Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

woman I can barely keep up on this thread and I live on my own.
Well, you're probably a slow reader?
I have a genius IQ. I can read one paragraph in less than 10 seconds.
I can type 95 WPM, not that hard for me

You say too much time with your kids is unhealthy but that is one extreme. The other extreme is plonking them in front of video games and getting them to play that, and telling them mommy's busy getting into internet arguments when they start screaming for attention which I strongly suspect is the case

You know the song about the cats in the cradle? You spend so little time socialising with them they'll drift off onto their own life then when you're older your kids won't have time for you... Or your cult

My children get plenty of attention from me. I feel no guilt

And you spent just as much time here before you gave birth

Yes, in my last trimester. When it's important to put your legs up so your veins don't swell.

I take several internet breaks throughout the day: on the toilet, in fast food lines, in bank lines, waiting for my children to buckle up. I check email, read the news, etc.

you say you study the torah why not do that with your fellow cultists? Why not make text wall arguments with them online? Talk via video feed, things like that?

Why are you assuming I dont?

we made it every netzarims business yet strangely only you are here...

Don't assume other Netzarim and Messianics aren't lurking this thread. No further comment.

Don't drop the Cathar argument either. Answer that one first.

I already answered you. I answered with a question.

Find me somewhere where it says women specifically can have concubines or multiple husbands.

Firstly, to address the manner of your question. In The Torah it says that we are not only to follow the commands of YHWH, it says we are to follow the principles, judgments, rulings and commissions as well. That is Deut. 11:1. So, what we are to obey that Elohim has written is not only the affirmative commands like "thou shalt..." but also principles like "for this reason a man must leave his father and mother...".

In The Torah the principle is that two people marry and cleave together, for life. "For this reason a man must leave his father and mother and cleave unto his wife". So ideally, two virgins meet and they stay married in a strictly monogamous relationship their entire lives.

However, since Elohim is well aware that humans can choose to sin, or they die, They have created instructions in The Torah for navigating sin. There are several situations in which someone may lose a spouse due to (a) excommunication from the community, or (b) death. In these situations, the remaining spouse is free to re-marry another Israelite. However, if someone divorces an Israelite with no just cause, and remarries another Israelite, then that is Adultery.

(A) The following The Torah says are valid forms of divorce that allow a woman to re-marry:

1. When she divorces because her spouse commits any of the sins which The Torah says that a person must be excommunicated permanently from the community, including the person who sins with a "high hand" (Numb. 15:30-31)

2. If a woman married a Goy, then she must repent by divorcing him (Deut. 7:3)

3. A virgin girl that lays with a man but her parent(s) refuse(s) to allow the marriage (Ex. 22:16)

(B) The following The Torah says are valid forms of death that allow a woman to re-marry another Israelite:

1. Any of the sins which The Torah says that a person must be stoned to death, including the person whose spouse falls into idolatry and is stoned to death (Deut. 13:7-11(12))

2. The woman whose spouse dies and leaves her childless (Gen. 38; Deut. 25:5-10)

3. Widows

(C) Concubines

According to The Torah, a marriage is made by two things: (1) consensual sex and (2) sharing (a) dwelling(s). See for example, Isaac and Rebekah who got "married" (made a Covenant) by Isaac taking her into his tent and having consensual sex (Gen. 24:67).

Concubines are those that:
(a) have sex in a committed monogamous relationship, but don't share a dwelling of any sort on a regular basis. It is a different kind of Covenant. It isn't considered a full marriage because they don't share a dwelling. The English equivalent is like "boyfriend", "girlfriend". Abraham and Jacob had concubines in The Torah and the women did not call them "husband" in return.

(OR)

(b) they live with a man as ba'al, but they are not having sex.



Essentially, one of the two components of marriage is missing: (a) the sex or (b) the dwelling together.

" When David arrived at his palace in Yerushalayim, the king took the ten women who were his concubines, whom he had left to care for the palace, and put them under guard. He provided for their needs but never slept with them" (2 Sam. 20:3)

(D) Can men be concubines?

According to The Torah, every principle of fair treatment that exists for one gender, equally exists for the other gender. The gender equality principle exists in The Torah:

"“You are not to have in your pack two sets of weights, one heavy, the other light. You are not to have in your house two sets of measures, one big, the other small. You are to have a correct and fair weight, and you are to have a correct and fair measure, so that you will prolong your days in the land Adonai your Elohim is giving you. For all who do such things, all who deal dishonestly, are destestable to Adonai your Elohim."

If you think this has only to do with trade and money, think again. This is what The Messiah said was a "measure" as well (the spiritual implication of this verse):

"For the way you judge others is how you will be judged — the measure with which you measure out will be used to measure to you." (Matthew 7:2)

"For the measure with which you measure out will be used to measure back to you!”" (Luke 6:38)

Also, men appear as Concubines in the Book of Ezekiel.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Man, she is a fucking moron. Even the most basic components of the law baffle her, yet she claims to be intelligent. She’s wrong about religion, she’s wrong about the law, but at least we pay some attention to her, so she doesn‘t care. It’s kind of endearing, actually.
Honestly what wonders me the most about her is how she seems to believe that people replying to her are uneducated christians, and how her bachelor's on that television show is the pinnacle of academia. I wonder if she'd better off if she spent that time watching Bachelorette instead.

EDIT:
I have a genius IQ.
Ain't no :optimistic: big enough.
I can read one paragraph in less than 10 seconds.
How long it takes you to understand one? Since you seem to draw in words, but your understanding of anything seems to be fairly superficial and literal.
I can type 95 WPM, not that hard for me
So can pretty much anyone in the fourth grade typing lessons.
 
Well, you're probably a slow reader?
I have a genius IQ. I can read one paragraph in less than 10 seconds.
I can type 95 WPM, not that hard for me



My children get plenty of attention from me. I feel no guilt




Yes, in my last trimester. When it's important to put your legs up so your veins don't swell.

I take several internet breaks throughout the day: on the toilet, in fast food lines, in bank lines, waiting for my children to buckle up. I check email, read the news, etc.





Why are you assuming I dont?




Don't assume other Netzarim and Messianics aren't lurking this thread. No further comment.






I already answered you. I answered with a question.





Firstly, to address the manner of your question. In The Torah it says that we are not only to follow the commands of YHWH, it says we are to follow the principles, judgments, rulings and commissions as well. That is Deut. 11:1. So, what we are to obey that Elohim has written is not only the affirmative commands like "thou shalt..." but also principles like "for this reason a man must leave his father and mother...".

In The Torah the principle is that two people marry and cleave together, for life. "For this reason a man must leave his father and mother and cleave unto his wife". So ideally, two virgins meet and they stay married in a strictly monogamous relationship their entire lives.

However, since Elohim is well aware that humans can choose to sin, or they die, They have created instructions in The Torah for navigating sin. There are several situations in which someone may lose a spouse due to (a) excommunication from the community, or (b) death. In these situations, the remaining spouse is free to re-marry another Israelite. However, if someone divorces an Israelite with no just cause, and remarries another Israelite, then that is Adultery.

(A) The following The Torah says are valid forms of divorce that allow a woman to re-marry:

1. When she divorces because her spouse commits any of the sins which The Torah says that a person must be excommunicated permanently from the community, including the person who sins with a "high hand" (Numb. 15:30-31)

2. If a woman married a Goy, then she must repent by divorcing him (Deut. 7:3)

3. A virgin girl that lays with a man but her parent(s) refuse(s) to allow the marriage (Ex. 22:16)

(B) The following The Torah says are valid forms of death that allow a woman to re-marry another Israelite:

1. Any of the sins which The Torah says that a person must be stoned to death, including the person whose spouse falls into idolatry and is stoned to death (Deut. 13:7-11(12))

2. The woman whose spouse dies and leaves her childless (Gen. 38; Deut. 25:5-10)

3. Widows

(C) Concubines

According to The Torah, a marriage is made by two things: (1) consensual sex and (2) sharing (a) dwelling(s). See for example, Isaac and Rebekah who got "married" (made a Covenant) by Isaac taking her into his tent and having consensual sex (Gen. 24:67).

Concubines are those that:
(a) have sex in a committed monogamous relationship, but don't share a dwelling of any sort on a regular basis. It is a different kind of Covenant. It isn't considered a full marriage because they don't share a dwelling. The English equivalent is like "boyfriend", "girlfriend". Abraham and Jacob had concubines in The Torah and the women did not call them "husband" in return.

(OR)

(b) they live with a man as ba'al, but they are not having sex.



Essentially, one of the two components of marriage is missing: (a) the sex or (b) the dwelling together.

" When David arrived at his palace in Yerushalayim, the king took the ten women who were his concubines, whom he had left to care for the palace, and put them under guard. He provided for their needs but never slept with them" (2 Sam. 20:3)

(D) Can men be concubines?

According to The Torah, every principle of fair treatment that exists for one gender, equally exists for the other gender. The gender equality principle exists in The Torah:

"“You are not to have in your pack two sets of weights, one heavy, the other light. You are not to have in your house two sets of measures, one big, the other small. You are to have a correct and fair weight, and you are to have a correct and fair measure, so that you will prolong your days in the land Adonai your Elohim is giving you. For all who do such things, all who deal dishonestly, are destestable to Adonai your Elohim."

If you think this has only to do with trade and money, think again. This is what The Messiah said was a "measure" as well (the spiritual implication of this verse):

"For the way you judge others is how you will be judged — the measure with which you measure out will be used to measure to you." (Matthew 7:2)

"For the measure with which you measure out will be used to measure back to you!”" (Luke 6:38)

Also, men appear as Concubines in the Book of Ezekiel.

No one cares.

Tell us about your butt. Doo you wipe and was or wash but not wipe?Does Marshall have moobs? Ever put him on his hands and knees and forced him to moo? Do his tiddies produce milk like his lower parts do, or do only females produce milk?
 
I can read a 700 page book in 15 seconds by just flipping through the pages really fast. It doesn’t matter how fast someone can read, lmfao, it’s about what you can comprehend. Judging by your participation in your own thread, very doubtful.
 
Also, here are a list of women in the Scriptures who participated in Serial Monogamy:

1. Tamar (Gen. 38 )

2. The prototype divorced woman who re-marries (Deut. 24:1-4)

3. The servant women (Exod. 21:7-11)

4. Abigail (1 Sam. 25)

5. Ruth (Ruth 4)

6. Bathsheba (1 Kings)

7. The Samaritan woman at the well (John 4)

8. The unnamed hypothetical woman (Matthew 22) -- I add this one because the mere fact that the Sadducees would even mention the idea of a woman having 7 husbands shows that it was not out of the norm for people to remarry.
 
I know youre forbidden from posting on this thread, but it's funny how much Andrew says he is over Melinda, and yet you keep simping for her. @xtamarlover the guy that compiled photos of all of her dead family members’ graves thinks that talking about gaping an asshole is retarded, yet you're totally normal and not a stalker who is banned from the state of VA.
 
Well, you're probably a slow reader?
I have a genius IQ. I can read one paragraph in less than 10 seconds.
I can type 95 WPM, not that hard for me
so you skim through paragraphs without reading it properly and shit out a text wall in a fit of rage

You say you can type real fast, prove it. Do a vid of you typing. Or if not, why should I believe you? You're a known liar, Mel. I don't think you type fast. You just like being here and being convinced you're a insane tart
My children get plenty of attention from me. I feel no guilt
:optimistic:

Yes, in my last trimester. When it's important to put your legs up so your veins don't swell.

I take several internet breaks throughout the day: on the toilet, in fast food lines, in bank lines, waiting for my children to buckle up. I check email, read the news, etc.
you get more time for your alleged breast feeding than I do free time and I can barely keep up. I think you spend more time than that here. You like it here. You like being told you're a whore

... Wait 🤢

Why are you assuming I dont?
you prefer to spend so much time here..


Don't assume other Netzarim and Messianics aren't lurking this thread. No further comment.
that's even funnier. They're here but don't seem to want to join in your insane "debating" (read: defend your royal highness from the horrific torture of being called a mentally ill slut)
 
Well, you're probably a slow reader?
I have a genius IQ. I can read one paragraph in less than 10 seconds.
I can type 95 WPM, not that hard for me



My children get plenty of attention from me. I feel no guilt




Yes, in my last trimester. When it's important to put your legs up so your veins don't swell.

I take several internet breaks throughout the day: on the toilet, in fast food lines, in bank lines, waiting for my children to buckle up. I check email, read the news, etc.





Why are you assuming I dont?




Don't assume other Netzarim and Messianics aren't lurking this thread. No further comment.






I already answered you. I answered with a question.





Firstly, to address the manner of your question. In The Torah it says that we are not only to follow the commands of YHWH, it says we are to follow the principles, judgments, rulings and commissions as well. That is Deut. 11:1. So, what we are to obey that Elohim has written is not only the affirmative commands like "thou shalt..." but also principles like "for this reason a man must leave his father and mother...".

In The Torah the principle is that two people marry and cleave together, for life. "For this reason a man must leave his father and mother and cleave unto his wife". So ideally, two virgins meet and they stay married in a strictly monogamous relationship their entire lives.

However, since Elohim is well aware that humans can choose to sin, or they die, They have created instructions in The Torah for navigating sin. There are several situations in which someone may lose a spouse due to (a) excommunication from the community, or (b) death. In these situations, the remaining spouse is free to re-marry another Israelite. However, if someone divorces an Israelite with no just cause, and remarries another Israelite, then that is Adultery.

(A) The following The Torah says are valid forms of divorce that allow a woman to re-marry:

1. When she divorces because her spouse commits any of the sins which The Torah says that a person must be excommunicated permanently from the community, including the person who sins with a "high hand" (Numb. 15:30-31)

2. If a woman married a Goy, then she must repent by divorcing him (Deut. 7:3)

3. A virgin girl that lays with a man but her parent(s) refuse(s) to allow the marriage (Ex. 22:16)

(B) The following The Torah says are valid forms of death that allow a woman to re-marry another Israelite:

1. Any of the sins which The Torah says that a person must be stoned to death, including the person whose spouse falls into idolatry and is stoned to death (Deut. 13:7-11(12))

2. The woman whose spouse dies and leaves her childless (Gen. 38; Deut. 25:5-10)

3. Widows

(C) Concubines

According to The Torah, a marriage is made by two things: (1) consensual sex and (2) sharing (a) dwelling(s). See for example, Isaac and Rebekah who got "married" (made a Covenant) by Isaac taking her into his tent and having consensual sex (Gen. 24:67).

Concubines are those that:
(a) have sex in a committed monogamous relationship, but don't share a dwelling of any sort on a regular basis. It is a different kind of Covenant. It isn't considered a full marriage because they don't share a dwelling. The English equivalent is like "boyfriend", "girlfriend". Abraham and Jacob had concubines in The Torah and the women did not call them "husband" in return.

(OR)

(b) they live with a man as ba'al, but they are not having sex.



Essentially, one of the two components of marriage is missing: (a) the sex or (b) the dwelling together.

" When David arrived at his palace in Yerushalayim, the king took the ten women who were his concubines, whom he had left to care for the palace, and put them under guard. He provided for their needs but never slept with them" (2 Sam. 20:3)

(D) Can men be concubines?

According to The Torah, every principle of fair treatment that exists for one gender, equally exists for the other gender. The gender equality principle exists in The Torah:

"“You are not to have in your pack two sets of weights, one heavy, the other light. You are not to have in your house two sets of measures, one big, the other small. You are to have a correct and fair weight, and you are to have a correct and fair measure, so that you will prolong your days in the land Adonai your Elohim is giving you. For all who do such things, all who deal dishonestly, are destestable to Adonai your Elohim."

If you think this has only to do with trade and money, think again. This is what The Messiah said was a "measure" as well (the spiritual implication of this verse):

"For the way you judge others is how you will be judged — the measure with which you measure out will be used to measure to you." (Matthew 7:2)

"For the measure with which you measure out will be used to measure back to you!”" (Luke 6:38)

Also, men appear as Concubines in the Book of Ezekiel.
No. You didn't. You didn't address the Cathar question at all. You said they didn't exist and then I quoted a respected French expert on the matter.
 
I think we've been to this rodeo enough times with this cow to know that when a question gets too difficult she just ignores it.
Yep. She pretty consistently responds to about 3 of my posts with nonsense and then drops it to go to a different target when she’s run out of ideas.
that's even funnier. They're here but don't seem to want to join in your insane "debating" (read: defend your royal highness from the horrific torture of being called a mentally ill slut)
The only other person from her cult reading this thread is probably referring to the one, the only, the great @xtamarlover who is banned from posting in here, yet makes reactions to posts all the time.
No. You didn't. You didn't address the Cathar question at all. You said they didn't exist and then I quoted a respected French expert on the matter.
Don’t forget, the article she used only claimed they MAY not have existed.
 
Yep. She pretty consistently responds to about 3 of my posts with nonsense and then drops it to go to a different target when she’s run out of ideas. The only other person from her cult reading this thread is probably referring to the one, the only, the great @xtamarlover who is banned from posting in here, yet makes reactions to posts all the time.

Don’t forget, the article she used only claimed they MAY not have existed.

At least she responds to some of your posts. Im still here almost two years later wondering whether Tamar has milked Marshall's moobs before? Or if his man milk only comes from his down there part.
 
Also, here are a list of women in the Scriptures who participated in Serial Monogamy:

1. Tamar (Gen. 38 )

2. The prototype divorced woman who re-marries (Deut. 24:1-4)

3. The servant women (Exod. 21:7-11)

4. Abigail (1 Sam. 25)

5. Ruth (Ruth 4)

6. Bathsheba (1 Kings)

7. The Samaritan woman at the well (John 4)

8. The unnamed hypothetical woman (Matthew 22) -- I add this one because the mere fact that the Sadducees would even mention the idea of a woman having 7 husbands shows that it was not out of the norm for people to remarry.
Does it matter if Marshall is a concubine?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: ForscytheBat
Melinda, no one here is impressed with your lies. Why not tell the truth for once in your life and stop trying to inflate your delicate ego?
 
I'm a little late on this, but this:

In fact, I would go so far to say that I believe paper currency was made purposely to oppress women. Paper currency began to replace gold around the same time that women began to make advances in literacy attainment and college enrollment. So the only way men could oppress women was creating places where paper currency is exchanged.

This may be the dumbest thing you've ever written here. Women's literacy or college enrollments are in no way tied to the adoption of paper currency. That is a retarded assertion and you are retarded for writing it.
 
I'm a little late on this, but this:



This may be the dumbest thing you've ever written here. Women's literacy or college enrollments are in no way tied to the adoption of paper currency. That is a retarded assertion and you are retarded for writing it.
Be careful she might outdo herself with stupid assertions she makes

From saying you deal with snake bites by sucking on them to saying viruses have demon energy to saying women everywhere who work must be sterile abortion machines. It just gets crazier and crazier.

... The ride never ends
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Toasty
I owe the government nothing, absolutely nothing, in exchanged for affirmative action. They oppress the poor and women by making it impossible to receive small business loans without already having collateral and then they make it impossible for religious women who don't sterilize their uterus and practice ecological breastfeeding to hold corporate jobs.

The system is rigged to favor men who don't breastfeed or get pregnant. In fact, I would go so far to say that I believe paper currency was made purposely to oppress women. Paper currency began to replace gold around the same time that women began to make advances in literacy attainment and college enrollment. So the only way men could oppress women was creating places where paper currency is exchanged. Because when a woman is pregnant, postpartum and breastfeeding she cannot get to those places without a struggle or not at all even sometimes.

If gold, hunting, gathering and small businesses still ruled the world, women could attain equality in the market.

Now, are you talking about Tang Dynasty (618-907), the Song Dynasty (960), Prague cloth money (960), the Knights Templar Notes, the Stockholm Banco notes in 1661, the bank of england in 1694, etc. etc.
Paper currency has been around for a hell of a long time and replaced gold centuries ago.
 
The Samaritan woman at the well, yes, She had 5 husbands...and then a cocubine.
Correction... she was a slut, going through men like underwear. Jesus was slut-shaming her. It worked; she felt convicted instead of righteously indignant when her promiscuous lifestyle was called out. She immediately became defensive and changed the subject. It's not clear whether she changed her lifestyle after her encounter with Jesus, but it does say that many of the Samaritans believed in him as a result of what she told them.
Also, here are a list of women in the Scriptures who participated in Serial Monogamy
I love that you included Bathsheba. She got pregnant by someone else while married to her husband; that's not "serial monogamy," it's adultery. But the point of stories like those (as well as the story of Rahab, who was literally a prostitute; I notice you didn't include her in your list, for obvious reasons) is not to show that their lifestyles were fine, it's to show that repentance is possible. Obviously that point was lost on you.

Anyway, there's a difference between being actually, officially, married, and then either being divorced or having your spouse die, then officially, actually marrying someone else... and fucking a bunch of people and justifying it after the fact by saying you were in a "covenant marriage" with them at the time.
 
Correction... she was a slut, going through men like underwear. Jesus was slut-shaming her. It worked; she felt convicted instead of righteously indignant when her promiscuous lifestyle was called out. She immediately became defensive and changed the subject. It's not clear whether she changed her lifestyle after her encounter with Jesus, but it does say that many of the Samaritans believed in him as a result of what she told them.

I love that you included Bathsheba. She got pregnant by someone else while married to her husband; that's not "serial monogamy," it's adultery. But the point of stories like those (as well as the story of Rahab, who was literally a prostitute; I notice you didn't include her in your list, for obvious reasons) is not to show that their lifestyles were fine, it's to show that repentance is possible. Obviously that point was lost on you.

Anyway, there's a difference between being actually, officially, married, and then either being divorced or having your spouse die, then officially, actually marrying someone else... and fucking a bunch of people and justifying it after the fact by saying you were in a "covenant marriage" with them at the time.
It's literally Islamist thinking. I don't know if you've been to the middle east but they have brothels called "marriage houses" where you pay like $50 to sign a "marriage contract" with a woman for an hour or whatever.
 
I love that you included Bathsheba. She got pregnant by someone else while married to her husband; that's not "serial monogamy," it's adultery.

No, it wasn't Adultery because her husband was not an Israelite. He was a Hittite. That's why it repeats over and over: "Uriah, the Hittite". Adultery was sleeping with another Israelite man's wife. If a man slept with a Goy man's wife it was sexual immorality (still wrong, but not Adultery). You know why that's fair? You don't get the protection of The Torah as a Goy because you aren't in Covenant with Elohim. Very fair, very fair.

Anyways, Lev. 20 sums it up: "If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife, that is, with the wife of a fellow countryman, both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death"

Study before you speak. Submit your mind to Elohim before you think you know what you are talking about!!


Correction... she was a slut, going through men like underwear. Jesus was slut-shaming her. It worked; she felt convicted instead of righteously indignant when her promiscuous lifestyle was called out. She immediately became defensive and changed the subject. It's not clear whether she changed her lifestyle after her encounter with Jesus, but it does say that many of the Samaritans believed in him as a result of what she told them.

That's not what Yahushua said.

Neither have you defined "whoredom" correctly according to The Torah. Strike two.


It's literally Islamist thinking. I don't know if you've been to the middle east but they have brothels called "marriage houses" where you pay like $50 to sign a "marriage contract" with a woman for an hour or whatever.

That's Prostitution

You're an idiot


Now, are you talking about Tang Dynasty (618-907), the Song Dynasty (960), Prague cloth money (960), the Knights Templar Notes, the Stockholm Banco notes in 1661, the bank of england in 1694, etc. etc.
Paper currency has been around for a hell of a long time and replaced gold centuries ago.


I'll look into this. I am intrigued. However, these may simply be "outliers". Of course, there will always be "outliers" in any statistical situation. Those cannot be said to drive the norms of society
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, it wasn't Adultery because her husband was not an Israelite. He was a Hittite. That's why it repeats over and over: "Uriah, the Hittite". Adultery was sleeping with another Israelite man's wife. If a man slept with a Goy man's wife it was sexual immorality (still wrong, but not Adultery). You know why that's fair? You don't get the protection of The Torah as a Goy because you aren't in Covenant with Elohim. Very fair, very fair.

Anyways, Lev. 20 sums it up: "If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife, that is, with the wife of a fellow countryman, both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death"

Study before you speak. Submit your mind to Elohim before you think you know what you are talking about!!







That's not what Yahushua said.

Neither have you defined "whoredom" correctly according to The Torah. Strike two.




That's Prostitution

You're an idiot





I'll look into this. I am intrigued. However, these may simply be "outliers". Of course, there will always be "outliers" in any statistical situation. Those cannot be said to drive the norms of society
It isn't prostitution. The Quran is very clear. It is a marriage contract, just like the marriage covenants you have. :^)
 
Back