Pastadome - A place for friends who are being too friendly in other threads.

I see you won't answer the question, which means you have no answer.

I never claimed Biden would stop the riots, but he would do more to prevent them from occurring in the first place, like not sucking up to white supremacists like Trump has. Now, answer my question, angry little man
I'm sorry but the hook has slipped.
 
What? Is that angry manlet for "I have no answer to your question"?
No, it's normal people speak for your fish has slipped off the hook retard. Also, overwhelming national guard once he doesn't have to worry about election and possibly even the insurrection act. Now kindly go and jerk your duck to Chynas massive clit.
 
No, it's normal people speak for your fish has slipped off the hook retard. Also, overwhelming national guard once he doesn't have to worry about election and possibly even the insurrection act. Now kindly go and jerk your duck to Chynas massive clit.

Why hasn't he done that now? Why is he saying "the stuff that is happening now will happen with Biden as president, but not with me as president"? Your answer makes zero sense, which shouldn't shock me since we've determined that you're just an angry little man.
 
Why hasn't he done that now? Why is he saying "the stuff that is happening now will happen with Biden as president, but not with me as president"? Your answer makes zero sense, which shouldn't shock me since we've determined that you're just an angry little man.
Nigga you are really dumb you know that? If he does it now it'll just be used for political purposes. Don't blame me, it's the left that started setting cities on fire for political purposes.
>We've
Who is we? Take your DID meds.
 
Nigga you are really dumb you know that? If he does it now it'll just be used for political purposes. Don't blame me, it's the left that started setting cities on fire for political purposes.
>We've
Who is we? Take your DID meds.

So you are saying that he is refusing to put his country before his campaign? That is really shitty of him to do. Shouldn't a president, especially one that you guys claim "loves his country" so much, put his country first?

Anyone reading this thread is we.
 
So you are saying that he is refusing to put his country before his campaign? That is really shitty of him to do. Shouldn't a president, especially one that you guys claim "loves his country" so much, put his country first?

Anyone reading this thread is we.
Give your plan oh mighty one, great hulkster. Or snap into a slim jim like cool guy.
 
I can't believe that @Hollywood Hulk Hogan got me to agree with him on a political subject. @Titos should just kill himself at this point, because there's really no way to recover from this.
It doesn't really count tho because HHH is directly contradicting his statements about Trump being a fascist for arresting rioters and looters (aka everything that's actually in his power). He's just appealing to logic that he doesn't actually believe in to win an argument. In truth it doesn't matter what Trump does, HHH is gonna sperg about how awful and dangerous he and his supporters are every opportunity he gets.
 
I see you won't answer the question, which means you have no answer.

I never claimed Biden would stop the riots, but he would do more to prevent them from occurring in the first place, like not sucking up to white supremacists like Trump has. Now, answer my question, angry little man

Correct answer would be the people causing the riots are the ones who support Joe Biden. They want unrest in the country to own the president through the exact same logic purported by hogan. (see Portland mayor's letter to the president) Legally the president can't do much when a state official denies him access.

We can either:
Blame the person who can't do anything (if he did hulk would be screaming that Trump is a dictator) while abusing the constitution and cause further unrest or we can place the blame on the local leadership who don't do anything.

Trump, can't stop it, if he does he would have more unrest than if he just ignored it. More a reflection of the democrats than the republicans.

Other guy is just being MOTI, for such shitty points idk why.
 
I dunno, you're the one saying Trump will stop it, but he cares more about his campaign than he does his country so he won't do it until after the election
Is this the start of the @SIGSEGV X @Hollywood Hulk Hogan OTP
OTP.png
 
Correct answer would be the people causing the riots are the ones who support Joe Biden. They want unrest in the country to own the president through the exact same logic purported by hogan. (see Portland mayor's letter to the president) Legally the president can't do much when a state official denies him access.

We can either:
Blame the person who can't do anything (if he did hulk would be screaming that Trump is a dictator) while abusing the constitution and cause further unrest or we can place the blame on the local leadership who don't do anything.

Trump, can't stop it, if he does he would have more unrest than if he just ignored it. More a reflection of the democrats than the republicans.

Other guy is just being MOTI, for such shitty points idk why.

I am not the one saying that Trump would prevent the riots. That is what you guys are claiming. I am not claiming Biden would prevent the riots, either.

Trump is saying that if Biden is elected, the riots will happen, which implies he will stop them. They are currently happening under Trump. How can you expect him to stop them if he's re-elected if he can't stop them now? If he's refusing to because of the election, that means he is putting his campaign ahead of his country, which is a pretty shitty thing to do. So either he can't stop them and is lying, or he won't stop them until after the election because he values his campaign over his country. Which one is it?


Believe it or not, @SIGSEGV and I gotten along for a while now
 
Trump is saying that if Biden is elected, the riots will happen, which implies he will stop them.
He has stopped them in all places where he has been granted the authority to intervene, Kenosha for example. He is not refusing to interfere because of the election, he is refusing to go to Portland because of the constitution. They need to ask him to get involved. Portland doesn’t and it is chaos.

Say he commits to sending in troops, Democrats would then challenge his authority to do so, causing more unrest.

As I said before, the actions of the democrats are being reflected here with this general disarray, not the feds.
 
Trump is saying that if Biden is elected, the riots will happen, which implies he will stop them. They are currently happening under Trump. How can you expect him to stop them if he's re-elected if he can't stop them now? If he's refusing to because of the election, that means he is putting his campaign ahead of his country, which is a pretty shitty thing to do. So either he can't stop them and is lying, or he won't stop them until after the election because he values his campaign over his country. Which one is it?
Before anyone gets too deep into the dick-punching over this, it's worth mentioning that Acting DHS Chad Wolf, during an interview with Tucker Carlson, talked about discussions that he's had with AG Barr about multiple investigations being underway into Antifa, who's funding them, and how their networks are functioning because they are way too organized and well-funded for it to be a purely grassroots sort of organization.

The Department of Homeland security has been working to tie Antifa to foreign powers, because while the law generally prohibits the gathering of intelligence and spying against U.S. residents, these protections no longer apply if it's believed that someone is acting as an agent of a foreign government or power. Antifa's network is being analyzed under the 2019 DHS Strategic Framework for Countering Terrorism and Targeted Violence.

Four weeks ago, the Washington Post published an article concerning information that was leaked to them from someone inside of the DHS, and that person was promptly uncovered and reassigned, because The Washington Post was fed classified information revealing that the agency had been compiling intelligence reports on Americans (rioters) who were posing as journalists.

It was lost in the shuffle amidst all of the statue-toppling, but when the DHS created the Protecting American Communities Task Force, that allowed the DHS to send assets to Portland and other cities. Does anyone really think they were sent there just to protect statues? Because I don't, I think that was a guise, because a month earlier in June, the Customs and Border Protection's National Targeting Center, Counter-Network Division, compiled data on individuals who returned from Syria and fought with the Yekîneyên Parastina Gel. These individuals supposedly had ties to the U.S. branch of Antifa, according to that report.

A month before that, in May, was when Trump's administration officially classified Antifa as a terrorist organization, which gave the government a massive amount of wiggle room when it came to how they can investigate and treat people in Antifa's ranks, a month before they "needed" to be able to do that. If you follow all of this stuff backwards, you can start to see the pattern emerging and get an idea for where all of this is headed. If you treat reality like it's an episode of 24, and are expecting non-stop shoot-outs and hordes of people being frog-marched in orange jumpsuits in the street, you're going to be sorely disappointed.

There's a lot going on concerning Antifa and the mapping-out of their organization at the moment--especially when you consider that this is not just a domestic issue--but people are agonizingly impatient and they want immediate results. We could fire up the Insurrection Act right now, march down to Portland and throw every motherfucker in the city into a back of a van, but does anyone really believe that the people marching on the streets are the people who are funding the organization or calling the shots?

How many years did we spend killing tens of thousands of random assholes in sandy, shit-hole countries before someone had the bright idea to just take out the leadership instead? Antifa is not a purely-domestic organization. Treating it like one and just pitching random foot-soldiers into a cell would accomplish absolutely nothing.
 
He has stopped them in all places where he has been granted the authority to intervene, Kenosha for example. He is not refusing to interfere because of the election, he is refusing to go to Portland because of the constitution. They need to ask him to get involved. Portland doesn’t and it is chaos.

Say he commits to sending in troops, Democrats would then challenge his authority to do so, causing more unrest.

As I said before, the actions of the democrats are being reflected here with this general disarray, not the feds.

So you are saying he is lying then, because he still won't be able to stop them after the election? What will him being re-elected change that will allow him to stop them that he can't do now?

You can just admit it was a stupid thing to say and you'll look a lot less stupid to anyone who isn't a fellow Trump cocksucker
 
Gee you sure are a smart man Mr. Hogan, please lay forth your policy proposal for how Trump should legally stop the riots and not destroy any chance of re-election/not getting impeached again. Bestow us with your wisdom.
I love the implication of your statement, that if protecting American citizens by invoking the Insurrection Act and sending in SEAL Team Six to shoot rioters in the head would cause Trump to not be re-elected, Trump should not do it. Because apparently his re-election is more important than the lives of American citizens.
 
Back