- Joined
- Jun 17, 2014
According to who?Funniest part of this whole process is watching evil people try to judge a person who is TAMIYM![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
According to who?Funniest part of this whole process is watching evil people try to judge a person who is TAMIYM![]()
Such a Goy thing to say. Patriarchal Goy men are obsessed with this phrase
Not only that, she refuses to prove her tits don't look like a short stack of pancakes hanging her chest. She's a liar and doesn't showerFrom your earlier post: "Stereotyping has a negative connotation. I'm simply describing my observation of body types in races." Melinda Scott-Genius at Large
Your hypocrisy knows no bounds., similar to your espousing your half-assed knowledge of the Torah as though it should mean something. It's more akin to a child trying to understand Plato's Allegory of The Cave. My odds are on the kid understanding The Cave. Melinda, by posting here daily you are contradicting its teachings. This is not because of the nature of The Farms, it is because of what you are trying to get out of it: attention. You are exactly what everyone is saying, a narcissist. If your pea sized brain followed any of this,, take a week of lame ass, boring posts and figure out how it all violates your precious Torah.
They probably look sorta nice right now, as she is breast feeding. Wait until Marshall's latest bastard is weaned, then they will look like balloons after my cat got to themNot only that, she refuses to prove her tits don't look like a short stack of pancakes hanging her chest. She's a liar and doesn't shower
Uh huh
Hey, if you're going to throw up the excuse that it's just you being a netzarim vs """goy""" folk where are all the non-goy women with 20 sex partners and 30 children?
YHWH
From your earlier post: "Stereotyping has a negative connotation. I'm simply describing my observation of body types in races." Melinda Scott-Genius at Large
Your hypocrisy knows no bounds., similar to your espousing your half-assed knowledge of the Torah as though it should mean something. It's more akin to a child trying to understand Plato's Allegory of The Cave. My odds are on the kid understanding The Cave. Melinda, by posting here daily you are contradicting its teachings. This is not because of the nature of The Farms, it is because of what you are trying to get out of it: attention. You are exactly what everyone is saying, a narcissist. If your pea sized brain followed any of this,, take a week of lame ass, boring posts and figure out how it all violates your precious Torah.
Not only that, she refuses to prove her tits don't look like a short stack of pancakes hanging her chest. She's a liar and doesn't shower
They probably look sorta nice right now, as she is breast feeding. Wait until Marshall's latest bastard is weaned, then they will look like balloons after my cat got to them
I wonder if she realizes that, minus the weird cult she belongs to, she is the embodiment of the "southern loser single mom on gibs with kids from 5 different men" stereotype. Very sad. Many such cases.
She's shown the same level of responsibility and foresight in choosing mates and reproducing as the dumbest, poorest, most feral inner-city hood rat. They both embody the same basic concept: "We'll have as many children with unreliable men as we want, and everyone else is going to pay for them."
I'd be willing to put down money that Melinda's children will continue the cycle of poverty, abuse, ignorance, and mental illness. They are supremely unprepared for the modern world, and every year that they remain in Melinda's care and custody is a year in which they learn nothing about their own society and nothing about how to successfully navigate that society. Melinda is setting them up for a lifetime of failure.
@TamarYaelBatYah did you and Marshal make up?
Then why haven't they found the interest in supporting their children emotionally or financially? Wouldn't these paragons of manhood, the type you had to padlock out of your room, who drugged and "raped"you be at least virtuous enough to love the children they created with you?Actually the men I have chosen were all men who showed at least some level of interest in finding truth. Much better men than you. Better than Christians, Athiest, Pagans, Muslims and most Jewish men.
Then why haven't they found the interest in supporting their children emotionally or financially? Wouldn't these paragons of manhood, the type you had to padlock out of your room, who drugged and "raped"you be at least virtuous enough to love the children they created with you?
That includes being stingy.
Lmao, it's almost like you have a long history of choosing unsuitable men to father your children, with Marshall only being the latest and perhaps worst choice you made.
Ok, how do you reconcile all that with your previous post claiming that all your former men were better than all the other kinds of men you can think of? "Seekers of truth" doesn't trump a father who at the bare minimum pays child support. Or even better, shows his sons and daughters what a good man is supposed to be. You have made poor choices.My ex husband thought abandoning the children somehow punishes me. He used the children as pawns.
My ex husband wore a mask and at the tender age of 17 I didn't see it coming. I was too young to be in a relationship but got in one because I had to become an adult at 16 - paying my own bills, buying my own car, working 20 hrs/week while in HS
My first husband I put in somewhat of a different category. He wasn't a truth seeker as much but he wasn't an atheist either. However, I was required by The Torah to marry him, being that I was a virgin at that time. I ended up being abused, so I left.
The male concubines I chose were truth seekers. But still evil, so I left them. They either had (1) closet addictions or were (2) not committed enough to following The Torah or (3) did some abusive act that was so horrendous, and I left
I had 2 children born from my male concubines, but they were out of the picture when I was pregnant. They are more like "sperm donor", not father. A father is someone who holds the child, calls them, plays with the child, etc.
Then I met Marshall. He shrivels up into a sulking ball of anger when I try to leave him or tell him to leave my house. That includes being stingy. I have enough resources to give my children what they need, what they want.
Marshall has to define his own relationship with the children. It's too soon to see what will happen. He may repeat the behavior of my first husband, try to punish me by not being involved with the children. Or he may be more involved. Only time will tell.
My first husband had his visitation cut off by court order because of repeated failure to show up for visitation. Repeated abandonment of my older sons. I supported that because I wanted to protect my son's emotional well being. It's not healthy for a parent just to walk in and out of a child's life
Marshall's choices will determine if he shares the same date of my ex. (I never said he couldn't visit the children).
Either way, my children see me as their primary parent. They are happy. If I end up having 2 ex husbands with no visitation than so be it. I'm woman enough to steer this boat alone and raise these children with my feet on the floor and chin up each morning. My children have each other for emotional support and love. They also see Elohim as their father. They will still blossom
Good fuckin’ luck with that. You really think your sons won’t grow up to be more deadbeats who knock up vulnerable women and skip out, just like their dads did? You think your daughters, having no standards or frame of reference for a functioning relationship, won’t fall prey to weirdos and spend their lives in misery surrounded by hungry, miserable kids who never see their fathers?My ex husband thought abandoning the children somehow punishes me. He used the children as pawns.
My ex husband wore a mask and at the tender age of 17 I didn't see it coming. I was too young to be in a relationship but got in one because I had to become an adult at 16 - paying my own bills, buying my own car, working 20 hrs/week while in HS
My first husband I put in somewhat of a different category. He wasn't a truth seeker as much but he wasn't an atheist either. However, I was required by The Torah to marry him, being that I was a virgin at that time. I ended up being abused, so I left.
The male concubines I chose were truth seekers. But still evil, so I left them. They either had (1) closet addictions or were (2) not committed enough to following The Torah or (3) did some abusive act that was so horrendous, and I left
I had 2 children born from my male concubines, but they were out of the picture when I was pregnant. They are more like "sperm donor", not father. A father is someone who holds the child, calls them, plays with the child, etc.
Then I met Marshall. He shrivels up into a sulking ball of anger when I try to leave him or tell him to leave my house. That includes being stingy. I have enough resources to give my children what they need, what they want.
Marshall has to define his own relationship with the children. It's too soon to see what will happen. He may repeat the behavior of my first husband, try to punish me by not being involved with the children. Or he may be more involved. Only time will tell.
My first husband had his visitation cut off by court order because of repeated failure to show up for visitation. Repeated abandonment of my older sons. I supported that because I wanted to protect my son's emotional well being. It's not healthy for a parent just to walk in and out of a child's life
Marshall's choices will determine if he shares the same date of my ex. (I never said he couldn't visit the children).
Either way, my children see me as their primary parent. They are happy. If I end up having 2 ex husbands with no visitation than so be it. I'm woman enough to steer this boat alone and raise these children with my feet on the floor and chin up each morning. My children have each other for emotional support and love. They also see Elohim as their father. They will still blossom
I'll just quote what I wrote here a month and a half ago.
Ok, how do you reconcile all that with your previous post claiming that all your former men were better than all the other kinds of men you can think of? "Seekers of truth" doesn't trump a father who at the bare minimum pays child support. Or even better, shows his sons and daughters what a good man is supposed to be. You have made poor choices.
Good fuckin’ luck with that. You really think your sons won’t grow up to be more deadbeats who knock up vulnerable women and skip out, just like their dads did? You think your daughters, having no standards or frame of reference for a functioning relationship, won’t fall prey to weirdos and spend their lives in misery surrounded by hungry, miserable kids who never see their fathers?
You’re in for a fun time when the teen years hit, dear. Elohim won’t be enough to pull your kids back from turning rebellious and crazy and addicted and pregnant.
You can find people at your level of righteousness, they're easy to come by at the abandoned Kmart at around midnight, you just gotta know where to look.I don't see you in a position to judge the men of YHWH when you yourself are inferior to them as a Goy.
You think men like you are a good choice?
Child support is not a concept in The Torah, so I have to disagree here.
I don't think I've made poor choices. There aren't that many men to pick from because I'm not going to marry a sexist (Christian and Ultra conservative Jewish men), nor an Athiest, nor a Pagan, nor anyone who doesn't share my commitment to The Torah. I won't marry any Messianic who believes in Paul (the King of Sexists) either.
So who does that leave to choose from?
Any woman who picks a sexist has picked a bad partner, that is NOT a successful relationship.
Any woman who picks an Athiest or Pagan has given Elohim the middle finger, that is NOT a successful relationship
There are less than 500 men in the English speaking world who want to follow The Torah and don't believe in Paul.
Hard to find a man at my level of righteousness!
My children follow The Torah, they aren't going to be rebellious teens. That is a Goy problem
Read Ezekiel 18 -- about the son who does better than his father. That is the righteous fate of my sons!