She-Ra and the Princess of Power - sjw bad animation reboot of shera

[Hummingbird]

They also ignore Bow, but it's understandable why (sjw have this hidden agenda with the goal to pussify black men so they keep portraying them as inferior to white women and claim they're "avoiding racial stereotypes that black men are violent". This is why we can't have characters like Blade anymore.)

The show seems kind of scared of making a tough guy. They even eventually defanged Hordak to the point that he could only be a threat due to Catra and don't use the other male horde members.

 

[Pokemonquistador2]

The show seems kind of scared of making a tough guy. They even eventually defanged Hordak to the point that he could only be a threat due to Catra and don't use the other male horde members.

Strong males are toxic masculinity. And in a girls series that's all about lesbian shipping, you don't want any of that nasty old action and plot to get in the way, do you?

 

[Juan's Sombrero]

Spinnerella is not good enough, I guess.


true. But they portray Glimer as a passive victim who is somehow mistreated in the show and friendzoned when her/adora relationship was never portrayed as romantic and she basically got everything she wanted without having to sacrifice much (except her mom, but it's not like she gave a shit abt her).
They also ignore Bow, but it's understandable why (sjw have this hidden agenda with the goal to pussify black men so they keep portraying them as inferior to white women and claim they're "avoiding racial stereotypes that black men are violent". This is why we can't have characters like Blade anymore.)

Strong males are toxic masculinity. And in a girls series that's all about lesbian shipping, you don't want any of that nasty old action and plot to get in the way, do you?

The kind of "man" they approve of is a passive yes-man who would bow to quite literally anything they whim. Basically, a slave.

Unfortunately, a good number of these same kind of "men" they surround themselves with are often as mentally unstable, duplicitously passive aggressive, and just as manipulative.

 

[Mr Metron666]

Thought this would belong here. A bunch of She Ra fans sperging about how "nEw sCoRpIa iS sUpErIoR tO oLd sCoRpIa" (Archive). Surpisingly, a few of the show's haters on KIA would actually agree. They too think that she is the best character & one of the few good things about the new show. And then there are others (mostly on KIA 2) who think that both versions look like drag queens. Wanna know something even funnier? The guy who originally tweeted this goes on a little tirade about how characters shouldn't be just sex objects for the viewer, then begs for cash because he writes erotic fanfiction.

The main character of the novel I'm writing is bisexual. But since that doesn't matter in the story as a whole it only comes up in a few situations where it's actually important because it's part of how the characters experiences the world. I think sexuality is actually a just tiny part of the character and if you aren't writing a story where sexuality plays a huge role (like a story for children!!!) then it should never ever be shoehorned in. Of course you can includd it but only when it's necessary and don't overdo it for woke points.

Characters can have a sexuality but they AREN'T a sexuality. The same goes for race my opinion.

I'm actually flummoxed by how much these people invest in sexuality. You're right, it isn't a personality, and should nowhere near be important if they do want it to be normalized. It should just happen. I can't properly explain it, but Japanese creators like Togashi (Yu Yu Hakusho and Hunter x Hunter) actually had transgender characters in his works, but nobody cared because it felt natural and casual.

I completely agree. I don't mind having LGBT characters (or any other minority) in fictional media (even in kids media which is why (unpopular opinion alert) I actually appreciate Steven Universe), but said characters have to have more of a leg to stand on other than their sexuality (or race or gender for that matter), otherwise it's just tokenism. What's happening now is just like what was happening back in the 70s & 80s after the civil rights movement with cartoons like Super Friends having ethnic characters like Apache Chef & El Dorado purely for the sake of racial diversity. To tell you a funny story, I actually came across a least one She Ra fan (& a furry to boot) who actually bemoaned the rest of the fanbase harping on about LGBT rep & not giving a damn about story & characters (though the quality of that is also debatable to say the least) & even said that if you let your sexuality define you, you're a boring person (fucking. based). Though the same person also describes herself as demisexual/panromantic & has pronouns in her bio so.

Budget cuts, time constraints, pure lazyness, Noelle is lying to make fanatics connect dots that aren't there.
Take your pick.

I think it's lazyness in the artstyle since most mainstream's idea of aging a character up is adding wrinkle lines, cutting/growing hair, adding scars and of course losing body parts and keeping them off. It's never the body morphing out of the mold it set itself in like real aging does. They do it in movies but I haven't seen it in TV for a while.

Well, aging the characters up would have probably meant they'd probably have to give the female characters a least a bit of cleavage to show they've come of age & we all know that's a big no-no for a show like this (though then again, the adult characters don't have cleavage either. I kinda reminds me of when 4kids heavily edited One Piece, one of the things they censored was literally every female character's cleveage, no matter how small. And it looks like gonna be the future of female character designs).

Speaking of no cleveage, since we're an equal opportunity site, shouldn't we make a thread on the show haters as well? Because a lot of them can be rather cringe as well, especially the neckbeards who sperg about She-Ra not having cleveage (though as I said above, I feel this criticism is more valid & applicable to the adult female characters rather than the teen She Ra & most of her friends). In fact, they might be the reason why the show's averted the "get woke, go broke" rule for so long (how many seasons has it had now? 4 or 5?)

 

[Yamma Damma]

*snip*
Speaking of no cleveage, since we're an equal opportunity site, shouldn't we make a thread on the show haters as well? Because a lot of them can be rather cringe as well, especially the neckbeards who sperg about She-Ra not having cleveage (though as I said above, I feel this criticism is more valid & applicable to the adult female characters rather than the teen She Ra & most of her friends). In fact, they might be the reason why the show's averted the "get woke, go broke" rule for so long (how many seasons has it had now? 4 or 5?)

Nah. The show is over and during its run there was no big conroversies to remind the sane public that fandoms are retarded. (see: Voltron fandom) This will turn into the same thing as the SU thread: random tidbits and hater dumbassery until something else happens related to it. After all people keep howling for a movie or something...

 

[RumblyTumbly]

Strong males are toxic masculinity. And in a girls series that's all about lesbian shipping, you don't want any of that nasty old action and plot to get in the way, do you?

Toxic Masculinity is one of those things that show how people take an idea and go too far with it.

Are their masculine behaviors I'd consider toxic? Yeah. Alot of hazing activities go too far, and there is showing off and abuse that can result from trying to act manly. If masculinity is not balanced out with good morals, it can lead to some bad things. (BTW, the same is true of femininity, as women can be flipping monsters if left unchecked, but that never gets brought up)

But these numb nuts that pushed the whole "Toxic Masculinity" thing have pushed it to basically account for literally anything that is even remotely masculine. Tough guys, even noble tough guys, are seen as toxic now.

When Thundercats Roar came out (has that been cancelled yet?), I got into a debate with someone that said that version of TCats was needed because the original was so toxic. When I asked "How so?", it turned into a talk about Lion-O having to learn to be a fighter and so tough, and how everybody had to have perfect bodies. Its insane. Forget the fact that there is nothing inherently toxic about any of that, or that the show constantly pushed values such as Truth, Justice, Honor, and Loyalty...nope! It was toxic, so it needed deconstructing.

Unreal.

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

Toxic Masculinity is one of those things that show how people take an idea and go too far with it.

Are their masculine behaviors I'd consider toxic? Yeah. Alot of hazing activities go too far, and there is showing off and abuse that can result from trying to act manly. If masculinity is not balanced out with good morals, it can lead to some bad things. (BTW, the same is true of femininity, as women can be flipping monsters if left unchecked, but that never gets brought up)

But these numb nuts that pushed the whole "Toxic Masculinity" thing have pushed it to basically account for literally anything that is even remotely masculine. Tough guys, even noble tough guys, are seen as toxic now.

When Thundercats Roar came out (has that been cancelled yet?), I got into a debate with someone that said that version of TCats was needed because the original was so toxic. When I asked "How so?", it turned into a talk about Lion-O having to learn to be a fighter and so tough, and how everybody had to have perfect bodies. Its insane. Forget the fact that there is nothing inherently toxic about any of that, or that the show constantly pushed values such as Truth, Justice, Honor, and Loyalty...nope! It was toxic, so it needed deconstructing.

Unreal.

I thought literally everyone hated the reboot. I guess I was wrong.

 

[JambledUpWords]

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

View attachment 1532371View attachment 1532372View attachment 1532373View attachment 1532374View attachment 1532375View attachment 1532376

Well compared to most of the cast...

 

[Super-Chevy454]

They also ignore Bow, but it's understandable why (sjw have this hidden agenda with the goal to pussify black men so they keep portraying them as inferior to white women and claim they're "avoiding racial stereotypes that black men are violent". This is why we can't have characters like Blade anymore.)

And they said Black Lives matter! My ass!

 

[JambledUpWords]

 

[Juan's Sombrero]

Toxic Masculinity is one of those things that show how people take an idea and go too far with it.

Are their masculine behaviors I'd consider toxic? Yeah. Alot of hazing activities go too far, and there is showing off and abuse that can result from trying to act manly. If masculinity is not balanced out with good morals, it can lead to some bad things. (BTW, the same is true of femininity, as women can be flipping monsters if left unchecked, but that never gets brought up)

But these numb nuts that pushed the whole "Toxic Masculinity" thing have pushed it to basically account for literally anything that is even remotely masculine. Tough guys, even noble tough guys, are seen as toxic now.

When Thundercats Roar came out (has that been cancelled yet?), I got into a debate with someone that said that version of TCats was needed because the original was so toxic. When I asked "How so?", it turned into a talk about Lion-O having to learn to be a fighter and so tough, and how everybody had to have perfect bodies. Its insane. Forget the fact that there is nothing inherently toxic about any of that, or that the show constantly pushed values such as Truth, Justice, Honor, and Loyalty...nope! It was toxic, so it needed deconstructing.

Unreal.

I genuinely hope this entire toxic thing gets dumped eventually. It sounds closer to scientific sexism.

I also somewhat hope that idiot was just trolling you (unlikely), because I don't see being exactly like the characters in TCR as anything but autistic, sleazy and lame. Not to mention improper, because anybody who isn't a straight up far leftist will always think that person a weirdo. No wonder so many leftist men are such weaselly scumbags.

You know what is toxic? Being a coward. Antifa types attacking the vulnerable, elderly and decent people who have nothing to do with the usual grievances they claim to fight. These riots have claimed children already. That's toxic.

You also get this feeling whenever you confront these kind of "men" that there's something wrong with them. More often than not, they're hiding behind a veneer of being "nice guys". If I've learned anything from gamergate, it's that "male feminist" is synonymous with predator.

 

[Juan's Sombrero]

View attachment 1532371View attachment 1532372View attachment 1532373View attachment 1532374View attachment 1532375View attachment 1532376

Well compared to most of the cast...

View attachment 1532422View attachment 1532423View attachment 1532424View attachment 1532425View attachment 1532426View attachment 1532427View attachment 1532428View attachment 1532429View attachment 1532430View attachment 1532431View attachment 1532432View attachment 1532433View attachment 1532434View attachment 1532435View attachment 1532436View attachment 1532437

Spoiler them, please. My eyes were not prepared. Holy shit!

 

[Granola Grenadine]

They also ignore Bow, but it's understandable why (sjw have this hidden agenda with the goal to pussify black men so they keep portraying them as inferior to white women and claim they're "avoiding racial stereotypes that black men are violent". This is why we can't have characters like Blade anymore.)

Hell, OG Bow was far more masculine, and he looked like this:

Toxic Masculinity is one of those things that show how people take an idea and go too far with it.

Are their masculine behaviors I'd consider toxic? Yeah. Alot of hazing activities go too far, and there is showing off and abuse that can result from trying to act manly. If masculinity is not balanced out with good morals, it can lead to some bad things. (BTW, the same is true of femininity, as women can be flipping monsters if left unchecked, but that never gets brought up)

But these numb nuts that pushed the whole "Toxic Masculinity" thing have pushed it to basically account for literally anything that is even remotely masculine. Tough guys, even noble tough guys, are seen as toxic now.

You're not wrong. When Steven Universe Future was airing and Steven was acting like just about any fuckstick teenager even in normal life, I saw some tumblr tard unironically suggest "toxic masculinity" as the reason he was lashing out. Problem is, the kid grew up with literally one male role model that was the sweetest character on the show, while the rest of his mentors were female (or "female presenting", because alien space rocks) with varying degrees of toxic personalities.

 

[Hummingbird]

Hell, OG Bow was far more masculine, and he looked like this:

View attachment 1532834


You're not wrong. When Steven Universe Future was airing and Steven was acting like just about any fuckstick teenager even in normal life, I saw some tumblr tard unironically suggest "toxic masculinity" as the reason he was lashing out. Problem is, the kid grew up with literally one male role model that was the sweetest character on the show, while the rest of his mentors were female (or "female presenting", because alien space rocks) with varying degrees of toxic personalities.

From what I've seen, Greg wasn't treated that well by they dysfunctional space rocks that looked down on him and denied him exposure to his son.

As for Bow, I couldn't get over how it looked like reboot-Bow didn't have a dick the way his crotch looks.

 

[Juan's Sombrero]

Nah. The show is over and during its run there was no big conroversies to remind the sane public that fandoms are retarded. (see: Voltron fandom) This will turn into the same thing as the SU thread: random tidbits and hater dumbassery until something else happens related to it. After all people keep howling for a movie or something...

And...where exactly is Noelle gonna scrape the money for a movie? From the nonexistent sales her unmade toys would have garnered?

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

And...where exactly is Noelle gonna scrape the money for a movie? From the nonexistent sales her unmade toys would have garnered?

There actually WERE toys made.

they just sold like literal shit

 

[Juan's Sombrero]

There actually WERE toys made.

they just sold like literal shit

Hm, could it be because the audience they cater to are LARPing socialists who don't buy anything except Starbucks?

 

[Munchingonfish]

And...where exactly is Noelle gonna scrape the money for a movie? From the nonexistent sales her unmade toys would have garnered?

Their goal is to harass Netflix into ordering a movie. It worked for Sense8.

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

Their goal is to harass Netflix into ordering a movie. It worked for Sense8.

And what a well-remembered, timeless classic that was.