Jar-Jar Fanboy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 22, 2020
Weren't Bella Thorne's pics technically nudes? If it's the pics I'm thinking of, she was naked, you just couldn't see anything due to strategic arm placement. But also, why are these e-thots so salty about Bella Thorne doing OnlyFans? It's not like the people who are spending money on Bella Thorne would be spending on you instead. And on another note, all the e-thots upset about making less money now, maybe don't rely on something as fickle and financially risky as sex work to pay the bills? The same is true for any sort of self-employed "artistic" field. Unless you're very successful, and have a lot of money saved, if something goes wrong, you're fucked. Say you're a musician signed to a label. You make enough to get by, but you're no, idk, Ed Sheeran, and your tour gets cancelled, your label goes under, well, hope you have a backup plan, because your income just dried up for the next little bit. Sure, if an Ed Sheeran tour gets cancelled, that dude has enough in the bank to be perfectly fine, the same way the top OnlyFans e-thots, assuming they're not morons with money, could have saved up a good amount and be fine with the changes, but the smaller e-thots are now fucked. That's just the financial risk you assume when you chase your dreams of whoring yourself on the internet for money. It sucks for them, but it's just how the world worksHopefully she will be negatively affected by this:
Twat "actress" promised nudes, collected $, didn't deliver, dumbasses who paid are demanding refunds so now onlyfans whores are capped at $50 charge per view and $100 tip. Also, payment will be monthly instead of weekly. "Actress" did this to de-stigmatize sex workers and for publicity, now whores have to suffer from the mess.