Pedophiles of Sluthate AND Lookism (MRZ, Brian Peppers and many more!)

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Which user is a bigger faggot?

  • @drz

  • Marijan Siklic

Results are only viewable after voting.
J

JU 199

Guest
kiwifarms.net
(Update: This thread will also cover SH's defective son- lookism.net)

Some of you may be asking, "Ass Manager, why should we have a separate thread for these people? Surely the standard Sluthate thread should contain them?

Sluthate is a barrel of laughs (as shown by their 'raid' today), but there's a darker side to the webforum. Several pedophiles and pedo shields are actively using the website to network and share 'JB' (jail bait) and child porn.

Having these people co-exist on the sluthate thread brings down the mood. Since we now have the advantage of a sub-forum, it makes sense to keep their disgusting behavior in a separate thread.


An example of suitable content-

http://sluthate.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=89868

# of pedos rise with inceldom - SlutHate.com PuaHate .png

# of pedos rise with inceldom - SlutHate.com PuaHate (1).png

# of pedos rise with inceldom - SlutHate.com PuaHate (2).png


So basically-

Anything with Brian peppers, MRZ, @OmegaKV, Jbslayer or their associates (will update this with more names)
Anything that mentions JB or CP
Hilarious SH user interactions (putting them down or supporting them shudder )

Remember- people like MRZ need to be watched. They rationalize their behavior and make excuses for their horrific fetishes. The posts below by him are an example of this-

# of pedos rise with inceldom - SlutHate.co.png

Why should we feel guilty for evidence.png


This is their horrific JB thread.

http://sluthate.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=67162&start=0

What's a bannable offence anywhere else is OK on Sluthate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Winner
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: AN/ALR56, Pinkamena Diane Pie, Sanic and 17 others
OmegaKV said:
I'm not a pedophile. A pedophile is a person who is attracted to girls 8 and under. I am attracted women as young as 12 at the very youngest, and 40 at the very oldest. Most women are completely matured or almost completely matured sometime between ages 14 and 16, and after 16 they start decaying. Whether they admit it or not, almost all heterosexual men are sexually attracted to precocious girls as young as 12 or even younger. This includes most of the men who will call me a pedo.
Click to expand...
Don't forget @OmegaKV.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: WireSponge, 2003, Sanae Kochiya and 6 others
And even there some of them actually find this wrong.

Edit:Hell I feel wrong going though this garbage.
 
Do you aknowledge that mrz has autism and brian peppers some kind of mental illness due to the bullying he alledgely received? lmao at this retard giving all those fucks when he is arguing against mental people just lol

Be careful with that face of yours someone may think you're a rapist damn dat rapist stare doe.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Deviant
Reactions: Duke Nukem, TiredConlanger, ChuckSlaughter and 30 others
Hey it's mrz. I won't post objectionable pictures this time (though last time I posted legal picture anyway). I see that you guys have preconceived perception of me. I just want US age of consent to be more like it is in Germany, Spain, Portugal, etc. And want it to be legal to look at CP. It's actually been proven that legalizing CP reduces child molestation rates anyway. Also, none of the reasons for keeping it illegal are legitimate or rational. I don't actually intend to rape or abuse people etc etc, and actually do nothing bad in reality.
 
  • Dumb
  • Deviant
  • Autistic
Reactions: sixuglymidgets, aerostar88, Sanshain and 47 others
zrm said:
Hey it's mrz. I won't post objectionable pictures this time (though last time I posted legal picture anyway). I see that you guys have preconceived perception of me. I just want US age of consent to be more like it is in Germany, Spain, Portugal, etc. And want it to be legal to look at CP. It's actually been proven that legalizing CP reduces child molestation rates anyway. Also, none of the reasons for keeping it illegal are legitimate or rational. I don't actually intend to rape or abuse people etc etc, and actually do nothing bad in reality.
Click to expand...
Welcome to the Farms mrz!

Do you have some studies to prove any of this?
 
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Arctic and DirkBloodStormKing
dollarpennypincher said:
Welcome to the Farms mrz!

Do you have some studies to prove any of this?
Click to expand...

Sure, I can back up pretty much everything I say with scientific studies.

https://www.springer.com/about+springer/media/springer+select?SGWID=0-11001-6-1042321-0

Could making child pornography legal lead to lower rates of child sex abuse? It could well do, according to a new study by Milton Diamond, from the University of Hawaii, and colleagues.
Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA), that rape and other sex crimes have not increased following the legalization and wide availability of pornography. And most significantly, the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen considerably since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible – a phenomenon also seen in Denmark and Japan. Their findings are published online today in Springer’s journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.
The findings support the theory that potential sexual offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex crimes against children.
Click to expand...
 
  • Dumb
  • Deviant
  • Autistic
Reactions: ChuckSlaughter, Miel67, Sanshain and 24 others
zrm said:
Hey it's mrz. I won't post objectionable pictures this time (though last time I posted legal picture anyway). I see that you guys have preconceived perception of me. I just want US age of consent to be more like it is in Germany, Spain, Portugal, etc. And want it to be legal to look at CP. It's actually been proven that legalizing CP reduces child molestation rates anyway. Also, none of the reasons for keeping it illegal are legitimate or rational. I don't actually intend to rape or abuse people etc etc, and actually do nothing bad in reality.
Click to expand...
You might not be posting "objectionable" pictures, but I find your continued existence very objectionable.

Meditate on that. Ideally in prison.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Krungus, Pinkamena Diane Pie, Drawets Rednaxela and 9 others
Simplicity111 said:
Child pornography involves sexual abuse of children, you know.
Click to expand...

Not all of it does, there is a good deal of self produced JB porn that isn't abusive. A lot of it definitely does though, I don't disagree with that at all and I can tell abusive porn from porn that isn't abusive pretty well. I would make an analogy to the medical experimentation the Nazis did on the Jews, although very much of this was junk science, they actually did obtain some useful information related to things such as the human body's ability to withstand cold temperatures.

After the war their research was actually cited in other research that wasn't abusive in nature, and this caused a great deal of controversy. On the one side, people argue that we should use the Nazi research as it is useful, because it can actually be used to help people today. On the other side, people argue that it should just be entirely destroyed because it required human suffering and abuse to come into existence.

I know that abusive CP requires child abuse to be produced, and I think the production of CP should remain illegal (unless it is like soft JB stuff that isn't actually abusive). However, even though we don't want people to produce CP (just as we don't want them to run coercive and deadly medical experiments on Jewish people), they still have produced it, and they still continue to produce it even as we try to prevent them from doing so. I think that because CP actually can be used as a tool to lessen the probability of some people from molesting children (overall it reduces the rate of child abuse, although in some cases it can actually trigger it), it would be beneficial for society if it were legal to view it (without paying for it to be produced of course), and even though it has horrible origins, we cannot destroy such a valuable tool that already exists simply because bad things had to happen to create it.

I also believe in complete freedom of information and think that nothing should be censored.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Deviant
Reactions: Pensive Emoji, ChuckSlaughter, aerostar88 and 36 others
There are some rare ways the topic of pedophilia could be discussed and be funny, discussing the merits and harms of watching children getting fucked is not one of them, no matter what side you're on.

now if there was pics of some child getting inflated from a concrete enema...

(that's a joke folks)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
  • Informative
Reactions: Krungus, the McD Mighty Wings, Remilia and 12 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back