Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

I'm imagining a brave new world where the daycare 'industry' takes off and parents are looking for sitters for their kids so they can go to work looking after someone else's kid. :story:
This is probably the biggest form of welfare fraud in the inner city-- LaQueefa gets a check to cover sending her three kids to LaQuanda's Daycare, and LaQuanda gets a check to cover sending her three kids to LaQueefa's Daycare. No one bothers to check, because anytime someone does, the usual suspects start screeching about rrrrrrrraaaaaaaaaaaaaacccccccccccciiiiiiiiiiiissssssssmmmmmm!!!!
 
This is probably the biggest form of welfare fraud in the inner city-- LaQueefa gets a check to cover sending her three kids to LaQuanda's Daycare, and LaQuanda gets a check to cover sending her three kids to LaQueefa's Daycare. No one bothers to check, because anytime someone does, the usual suspects start screeching about rrrrrrrraaaaaaaaaaaaaacccccccccccciiiiiiiiiiiissssssssmmmmmm!!!!
It's either that or hair salons that stock one EBT product so they can charge gibs cards for spa treatments.
 
Shots fired outside the White House
1597133591100.png

Does "everything" Trump "says" get put in scare quotes by ABC?

I guess since he's apparently the fucking antichrist
1597133672900.png


EDIT:
https://archive.vn/HaGBh
 
Last edited:

ughhhh can someone please inform this fucking WHITE MALE that
- Ukrainian surnames traditionally end in -enko and -chuk, the ending -ov is typical RUSSIAN surname ending, and by confusing the two he is actively erasing and invalidating Ukrainian culture, history and identity, like a fucking coloniser that he is
- additionally, Ukrainian and Slavic culture and identity does not belong to him, and he is not allowed to use it for his tweets, especially in connection it with literal hitler nazi like dromalt brumpf, this is pure cultural appropriation
- ADDITIONALLY using slavface (pale, sickly skin color) is highly problematic, and making fun of the proud alcoholic, chainsmoking people living in climate with 10 sunny days a year based on their racial features is something a nazi would do
and that he should maybe stay in his fucking lane and not use Slavs (who are not white) as punchlines in his posting career

I like how the Democrats spent every moment of their elections insisting McCain and then Trump were going to say "nigger" live on television and now they've put forth a candidate themselves who is vastly more likely to do so.

it would totally not a problem if their guy did it, see how they didnt mind the dem politicians caught doing blackface, who still got re-elected later
 
Last edited:
Only if you have a very vague understanding of what freedom actually is and how it's defined, especially in US law.
How it's defined in the law is far less important than whether the citizens value it.

When your mockery becomes the norm, no amount of law will save it. To quote Samuel Adams: "May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
 
Only if you have a very vague understanding of what freedom actually is and how it's defined, especially in US law.
We recommend wearing masks in order to curb the spread of the disease.
If you're a responsible person, you will wear a mask.
if you are not wearing a mask, you are not allowed to enter any non-restaurant establishment.
If you don't wear a mask, you may be subjected to a fine of up to $500.
If you do not wear a mask, you will be considered an active threat to public safety, and may be subjected to incarceration and prosecution.
There are currently discussions that will require people to wear masks inside their own homes.
All of this, of course, is predicated on even being allowed outside of your house for non-essential reasons. There are places that are still on lockdown. When they went out to protest, they were called bioterrorists, publicly scorned by their local governments, social pariahs for daring to put their right to earn a wage and buy food over 'public health'.

Why are they complaining, anyway? This is all for public safety.

In addition to wearing a mask, you must now also get tested for coronavirus every two weeks.
If you are not tested or fail to provide your papers in time, you may be furloughed from your job until you are found compliant.
If you do not provide papers, you may be fired.
If you do not obtain papers, you will not be hired.
If you do not keep your papers on your person, you will not be allowed into establishments. If you do provide papers proving you are 'clean', you must still wear a mask, or else risk being fined. After all, you took that test three days ago. You could have been infected between then and now.

Why would anybody complain? It's for public safety.

When the vaccine is produced, you must be inoculated. This is not an option.
You must be given papers in order to prove you have been inoculated.
Without these immunization papers, you will not be able to enter establishments.
You will not be able to return to your job.
You will not be able to make monetary transactions. You will not be able to vote.
It doesn't matter that this disease is less deadly than the flu. You are a threat to public health. You must receive your vaccination papers.
You MUST receive your vaccination papers.
YOU. MUST. RECEIVE. YOUR. VACCINATION. PAPERS.

Why would anybody object? It's for public safety.


This is not a hypothetical slippery slope. This is what is happening and measures that have actually been discussed. This is the response to a disease that has a lower mortality rate than the seasonal flu but has been turned into a weapon of terror to enforce more and more compliance, both from government mandate and social stigma. Fauci has suggested making most of these requirements -- social distancing, reduced capacity, mask wearing, limited gatherings -- permanent.

This took four months.

But there's no problem.

After all, it's for public safety.
 
View attachment 1511420
Does "everything" Trump "says" get put in scare quotes by ABC?

I guess since he's apparently the fucking antichrist
View attachment 1511424

EDIT:
https://archive.vn/HaGBh
I'm so sick of liberals trying to appeal to Christianity. Who do they think they're fooling? They've shown, in no uncertain terms, that they have nothing but contempt for my faith and my brothers and sisters in Christ. They'd gladly do to Christians what ChiComs are doing to Uighur Muslims, given the chance.

Maybe I could see that working on Methodists, Episcopalians, and cafeteria Catholics, but no serious Christian buys it.

We recommend wearing masks in order to curb the spread of the disease.
If you're a responsible person, you will wear a mask.
if you are not wearing a mask, you are not allowed to enter any non-restaurant establishment.
If you don't wear a mask, you may be subjected to a fine of up to $500.
If you do not wear a mask, you will be considered an active threat to public safety, and may be subjected to incarceration and prosecution.
There are currently discussions that will require people to wear masks inside their own homes.
All of this, of course, is predicated on even being allowed outside of your house for non-essential reasons. There are places that are still on lockdown. When they went out to protest, they were called bioterrorists, publicly scorned by their local governments, social pariahs for daring to put their right to earn a wage and buy food over 'public health'.

Why are they complaining, anyway? This is all for public safety.

In addition to wearing a mask, you must now also get tested for coronavirus every two weeks.
If you are not tested or fail to provide your papers in time, you may be furloughed from your job until you are found compliant.
If you do not provide papers, you may be fired.
If you do not obtain papers, you will not be hired.
If you do not keep your papers on your person, you will not be allowed into establishments. If you do provide papers proving you are 'clean', you must still wear a mask, or else risk being fined. After all, you took that test three days ago. You could have been infected between then and now.

Why would anybody complain? It's for public safety.

When the vaccine is produced, you must be inoculated. This is not an option.
You must be given papers in order to prove you have been inoculated.
Without these immunization papers, you will not be able to enter establishments.
You will not be able to return to your job.
You will not be able to make monetary transactions. You will not be able to vote.
It doesn't matter that this disease is less deadly than the flu. You are a threat to public health. You must receive your vaccination papers.
You MUST receive your vaccination papers.
YOU. MUST. RECEIVE. YOUR. VACCINATION. PAPERS.

Why would anybody object? It's for public safety.


This is not a hypothetical slippery slope. This is what is happening and measures that have actually been discussed. This is the response to a disease that has a lower mortality rate than the seasonal flu but has been turned into a weapon of terror to enforce more and more compliance, both from government mandate and social stigma. Fauci has suggested making most of these requirements -- social distancing, reduced capacity, mask wearing, limited gatherings -- permanent.

This took four months.

But there's no problem.

After all, it's for public safety.
"Public health" will be to this generation what "national security" was 20 years ago: a blanket excuse for the government to do whatever it wants, Constitution or human rights be damned.
 
"Public health" will be to this generation what "national security" was 20 years ago: a blanket excuse for the government to do whatever it wants, Constitution or human rights be damned.
If they gave a shit about public health they'd be railing on Body Positivity and HAES. I've yet to see a single one of the politicians who harp on and on about the "public health" also turn around and go, "Hey maybe being a 500lb fat fuck who eats bacon grease all day isn't a good way to try to negate the impacts of this virus on your system."

I don't know when exactly the Left decided that the obesity epidemic stopped being an epidemic and started to become "formless land whales are beautiful" but that's where the cracks started to widen for me, when I still considered myself a part of the political Left. It happened fast and it wasn't a subtle shift, we went directly from "being obese is a horrible affliction look at what it does to your body oh my god" to "date this car-sized bitch or you're a bigot."

I just about got fucking whiplash when it happened.
 
If they gave a shit about public health they'd be railing on Body Positivity and HAES. I've yet to see a single one of the politicians who harp on and on about the "public health" also turn around and go, "Hey maybe being a 500lb fat fuck who eats bacon grease all day isn't a good way to try to negate the impacts of this virus on your system."

I don't know when exactly the Left decided that the obesity epidemic stopped being an epidemic and started to become "formless land whales are beautiful" but that's where the cracks started to widen for me, when I still considered myself a part of the political Left. It happened fast and it wasn't a subtle shift, we went directly from "being obese is a horrible affliction look at what it does to your body oh my god" to "date this car-sized bitch or you're a bigot."

I just about got fucking whiplash when it happened.
What you experienced was the need for Democrats to maintain their coalition. I have mentioned this before, but will reiterate. The democratic coalition is made up of several segments with mutually opposed wants. With the 'progressive' wing become an outsized minority of power due tot he fact they DO vote at higher rates. This means that the Democratic party was forced to pander to them, and more or less ignore the voting blocks they originally did so for.
 
Back