Dax Herrera / Dick Masterson / Daxipad / Juju The Cow / Wolfie / The Dick Show (TDS), The Biggest Problem in the Universe (TBPITU) / New Project 2 - Balding least funny contrarian paedophile defender in the universe, "women are fat" jokes virtuoso, e-daddy of Sektards, chaser and cross-species roleplay sodomy enthusiast. Roleplays as a cow named Juju while he gets fucked in the anus by women. Fat.

How many pushups can Juju do?

  • 0

    Votes: 64 50.8%
  • 1

    Votes: 34 27.0%
  • >1

    Votes: 28 22.2%

  • Total voters
    126
Dick is man that jump way too deep into the internet 2.0, if you look at his last show (BPITU) it for people that grow during late internet 1.0 / internet 2.0 and his social retardation mix with his warped view of lolbertrainism. It was recipe for bomb and that bomb just went off, I sad when mumkey turned but this time I ready to ride this roller coaster of laughs.
 
I think the "put a bullet in digibro's brain and I won't care" is just an exaggeration, and I'd like to hear Josh's take on the tranny porn thing. I'm sure he had a reason for bringing it up.
I mean he brought up Digibro not deserving to live later on again and shit so I'm pretty sure he actually wants him to die either way which like whatever, he's a pedo but showcasing your want to kill or for other people to die so deadpan and serious like he did is kinda gay no matter how you cut it. I'd like to hear his take on the lesbian porn thing but all straight dudes are turned on at the sight of 2 hot girls kissing and fucking, it's really weird and objectively incorrect to diagnose people who like lesbian porn as trannies.
 
So not only has Dick ignored Josh's advice about Twitter, he's doubling down on the "jokes".
Why do people keep seeing the "haha jokes on you, I was only pretending to be retarded" meme and think it's a good idea to emulate it?
I like how in the show with Null he was like "I won't stop jokes because of cancel culture" and was talking about it in the context of it being the industry vs himself. It's like he actually can't admit to the fact that he's a nobody who is paid by and large by people who find his pedo defending objectionable. It doesn't matter if "people in Hollywood" are fine with it. You're not a big Hollywood guy, Dax.
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Andrews Stan
1597649175590.png

https://archive.md/ha7C4 by Dell Conagher
1597649229526.png

1597652198697.png
1597649183715.png

https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/obscenity#:~:text=Obscenity is not protected under,if given material is obscene.
 
Last edited:
Let me explain how I think Null really fucked up in that Conversation

He opened up about the Riley shit, and this shit just comes off as really pathetic and petty from Josh, he just assumed that Riley spoke for Dick and instead of standing his ground, bitched out and ran away and got his feelings hurt by some druggie faggot.

He then jumped to the next argument of 'You made things difficult for me personally', which, coming from Josh, who runs a website that finds a lot of people having their life made 'difficult' by shit on it, comes off as weak.

Only then does he jump to his strong arguments, the defending pedophilia, but Josh framed this already as him being petty and upset and having his feelings hurt by a druggie

Even if Null is objectively correct that Digi is a Pedo and Dick is a retard for defending him, Josh's opening makes him look like he's doing this all for petty reasons and that the only real issue is that his feelings got hurt by Riley telling him to leave the Dick Show discord. People can tell him 'You won!' and Dick's fans will say he won on their own circlejerk hugboxes, but everyone fucking lost as far as I'm concern, because Null looks like a petty bitch whining about Riley, and Dick looks like a retard defending a pedophile.

People claiming this is going to be doctored and altered are idiots, this shit was broadcast live to Dick's fans, to a video that most of them will at one point or the other, actually watch. He can't hide this and frankly, won't.

90% of the people here are too autistic to understand human interaction and can't understand human social cues.

In conclusion, delete twitter.
I don't think Riley thing is the strongest thing to open with, but it didn't undermine Josh's point altogether. We don't know the degree to which Dick had a hand in this and even if my front of house treats you badly, that reflects on me, the restaurant owner.

Null could have gone a lot harder on some things, but it was clear he was holding back to bow out somewhat politely. This makes his position sound weaker in the context of blood sports, but not in the context of human relationships. And Dick was mature enough to get that, too.

People should keep in mind that these people know they're talking to a crowd on these shows and both Null and Dick engage in this with some level of performativity. You should take these things as public statements. There's always more under the surface.
 
I'd like to hear his take on the lesbian porn thing but all straight dudes are turned on at the sight of 2 hot girls kissing and fucking, it's really weird and objectively incorrect to diagnose people who like lesbian porn as trannies.
The thing with troons, is that they're usually porn addicted and that where they get most of their perception of sexual things. There is no Male Actor you can self insert as in a lesbian porno and at some point a porn addict can't get off to self inserting themselves as the dude so they get off self inserting as the girl, which is where you get the sissy, femboy, trap fetishes/depravities. You could do a poll to a decent sample size of trannies and ask "Did you realize that you were trans partly through porn or lesbian porn?" and the overwhelmingly majority would say yes. I think Nool could have used a better choice of words idk

(Hell I think one of the Wachowskis said they found their trans identity from jerking it to tranny porn)
 
Josh came off pretty autistic and dare, I say it, upset online?
Digi was always "the loli guy" he's more annoying now that he's a troon but that didn't really change all that much in regards to his morals.
The problem is Josh didn't say anything new or insightful, everyone heard the "loli is pedo" argument before and adding retarded takes like calling people trannies for being into lesbos didn't exactly help.

From what I got skimming his thread, digitroon was already losing money and popularity so the best course would have been to just leave him alone until he self immolates or fucks off instead of going on some based anti-paedo crusade.
 
Josh came off pretty autistic and dare, I say it, upset online?
Digi was always "the loli guy" he's more annoying now that he's a troon but that didn't really change all that much in regards to his morals.
The problem is Josh didn't say anything new or insightful, everyone heard the "loli is pedo" argument before and adding retarded takes like calling people trannies for being into lesbos didn't exactly help.

From what I got skimming his thread, digitroon was already losing money and popularity so the best course would have been to just leave him alone until he self immolates or fucks off instead of going on some based anti-paedo crusade.
Ok, Dax.
 
Are there these dudes huffing paint? "Neither" is the sane and reasonable answer to that shitty distraction tactic.
Why do people not understand hypotheticals?
First off, "neither" is not an option. The entire point of such a hypothetical is that you're presented with two uncomfortable choices, often ones that could easily be avoided in a real life scenario. It's a thought experiment to explore an idea.
The point of asking this particular question is to illustrate that there is a difference between the two. If you establish that there is a difference, you can no longer equate the two and it's up to debate where the similarities lie or what the implications are.
 
Why do people not understand hypotheticals?
First off, "neither" is not an option. The entire point of such a hypothetical is that you're presented with two uncomfortable choices, often ones that could easily be avoided in a real life scenario. It's a thought experiment to explore an idea.
The point of asking this particular question is to illustrate that there is a difference between the two. If you establish that there is a difference, you can no longer equate the two and it's up to debate where the similarities lie or what the implications are.

The funny things about hypotheticals is you'd have to have hypothetically made the choice to have one or the other leading up to the point the question is presented. It was a rhetorical trap that Dax genuinely thought would work. What a smoothbrain take.
 
Back