U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Has anyone else seen this interview clip with Larry Grathwohl, who was an FBI agent undercover with the Weather Underground? He describes how they wanted to create re-education camps and expected to “eliminate” 25 million people who could not be re-educated.


Sound familiar?


Just an aside, Larry's daughter Lindsay Grathwohl lives in the SF Bay Area and has been a presense in the free speech/anti-Marxist/whatever you want to call it movement/community for the past few years.

Here's the full film for anyone interested.
 
Keep it up kids. I'm curious to see one of these used as an anti-personnel device.
7c69678d6a6b0358353252176c7a64b9.jpg
 
Shame no one had any thermite. Just place it on the engine block and let it do it's job

Would that expanding insulation foam melt if exposed to gasoline? I mean, spray it in the gas fill and it would be out of commission for at least a day to clean that out.

A streamer just got arrested after she refused to clear the street.
View attachment 1504783

The gradual descent from haughty bitch to terrified mewling was amazing.
 
@Forgetful Gynn, @Evo, @Wilhelm Bittrich and other right wingers, what are your thoughts on this version of Hitler?

Well to start with i'd say upwards of 95% of "right wingers" would not hold views anywhere near mine regarding WW2 and Uncle Adolf, so no need to tar those people with the same brush.

As for that depiction, from what I've seen he never wanted war. He never wanted death or bloodshed in Europe. He did his best to get rid of the jews, yes, but through means of immigration and repatriation, and mostly because they spread communism and stole from the poor. I get that the scene there takes place when he was supposedly crazy at the end. I don't know the extent of how that actually effected him. This bit from Europa: The Last Battle is a good example of how I see him and his works. (UPDATE: Found a better version, replaced original link)

I don't know if I've ever seen an accurate depiction of Hitler in a movie. The one in "Look Who's Back" wasn't bad, with the notable exception of the dog shooting scene, he'd never do that. All the others are usually too cartoony or mad, except the one from Danger 5, that one was just funny.

But I will say that the actor playing him in that tiger movie is the spitting image of my dad. It's uncanny.
 
Last edited:
It's true that a significant majority of antifa are woke white regressives, but I'm wary of mainstream/social media trying to spin them into a white nationalist movement or something. They could just say they were innocent people brainwashed by far right extremists, tricked into violence the way they always kindly write about how blacks are animals that we must take pity on for they know not what they do.

Most people don't do surface level research, otherwise we wouldn't have gotten idiotic conspiracies like the OK sign or traps are a trans slur. Although it'd be kind of hilarious to label antifa as white supremacist fascists because they've been working just so gosh darn hard at punching those very chuds.
 
What's the chances of these guys getting so comfortable attacking cops that they actually start shooting people and expecting not to be shot back?

It seems like they're starting to get pretty aggressive and they don't think there's gonna be consequences.

I doubt it. AntiFa cannot allow themselves to be seen as the aggressor. The second they start shooting is the second they lose the "underdog" status.

The Portland Mayor condemned them for blocking police into a precinct and setting fire to it. If he is starting to think this went too far then shit has gone south.

It is like I said previously, all these riots started with a group seceding from the union. They don't have any further they can escalate.
 
2ee93470e09907fed48ca53162178b1b.png


At no point in this absolute fucking disaster of an article do they ever deign to point you towards this list of 329 murders. I gave them the benefit of the doubt and pored over the entire thing, and even managed to make it past sentences like, "Ngo spoke of the long history of antifa organizing in Portland, but unsurprisingly omitted the most obvious reason for it: In recent years, Portland has become an epicenter of far-right violence, to which anti-fascist action is a rightful response." Without having my brain melt out of my ears, but at no point in this article do they ever attempt to clarify this statement.

The Intercept has asserted, without evidence wink wink, that 329 murders have been carried out by right-wing extremists since 1994.

It's actually a little irritating to find the CSIS study because most articles written about it won't directly link you to the fucking study. They might link you to a summary, they might mention the CSIS by name, but none of them bothered to link you to the actual study because God forbid someone read this shit for themselves. They might also notice that the study immediately gives them a body count, equates 25% of the terrorism in this country to Left-leaning politics, and defines Antifa as particularly violent, if not necessarily as fatal, though that's probably because Antifa is filled with noodle-armed limp-dicks, but that's not a statement you're like to see in any official capacity.

I'm not prone to taking this study at its word, though, because according to the graph that it supplies, there have been zero instances of Left-wing or ethnonationalist-related terrorism in 2020. That sounds extraordinarily dubious to me, considering that Left-wing terrorists are actively burning their own cities, and I'm reasonably certain that an enthonationalist has done something stupid, somewhere, this year.

lolokay2.jpg


This study also measures everything as a single incident, no matter how large it might be. A right-wing extremist threatening to shoot a black man is counted as one incident. The September 11th attacks are also counted as a single incident. Technically correct, but that might be a bit misleading on a graph.

I was attempting to figure out what exactly they're defining as "right-wing" because I've seen plenty of lists that equate a sovereign citizen stabbing someone as a "right-wing terror attack", but when you try to see their reference for citation #9, which ought to send you to the data they compiled, it just says, "The data set includes incidents that occurred in the 50 U.S. states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico"

Thanks, very helpful.

So, fuck it, we'll go back to the summary to see where their data is being pulled from:

lolokay.jpg


Okay, so it's being monsterously skewn by data from the Anti-Defamation League and by exclusively sourcing heavily left-leaning publications. See? That's all that you had to tell me, because now I know that your data set has effectively been poisoned and I don't need to waste my time referencing any of the other things in the list. God, why do journalists have to make this shit so irritating?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back