U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reading the replies... American blacks, no most Americans in general are so fucking ignorant, uneducated and gullible it's unbelievable. Slaves were an investment, it doesn't make sense to eat, completely starve them or do half the things these idiots claim. This is the result of being conditioned and the plain refusal to actually pay attention to any history. On the bright these tweets made my day
View attachment 1502357View attachment 1502359
Also lol
View attachment 1502392

These people don't care about the past or the future, they only live in a never ending present, consequences aren't even an afterthought.

What the fuck is a "lil peanut brian"

Okay, this thread is becoming hazardous to my health. Time for me to lurk.

View attachment 1502528

Focus on the lil peanut Brian's instead.
 
It's from the link in the picture you posted.

View attachment 1502286

This has to be fake. It's literally quoting Syme from 1984.

“It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words. Of course the great wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hundreds of nouns that can be got rid of as well. It isn't only the synonyms; there are also the antonyms. After all, what justification is there for a word which is simply the opposite of some other words? A word contains its opposite in itself. Take 'good,' for instance. If you have a word like 'good,' what need is there for a word like 'bad'? 'Ungood' will do just as well--better, because it's an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if you want a stronger version of 'good,' what sense is there in having a whole string of vague useless words like 'excellent' and 'splendid' and all the rest of them? 'Plusgood' covers the meaning, or 'doubleplusgood' if you want something stronger still...In the end the whole notion of goodness and badness will be covered by only six words--in reality, only one word. Don't you see the beauty of that, Winston?”


By the way, Syme disappeared in Book 2, Chapter 5 and was unpersoned.
 
Absolutely. We've tested the Conservation of Momentum so many different ways that we know for practical certainty that it is a thing and that you cannot violate it no matter how hard you try. The Em Drive claimed to violate the conservation of momentum. Therefore, there was no good reason to ever believe that the Em Drive could possibly work and lo and behold it fucking didn't. Intuition was never a factor.

Those have also been widely tested and remained resolute. It is a watering down of science to even question such things as racial IQ or the Conservation of Momentum. Don't even get me started with heresy like FTL travel or the "Alcubierre Drive" which directly violate fucking Causality itself and how so many people who should know better think they're possible or worth investigating.
Eh, the math behind the Alcubierre metric is sound, it just has the teeny tiny problem of hinging on the existence of exotic matter with negative mass. Just because something is a valid solution to something doesn't mean it's a physically possible one. Tachyons are also valid solutions, but whatever the fuck would imaginary mass be?
If negative mass or energy density could somehow be synthesized, it'd be an interesting thing because we'd have to re-evaluate causality to some degree. The Alcubierre metric tries to get away with it by preserving causality locally, but it could still cause some paradoxa.
I'm not holding my breath on discovering negative mass, though. The only even semi-plausible lead on that that I heard of is the hypothetical Woodward effect, which apparently has a term that would allow the creation of negative energy density under certain circumstances. But the Woodward effect itself isn't exactly proven or even accepted science to begin with.
 
The American flag is "fascist." The same country that allowed these ANTIFA scumbags to do what they please, until they start initiating violence. What the fuck?

@mindlessobserver this is somebody I have no problem defending. That lady with the Nazi flag, I'm sorry she was targeted by them, but she decided to play a stupud game with using that armband.
This reminds me of the controversy surrounding Charlie Hebdo and the drawing of Muhammad. Do you think the publication was playing 'stupid games,' and should not have provoked the Muslims that way? Free speech means just that, regardless of how "inciting" it is. It is not to be met with violence. Even if I call some rando "nigger," that does not give that rando permission to assault me. Or at least, it shouldn't but this is where were headed: words equal violence. It's wrong, just like the concept of "hate speech" is wrong.
 
When did the world get so full of snowflakes? Ive been trying 2 think whether it was a slow progressive thing or if it just happened over night but I literally cant think of a time when things have been worse. When people cant say things or do things because it'll offend someone somewhere!
When did 'getting offended on someone elses behalf' become a thing? You're not offended yourself and the other person isnt bother either, but you're offended on their behalf...the world is literally batshit crazy atm!
 
Are there laws in place to protect citizens fighting insurgents? Does anybody know the point when protecting your home or town against enemies becomes legal? Like some Red Dawn shit. I know we aren't there yet but is there a precedent for this that I'm unaware of?
 
Are there laws in place to protect citizens fighting insurgents? Does anybody know the point when protecting your home or town against enemies becomes legal? Like some Red Dawn shit. I know we aren't there yet but is there a precedent for this that I'm unaware of?
They don't care. As long as they get there way, they win. Even if it fucks everyone over in the long run.
 
They're just going to say everyone is an American. They will make themselves believe it, like everything else.

View attachment 1502525



Found that here. Scary idea's.

America guarantees equality under the law.

No, we do not grant equity. We just make sure the law does not unfairly target people unfairly.
 
This has to be fake. It's literally quoting Syme from 1984.

“It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words. Of course the great wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hundreds of nouns that can be got rid of as well. It isn't only the synonyms; there are also the antonyms. After all, what justification is there for a word which is simply the opposite of some other words? A word contains its opposite in itself. Take 'good,' for instance. If you have a word like 'good,' what need is there for a word like 'bad'? 'Ungood' will do just as well--better, because it's an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if you want a stronger version of 'good,' what sense is there in having a whole string of vague useless words like 'excellent' and 'splendid' and all the rest of them? 'Plusgood' covers the meaning, or 'doubleplusgood' if you want something stronger still...In the end the whole notion of goodness and badness will be covered by only six words--in reality, only one word. Don't you see the beauty of that, Winston?”


By the way, Syme disappeared in Book 2, Chapter 5 and was unpersoned.

@Forgetful Gynn is literally at the bottom of the s/s.
 
Normie: "Okay we should talk about police refor.." Progressive: "ABLOISH ALL POLICE YOU NAZI!"

I wish this was an exaggeration. They had a good opportunity with that Brianna Taylor situation, almost everybody agrees that no-knock raids are overused and in need of reform. They wasted that by screeching for the cops all the be charged with 1st degree murder.
 
This is paper tiger behavior. The mob has power because extremely wealthy people (that conservatives helped empower) protects them. You can't undo decades of sticking your head in the sand with empty platitudes.

A pro-PRC Maoist gimmick poster has no room to talk about paper tigers.

Your whole retarded gimmick is simping for the biggest paper tiger in modern geopolitics
 
Antics aside, I'm surprised her and her property are intact.

It almost seems like this was scripted. I am not going to try to dox some old lady getting harassed on her own property to find out, but it just seems suspicious that they just randomly found an old lady watching "Who Wants to be a Millionaire?" in her living room and she decides to go outside to engage with a bunch of speds while wearing a fucking swastika when the nation is having race riots due to some black loser overdosing in police custody.
 
A pro-PRC Maoist gimmick poster has no room to talk about paper tigers.

Your whole retarded gimmick is simping for the biggest paper tiger in modern geopolitics

So let me get this right: The CCP is simultaneously an incompetent paper tiger, and also capable of infiltrating the upper levels of both your government and your corporations, causing widespread chaos and civil unrest and bringing the US down to its knees. Wow talk about doublethink.
 
hi five.gif

Let's be hopeful for the future, frens! Things will get worse before they get better, but we will all be okay! The Minecraft server is a good way to relax, too.
 
That was a lot of catch up. The biggest pitfall in all of this going on for so long is the initial bending of the knee to these lunatics. A dangerous precedent was set when we ignored one gleaming policy: "No negotiation with terrorists". Since they have, in essence, caved to terrorist demands, and pushed policy and laws to appease the mass these riots will never end. This will never stop now. They've demonstrated it works. Were going to be a warring, rioting mess going forward.

When did the world get so full of snowflakes? Ive been trying 2 think whether it was a slow progressive thing or if it just happened over night but I literally cant think of a time when things have been worse. When people cant say things or do things because it'll offend someone somewhere!
When did 'getting offended on someone elses behalf' become a thing? You're not offended yourself and the other person isnt bother either, but you're offended on their behalf...the world is literally batshit crazy atm!

Soylent was developed in 2013. Im not a scientist, but there must be something to this. Does the introduction of soy supplements coincide with the softening of the US?
 
So let me get this right: The CCP is simultaneously an incompetent paper tiger, and also capable of infiltrating the upper levels of both your government and your corporations, causing widespread chaos and civil unrest and bringing the US down to its knees. Wow talk about doublethink.

Obvious bait gimmick is obvious

But to put your retarded comment into context, the CCP just got a lucky break in the 1990's and 2000's because short-sighted neocons and neolibs thought they could use corporatism to get the PRC on our side.

That didn't work and Trump sees the CCP for the bastards they are. China ended up crippling the global economy with the plague they neglected and deliberately lied about until it was too late and too large to ignore.

And now Chairman Winnie is one major flood away from a major coup, while the CCP is one dam burst away from losing their mandate of heaven entirely. The blind compliance of the Han Chinese people hinges entirely on the propaganda of the CCP and the economic prosperity that maintains it. China is already in an economic recession, and if the floods in Southern China get worse, their economy will collapse.

And if Trump wins 2020, expect the trade war to escalate and the CCP's biggest food supplier to cut them off and be royally pissed. Hope you enjoy your famine.

 
Does the introduction of soy supplements coincide with the softening of the US?

Yes they are used as "protien" filler in ALL frozen items in the us, if you are lazy already, now you are doubling that with extreme soy exposure, which keep in mind was already higher than japan back in like 2006 because despite having a diet with lots tofu in japan, us veg/vegans weren't diversifying their diet. Source:20/20 a million years ago
 
When did the world get so full of snowflakes? Ive been trying 2 think whether it was a slow progressive thing or if it just happened over night but I literally cant think of a time when things have been worse. When people cant say things or do things because it'll offend someone somewhere!
When did 'getting offended on someone elses behalf' become a thing? You're not offended yourself and the other person isnt bother either, but you're offended on their behalf...the world is literally batshit crazy atm!
I think what happened was that there was an intentional infiltration of occupy wallstreet from somewhere, and they successfully killed the momentum the class warfare movement had gained with race and sex politics. It just snowballed from there.

I have some theories about why it all spread so fast but who really knows. I think a big part of it is that this sjw shit seems to attract women that don't want to admit to themselves they believe they are unattractive, and a congregation of women like that attracts a certain type of men (the same type that become male feminists). The reason you see so many women with an awful sense of style (blue hair or shaved head or whatever) is because the type of woman attracted to this kind of politics is not only insecure (believes they are not attractive enough to get a desirable man), but also weak minded (they cannot admit to themselves that they feel unattractive, they know its true but refuse to accept that they have those thoughts). The way they get around this mentally is to adopt styles that ugly themselves up. They do some stupid shit with their hair or something. The reason for this is that they want to look like they could be attractive if they cleaned themselves up. They want people to think they are unattractive by choice, and they want to believe this themselves, as it allows them to hide from the fact that they feel unattractive, or at least unable to get a man they would consider desirable.
 
I think what happened was that there was an intentional infiltration of occupy wallstreet from somewhere, and they successfully killed the momentum the class warfare movement had gained with race and sex politics. It just snowballed from there.

I have some theories about why it all spread so fast but who really knows. I think a big part of it is that this sjw shit seems to attract women that don't want to admit to themselves they believe they are unattractive, and a congregation of women like that attracts a certain type of men (the same type that become male feminists). The reason you see so many women with an awful sense of style (blue hair or shaved head or whatever) is because the type of woman attracted to this kind of politics is not only insecure (believes they are not attractive enough to get a desirable man), but also weak minded (they cannot admit to themselves that they feel unattractive, they know its true but refuse to accept that they have those thoughts). The way they get around this mentally is to adopt styles that ugly themselves up. They do some stupid shit with their hair or something. The reason for this is that they want to look like they could be attractive if they cleaned themselves up. They want people to think they are unattractive by choice, and they want to believe this themselves, as it allows them to hide from the fact that they feel unattractive, or at least unable to get a man they would consider desirable.

Unironically based and truthpilled. I know at least five commies that dropped their radical politics once they started getting dick/pussy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back