Snowflake Chloe Wilkinson / DissociaDID and Nanette Zuniga / Nan / TeamPinata

I know we're all starved for content since Queen Munch went into hibernation but can we cut the sperging about other ill/"ill" people and take it to either the general munchie thread or multiples thread and stop shitting this one up? Ffs.
Conversations will be had. She's been brought up, so she will be addressed. If you don't like it, Why not grab yourself a nice, hot mug of STFU?
 
Conversations will be had. She's been brought up, so she will be addressed. If you don't like it, Why not grab yourself a nice, hot mug of STFU?
Keep shitting up the thread with crap that doesn't belong here and see what happens. Instead of trying to be an edge Lord, read the rules and room. You'll have a much easier time on this site for it.
 
View attachment 1550703
Yikes, Chloe’s fans are really something else. Should've used a frozen lake as the background to be more accurate lol
B94CA217-07FD-4DBF-BE00-F475960DF80F.jpeg

made some fan art <3
 
Keep shitting up the thread with crap that doesn't belong here and see what happens. Instead of trying to be an edge Lord, read the rules and room. You'll have a much easier time on this site for it.
Are you a mod? Or just one in training? Thanks for the tip, Karen. Let's share a cup ;) *Puts on glasses to better see what happens*
 
Are you a mod? Or just one in training? Thanks for the tip, Karen. Let's share a cup ;) *Puts on glasses to better see what happens*

Your post about Tatiana was somewhat relevant at the time, but now you're just sperging. At first Jumpingtrash overreacted but at this point they're just trying to give you advice before the mods ban you. You can't let one critical post get to you like that here. It's not a personal attack, just ignore it and move on. Also, the asterisk shit is cringe. In summary,

31D8A1EA-464C-4483-8385-4A1DA65A686F.gif
 
Your post about Tatiana was somewhat relevant at the time, but now you're just sperging. At first Jumpingtrash overreacted but at this point they're just trying to give you advice before the mods ban you. You can't let one critical post get to you like that here. It's not a personal attack, just ignore it and move on. Also, the asterisk shit is cringe. In summary,

View attachment 1590822
Everyone here has an opinion on how others should be.
and yet nobody gives a f*ck.
Thanks for yours, also. *Criiiinge*
 
I was posting about Zarbi over in the plurals thread a few days ago, so maybe I’m just being paranoid, but thoughts? @BootesVoid did you murder your sex trafficker and then admit to it on Twitter?

38067B2F-0675-4140-A696-4C63C6CBC236.jpegF155ACF2-41E2-4DA2-AB3C-F07D845540A4.jpegAFE1A3A3-13B5-43ED-82A1-4613E84F7D78.jpegFE4A9A05-7C81-43C5-890A-EB8A34A09C2E.jpeg

ETA: wow, I’m honored to have my artwork posted in your gallery
5E924518-6FA4-4BB1-BB40-651C1F798D45.jpeg
Further evidence that this could be bootes: 75C10E3F-326D-4EEF-A203-EC25C2AF21A6.jpeg3346A18A-A355-4C2C-BA16-B1A7D8DBA6A7.jpeg
Bootes claims that they’ve gone to the police to report Chloe for racketeering, so they must live in the UK just like Zarbi does
D727D3E6-9FE5-49F8-90D1-1C8332BE948E.jpeg26B46A8C-C53A-4076-B1E2-051B814F3EAE.jpeg
Bootes claims to know Chloe on a personal level and Zarbi seems to have pics of Chloe that the public doesn’t
 
Last edited:
I was posting about Zarbi over in the plurals thread a few days ago, so maybe I’m just being paranoid, but thoughts? @BootesVoid did you murder your sex trafficker and then admit to it on Twitter?

View attachment 1592749View attachment 1592750View attachment 1592751View attachment 1592752

ETA: wow, I’m honored to have my artwork posted in your gallery
View attachment 1592757
Further evidence that this could be bootes: View attachment 1592762View attachment 1592763
Bootes claims that they’ve gone to the police to report Chloe for racketeering, so they must live in the UK just like Zarbi does
View attachment 1592772View attachment 1592773
Bootes claims to know Chloe on a personal level and Zarbi seems to have pics of Chloe that the public doesn’t
Lol it's one thing to post petty thoughts about a person's booze consumption as part of an anonymous forum dedicated to the power of collective autism. It's entirely another to let that spill over into many posts on your personal twitter account.

Even better is when you post the same thing almost word for word under two different usernames, one of which is similar to a third username that you happen to use on KiwiFarms.

I wonder if Bootes ever goes by SunglowPaladin...
Dynastia (1).png
 
Last edited:
I was posting about Zarbi over in the plurals thread a few days ago, so maybe I’m just being paranoid, but thoughts? @BootesVoid did you murder your sex trafficker and then admit to it on Twitter?

View attachment 1592749View attachment 1592750View attachment 1592751View attachment 1592752

ETA: wow, I’m honored to have my artwork posted in your gallery
View attachment 1592757
Further evidence that this could be bootes: View attachment 1592762View attachment 1592763
Bootes claims that they’ve gone to the police to report Chloe for racketeering, so they must live in the UK just like Zarbi does
View attachment 1592772View attachment 1592773
Bootes claims to know Chloe on a personal level and Zarbi seems to have pics of Chloe that the public doesn’t

This person doesn’t seem to know what the fuck they’re on about.

The government scheme paying 80% of income ending in October is the Furlough scheme. For employees. Chloe is not on this.

The Self-employment grant paid out 80% of average trading profits over the past 3 years for 3 months in July and will do the same at 70% in October. There was no requirement for people to stop working. It’s a grant.
She might have been on this

If the council had been paying her rent, she’d have had to have been on Universal Credit. This wouldn’t automatically stop in October and neither would it have allowed her to claim from either of the other two schemes as she wouldn’t be eligible unless she was unemployed or on a very low income.

Also, ‘racketeering’ isn’t really a thing in the UK. It’s also not something one does alone. Were Chloe a racketeer, she’d be reported to the National Crime Agency.

For fraud, they’d need to contact ActionFraud.


One would think that someone who has reported a crime to a police agency would be able to use more specifics about what they actually reported and to whom.
 
This person doesn’t seem to know what the fuck they’re on about.

The government scheme paying 80% of income ending in October is the Furlough scheme. For employees. Chloe is not on this.

The Self-employment grant paid out 80% of average trading profits over the past 3 years for 3 months in July and will do the same at 70% in October. There was no requirement for people to stop working. It’s a grant.
She might have been on this

If the council had been paying her rent, she’d have had to have been on Universal Credit. This wouldn’t automatically stop in October and neither would it have allowed her to claim from either of the other two schemes as she wouldn’t be eligible unless she was unemployed or on a very low income.

Also, ‘racketeering’ isn’t really a thing in the UK. It’s also not something one does alone. Were Chloe a racketeer, she’d be reported to the National Crime Agency.

For fraud, they’d need to contact ActionFraud.


One would think that someone who has reported a crime to a police agency would be able to use more specifics about what they actually reported and to whom.
She also posts things like this, so I don’t think she’s all there
 
Maybe her dad is the CEO of YouTube and she gets special privileges.

That’s enough evidence there this person has never come into contact with the police, let alone reported Chloe.

Unless her dad is actually her mom, this is unlikely. The CEO of youtube is Susan Wojcicki, and has been for over half a decade.
 
Maybe her dad is the CEO of YouTube and she gets special privileges.

That’s enough evidence there this person has never come into contact with the police, let alone reported Chloe.
You KiWee farmers are the ULTIMATE Lolcows and Spergers!

Do any of you actually have a life of your own? You think you're so edgy, but you're actually nothing but a bunch of sad voyeurs, too afraid to even communicate with the people you sit back and talk about.

1. Internet fraud is obviously an international issue, covered by different laws in different countries. Is that simple enough for you fuckwits to understand?

2. You can follow me around screen capture my activity as much as you want. You don't need it, but you have my permission.

3. Did I kill someone? You're the big internet detectives - see what you can find out.

4. Do I speak the truth? Refer to point 3 above.
 
You KiWee farmers are the ULTIMATE Lolcows and Spergers!

Do any of you actually have a life of your own? You think you're so edgy, but you're actually nothing but a bunch of sad voyeurs, too afraid to even communicate with the people you sit back and talk about.

1. Internet fraud is obviously an international issue, covered by different laws in different countries. Is that simple enough for you fuckwits to understand?

2. You can follow me around screen capture my activity as much as you want. You don't need it, but you have my permission.

3. Did I kill someone? You're the big internet detectives - see what you can find out.

4. Do I speak the truth? Refer to point 3 above.

Oh wow. That actually hurt.

I think someone would’ve reported you to the murder police by now if it wasn’t for the fact that you’re clearly a fantasist.

Plus, no one here really cares if you did actually murder someone or not because that illusion of mystery you keep trying to create is obviously the only remotely interesting thing about you. And it’s not very interesting.

Probably why you keep popping up in different places claiming to know things and then diverting any time anyone asks a question.
 
You KiWee farmers are the ULTIMATE Lolcows and Spergers!

Do any of you actually have a life of your own? You think you're so edgy, but you're actually nothing but a bunch of sad voyeurs, too afraid to even communicate with the people you sit back and talk about.

1. Internet fraud is obviously an international issue, covered by different laws in different countries. Is that simple enough for you fuckwits to understand?

2. You can follow me around screen capture my activity as much as you want. You don't need it, but you have my permission.

3. Did I kill someone? You're the big internet detectives - see what you can find out.

4. Do I speak the truth? Refer to point 3 above.

Screen Shot 2020-09-13 at 7.17.25 PM.png

Lol, calm down.
 
Oh wow. That actually hurt.

I think someone would’ve reported you to the murder police by now if it wasn’t for the fact that you’re clearly a fantasist.

Plus, no one here really cares if you did actually murder someone or not because that illusion of mystery you keep trying to create is obviously the only remotely interesting thing about you. And it’s not very interesting.

Probably why you keep popping up in different places claiming to know things and then diverting any time anyone asks a question.
Well you are the no-life losers who follow me around the internet, rather than the other way around LOL!

Can somebody call an ambulance?

Those 'Autistic' reactions have really triggered me!

You're funny. You actually thing these bullshit 'reactions' on your shitty bored-people's forum actually mean something - LOL!

Conversations will be had. She's been brought up, so she will be addressed. If you don't like it, Why not grab yourself a nice, hot mug of STFU?
Give 'em that 'Autistic' reaction - that'll teach 'em.
 
Back