Furry Fandom and Drama General

Forgot this one
EgyDP7bVgAEqyJt.jpg
 
The new ACAB overlords of FLO have made their statement regarding "Feral" NSFW Art.

https://furrylife.online/forums/topic/2112-nsfw-feral-policy/ ( https://archive.vn/XJztn )

TL;DR
  • No, you can't fuck Simba or Balto. They aren't "transformative" enough.
  • No mention of the "harkness test".
  • "Adult" MLP Characters are OK to bang/post (even though they're horses.)
  • Dinosaurs are ok to bang, cuz they extinct n' shit.
  • Pokemon, Digimon, and other IPs are also OK to bang/post for fake creatures with unique lore.
  • Only existing animals are banned from the NSFW category it seems. (Wonder if extinct mammalian species are banned, hahaha.)
 
The new ACAB overlords of FLO have made their statement regarding "Feral" NSFW Art.

https://furrylife.online/forums/topic/2112-nsfw-feral-policy/ ( https://archive.vn/XJztn )

TL;DR
  • No, you can't fuck Simba or Balto. They aren't "transformative" enough.
  • No mention of the "harkness test".
  • "Adult" MLP Characters are OK to bang/post (even though they're horses.)
  • Dinosaurs are ok to bang, cuz they extinct n' shit.
  • Pokemon, Digimon, and other IPs are also OK to bang/post for fake creatures with unique lore.
  • Only existing animals are banned from the NSFW category it seems. (Wonder if extinct mammalian species are banned, hahaha.)
Trust furries to come up with a set of rules that's about as consistent as jell-o.

Well, I suppose if you're into fucking sabertoothed tigers, dire wolves or pastel-colored horses you'll be feeling right at home there.

How long do we reckon until the more militant anti-feral spergs start revolting? Because those rules are barely a notch more restrictive than FA's.
 
Trust furries to come up with a set of rules that's about as consistent as jell-o.

Well, I suppose if you're into fucking sabertoothed tigers, dire wolves or pastel-colored horses you'll be feeling right at home there.

How long do we reckon until the more militant anti-feral spergs start revolting? Because those rules are barely a notch more restrictive than FA's.
They concern themselves more with throwing out anyone who isn't a marxist than sex with the family dog.
 
New update on FurryLifeonline.

1.)

Generally Prohibited Content and Behavior

  1. Any Media which promotes, glorifies, encourages, or in any way puts forth in a positive light, and includes but is not limited to: terrorism, illegal acts, hate speech, hate groups (such as the KKK, Nazism, Fascism, Authoritarianism, the Alt-Right, Q-Anon, All Lives Matter, Back the Blue, Kekistan, etc.), harm or abuse to minors (including nsfw "cub" art), animals, or adults, spam or deceptive media, harassment, or human trafficking.
DeoTasDevil, KINDRED and many more prominents have been made members of Staff.

https://furrylife.online/forums/top...licy-on-hate-groups-protecting-our-user-base/ [Archive - https://archive.md/mZTiP]
Looking forward to Deo's thread getting some khan tents.
 
I like that they're implying that degenerates jacking off to The Lion King are going to be desensitized and encouraged to go rape lions. :story: :story:
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: BlazikenLover
At least they’re actually attempting to try which is more than most furfag sites do, but I guess so many freaks have made it a point to toe the line on fucking everything that any attempt to actually moderate fucked up content will get an army of spergs raging and trying to claim that everything else that toes the line needs to be banned too.

Just ban NSFW feral art using the exact same justifications for banning cub art and be done with it. Cub is a stand-in for pedophilia, feral porn is a stand-in for bestiality. God forbid actually grow a spine and start setting standards for your fandom. Who cares if all the feral fuckers throw a fit at being equated to zoophiles? Maybe while they’re busy pouting they’ll have an epiphany and realize that wanting to get mounted by a “sentient” Wolf is just fucking zoophilia and either fix their shit or drop the pretense and out themselves.

This shit isn’t hard. It just requires a damn spine.
 
I like that they're implying that degenerates jacking off to The Lion King are going to be desensitized and encouraged to go rape lions.

If there's anyone out there who can rape a lion, godspeed. I'm not going to tell them they can't. For that matter I'm not going to tell them anything. I'm going to stay far away from them.
 
If you mean Zoo Porn as in a grainy youtube video of a lion licking its nuts or 2 big cats getting it on I wouldn't be very worried.

Probably a controversial opinion but I do wonder if people who upload that shit on YT are Zoophiles. Yeah, it's likely that it's just some tourist / person on vaca snapping a video like " lol they're having sex " but after the Zoosadist leaks, I tend to question everything.

Given YT's changes in policy about graphic content, I also wonder how those videos still exist.
 
Probably a controversial opinion but I do wonder if people who upload that shit on YT are Zoophiles. Yeah, it's likely that it's just some tourist / person on vaca snapping a video like " lol they're having sex " but after the Zoosadist leaks, I tend to question everything.

Given YT's changes in policy about graphic content, I also wonder how those videos still exist.
I think it depends on whether the channel has an unusual amount of videos about dogfucking. Or lionfucking, in this case. If it's just one or two videos within the context of someone's vacations or some funny situation, in a channel with other content, it should be fine. If it's a whole channel wholly dedicated to dozens of videos of animal dick where just clicking on the "videos" tab results in you mentally hearing it mouthbreathing in your ear, then you should grab the red flags and start waving them.
 
Back