Brianna Wu / John Flynt - Original Thread

What are you opinions on GamerGate and Brianna Wu / John Flynt?

  • I am of no opinion towards either.

    Votes: 104 8.6%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, but think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 631 52.1%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, but still think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 112 9.2%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 37 3.1%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 309 25.5%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, but still think that and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%

  • Total voters
    1,211
Status
Not open for further replies.

"I'm sorry Brianna that you are legally obligated to give me a leave as I am having a child. Of course, I told you about my pregnancy months before but you were to busy going to "talks" and bitching in twitter. to notice. But I'm sure you are prepared to deal with my absense and didn't use all the money of that CBC video in another motherfucking bike.."
 
I thought that Brianna had realized that she should not start twitter fights with gaming industry figures more important than her. How wrong I have been:

But this is a double-win for her. She gets to look like the Twitter crusader and when this bites her in the ass down the road, she can claim even more oppression! Yeah, not having to do any work ever is pretty sweet.
 
I wish him the best in getting a straight answer out of Wu, assuming Wu doesn't find the first thing in one of Dvack's tweets he can vaguely interpret as an attack, block him, and declare victory first.

It seems that her strategy of dealing with this matter is simply ignoring Dyack and hoping that he won't press the issue. As can be seen from her tweets and replies, she has been active on twitter just half an hour and yet failed to respond to Dyack's inquiry. If I had to make a bet, I'd say she most likely blocked him too, but that's almost a given.
 
It seems that her strategy of dealing with this matter is simply ignoring Dyack and hoping that he won't press the issue. As can be seen from her tweets and replies, she has been active on twitter just half an hour and yet failed to respond to Dyack's inquiry. If I had to make to bet, I'd say she most likely blocked him too, but that's almost a given.

It's standard terms of Wugagement here. Brianna engages someone out of nowhere, person has no idea what's going on, and Wu sits back as her followers attack (and give her more Patreon money for being a strong independent woman who needs their protection).
 
  • Agree
Reactions: PantsOfDesire
I miss the Nintendo Power era. Not because it was good or unbiased journalism, but because all we wanted to talk about was pokemans and mario karts and not soggy-knees and shit.
I'm trying to imagine an issue of nintendo power or any other early game magazine with a bunch of OP-ed pieces by SJWs

1. Ya I agree, let's start with the subreddit you're modding which is r/GamerGhazi!

2. hahaha. Another stupid comparison to add to the list. Thanks Brianna!

3. lel

4. something something take own advice
No Brianna you're not going to able to launch a 16 bit console when a 32 bit processor with gpu is almost free and emulators and dev tools already exist for actually good consoles exist.

Plus there are already more 16 bit games than anyone can finish and web games can do everything any 16 bit processor can do without forcing the dev to use c and asm... All for free.


How can she be so dumb about the business she's part of.
 
Dev base for 16-bit console? Perhaps there would be a handful of hardcore enthusiasts, but not the crowd Wu had in mind. Good fucking luck getting the current breed of Flash and Twine reliant San Francisco hipster developers to work within the constraints of SNES or Mega Drive level hardware. "Ew! Does it even run Patreon?"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back