2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think it's really interesting that Trump is so brazenly saying that they're keeping their eyes on the prize with New York. I can't help but ask myself, "Does Trump know something that we don't?"

I mean, at the very least, if Trump can get that 40% in NY, then I think that will definitely help him with the popular vote this time. Or, maybe he's playing the long-term game for the GOP; getting the ball rolling on trying to transform it into a red state eventually like the Dems have been doing with states like Texas. Trump might just be trying to get the GOP to play the same game the Dems have been for decades, and hey, it's about time.

Winning NY this year is one tall fucking order, and I don't expect it. However, let's just say this: If the madman actually does it, then Election Night 2020 is going to be one early night.
He's not gonna win California either but this AB5 thing is starting to become a real issue for the Dems. Plus they're having rolling blackouts like a third world country because all they wanna do is use solar and wind power.

Even though California is super blue, more people voted for Trump there than any other state except Texas and Florida I believe.
 
He's not gonna win California either but this AB5 thing is starting to become a real issue for the Dems. Plus they're having rolling blackouts like a third world country because all they wanna do is use solar and wind power.

It's not just the AB5 and the rolling blackouts.

There's also the fact that they put an affirmative action measure on the ballot as well as a measure to kneecap Proposition 13. Those two things will turn out more Republican voters in California than in 2016.
 
I think it's really interesting that Trump is so brazenly saying that they're keeping their eyes on the prize with New York. I can't help but ask myself, "Does Trump know something that we don't?"
My guess is Trump is suggesting NY is in play as a motivational ploy for finally giving us some payback from these stupid riots. It comes with reason with mass exodus from NYC, so it's plausible there's a very small chance.
 
It's not just the AB5 and the rolling blackouts.

There's also the fact that they put an affirmative action measure on the ballot as well as a measure to kneecap Proposition 13. Those two things will turn out more Republican voters in California than in 2016.
And not to mention wildfires again, for the millionth time, because they refuse to manage their underbrush.

For people of superior intelligence, they sure are stupid.
 
I think this might happen, but more of extralegal justice. These riots (and more specifically, their enablers in DA offices, mayorships, legal defense networks, etc.) have done a great job at undermining faith in the judicial system on the right. If you can't trust the cops to arrest a rapist or murder, you either live life in fear or engage in shoot, shovel, shut-up. America's a big beautiful country, with fruited plains, purple mountains majesty, between two shining seas.

None are coming to mind now, but somebody in the vein of Buttigieg would have sufficed. It's a big party. I'm sure there was a congressman or senator with loyalty to the party and, I dunno, a Latino grandparent they could have rallied the troops around.
Gonna challenge you on identity politics here. You will never be able to get an effective leader from engaging in it, because it was never designed to be used as an effective tool for leadership. You will also never get any good plans from it, because it was never for good plans. It was designed to destroy, and that's all it does.

Idpol is a rusty mace painted pretty colors. It's nothing more than a glorified weapon, and that's all it can ever be. It's perfect for disrupting movements, because it's impossible to be pure enough for rules that shift and bend based on what's convenient. It taps into human tribalism, and makes it feel like if your demographic image is not in charge, you're being ignored. It destroys meritocracy, and prevents the best person from rising if they can't pass enough arbitrary, constantly changing goalposts. If you don't like an idea or a person or a plan, you no longer have to come up with criticism of the plan or idea, or justify an alternative candidate; you can just criticize the people who are doing something. Suddenly, the committee is wrong because it doesn't have enough blacks or women. Doesn't matter how efficient or competent the original was, it clearly was narrow minded so the new one will be better. Look at the DNC singer to see the fruits of intersectionality - a no-name liberace knock-off dancing in front of a green screened black amerikkka flag that looks like a watermelon, singing a song everyone was over 40 years ago about Vietnam (a war that was over before over half the country was even born). A billion dollar presidential campaign and hundreds of smaller ones, and that's what they played, because he fits the right progressive stack.

It also cuts both ways. Intersectionality has literally revived white nationalism and the legit alt-right more than a thousand dank holocaust memers. If everyone is teaming up, you need to or else you're at a bad disadvantage when it comes time to play.

The silver lining is that it's now being used within the warring democratic factions. It's too valuable of a tool to not use against your rivals - hell, it's literally how AOC took her predecessor's seat. He couldn't represent a hispanic area as a FUCKING WHITE MALE.

If the Democrats want a unifier, they need someone who will tell critical theorists to go to the back of the bus. Playing "I'm really a POC cause my great-grandmother was brownish" is literally the most cowardly and pathetic capitulation possible. It's how you get Elizabeth Warren claiming a 1/1,648th is somehow owning Trump.
 
And not to mention wildfires again, for the millionth time, because they refuse to manage their underbrush.

For people of superior intelligence, they sure are stupid.
and Lack of water because they refuse to "alter the eco system" in order to save the water that falls..and then goes straight to the ocean.
 
and Lack of water because they refuse to "alter the eco system" in order to save the water that falls..and then goes straight to the ocean.

Well, that, and they send all the state's water to the Almond farmers.

But remember, the Left "Identifies as" smart people, and if you question that, that's geniusphobic.
 
Looks like things might change for Biden.

Annotation 2020-08-19 202231.png

Annotation 2020-08-19 202247.png
 
The main tactic it seems the Dems are using is blaming the COVID-19 pandemic on Tramp or whatnot.

A combination from what I've seen from majority of the vids or whatnot from the Dems with their brand of emotional manipulation and distortion of information, is that they all share the commonality of placing sole blame of 170,000 lives on Tramp, which I feel is somewhat unfair.

Sure, I think that he should've taken stricter action to make sure that all states secure themselves instead of letting the states do whatever they please no matter if it benefits the people or not, but I feel as if there should be a more collective blame on either the authoritarian way certain states handled it or the lax way that some of the Southern states handled it which kinda fucked them over rather than REEEEEEEEEEEEE DRUMPF. They do this because it hits close to you and provides enough emotional manipulation to empower their voters.
 
I like that the DNC is blaming Trump for not responding fast enough AND crashing the economy AND unemployment rising. I know it's easy to people not paying attention to point to those things, but there was zero plan that didn't involve crashing the economy and unemployment short of just not doing anything and letting the virus kill people off and flood hospitals.

I also like, just like in 2016, it's easy to point fingers at Trump without actually stating what he should have done/what they would have done. They just say "we would have done things differently!" Ok? How? It's like when my friends and I ironically talk shit about UFC fighters losing even though we know there's zero chance we wouldn't get beaten to death if we were fighting. It's easy to just say "do something differently" without actually stating what it would have been because you know you didn't actually have an alternative plan.
 
I like that the DNC is blaming Trump for not responding fast enough AND crashing the economy AND unemployment rising. I know it's easy to people not paying attention to point to those things, but there was zero plan that didn't involve crashing the economy and unemployment short of just not doing anything and letting the virus kill people off and flood hospitals.

I also like, just like in 2016, it's easy to point fingers at Trump without actually stating what he should have done/what they would have done. They just say "we would have done things differently!" Ok? How? It's like when my friends and I ironically talk shit about UFC fighters losing even though we know there's zero chance we wouldn't get beaten to death if we were fighting. It's easy to just say "do something differently" without actually stating what it would have been because you know you didn't actually have an alternative plan.
There is also the fact that..Unemployment went down after the big 30% spike a few months ago.

We did something unprecedented in shutting down the entire economy for weeks..and despite not being fully opened again things did not turn out nearly as horrible as they could have.
 
I think it's really interesting that Trump is so brazenly saying that they're keeping their eyes on the prize with New York. I can't help but ask myself, "Does Trump know something that we don't?"

I mean, at the very least, if Trump can get that 40% in NY, then I think that will definitely help him with the popular vote this time. Or, maybe he's playing the long-term game for the GOP; getting the ball rolling on trying to transform it into a red state eventually like the Dems have been doing with states like Texas. Trump might just be trying to get the GOP to play the same game the Dems have been for decades, and hey, it's about time.

Winning NY this year is one tall fucking order, and I don't expect it. However, let's just say this: If the madman actually does it, then Election Night 2020 is going to be one early night.
Maybe he is trying to build up local support and candidates in Upstate New York? Lord knows they have been abandoned to wither and die for decades at this point.
 

New Trafalgar Poll

note that while it has a reputation for being somewhat R favored, it actually UNDERESTIMATED Republican performance at times. In 2018 Ohio Gubernatorial they said democrat Cordray+4 when repub Mike DeWine won by +3. In 2018 Michigan Senate they had democrat Stabenow+9 while she only won by +7.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back