting thread to be pulled on about how being 'performative', like acting 'in bad faith', are such horrible concepts to SJWs. How much of their time is spent on questioning motives, doubting behaviours, requiring conditions for acceptability from 'allies' that are impossible. How, because they demand knowledge of the thoughts and feelings of a person, but don't trust the words of the person themselves, they give themselves carte blanche to decide how everybody else really feels, in effect giving themselves the power to define someone else's thoughts and emotions for them.

How the power they want to have over other people is not just in their actions and words, but in deciding what they really mean, how they really feel, they want the power to redefine any other person in whatever manner they choose. How closely that aligns with certain very negative personality disorders and ways of seeing the world.

This could be a source of a @Jaimas-style essay about the sociopathy of the indignant left. Or I could just have a headache and be annoyed at all the REEEEEEing. But I still think it's extremely telling that the worst crime for them is thoughtcrime, and how much that is because they can accuse anything of being a thoughtcrime and it can't be disproved.

Social anxiety is heavily enriched in Twitter culture. Once you have a bunch of connections who share the same delusion, it's easy to reinforce that delusion. They'll tell you that your paranoid thoughts are 100% true and valid, so listen to your anxiety and build up the walls of your hug box even more, because the rest of the world really is judging you for being different.
 
Social anxiety is heavily enriched in Twitter culture. Once you have a bunch of connections who share the same delusion, it's easy to reinforce that delusion. They'll tell you that your paranoid thoughts are 100% true and valid, so listen to your anxiety and build up the walls of your hug box even more, because the rest of the world really is judging you for being different.
They also feel they're under surveillance by their peers 100% of the time, since everything they do in social media is essentially public. That's why you often see scummy AD accounts or private messages. Their entire social environment enforces social anxiety as a method of keeping everybody in line, and they need escape valves. Like the Farms.

Hello again, lurkers!
 
Further on the '2 + 2 = 4 is white colonising supremacy' concept...
Edit: The linked thread is worth reading for a proper exploration of just what the educators trying to push this sort of stuff believe, and what they get away with publishing.

Tl;dr: The usual destructive attempts to redefine meaning out of existence, including 'if you don't get why 2 + 2 doesn't have to equal 4 then you're transphobic' as well.

 
If it were that easy to dismiss the gap someone would do it. The reality is that you can't make those assumptions about black or white nutrition (because the data is anonymized for patient privacy), and even if you could the lag in IQ from prenatal health seems to disappear in adulthood except in the case of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and other drug-related diseases, which are screened out of these studies.

Funny you should mention FAS, because outside of that, Native Canadians occupy almost the exact same socio-economic position as American Blacks, don't appear to have the MOAO-L issue you've described, and neither do Chinese people, who also have the gene in question, based on my 3 minutes of googling.

And the most cited studies on the matter have N=75 or so, which isn't enough data to work from.

And apparently I have Canadians showing up in feeds, so here's some more stupid -

1596630710505.png


Apparently, it's time to throw the faggots under the bus for the dune coons, because there's assholes happily trying to claim that the people pictured attacked the homos because of "racist commentary." That sure sounds a shit ton like the kind of bullshit that the British get fed, to defend Muslim "cultural enrichment."

 
Last edited:
The amount of good traits that get attributed to white supremacy is baffling. Valuing punctuality? That's white supremacy. Placing an importance on manners and professionalism? White supremacy. Advocating for a two parent household? Wouldn't ya know, that's also white supremacy. If you want to lower the amount of white supremacists, stop making it sound so fucking appealing
 

They will succeed in bringing people out of neutrality...and to opposing them. Nobody wants this sanctimonious bs shoved at them.
All infographics like these show me is that most people are too lazy to do their own research and make their own talking points. Stuff like this is just spoon fed to the masses and anyone that repeats these rebuttals verbatim shows no original thought or critical thinking skills.

Regarding the BLM post specifically, this post is disingenuous and does little to persuade. Also, making villains out of those that are neutral will only make people angrier. Finally, BLM is political because it chose to be political from the start. You can’t say you want to change or get rid of law enforcement and claim it isn’t political because you said so. Any movement that tries to change the way governments operate is inherently political.
 
All infographics like these show me is that most people are too lazy to do their own research and make their own talking points. Stuff like this is just spoon fed to the masses and anyone that repeats these rebuttals verbatim shows no original thought or critical thinking skills.

Regarding the BLM post specifically, this post is disingenuous and does little to persuade. Also, making villains out of those that are neutral will only make people angrier. Finally, BLM is political because it chose to be political from the start. You can’t say you want to change or get rid of law enforcement and claim it isn’t political because you said so. Any movement that tries to change the way governments operate is inherently political.

There is a reason we all call them a Borg. Every time one person I know posts one of these, it‘s guaranteed I will see it several more times from that group.

My favorite part of this post is where they ask “what do you think about police brutality?” and the imaginary respondent says it is bad BUT...and they get mad because nooooooo you are supposed to follow the script they built for you in their heads!!!!!!!
 
If BLM's treatment of that Cuban-owned business in Louisville is any indication, the knife was placed in early.

This shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. Black racists may hate white people above all else, but they've got no love for Latinos and see them as just as big an obstacle to their supremacists views as they do any other race.
 
This shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. Black racists may hate white people above all else, but they've got no love for Latinos and see them as just as big an obstacle to their supremacists views as they do any other race.
It's fine, the Hindus and the East Asians are going to get the bullet before the Latinos if BLM has their way.
 
Further on the '2 + 2 = 4 is white colonising supremacy' concept...
Edit: The linked thread is worth reading for a proper exploration of just what the educators trying to push this sort of stuff believe, and what they get away with publishing.

Tl;dr: The usual destructive attempts to redefine meaning out of existence, including 'if you don't get why 2 + 2 doesn't have to equal 4 then you're transphobic' as well.
Even the examples they give aren't of 2+2 equaling 5, they're of 2.5+2.5 equaling five. Did they even make it past the fourth grade?
 
There is a reason we all call them a Borg. Every time one person I know posts one of these, it‘s guaranteed I will see it several more times from that group.

My favorite part of this post is where they ask “what do you think about police brutality?” and the imaginary respondent says it is bad BUT...and they get mad because nooooooo you are supposed to follow the script they built for you in their heads!!!!!!!
And they have no answer for it either. It's just anger.
 
Even the examples they give aren't of 2+2 equaling 5, they're of 2.5+2.5 equaling five. Did they even make it past the fourth grade?
how is the numeric system white supremacist when it is indian-arabian in origin

they could actually have an argument if they said whites owe a large facet of civilization to the indo-arabs but the idea a race "owns" the concept is as much stupid and bitter straw-grasping as those shitty comics
 
It's fine, the Hindus and the East Asians are going to get the bullet before the Latinos if BLM has their way.
I'd say it depends on the area since there's still areas in America where east, south east, and central asians are less than 3% of the total population. If there's none of them around, Latinos are going to take the hit as the other white meat.
how is the numeric system white supremacist when it is indian-arabian in origin

they could actually have an argument if they said whites owe a large facet of civilization to the indo-arabs but the idea a race "owns" the concept is as much stupid and bitter straw-grasping as those shitty comics
Love the idea that they'd screech over it like shitty original character drama online. "ORIGINAL NUMBERS SYSTEM DO NOT STEAL WHITEY AND DDLG DON'T INTERACT"
 
I'd say it depends on the area since there's still areas in America where east, south east, and central asians are less than 3% of the total population. If there's none of them around, Latinos are going to take the hit as the other white meat.
Now the question is, what about the (non-black) dark skinned Latinos? Will they make an exception or will they ignore that factor like they do with the Pakastani and south Indians?
 
how is the numeric system white supremacist when it is indian-arabian in origin

they could actually have an argument if they said whites owe a large facet of civilization to the indo-arabs but the idea a race "owns" the concept is as much stupid and bitter straw-grasping as those shitty comics

Because 2+2=4 is a White Western perspective that marginalizes other ways of knowing, and all such white hegemonies systemically oppress fat queer trans BIPOC. It's more of the magic of postmodernism.
 
Now the question is, what about the (non-black) dark skinned Latinos? Will they make an exception or will they ignore that factor like they do with the Pakastani and south Indians?
Considering they don't include recent african immigrants as capital B Black, probably not. Even if they include them they'll drag them into the light skin vs dark skin wars. I feel bad enough for the poor Black people who get dragged into that already :(
 
Back