Star Wars Griefing Thread (SPOILERS) - Safety off

I don't see how it goes too far though, there has been plenty of societies in real life history that have had reputations as "super mercs". The Danes were famously hired around the world as the best warriors money could buy once upon a time and Mandos have a very similar culture to the old Scandinavian one. I don't religiously read up on the behind the scenes like some people do but I would not be surprised at all if they were directly based on them.

And really, making Force sensitives neigh unkillable just gives things a Superman complex and that shit is not fun, but it is boring. I can buy a warrior who has trained his entire life, and has trained in a team his entire life, with good gear, can take down a Jedi simply because there is more to a fight than being a living magic 8 ball. There's no drama in the whole only a Jedi can kill a Jedi thing and I don't understand why someone would want to read about these perfect creatures who can do no wrong and not be killed. I like the Mandalorians because they show that god can bleed.
Oh I agree with this on the surface, but give the awesome super mercs their own armor, don't copy paste it from Boba Fett...unless Boba Fett is actually one of them.
 
Oh I agree with this on the surface, but give the awesome super mercs their own armor, don't copy paste it from Boba Fett...unless Boba Fett is actually one of them.

Was Fett being a Mando ever in contention though, even before the prequel retconning?
 
Was Fett being a Mando ever in contention though, even before the prequel retconning?
I haven't the foggiest, but that really doesn't matter to me in the very least.

If you want to use The Fett's armor then you should have The Fetts involved. Saying Jango just stole his armor from the "real" Mandolorians is stupid. In the very least make Jango the black sheep of the bunch who took his armor, told his people to fuck off and sold his skills as a mercenary.
 
Although Fett wore Mandalorian armor, the government of Mandalore saw him as nothing more than a common mercenary and insisted he had no actual ties to the Mandalorians. Nevertheless, his reputation attracted the attention of the Sith as they plotted their return to galactic power and ties to the Warrior culture are ambiguous at best.

Eh this gets very prequel ret-conning-ish and I have honestly never paid much attention to PT or Clone Wars shit, so I honestly have no idea what the fuck they've done with his character.


EDIT:

Jango Fett was a Mandalorian in the lore of Star Wars Legends. In the "Creating Mandalore" featurette on The Clone Wars: Season Two DVD set, however, series director Dave Filoni explained that, according to George Lucas, the Fetts were not Mandalorians.[26] After the creation of the new official Star Wars canon, Pablo Hidalgo of the Lucasfilm Story Group reiterated that the Fetts are not Mandalorians, though they might claim to be.[27] However, Jango was stated to be a Mandalorian, through the Z-6 Jetpack entry on the StarWars.com Databank[23] and in Star Wars Helmet Collection 17.[28] Finally, one of the announcement teasers for The Mandalorian described Jango and his son, Boba as Mandalorians, leaving their actual status as Mandalorians ambiguous.[29]
https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Jango_Fett#cite_note-Favreau_post-28

This is honestly good enough for me, Disney EU doesn't exist to me so the Fetts are Mandos as far as I am concerned. All you have is this faggot's word re: George Lucas and I'm inclined more towards 20 years of EU rather than some dude who can't stop jacking off over his OC do not steal.
 
Last edited:
You should really open yourself to the possibility that people might defend things that you hate for reasons other than childhood sexual fixation. The world would probably make more sense to you in consequence.

@LORD IMPERATOR's one-dimensional adolescent power fantasy cherry-picking does not accurately represent "the fictional works" in question.

As far as the creator is concerned, a Mandalorian can take on Force-users on even terms and kill them. Trying to weasel out of acknowledging this overriding canonical truth is dishonest.

Filoni's detractors generally have the basic decency to point to specific incidents or quotations involving their criticism of his writing. Not so with the anti-Traviss NPCs, who never manage to get further than "Mandalorian Woman Bad!"

I guess that makes sense.

The Kung Fu monk guy was also really hard to find. Not!Kyle, Not!Jan and Not!Rohm Moc all pegwarmed terribly (though the various Stormtrooper variants seemed to sell well enough).

The funny thing is, I LIKE the Mandalorians. I love the Old Republic-era Mandalorians, I have a healthy respect for the Fetts, and I don't mind Mandos that much. The problem is, Traviss and her fans take it to the extreme to the point where they demonize the Jedi and act as if Mandos are their moral superiors. Which is hilariously stupid, considering that at their best day, the Mandos are just guns for hire, while the Jedi have forsaken love, wealth, and political power to defend the galaxy and keep civilization afloat. Sorry, but the space version of Swiss Mercenaries are not morally superior to the Space Templars, no matter how much Karen Traviss tries to justify it. Jango Fett was one of the "good" Mandalorians who didn't want to become a violent savage, and he ends up killing innocent people from time to time, like in the Bounty Hunter game, where he guns down innocent Republic soldiers on Coruscant and prison guards just minding their duty in Oovo IV, all to get to his targets. After all, he got on the Jedi's shit list in EPII for trying to off an innocent Senator who was vouching for peace. Why did he do it? BECAUSE MONEY, BABY! CHA-CHING!

How are the works I'm citing cherry-picking? I cited comics, novels, TV shows, the films, video games of every stripe, from strategy games, to shooter games and action games, among others. That's as wide a range for works anyone can get. Meanwhile, YOU cherry-pick works. So far I've only seen you cite comics. And not even the most important ones.

Uh, no. Most Mandalorians fail at taking on Force-users. We even see this in the films. Jango at best managed to get a draw with Obi-Wan and caught another Jedi by surprise and killed the latter. When he was face-to-face with a Jedi like Mace Windu, he got his head cut off. His son Boba didn't fare much better, failing at defeating Luke and getting beaten by a blind man. Newsflash: your average Mando would get squashed by the average Jedi. Especially during the Mandalorian Wars, when the Jedi Knights started joining the war in large numbers, the Mandalorians began losing whole systems that they once conquered from the Republic. The Mandalorians who could kill Jedi are usually the creme of the crop elites, guys like Canderous and the Fetts, and even then, they can't kill the top dogs among the Jedi even if they tried. Canderous bowed out to Revan because the latter was his superior in both combat skills and tactics. The Fetts lost horribly against Jedi and were humiliated in the films, something the Expanded Universe had to make up for by making them kill no-name Jedi who aren't as strong as the main cast Jedi. And of course, prior to the Clone Wars, the Mandos got wiped out by the Jedi at Galidraan in a fair, open battle.

Basically, the only times the Mandos can kill Jedi is if it's the best of the Mandos against some random Jedi. Or if the Jedi get distracted/underestimate the Mandalorians. But if a competent Jedi approaches them with the intent to kill, well, either we get what happened in Episode II where Jango lost his head, or we get what happened in Episode VI where Boba Fett was sent tumbling down into Cthulhu's gaping butt-hole. Thank God the EU saved him from that ignoble fate.

In fact, after playing (and beating) Star Wars: Bounty Hunter this morning, and comparing that experience with Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy, I'm more than convinced of my stance. Take that game, and take all the narrow escapes and hard fights Jango goes through. Subtract Jango, and place in a Jedi in his position. Say Aayla Secura, or Shaak Ti, or even Jaden Korr. The parts where Jango has to kill a whole army with guns, where he has to fight tooth and nail to blow through the enemy, becomes a cakewalk if Aayla Secura has to go through that. Whole armies that Jango had a hard time killing, Shaak Ti would carve through them like walnut pie. I could just imagine how Montross would have fared had he faced the likes of Jaden Korr.

Heck, compare fighting armies in Bounty Hunter with fighting armies in Jedi Academy. In the former, when you get a crowd of people charging at you guns blazing, you better start mashing the fire button like there's no tomorrow and have the reflexes of a Mexican jumping bean just to avoid enemy fire. In the latter, carving up armies of Stormtroopers even as a low-level Jedi is child's play; you're not in danger, you ARE the danger. Even when the game throws power-armored goons at you later on such as Rocket Troopers and Hazard Troopers, armed with heavy repeaters, missile launchers, and concussion rifles, you can power on through with the Force and your lightsaber, or even use the Force to send their projectiles flying back at them just for extra fun. Heck, you can even go the Palpatine route and forgo a lightsaber altogether; in one mission where the Empire takes your Jedi captive and take your lightsaber away, you can easily fry the whole base's worth of Stormtroopers with Force Lightning.

Both Mandalorians and Jedi can carve through armies like a hot knife through butter. But the difference is, a Mandalorian has to fight tooth and nail doing so, while a Jedi might as well be on autopilot, because it's as mundane as carving a cake. It's the difference between playing as an ODST in Halo, and playing as Master Chief. With the former, you have to be more cautious, since you're not as strong or agile as a Spartan. With the latter, you're a killing machine that's so efficient and scary, the enemy calls you a demon and they tremble with religious fear when you kill their captains and they run for the hills.

Filoni groupies at least have the decency to point out the true slave-master of the clones; Darth Sidious. That, and the way Filoni handled the Mandalorians was more tactful and nuanced than Traviss' take which just nourished the Mando fans' ego. In Filoni Wars, the Mandalorians are powerful, nuanced, and flawed, kind of like how they were in the EU works not written by Karen Traviss, like Jango Fett's star video game, Star Wars: Bounty Hunter, or Knights of the Old Republic, where the Mandalorians you fight come with energy shields that laugh off blaster rounds and swords that can block lightsabers, and yet they still lost because they weren't perfect.

I don't see how it goes too far though, there has been plenty of societies in real life history that have had reputations as "super mercs". The Danes were famously hired around the world as the best warriors money could buy once upon a time and Mandos have a very similar culture to the old Scandinavian one. I don't religiously read up on the behind the scenes like some people do but I would not be surprised at all if they were directly based on them.

And really, making Force sensitives neigh unkillable just gives things a Superman complex and that shit is not fun, but it is boring. I can buy a warrior who has trained his entire life, and has trained in a team his entire life, with good gear, can take down a Jedi simply because there is more to a fight than being a living magic 8 ball. There's no drama in the whole only a Jedi can kill a Jedi thing and I don't understand why someone would want to read about these perfect creatures who can do no wrong and not be killed. I like the Mandalorians because they show that god can bleed.

But Lucas practically portrayed the Jedi as mythical with their powers. In the first movie, one Jedi rewrites people's brains effortlessly while another one chokes people with his mind. Meanwhile, the Mandalorians in the films don't get much in terms of victories outside of draws and surprise kills. They usually get killed (Jango) or humiliated. (Boba) Lucas' input in the Expanded Universe, works like Dark Empire (where he directed the writers to revive the Emperor) and Force Unleashed (which he used as a bridge between Episodes 3 and 4) have the Jedi going balls-to-the-wall with Force powers. In the former, the Emperor wipes out whole fleets with his mind. In the latter, Darth Vader's valet shanghais a Star Destroyer with his brain and causes it to crash on a military facility. So the Jedi being Superman just follows the author's intent.

That, and the Jedi themselves trained for life to learn how to fight, so they have as much, if not more training, than the Mandalorians. Heck, some wash-out Jedi Exile from KOTOR 2 who lost her connection to the Force visits an academy in Telos where a whole clan of Echani martial arts masters lived, and she whooped their asses at their own game of fisticuffs without the Force. Later on, she visited a Mandalorian camp in Dxun where she beat up Mandalorians in hand-to-hand combat and duels using simple dueling blades. Learning how to be a Jedi doesn't just mean learning the Force, but learning a thousand generations' worth of combat forms and techniques. So even if you strip the Force away, you're left with a guy who can still kick your ass 5 ways to Friday. Ahsoka Tano overpowered Cad Bane when the latter took away her sabers, and Cad had to use an underhanded electric gauntlet trick to bring her down. When even the fucking teenagers of the Jedi Order can take grown men down with their hands, that's proof that they're the top dog warriors.

Stories where the common man can make gods bleed used to be fun. I remember enjoying stories where Batman beats Superman, or how Mandalorians, clone troopers, and Sith commandos can kill Jedi. But now, they're passe. They've lost their taste. It's become ridiculous now how people think that some armor and training means you can always stop a powerful psychic who has trained for combat his entire life, who can enhance his body with otherworldly powers. Or how some tech and prep time means a regular man will always come out on top against an alien who can destroy the planet with a single blow. I remember how now, among DC fans, they've reversed their stance that Batman can beat Superman, as more and more admit that if Superman was serious, Batman would lose, down to the point where even the Justice League film portrayed that if Superman didn't give a shit about casualties, he can kill Batman in a heartbeat.

All those stories of Superman getting beaten by Batman was due to the former fighting with his hands tied. If he fought Batman in those stories with the same strength and dedication with which he fought Darkseid, Batman would be a blood smear on the ground. The same goes for the Mandos: there are some cases where a Mando can get the upper hand on a Jedi, but every time the Mandos and Jedi fight each other on large-scale battlefields and wars, the Jedi win and the Mandalorians get slaughtered. And in the movies, the Mandos don't even get close to being able to kill Jedi outside of a surprise attack. You don't see many Mandos killing Jedi, and to kill a Jedi is already a great victory for a Mandalorian, whereas to slaughter whole scores of Mandalorians is just another day at work for a Jedi at Galidraan or during the Mandalorian Wars. This is why in the Star Wars: Bounty Hunter game, which was about Jango Fett, the leader of the Mandalorians before the Clone Wars, the final boss is a wash-out Jedi Padawan who became a drug queen.
 
Last edited:
I don't see how it goes too far though, there has been plenty of societies in real life history that have had reputations as "super mercs". The Danes were famously hired around the world as the best warriors money could buy once upon a time and Mandos have a very similar culture to the old Scandinavian one. I don't religiously read up on the behind the scenes like some people do but I would not be surprised at all if they were directly based on them.

And really, making Force sensitives neigh unkillable just gives things a Superman complex and that shit is not fun, but it is boring. I can buy a warrior who has trained his entire life, and has trained in a team his entire life, with good gear, can take down a Jedi simply because there is more to a fight than being a living magic 8 ball. There's no drama in the whole only a Jedi can kill a Jedi thing and I don't understand why someone would want to read about these perfect creatures who can do no wrong and not be killed. I like the Mandalorians because they show that a god can bleed.
Nothing wrong with being able to kill strong force sensitives with good old fashioned blasters or tactics if you have the skill and planning to do so, or through just plain luck, a well timed trap or brute strength and intimidation a la Grievous is fun too. The problem is that there are those who consider the very notion that a Mando could be in any way inferior to another faction, especially a jedi or non-mando warrior, in terms of both combat and philosophy to be absolute heresy. The opposite is just as bad, ie "jedi is da bestest" is just as bad as "mando is da bestest" as having a faction boner is always pretty cringe when really all factions should be equally fun to enjoy instead of engaging in pointlessly cringy "my guy is stronger than your guy" debates, and any moral differences should be left open to interpretation instead of flat out declaring my guys are good and your guys are not. Fans should just say what makes their guys great instead of having to resort to some cringy dick measuring contest by constantly bashing one another or trying to peg each other down like "oh no jedis shouldn't be that strong! It makes mandos look weak! Boohoo!" and vice versa. Anyone can beat anyone depending on who is writing, so no feats in the world can save you from what a writer wants. So its fine to have powerful jedi so long as its not some padawan or greenhorn knight/sith so long as how they're beaten is written well, hell fight turnouts hardly matter so long as its written well anyway, factions be damned, but if the Force is clearly on their side, ie Luke or instances of Oneness, then trying to undermine the Force is an absolute no.

The problem is Traviss usually prefers her guys to win and be the entire focus, and if they can't win in combat, then they must win in terms of philosophy/moral superiority which is even worse which goes against the very spiritual doctrine George enforces which contrasts with the Mandalorian's own secular ways and as Karen portrays them it doesn't allow enough room for interpretation. Hell, Traviss hardly paid much attention to non-mando characters as it was, as she didn't even know who Mara Jade was until she killed her off in Sacrifice (although to be fair that was a committee decision but to not know one of the biggest EU characters alongside Thrawn and then those in charge having her write for a character she hardly knew is just one big wtf all around, showing that she needed to stop spending so much time in her Mando bubble). In short, jedis should be considered the pinnacle of power but not all be unbeatable unless it is to put emphasis on the greatness of the Force itself rather than the might of the individual jedi and mandos are too obnoxiously smug mary and marty sues with too much secular plot armor.
 
Last edited:
This is honestly good enough for me, Disney EU doesn't exist to me so the Fetts are Mandos as far as I am concerned. All you have is this faggot's word re: George Lucas and I'm inclined more towards 20 years of EU rather than some dude who can't stop jacking off over his OC do not steal.

Here is Filoni on the subject:
Go to 02:51 on this video:
To George, the Mandalorians, above all - dating back to Empire Strikes Back - are supercommandos. They’re a race of people that were a military. They can’t be so vagabond as they’ve appeared in the EU. They can’t be this group of people that are vastly different in paint job and paint scheme, because if you do that, they look too much, immediately, like a bunch of Boba Fetts. It robbed Boba Fett of his uniqueness.

Here he is talking about it on a podcast:
 
Last edited:
I have to wonder, does the thread still need to have the "Rise of Skywalker Spoilers" header hanging there? We've long since passed the spoilers period.
I check the link in that section and guess what I see first?
1597549822392.jpeg

A pic of Filoni wearing a wolf constellation shirt that says "THWOLF"...


Edit:
Disney is apparently making a whole new series about Boba Fett after all... but its not a TV show, its an anthology novel series set in the Filoni Wars era with young Boba and Ventress joining his "crew"...
Meanwhile they're still making an AladdinxThrawn cartoon but they can't be arsed to finish animating the Boba vs Cad Bane story because they wasted their budget on Ahsoka wankery, so they just drop that storyline off into a novel... Bravo Disney.
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile they're still making an AladdinxThrawn cartoon but they can't be arsed to finish animating the Boba vs Cad Bane story because they wasted their budget on Ahsoka wankery, so they just drop that storyline off into a novel... Bravo Disney.

Wow so another show that take place in the Imperial Era: first Rebels, Ahsoka Show (rumor, unknown Era), Bad Batch and now AladdinxThawn, I wouldn't be surprise if we probably get more unnecessary show. Which I don't want cause I rather see more Grievous in action that prove he isn't too weak as Filoni Wars poorly portrayed him as, or just add a character that finally surpassed Grievous unnecessary (Gungan) shame.

Also Man, I'm still mad we never got this Arc where Grievous kick Kenobi ass in a fully render.
Grievous_defeats_Kenobi.png
 
Last edited:
Good post. I hadn't considered the marketing aspects of Gennedy Wars. Lucas for his flaws really understood, and more importantly as you point out, took time to CONTINUE to understand, the market.

Only thing I'd counter on you is the "used future' look being an issue. Luke wears (essentially) three outfits: Tatooine Robes, Flight Suit, and his ROTJ outfit. None of them are particularly off-the-wall for people in the 70s/80s. Now granted that's two more outfits than MaRey has in her movies. I think the problem is, as you said, the costumes they did use for everyone was completely lifeless.
It's not that the "used future" look is an issue in itself...it's a classic aesthetic of 20th Century Sci-Fi, and has adorned numerous settings from Alien to Blade Runner. The problem is in its implementation, and its failure to match the setting of the universe. In terms of implementation, the ST uses it quite liberally, but fails to justify it whatsoever; it makes sense for the OT to have this aesthetic in its costumes, tech and production design because of the era in which it is set. The Empire has been in control for two decades, and the influence of their rule has led all of the colorful and culturally-rich designs of the Old Republic Era to be sapped out and abandoned to properly characterize it, reflected in the living conditions and dress of everyman characters like Luke, mercenaries like Han, and the entirety of the Rebel Alliance. The ST isn't set in that backdrop anymore---it has enjoyed 30+ years of peace and prosperity under the New Republic, and yet everything looks just as run-down and rustic as it was during the reign of the Empire. There's no logic in it---Abrams and Johnson just wanted to regurgitate the used future look of the OT to satisfy their shallow and superficial understanding of what the galaxy should look like, or to avoid any and all resemblance to "those yucky prequels."

Moreover, the thing that characterized the OT Costumes was a variety of costumes. As you mentioned, Luke undergoes several outfits across the series--fuck, he goes through three different major costumes in ESB alone, and Leia goes through just as many in ROTJ. By contrast, there's not a whole lot of variety to Rey's look outside of occasional color or hairstyle changes....and everyone else has such static and lifeless costumes, devoid of personality or intrigue, that they look dressed up for other films instead of Star Wars.

What they should've done was do what the EU Comics and Games did: build off the existing era and inject personality, culture, and functionality to the designs---as well as add some damn aliens. In a galaxy like Star Wars, a "diverse cast" should look like this...
Legacy_characters (1).jpg

...and not this.
EL6lytrWwAESZCU.jpg

It isn't about race, gender, sexuality, or any other trivial Earth minutia. It's about wanting exotic aliens and eye-catching costumes instead of bland, interchangeable humans clad in Logan's Run outfits. For fuck's sake, even Star Wars Rebels did its aliens and costumes better, and it's a fucking TV-Y7 Cartoon aimed at glue-scarfing children on Disney XD. Putting its questionable ideas and slipshot writing aside, its costumes, aliens and even ship designs were and still are leagues ahead of the current films, and lend themselves to a good aesthetic that was sadly hampered by the limitations of its non-existent budget. They can be retooled into something acceptable, as seen here:

star_wars_rebels-16.jpg
 
It's not that the "used future" look is an issue in itself...it's a classic aesthetic of 20th Century Sci-Fi, and has adorned numerous settings from Alien to Blade Runner. The problem is in its implementation, and its failure to match the setting of the universe. In terms of implementation, the ST uses it quite liberally, but fails to justify it whatsoever; it makes sense for the OT to have this aesthetic in its costumes, tech and production design because of the era in which it is set. The Empire has been in control for two decades, and the influence of their rule has led all of the colorful and culturally-rich designs of the Old Republic Era to be sapped out and abandoned to properly characterize it, reflected in the living conditions and dress of everyman characters like Luke, mercenaries like Han, and the entirety of the Rebel Alliance. The ST isn't set in that backdrop anymore---it has enjoyed 30+ years of peace and prosperity under the New Republic, and yet everything looks just as run-down and rustic as it was during the reign of the Empire. There's no logic in it---Abrams and Johnson just wanted to regurgitate the used future look of the OT to satisfy their shallow and superficial understanding of what the galaxy should look like, or to avoid any and all resemblance to "those yucky prequels."

Moreover, the thing that characterized the OT Costumes was a variety of costumes. As you mentioned, Luke undergoes several outfits across the series--fuck, he goes through three different major costumes in ESB alone, and Leia goes through just as many in ROTJ. By contrast, there's not a whole lot of variety to Rey's look outside of occasional color or hairstyle changes....and everyone else has such static and lifeless costumes, devoid of personality or intrigue, that they look dressed up for other films instead of Star Wars.

What they should've done was do what the EU Comics and Games did: build off the existing era and inject personality, culture, and functionality to the designs---as well as add some damn aliens. In a galaxy like Star Wars, a "diverse cast" should look like this...

...and not this.
It isn't about race, gender, sexuality, or any other trivial Earth minutia. It's about wanting exotic aliens and eye-catching costumes instead of bland, interchangeable humans clad in Logan's Run outfits. For fuck's sake, even Star Wars Rebels did its aliens and costumes better, and it's a fucking TV-Y7 Cartoon aimed at glue-scarfing children on Disney XD. Putting its questionable ideas and slipshot writing aside, its costumes, aliens and even ship designs were and still are leagues ahead of the current films, and lend themselves to a good aesthetic that was sadly hampered by the limitations of its non-existent budget. They can be retooled into something acceptable, as seen here:

View attachment 1523974

Ah, I think I'd misunderstood what you were arguing against.
I definitely agree with you about the cast, and the toys being boring, and no one understanding how to make things toys for children; like I said about Rogue One, it was like they made toys only for Adult collectors, while simultaneously doing everything possible to drive off existing fans,aka the market for that shit.

As far as OT/PT/ST costuming...

OT, there were basically two settings: Edge of Civilization, and Imperial Facilities. Everything on Hoth/Yavin/Dagoba was shitty and run down because it was point furthest from the bright center of the universe. In Imperial Control , everything was neat and orderly.
I'd argue the exception that demonstrates the rule, Bespin,where everything was all well maintained despite it being a mining outpost.

The PT took place in areas much closer to civilization, so I'd expect more refinement.

ST was supposed to be taking place in far-flung areas as well, so even though the Republic had been back, baby I would expect things to be closer to the OT.
I'm not saying this wasn't completely fucking retarded and incomprehensible, but the Resistance (gah) was a bunch of paramilitaries operating against the wishes of the central government - so having their equipment state be at about the level of the OT rebellion isn't too far of a stretch as long as you swallow the above cyanide capsule.
 
Oh, so now they remember that she exists?

Meanwhile they're still making an AladdinxThrawn cartoon but they can't be arsed to finish animating the Boba vs Cad Bane story because they wasted their budget on Ahsoka wankery, so they just drop that storyline off into a novel... Bravo Disney.
Why don't they make it not canon? I kind of wish Cad Bane was still alive to appear on The Mandalorian. I know he would be quite old but it would be badass to see an old cowboy/bounty hunter in that show.
 
I have to disagree on the costumes. Samurai movies prove again and again a robe and sword combo is timeless, and so do Westerns for "rugged individualism" / used future. The only inherent costuming advantage the OT has on any other existing or hypothetical movie is that the zero to hero story has been done and while a military uniform is an upgrade for Luke and therefore exciting, that excitement cannot be 100% repeated for credit with any other character.

The ST outfits suck because the ST characters suck. They aren't doing anything meaningful because the story is disgustingly predictable, so much that even an actor death couldn't get in its way. Compare it to the OT, where Lucas didn't know if he could use Han Solo, when "I am your father" could be an actual surprise plot twist (for an admittedly less jaded audience) - not in the "is he or isn't he" sense, but coming as a complete surprise. ST characters are hipster tourists wearing their costumes like a slumming diversity and inclusion consultant wears a pair of authentically ripped "fuck capitalism" $400 jeans.

Fancy clothes are for official business, religious functions, tea parties, and holonet sithposting. (Unfortunately, any attempt to ground fancy clothes in realism is met with autistic screeching about muh cultural appropriation.) Practical people should wear practical clothes. Between let's say 4 planets, a space battle, a ground battle, villain intro, Jedi training, a diplomatic mission / senate session / infiltration attempt, and a ceremony of some kind (awards / wedding / funeral), there'll be enough different costumes to get excited for next product.
 
Oh, so now they remember that she exists?
I wouldn't be too optimistic about that considering how disgraceful her last appearance in Disney shit was alongside Vos.
Why don't they make it not canon? I kind of wish Cad Bane was still alive to appear on The Mandalorian. I know he would be quite old but it would be badass to see an old cowboy/bounty hunter in that show.
Disney doesn't like to declare anything they've made as non-canon, and the closest thing to do that is Porgcuck or some other writer forgetting that something by another Disney author exists (which happens more often than not). The best you can hope for is that Furloni forgets those novels exist and he just adds Cad Bane in anyway. As much as I am apprehensive about even more Filoni OCs forcing themselves into everything, Cad Bane would actually be one of the few and far better tie-in villain options for a show like the Mandalorian over someone like Ahsoka or any other Filoni OC, especially due to his classic western motif look that's about as charmingly campy as Arrogantus. Or any other EU bounty hunter that got shafted for some Disney/Filoni OC such as Durge. Also the unceremonious way they butchered Aurra Sing's character and killed her off in Solo was also just another huge waste.
 
Last edited:
Most of the ST costumes were just ripoffs of what came before. Mostly OT stuff. A few females (Leia, Holdo) had more elegant dressing, the Resistance forces wore similar, practical outfits as the Rebels did in the OT, and the First Order was just beating the Empire's wardrobe to death that I'm surprised they didn't just forgo the First Order and just state that a remnant of the Empire rebuilt its power in the Outer Rim and returned, calling itself the "Galactic Empire" once more. The thing is, the ST was made with SJWs and Red Letter Media fans in mind, people who were the loudest when it came to Star Wars-they want Star Wars to ditch the "baggage" of the Prequels and everything after the 1980s, they want Star Wars to appeal to modern day leftists, et cetera. So they basically rebuilt the Rebels and Empire and had them fight all over again to make people feel as if they were back in the 80s again, only with a slight modification of having female characters show up the OT characters to appease the feminists in the crowd.

And yes, I will keep blaming the Red Letter Media crowd for this nonsense. They're just as responsible for this mess as the SJWs are. More, even, since they were the ones who convinced Lucas to sell to Disney in the first place due to endless demonization against him painting him as worse than Satan. At worst, he was Michael Bay minus the excessive T&A and sex jokes. At best, he re-invented science fiction and popularized it as a genre in ways that previous works like Star Trek and the Foundation Series never could. And yet people kept screaming that he raped their childhoods because a bunch of edgelords on the internet told them to do so.

What can I say? People can be stupid as hell. Only now are they realizing their flaws, with even RLM shifting to criticizing the Disney flicks so as to salvage their reputation with the SW fandom that now begins to see their demonization of the Prequels as complete and utter garbage.
 
I wouldn't be too optimistic about that considering how disgraceful her last appearance in Disney shit was alongside Vos.

Disney doesn't like to declare anything they've made as non-canon, and the closest thing to do that is Porgcuck or some other writer forgetting that something by another Disney author exists (which happens more often than not). The best you can hope for is that Furloni forgets those novels exist and he just adds Cad Bane in anyway. As much as I am apprehensive about even more Filoni OCs forcing themselves into everything, Cad Bane would actually be one of the few and far better tie-in villain options for a show like the Mandalorian over someone like Ahsoka or any other Filoni OC, especially due to his classic western motif look that's about as charmingly campy as Arrogantus. Or any other EU bounty hunter that got shafted for some Disney/Filoni OC such as Durge. Also the unceremonious way they butchered Aurra Sing's character and killed her off in Solo was also just another huge waste.
Bane would've been pretty cool, because you can have the Mando, an old Bane and even more senile Durge meet and conflict be in a small arc in a love letter/rip-off of The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly. That shit would be great.
What can I say? People can be stupid as hell. Only now are they realizing their flaws, with even RLM shifting to criticizing the Disney flicks so as to salvage their reputation with the SW fandom that now begins to see their demonization of the Prequels as complete and utter garbage.
Yeah, gonna disagree on this one wholeheartedly. They have much of the same opinion I have and had a similar trajectory to me in terms of the media. They and I both saw Force Awakens and gave it slack at the time, because a retread of ANH was a decent enough starting ground and a "return to form" if you will. Akin to Last Crusade in this respect where it played the movie safe, which isn't a bad idea after the not so good Clone War cg movie being the last time SW was in film.

In retrospect it was shit (pacing and writing was poor), but this is JarJar Abram's entire modus operandi: make up mysteries and leave off plot for later and let the stupids fill it in for you. They and I did not think it would turn to shit precisely because they were able to mostly consistently make good popcorn films out of Marvel, which also had a lot of backstory. We fell for the lazy shit's procrastination approach and expected Lucasfilms to not despise and loathe their fans and content.

Then came Rogue One. I thought the movie didn't let you care for the characters since you didn't get time to know them, and thought it jumped around too much (same complaints I had for Force Awakens btw, they don't let you breathe at all). They thought it was mostly mindless action, this was the first signs of something was going wrong to most people who did not look at the shitty books or comics they made and currently molder in Ollies.

TLJ was the kiss of death for both of us, and you know the rest.

They didn't do this about face to save reputation. They thought like me that Disney should at least be able to make something competent, if not inspired, and then realized the hideous mistake around where the normies did. I was thinking they would use some of the EU plot points, but goddamn did I not expect the worst parts of Jedi Prince and Dark Empire.

I will however agree on one thing: Rich Evans, I love the guy, but he's retarded for thinking the setting is too small to make good content with. He only is in the ballpark of right if you interpret his beliefs as "You can do some new and interesting things, but not with any current Hollywood producer".
 
Bane would've been pretty cool, because you can have the Mando, an old Bane and even more senile Durge meet and conflict be in a small arc in a love letter/rip-off of The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly. That shit would be great.

Yeah, gonna disagree on this one wholeheartedly. They have much of the same opinion I have and had a similar trajectory to me in terms of the media. They and I both saw Force Awakens and gave it slack at the time, because a retread of ANH was a decent enough starting ground and a "return to form" if you will. Akin to Last Crusade in this respect where it played the movie safe, which isn't a bad idea after the not so good Clone War cg movie being the last time SW was in film.

In retrospect it was shit (pacing and writing was poor), but this is JarJar Abram's entire modus operandi: make up mysteries and leave off plot for later and let the stupids fill it in for you. They and I did not think it would turn to shit precisely because they were able to mostly consistently make good popcorn films out of Marvel, which also had a lot of backstory. We fell for the lazy shit's procrastination approach and expected Lucasfilms to not despise and loathe their fans and content.

Then came Rogue One. I thought the movie didn't let you care for the characters since you didn't get time to know them, and thought it jumped around too much (same complaints I had for Force Awakens btw, they don't let you breathe at all). They thought it was mostly mindless action, this was the first signs of something was going wrong to most people who did not look at the shitty books or comics they made and currently molder in Ollies.

TLJ was the kiss of death for both of us, and you know the rest.

They didn't do this about face to save reputation. They thought like me that Disney should at least be able to make something competent, if not inspired, and then realized the hideous mistake around where the normies did. I was thinking they would use some of the EU plot points, but goddamn did I not expect the worst parts of Jedi Prince and Dark Empire.

I will however agree on one thing: Rich Evans, I love the guy, but he's retarded for thinking the setting is too small to make good content with. He only is in the ballpark of right if you interpret his beliefs as "You can do some new and interesting things, but not with any current Hollywood producer".

I don't think Durge is part of the new canon. If he is, I've never seen it.

I respectfully disagree. I never saw The Force Awakens as anything but RLM and feminist bait. It wasn't even that safe since it fucked the Jedi progression system into the dirt. In the previous films, even wunderkinds like Anakin and Luke took time to train. They were barely powerful in their first two movies, then in their third movie, they came into form. Rey was holding off attempted mind-rape and was winning fights with Dark Jedi in her first film. And it was so sloppy that they had to explain it as Rey subconsciously downloading Kylo's training when the latter failed at mind-raping her. "Safe" would have been Luke and a female Jedi apprentice kicking ass and taking names, like my playthrough of Jedi Academy where I play as a female Jedi and fight alongside Luke against some new Sith threat-that would bring in the female demographic while playing it safe with the older fans. "Safe" would not undo everything the OT characters accomplished, but rather build on top of the foundation that it laid. See again, Jedi Academy, and how Luke's revived Jedi Order became a well-established force that the New Republic calls in for support. You'd have done a better job with a "safe" film if you brought in Michael Bay and all he did was have the Jedi kick ass and have human and alien chicks show off T&A all the time. Maybe Rey as a character would have worked better if she was Jaina Solo and she was already trained off-screen so as to explain where her Jedi powers and experience with machines and lightsabers came from.

TFA meanwhile, was meant as a callback to the OT, down to the point where they REVERSED things so that the Empire is once again strong, the Rebels are once again weak, the Jedi are once again nearing extinction, Han Solo is a smuggler once more, just to get in those Red Letter Media fans who kept whining about how bad the Prequels were and how good it was back in the Original Trilogy days. And yet TFA utterly shits on the lessons of the OT, the most prominent of which was the lesson of Empire Strikes Back, the lesson which states that experience and wisdom matters. Luke had more power than Darth Vader, and Vader even says that Luke is strong enough to kill the Emperor, but thanks to his lack of training, he can't even make it past the Emperor's mechanical manservant. For that reason, Yoda tried to keep Luke from engaging the enemy until his training was complete. Meanwhile, TFA shows us that so long as you have the power of feminism at your side, you can instantly learn how to ward off mind-rape and be an expert lightsaber duelist even though prior to you meeting the enemy, you didn't even know the Force exists.

At the same time, everything accomplished by the good guys in the Original Trilogy is gone. The new democracy they created is ineffective and worthless, the good guys have even less forces than they did when they were a rebellion against a galaxy-wide empire, the Jedi are eradicated once more, the new Empire is just as evil as the old, except it has weapons that make the old empire look like a backwater post by comparison, which made the OT worthless as the actions of its heroes accomplished absolutely nothing.

And of course, the Prequel-bashers ate that shit up, calling Kylo Ren a "better Anakin" (even though he's everything bad about Anakin with none of the good) and saying that EPVII is the direction the Prequels should have gone but didn't. Meanwhile, I was sitting there, fuming at the fact that A) they made the Original Trilogy about as pointless as Naruto anime filler by making the OT heroes' accomplishments WORTHLESS, and B) they don't understand the main lessons the OT tried to teach. For each praise they threw at Disney's way, they added in more Lucas-bashing to go with it. And then now the tables have turned: now the fans want Lucas back, and now the prequel-bashers are about as popular among SW fans as dengue fever is in Manila.

The fact that RLM can talk on for hours praising the Original Trilogy's values while giving TFA a pass goes to show they didn't know SHIT about the Original Trilogy, since TFA basically made the accomplishments of the OT's heroes null and void while missing the point of the OT's lessons entirely. All it did was rob the OT of its aesthetics, add in Instant Jedi Just Add Feminism, and JJ Abrams called it a day. No fan of the Original Trilogy would support a film that stole its aesthetics, disregarded its lessons on the need for wisdom and training, and made the accomplishments of its heroes worthless, to the point where the title of Episode VI couldn't even count as true anymore because the ending implied that Luke would rebuild the Jedi Order, which in TFA has been reduced to a failure. "Return of the Jedi" my ass, they never came back in the films!

Not to attack any of you personally, but to me, RLM is two-faced in that they criticized the Prequels to hell and back for not being as good as the Original Trilogy which they elevated as a positive example, yet they also praised a film that shat all over the OT's lessons and the accomplishments of its heroes. The people who kept praising the Original Trilogy over the prequels didn't protest at the fact that EPVII made it about as meaningful as anime filler. It was then where I saw that RLM are fake fans of the Original Trilogy, since no real OT fan would accept a film that thoroughly destroys everything the OT heroes accomplished in place of shallowly recreating the scenario of the OT, except they took the good lessons and worldbuilding out and replaced it with SJW feminist pandering.

I mean, at least Legends waited until 130 years after the movies before having the Jedi get hunted down to extinction again, and even then, they didn't go all the way, since they had a Jedi Emperor who has his own Jedi Knights fighting the new Sith Emperor and his Sith minions, and both emperors had legions of Stormtroopers and Star Destroyers that they threw into battle against each other, which made the story different. TFA couldn't even wait for 50 years before killing the Jedi off again. I was hoping for a scenario where it turns out in EPVIII, the Jedi weren't extinct, Luke was just hiding them until the enemy revealed themselves so he can send in the boys and girls with laser swords and strike, and that Han lied about the Jedi being nearly extinct to protect his friend's plans. But that didn't happen. Why? Because TFA made it clear that the Jedi were extinct again. And people wonder why the next film after it was titled "The Last Jedi." We went from "Return of the Jedi" for Episode 6, and two movies later, it's "The Last Jedi", which makes the sixth movie completely pointless. But let's not fool ourselves. It all started with TFA. Rian Johnson only chose to double down EPVII's flaws while fixing none of them.

And I will never stop blaming RLM and the Prequel-basher crowd for this. They're the reason Lucas sold to Disney, their endless insults wore him down and convinced him to sell, and now that Disney ran the franchise to the dirt, to the point where even the bloody toy franchise is tanking, the destruction of Star Wars as a sci-fi IP and a media giant is complete. All thanks to these clowns.
 
Last edited:
I don't think Durge is part of the new canon. If he is, I've never seen it.

I respectfully disagree. I never saw The Force Awakens as anything but RLM and feminist bait. It wasn't even that safe since it fucked the Jedi progression system into the dirt. In the previous films, even wunderkinds like Anakin and Luke took time to train. They were barely powerful in their first two movies, then in their third movie, they came into form. Rey was holding off attempted mind-rape and was winning fights with Dark Jedi in her first film. And it was so sloppy that they had to explain it as Rey subconsciously downloading Kylo's training when the latter failed at mind-raping her. "Safe" would have been Luke and a female Jedi apprentice kicking ass and taking names, like my playthrough of Jedi Academy where I play as a female Jedi and fight alongside Luke against some new Sith threat-that would bring in the female demographic while playing it safe with the older fans. "Safe" would not undo everything the OT characters accomplished, but rather build on top of the foundation that it laid. See again, Jedi Academy, and how Luke's revived Jedi Order became a well-established force that the New Republic calls in for support. You'd have done a better job with a "safe" film if you brought in Michael Bay and all he did was have the Jedi kick ass and have human and alien chicks show off T&A all the time. Maybe Rey as a character would have worked better if she was Jaina Solo and she was already trained off-screen so as to explain where her Jedi powers and experience with machines and lightsabers came from.

TFA meanwhile, was meant as a callback to the OT, down to the point where they REVERSED things so that the Empire is once again strong, the Rebels are once again weak, the Jedi are once again nearing extinction, Han Solo is a smuggler once more, just to get in those Red Letter Media fans who kept whining about how bad the Prequels were and how good it was back in the Original Trilogy days. And yet TFA utterly shits on the lessons of the OT, the most prominent of which was the lesson of Empire Strikes Back, the lesson which states that experience and wisdom matters. Luke had more power than Darth Vader, and Vader even says that Luke is strong enough to kill the Emperor, but thanks to his lack of training, he can't even make it past the Emperor's mechanical manservant. For that reason, Yoda tried to keep Luke from engaging the enemy until his training was complete. Meanwhile, TFA shows us that so long as you have the power of feminism at your side, you can instantly learn how to ward off mind-rape and be an expert lightsaber duelist even though prior to you meeting the enemy, you didn't even know the Force exists.

At the same time, everything accomplished by the good guys in the Original Trilogy is gone. The new democracy they created is ineffective and worthless, the good guys have even less forces than they did when they were a rebellion against a galaxy-wide empire, the Jedi are eradicated once more, the new Empire is just as evil as the old, except it has weapons that make the old empire look like a backwater post by comparison, which made the OT worthless as the actions of its heroes accomplished absolutely nothing.

And of course, the Prequel-bashers ate that shit up, calling Kylo Ren a "better Anakin" (even though he's everything bad about Anakin with none of the good) and saying that EPVII is the direction the Prequels should have gone but didn't. Meanwhile, I was sitting there, fuming at the fact that A) they made the Original Trilogy about as pointless as Naruto anime filler by making the OT heroes' accomplishments WORTHLESS, and B) they don't understand the main lessons the OT tried to teach. For each praise they threw at Disney's way, they added in more Lucas-bashing to go with it. And then now the tables have turned: now the fans want Lucas back, and now the prequel-bashers are about as popular among SW fans as dengue fever is in Manila.

The fact that RLM can talk on for hours praising the Original Trilogy's values while giving TFA a pass goes to show they didn't know SHIT about the Original Trilogy, since TFA basically made the accomplishments of the OT's heroes null and void while missing the point of the OT's lessons entirely. All it did was rob the OT of its aesthetics, add in Instant Jedi Just Add Feminism, and JJ Abrams called it a day. No fan of the Original Trilogy would support a film that stole its aesthetics, disregarded its lessons on the need for wisdom and training, and made the accomplishments of its heroes worthless, to the point where the title of Episode VI couldn't even count as true anymore because the ending implied that Luke would rebuild the Jedi Order, which in TFA has been reduced to a failure. "Return of the Jedi" my ass, they never came back in the films!

Not to attack any of you personally, but to me, RLM is two-faced in that they criticized the Prequels to hell and back for not being as good as the Original Trilogy which they elevated as a positive example, yet they also praised a film that shat all over the OT's lessons and the accomplishments of its heroes. The people who kept praising the Original Trilogy over the prequels didn't protest at the fact that EPVII made it about as meaningful as anime filler. It was then where I saw that RLM are fake fans of the Original Trilogy, since no real OT fan would accept a film that thoroughly destroys everything the OT heroes accomplished in place of shallowly recreating the scenario of the OT, except they took the good lessons and worldbuilding out and replaced it with SJW feminist pandering.

I mean, at least Legends waited until 130 years after the movies before having the Jedi get hunted down to extinction again, and even then, they didn't go all the way, since they had a Jedi Emperor who has his own Jedi Knights fighting the new Sith Emperor and his Sith minions, and both emperors had legions of Stormtroopers and Star Destroyers that they threw into battle against each other, which made the story different. TFA couldn't even wait for 50 years before killing the Jedi off again. I was hoping for a scenario where it turns out in EPVIII, the Jedi weren't extinct, Luke was just hiding them until the enemy revealed themselves so he can send in the boys and girls with laser swords and strike, and that Han lied about the Jedi being nearly extinct to protect his friend's plans. But that didn't happen. Why? Because TFA made it clear that the Jedi were extinct again. And people wonder why the next film after it was titled "The Last Jedi." We went from "Return of the Jedi" for Episode 6, and two movies later, it's "The Last Jedi", which makes the sixth movie completely pointless. But let's not fool ourselves. It all started with TFA. Rian Johnson only chose to double down EPVII's flaws while fixing none of them.

And I will never stop blaming RLM and the Prequel-basher crowd for this. They're the reason Lucas sold to Disney, their endless insults wore him down and convinced him to sell, and now that Disney ran the franchise to the dirt, to the point where even the bloody toy franchise is tanking, the destruction of Star Wars as a sci-fi IP and a media giant is complete. All thanks to these clowns.
I was with you until you did the no true scotsman fallacy here to determine who is fan and who is not, and gave malice as a cause rather than ignorance in the form of only watching it once.

TFA is a film that gets worse the more you rewatch it or think about it, and it's clear they only watched it once much like they do with most Half in the Bag films. Rey for example only truly gets bad once you take her actions and being past the first third of the movie, since that part with her in the wastes was actually pretty well done IMO; it actually was nice to see some slow pacing at that point. Then she instantly knows how to fly machines with no explanation and can beat down trained Dark Jedi.

JarJar tries to prevent your brain from noticing that, but it will if you reflect on it. I had a similar set of realizations for example with Prometheus after watching it, which also rapes the shit out of a franchise I love.
 
Last edited:
Back