2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can anyone summarize what's currently going on with the USPS? My mom's a postmaster and completely losing her shit about the PMG's changes. She's thoroughly convinced that if Trump wins, she'll lose her job.

Ain't it constitutionally mandated, or you think privatized mail is on the horizon?
 
All democracies inevitably turn into left wing tyranny, you can figure this out by doing math, and not complex math but really simple math as in "the side that gets the most votes wins." Figuring out that all democracies, if left alone long enough, will turn into liberal tyrannies is as easy as recognizing that 1 is bigger than 2.
>1 is bigger than 2

Some really simple math we got here.
 
I just realized one thing, @Syaoran Li your prediction that if the Democrats lose they will clean house of far left elements almost certainly is not happening now.

With Harris picked as the VP this election is going to be seen as 2016 2.0 on steroids; Bernouts and farther-left types will be having meltdowns that they been once again used by the DNC for gayops that failed. That last part is the most important element to consider, because if they lose it means the establishment DNC has self-owned itself twice during the "most important elections in history to stop Fascism here!". Further radicalization is the obvious outcome of that.
 
I just realized one thing, @Syaoran Li your prediction that if the Democrats lose they will clean house of far left elements almost certainly is not happening now.

With Harris picked as the VP this election is going to be seen as 2016 2.0 on steroids; Bernouts and farther-left types will be having meltdowns that they been once again used by the DNC for gayops that failed. That last part is the most important element to consider, because if they lose it means the establishment DNC has self-owned itself twice during the "most important elections in history to stop Fascism here!". Further radicalization is the obvious outcome of that.

Can't clean the House of the far left elements if your base keeps wanting to vote those insurgents in in the primaries (as you can see with all the Squad pretty much retaining their seats and gaining one with Cori Bush). Hell, in the recent primaries held in Minnesota and Georgia, the "moderates" are being replaced with even more progressive Democrats such as Omar Fateh and Jen McEwen
So as much as I would like to believe in @Syaoran Li's predictions that the Democrats would clean house of the far left elements in their party once they lose, it's becoming more increasingly likely that these progressives winning in these primaries aren't just a fluke but a trend.
 
I just realized one thing, @Syaoran Li your prediction that if the Democrats lose they will clean house of far left elements almost certainly is not happening now.

With Harris picked as the VP this election is going to be seen as 2016 2.0 on steroids; Bernouts and farther-left types will be having meltdowns that they been once again used by the DNC for gayops that failed. That last part is the most important element to consider, because if they lose it means the establishment DNC has self-owned itself twice during the "most important elections in history to stop Fascism here!". Further radicalization is the obvious outcome of that.

You do bring up an excellent point, but there's a part of me that thinks they're going with Harris specifically they want to subtly clean house from within. It's clear that the DNC establishment hates The Squad and the more radical "Woke Left" wings of the Democratic Party, and they've lost control of Antifa and their grip on BLM is tenuous at best. If Biden wins, they will clean house but the corporations will still hold onto wokeness because they'll view it as working and Biden/Harris will no doubt continue coddling China.

If Trump wins, I can see one of two scenarios happening.

1. Trump and Barr decide to go apeshit on Antifa and BLM as payback for the summer of 2020 and they put that DOJ terrorist designation to good use. This will probably happen no matter what the Democrats do within their own ranks so long as Trump wins.

However, the DNC will have to respond, especially if the Flynn investigation and the Epstein scandals have any legs to them. They likely won't go anywhere, but if we're lucky enough we might get some major scandals and someone taking the fall as the Democrat equivalent of Oliver North.

I don't think Obama, Bloomberg, or the Clintons will ever face any consequences for any of this even if the investigation does actually go somewhere against al odds, although I could see either Clinton or Obama becoming persona non grata within the DNC similar to how Jimmy Carter was treated after the 1980 election, depending on what all happens after a Trump win.

The DNC will have two choices in a Trump win. Either clean house and shift the narrative and pin the blame on Bernie, the DSA, Antifa, and BLM or continue to radicalize further.

Since Harris is the VP pick for Biden, I think it's probably the second-least damaging move they could have pulled given their limited circumstances. Susan Rice would be a better pick for Biden actually increasing his odds of winning, while Harris actively damages those odds. But she's also got enough IdPol boxes checked for the MSM to keep pushing the narrative and pacify the NPC's and the less invested wokesters until the election.

If Trump wins and the DOJ has carte blanche to go hard after Antifa (and possibly BLM) then the Dems will either do a quiet internal soft purge and blame the radicals or they will try to pander to the Woke Left harder for the 2022 midterms and 2024.

If the DNC decides to do a serious post-mortem analysis in the event of a Trump win, I think they will purge the Woke Left from any serious positions of power. AOC will very likely have her district gerrymandered out of existence by 2022 since she's got the most gaffes and scandals, and Pelosi probably hates her the most among the Squad. Ilhan Omar will likely keep banking on the Somali, hood rat, and woke punk votes to stay in office unless she also gets gerrymandered as well. Tlaib and Pressley will probably still be in play but will be sidelined within the House.

A second Trump win will blackpill a lot of the Woke Left, but the question is will the Dems keep pandering to them or will they cut them off because they don't want to get burned in any DOJ backlash? I know this sounds optimistic, but the only reason why I think the DNC might not go further to the radical left in the event of a Trump win is because of the DOJ terror designations of Antifa at the start of all this. It's clearly some kind of nuclear option, and considering that there have been vannings and sending in federal agents to defend key federal properties, I'm pretty sure Trump isn't just "monitoring the situation" on this one. But he is having to fight with a major handicap due to both the optics issues related to the upcoming election, and because the deep blue states and cities are refusing to comply with him at all.

Trump and Barr did that for a specific reason, and given that it was officially announced on the DOJ's official government website and that several Antifa guys have been vanned by the Feds and that Teespring is no longer carrying Antifa merch for fairly obvious legal reasons, then I get the feeling that Trump will likely use the DOJ to full effect against Antifa and maybe BLM if he wins a second term since he won't have to play nice and fight with one hand tied behind his back anymore.

If Trump can win a second term and Antifa does get the hammer dropped hard on them, the DNC is more likely to quietly do an internal soft purge of the Woke Left just to save face and avoid getting accused of supporting terrorism. In that scenario, a large swath of the blackpilled and hardcore Woke Left will either get more violent (and suffer consequences) or will try to go into a third party like the lolberts.

But if the DNC are that bullheaded or if Barr doesn't go hard enough on Antifa, then the Woke Left will get more prominent within the Democratic Party.

We'll know more once the election is over. Make sure to vote in person and vote for Trump, at this point it's the only thing we can do to fight back right now.

Can't clean the House of the far left elements if your base keeps wanting to vote those insurgents in in the primaries (as you can see with all the Squad pretty much retaining their seats and gaining one with Cori Bush). Hell, in the recent primaries held in Minnesota and Georgia, the "moderates" are being replaced with even more progressive Democrats such as Omar Fateh and Jen McEwen
So as much as I would like to believe in @Syaoran Li's predictions that the Democrats would clean house of the far left elements in their party once they lose, it's becoming more increasingly likely that these progressives winning in these primaries aren't just a fluke but a trend.

I have no doubt that the leftist wing of the base such as the fucks in the Squad are going to keep pushing for more left-wing pushes. But a Trump win is the kind of thing that I don't think the DNC has planned for, and if Trump wins and keeps up the pressure on Antifa, then the DNC bigwigs may have to make tough choices.

I hope that Trump wins and that the Democrat leadership do the smart thing and throw the leftists under the bus, but the DNC has proven themselves to be short-sighted enough to shoot themselves in the foot long-term so I don't know what will happen.

Vote for Trump, because you know the DNC will play every dirty trick in the book to ratfuck the election. I think a Trump win will also prove that 2016 was not a fluke but a trend, since that's the kind of thing that cuts both ways.

Seriously, if Trump can pull off winning a second term after all this, I don't think he'd let those four years go to waste. Putting more heat on Antifa and BLM means the DNC and Silicon Valley won't be able to rely on their shock troops as well, and that could mean the DNC will have no choice but to purge and sideline as much of the extreme progressives as much as possible.

It's more or less an open secret that Pelosi and the DNC want to gerrymander AOC out of her office and if Trump wins after this shitshow, I have no doubt they will try to make an example out of AOC and possibly Omar via good old-fashioned gerrymandering and DNC electoral fraud. Pelosi no doubt hates AOC after all the bullshit the Squad has pulled in addition to taking the district that her successor had.

I know this sounds like optimism and cope, but we honestly don't know what all is going to happen since there are way too many variables at this point no matter who wins the election
 
Last edited:
You do bring up an excellent point, but there's a part of me that thinks they're going with Harris specifically they want to subtly clean house from within. It's clear that the DNC establishment hates The Squad and the more radical "Woke Left" wings of the Democratic Party, and they've lost control of Antifa and their grip on BLM is tenuous at best. If Biden wins, they will clean house but the corporations will still hold onto wokeness because they'll view it as working and Biden/Harris will no doubt continue coddling China.

If Trump wins, I can see one of two scenarios happening.

1. Trump and Barr decide to go apeshit on Antifa and BLM as payback for the summer of 2020 and they put that DOJ terrorist designation to good use. This will probably happen no matter what the Democrats do within their own ranks so long as Trump wins.

However, the DNC will have to respond, especially if the Flynn investigation and the Epstein scandals have any legs to them. They likely won't go anywhere, but if we're lucky enough we might get some major scandals and someone taking the fall as the Democrat equivalent of Oliver North.

I don't think Obama, Bloomberg, or the Clintons will ever face any consequences for any of this even if the investigation does actually go somewhere against al odds, although I could see either Clinton or Obama becoming persona non grata within the DNC similar to how Jimmy Carter was treated after the 1980 election, depending on what all happens after a Trump win.

The DNC will have two choices in a Trump win. Either clean house and shift the narrative and pin the blame on Bernie, the DSA, Antifa, and BLM or continue to radicalize further.

Since Harris is the VP pick for Biden, I think it's probably the second-least damaging move they could have pulled given their limited circumstances. Susan Rice would be a better pick for Biden actually increasing his odds of winning, while Harris actively damages those odds. But she's also got enough IdPol boxes checked for the MSM to keep pushing the narrative and pacify the NPC's and the less invested wokesters until the election.

If Trump wins and the DOJ has carte blanche to go hard after Antifa (and possibly BLM) then the Dems will either do a quiet internal soft purge and blame the radicals or they will try to pander to the Woke Left harder for the 2022 midterms and 2024.

If the DNC decides to do a serious post-mortem analysis in the event of a Trump win, I think they will purge the Woke Left from any serious positions of power. AOC will very likely have her district gerrymandered out of existence by 2022 since she's got the most gaffes and scandals, and Pelosi probably hates her the most among the Squad. Ilhan Omar will likely keep banking on the Somali, hood rat, and woke punk votes to stay in office unless she also gets gerrymandered as well. Tlaib and Pressley will probably still be in play but will be sidelined within the House.

A second Trump win will blackpill a lot of the Woke Left, but the question is will the Dems keep pandering to them or will they cut them off because they don't want to get burned in any DOJ backlash? I know this sounds optimistic, but the only reason why I think the DNC might not go further to the radical left in the event of a Trump win is because of the DOJ terror designations of Antifa at the start of all this. It's clearly some kind of nuclear option, and considering that there have been vannings and sending in federal agents to defend key federal properties, I'm pretty sure Trump isn't just "monitoring the situation" on this one. But he is having to fight with a major handicap due to both the optics issues related to the upcoming election, and because the deep blue states and cities are refusing to comply with him at all.

Trump and Barr did that for a specific reason, and given that it was officially announced on the DOJ's official government website and that several Antifa guys have been vanned by the Feds and that Teespring is no longer carrying Antifa merch for fairly obvious legal reasons, then I get the feeling that Trump will likely use the DOJ to full effect against Antifa and maybe BLM if he wins a second term since he won't have to play nice and fight with one hand tied behind his back anymore.

If Trump can win a second term and Antifa does get the hammer dropped hard on them, the DNC is more likely to quietly do an internal soft purge of the Woke Left just to save face and avoid getting accused of supporting terrorism. In that scenario, a large swath of the blackpilled and hardcore Woke Left will either get more violent (and suffer consequences) or will try to go into a third party like the lolberts.

But if the DNC are that bullheaded or if Barr doesn't go hard enough on Antifa, then the Woke Left will get more prominent within the Democratic Party.

We'll know more once the election is over. Make sure to vote in person and vote for Trump, at this point it's the only thing we can do to fight back right now.
The best thing for the DNC to do to return their party to a semblance of respectability is to imitate what Keir Starmer is doing with the British Labour Party. If Trump's opposition was Starmer and not Biden, he'd be in trouble, because he at least appears normal and competent.

So if you're wondering what a progressive house cleaning would be like, look across the pond because it'll probably happen there first.
 
You do bring up an excellent point, but there's a part of me that thinks they're going with Harris specifically they want to subtly clean house from within. It's clear that the DNC establishment hates The Squad and the more radical "Woke Left" wings of the Democratic Party, and they've lost control of Antifa and their grip on BLM is tenuous at best. If Biden wins, they will clean house but the corporations will still hold onto wokeness because they'll view it as working and Biden/Harris will no doubt continue coddling China.

If Trump wins, I can see one of two scenarios happening.

1. Trump and Barr decide to go apeshit on Antifa and BLM as payback for the summer of 2020 and they put that DOJ terrorist designation to good use. This will probably happen no matter what the Democrats do within their own ranks so long as Trump wins.

However, the DNC will have to respond, especially if the Flynn investigation and the Epstein scandals have any legs to them. They likely won't go anywhere, but if we're lucky enough we might get some major scandals and someone taking the fall as the Democrat equivalent of Oliver North.

I don't think Obama, Bloomberg, or the Clintons will ever face any consequences for any of this even if the investigation does actually go somewhere against al odds, although I could see either Clinton or Obama becoming persona non grata within the DNC similar to how Jimmy Carter was treated after the 1980 election, depending on what all happens after a Trump win.

The DNC will have two choices in a Trump win. Either clean house and shift the narrative and pin the blame on Bernie, the DSA, Antifa, and BLM or continue to radicalize further.

Since Harris is the VP pick for Biden, I think it's probably the second-least damaging move they could have pulled given their limited circumstances. Susan Rice would be a better pick for Biden actually increasing his odds of winning, while Harris actively damages those odds. But she's also got enough IdPol boxes checked for the MSM to keep pushing the narrative and pacify the NPC's and the less invested wokesters until the election.

If Trump wins and the DOJ has carte blanche to go hard after Antifa (and possibly BLM) then the Dems will either do a quiet internal soft purge and blame the radicals or they will try to pander to the Woke Left harder for the 2022 midterms and 2024.

If the DNC decides to do a serious post-mortem analysis in the event of a Trump win, I think they will purge the Woke Left from any serious positions of power. AOC will very likely have her district gerrymandered out of existence by 2022 since she's got the most gaffes and scandals, and Pelosi probably hates her the most among the Squad. Ilhan Omar will likely keep banking on the Somali, hood rat, and woke punk votes to stay in office unless she also gets gerrymandered as well. Tlaib and Pressley will probably still be in play but will be sidelined within the House.

A second Trump win will blackpill a lot of the Woke Left, but the question is will the Dems keep pandering to them or will they cut them off because they don't want to get burned in any DOJ backlash? I know this sounds optimistic, but the only reason why I think the DNC might not go further to the radical left in the event of a Trump win is because of the DOJ terror designations of Antifa at the start of all this. It's clearly some kind of nuclear option, and considering that there have been vannings and sending in federal agents to defend key federal properties, I'm pretty sure Trump isn't just "monitoring the situation" on this one. But he is having to fight with a major handicap due to both the optics issues related to the upcoming election, and because the deep blue states and cities are refusing to comply with him at all.

Trump and Barr did that for a specific reason, and given that it was officially announced on the DOJ's official government website and that several Antifa guys have been vanned by the Feds and that Teespring is no longer carrying Antifa merch for fairly obvious legal reasons, then I get the feeling that Trump will likely use the DOJ to full effect against Antifa and maybe BLM if he wins a second term since he won't have to play nice and fight with one hand tied behind his back anymore.

If Trump can win a second term and Antifa does get the hammer dropped hard on them, the DNC is more likely to quietly do an internal soft purge of the Woke Left just to save face and avoid getting accused of supporting terrorism. In that scenario, a large swath of the blackpilled and hardcore Woke Left will either get more violent (and suffer consequences) or will try to go into a third party like the lolberts.

But if the DNC are that bullheaded or if Barr doesn't go hard enough on Antifa, then the Woke Left will get more prominent within the Democratic Party.

We'll know more once the election is over. Make sure to vote in person and vote for Trump, at this point it's the only thing we can do to fight back right now.



I have no doubt that the leftist wing of the base such as the fucks in the Squad are going to keep pushing for more left-wing pushes. But a Trump win is the kind of thing that I don't think the DNC has planned for, and if Trump wins and keeps up the pressure on Antifa, then the DNC bigwigs may have to make tough choices.

I hope that Trump wins and that the Democrat leadership do the smart thing and throw the leftists under the bus, but the DNC has proven themselves to be short-sighted enough to shoot themselves in the foot long-term so I don't know what will happen.

Vote for Trump, because you know the DNC will play every dirty trick in the book to ratfuck the election. I think a Trump win will also prove that 2016 was not a fluke but a trend, since that's the kind of thing that cuts both ways.

Seriously, if Trump can pull off winning a second term after all this, I don't think he'd let those four years go to waste. Putting more heat on Antifa and BLM means the DNC and Silicon Valley won't be able to rely on their shock troops as well, and that could mean the DNC will have no choice but to purge and sideline as much of the extreme progressives as much as possible.

It's more or less an open secret that Pelosi and the DNC want to gerrymander AOC out of her office and if Trump wins after this shitshow, I have no doubt they will try to make an example out of AOC and possibly Omar via good old-fashioned gerrymandering and DNC electoral fraud. Pelosi no doubt hates AOC after all the bullshit the Squad has pulled in addition to taking the district that her successor had.

I know this sounds like optimism and cope, but we honestly don't know what all is going to happen since there are way too many variables at this point no matter who wins the election

Your posts are optimistic but they're the only thing that give me hope anymore. Thanks fren.
 
7c4cf723d845dd1701bbd1cd111b0baa.png


I'm just gonna' hang onto this one for a bit.
 
I was trapped in a dilemma before Biden decided which jungle bunny he wanted as his bedwench.

Susan Rice would have made Biden's odds of winning way easier and her style of government going by what Tucker said, would be Obama 2.0 with Republicans getting the house and senate back making life hell for her while she bombs a bunch of mudpeople for our Greatest Ally.

Kamala Harris makes Biden's job harder to win but she is more dangerous and seems less warhawkish and more authoritarian crony corporatism friendly.

I could live with a Susan Rice presidency but Kamala is bad and the sad part is that California is a story of how White Guilt is dangerous or any type of inner racial hatred is bad for any empire or superpower to function for future generations. The next superpower coming after the United States will definitely use any means necessary to stop self hatred and guilt of one's own race.
 
Last edited:
My question is whether most people are voting by mail-in ballot or in person albeit with social distancing/masks or at least the pretense of it. If the former is true, then the election will be a nailbiter at best. If the latter, it favors Trump since not only does he have a more energized base, but he'll probably do better after the debates seeing that Joe Biden is literally dementia-ridden. It seems that most people in the country aren't over the COVID panic, but they've mostly gone back to nichijou minus masks and other shit in addition to most places of business. It seems only large cities like New York and Seattle are the ones pushing the mail-in ballots, which heavily favor Democrats.

View attachment 1516072

I'm just gonna' hang onto this one for a bit.

>Dead-egger that didn't even take her husband's surname coping by inventing fantasy situations
Nothing new here.
 
https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2016/06/how-the-united-kingdom-voted-and-why/
Retaining national sovereignty was the main issue at play, with immigration a distant second.

They are now at the same footing as a trade partner while retaining a greater degree of domestic autonomy. In terms of trade they're subject to regulation, sure, but there's no longer any risk of Berlin sticking its fingers into UK monetary policy, like it did with Greece.

(I'm not qualified to say whether or not that was justified, but it still represents a broad power of intervention when it comes down to it).

You may know more about this than me, but overall I don't buy the line that immigration was the main driving force and it looks like the polls bear that out.
The EU doesn't dictate UK monetary policy, the Bank of England does. The UK was never part of the Eurozone.

I still maintain that EU migration was the central issue behind Brexit. National sovereignty may poll higher, but that's only because it was a central slogan of the Leave campaign. When you actually sit people down and ask them what "sovereignty" Britain will be gaining by leaving the EU, however, they invariably either don't know, or they mention border controls.

As I see it, the issue of free movement was absolutely crucial to the referendum result.
Learn. To. Read. Graphs. This is actually embarrassing.
I have read them, and it's not clear to me that they support your assertions. The increase in spending, whether overall, as a percentage of GDP, or as a rate of change, doesn't measurably change trajectory with the change of administrations; draw a line of best fit if you don't believe me. The only pivotal point in the data, that I see, is the time around when the 2014 pledge was agreed to, which would seem to support my view.
Why what a very European thing to say! I guess I'll just suffer here in silence with my excellent insurance, robust safety net in cases of poverty, and vastly lower effective tax rate.
I'm glad to hear that you have excellent insurance, but when all of the costs are factored in, I doubt you'll be making a net saving compared to Europeans. Americans might generally pay less taxes overall, but we know from the figures that they're not spending less taxes toward healthcare.
I didn't suspect you as a paid shill because you disagree with Trump, I did it because we're both several thousand words into this shitflinging and you won't fucking give up. I didn't stop because I'm an asshole. I know this much. I was just curious as to your motivation. At no point did I mention a conspiracy. There are a lot of people on this site who disagree with Trump but they don't write fucking novels about it while trying to be persuasive, mostly they just bitch and cry or else bait and laugh. It's the combination of cordial persistence and recycled talking points that I found suspicious.
My motivation is simply wanting to take part in an interesting discussion. I don't really care if people are persuaded to my point of view here; I just wanted to offer a challenge to the prevailing opinion in this thread, and perhaps steer it in a direction more befitting of the Deep Thoughts board. Don't ask why I'd do that, ask why most of the posters here seem to think that this is an A&H thread.
Democracy, human rights, and whatever, it's all nonsense. I can't believe that so many of you "conservatives" still don't get it, democracy is a fundamental evil against a traditionalist order. If you support democracy you are no better than one of those BLM thugs because you are facilitating the system which has allowed to flourish. And you are also not a conservative, everyone who supports democracy is a liberal.
This isn't the 19th century. You'd have to go back pretty far at this point to find a conservative who doesn't support democracy. And for the record, I never claimed to be a conservative, in fact I explicitly said in the post you're quoting that I don't consider myself one.
Tariffs ALWAYS work (except in fields where the country cannot physically produce the goods like Luxembourg and oil). Tariffs take time, you aren't going to see an immediate influx of jobs coming because they put a 2% tariff on computers. Empire always prevails, and your free trade shitholes were already conquered by soviet communism. This was explained by Yuri Bezmenov, Soviet protectionism and state socialism won in the end. You are already seeing the effects of soviet infiltration in the BLM riots. I'm a communist btw
A communist who supports tradition and empire, who decries Black Lives Matter, while praising the "Soviet" ideology you claim is behind the movement? Does not compute.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Draza
A communist who supports tradition and empire, who decries Black Lives Matter, while praising the "Soviet" ideology you claim is behind the movement? Does not compute.
Stalinism is traditionalist, I'm not one of those social democrat faggots who love LGBT, and empire is ok if it spreads communism like the soviet "empire". BLM aren't real socialists, they are class reductionists, they are, in a way, fundementally opposed to communism. And why wouldn't I praise the secret Soviet backers of that movement? it only proves how powerful communism really is
 
I know this sounds like optimism and cope, but we honestly don't know what all is going to happen since there are way too many variables at this point no matter who wins the election
I would just like to bring up one counterpoint to the DNC waking up: the current self-destruction of the UK's Labour party and how they probably assured a Tory super-majority for at least a decade.

Like the DNC, Labour went all in for idpol and far-left policies, and got thoroughly humiliated in the recent elections. A sane person would think it would cause the party to pivot and try and backtrack on some of their more ridiculous policies. So far, that has not happened, and the party has fractured further and further into irrelevance at this point.

While they're not one-to-one comparable to the current DNC, they're still a testament to how political parties can be stupid enough to push themselves into irrelevance.
 
I was trapped in a dilemma before Biden decided which jungle bunny he wanted as his bedwench.

Susan Rice would have made Biden's odds of winning way easier and her style of government going by what Tucker said, would be Obama 2.0 with Republicans getting the house and senate back making life hell for her while she bombs a bunch of mudpeople for our Greatest Ally.

Kamala Harris makes Biden's job harder to win but she is more dangerous and seems less warhawkish and more authoritarian crony corporatism friendly.

I could live with a Susan Rice presidency but Kamala is bad and the sad part is that California is a story of how White Guilt is dangerous or any type of inner racial hatred is bad for any empire or superpower to function for future generations. The next superpower coming after the United States will definitely use any means necessary to stop self hatred and guilt of one's own race.
Out of all the black women he could have picked, Kamala will be the easiest to attack. As usual, you can always count on the Dems to make the wrong choice.

A lot of Dems shied away from Rice because they were afraid of relitigating Benghazi. I'm glad they did because I don't think they had anything to worry about. Banging the Benghazi drum again, years later, would have fallen completely flat. It might have gotten the base a little more fired up but independents don't care.

However, Kamala's baggage? Yeah, that we can make them care about.

I would just like to bring up one counterpoint to the DNC waking up: the current self-destruction of the UK's Labour party and how they probably assured a Tory super-majority for at least a decade.
Honestly, I think an even bigger issue for Labour is the SNP. They will never get a majority while the SNP has a monopoly on Scotland. To form a government with them would require them to agree to an independence referendum. But if they agree to an independence referendum they'll never win England.

The left is their own worst enemy.
 
HOW will the GOP attack Kamala's past exactly? Would that mean saying they have a problem with police or could they still bring it up without coming off as "Yeah, we know the police are a problem?"
 
HOW will the GOP attack Kamala's past exactly? Would that mean saying they have a problem with police or could they still bring it up without coming off as "Yeah, we know the police are a problem?"

Hammer the point home about how she mistreated poor blacks as a prosecutor and maybe even invoke the fact her ancestors were slave owners. Call her out on her hypocrisy.

If you just go with the generic "Democrats are the real racists" spiel, it will fail. But if you go after Kamala Harris specifically and cite her record, and make sure that it's played in major campaign ads and gets a lot of airtime. Make sure to use that Trump campaign war chest to get the debates to happen
 
HOW will the GOP attack Kamala's past exactly? Would that mean saying they have a problem with police or could they still bring it up without coming off as "Yeah, we know the police are a problem?"

You just need to convince the progressives she's everything they hate. That won't win voters, but it will make the progressive crowd more likely to stay home and lower turn out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back