U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Has BLM done anything good in there existence besides "bRIngInG AWareNeSs". I always get told by my BLM supporter friends that they've done more good then bad when I bring up the Burn Murder Loot stuff.

The only thing I can think of is increasing negro fatigue by a factor of 1,000. Many people I know are now simply so tired of joggers that they wish they would all just disappear. They now realize that there is no more helping them, that no reconciliation is possible with them, and that, at the end of the day, they will just keep demanding more and more pounds of whitey's flesh and will NEVER be satisfied no matter what we do.
 
There's so much legal speak in this article. It's unclear to me what exactly they're accusing the council of. At some points they seem to say that the council allowed actions that reflected poorly on their little burn loot murder campaign. At other points they seem to say that the council fell back on plans to defund police that their group advocated. Some of the language relating to the council's direction of police forces can be read as them being too tough with "the community" or, in opposition, as holding them back and jeopardizing community safety (re the precinct they abandoned to the CHAZ). Reads as very strange to me, though maybe I'm just not looking closely enough at the article.
People are just now being federally charged for events back in May. This is not lost on BLM or Antifa. I'm hopeful that with the rapes, assaults, and murders at Chaz still looming over them and now in the aftermath of the deadly wildfires, Big BLM is fearing major legal repercussions for a ton of illegal shit done to civilians and the community at large. There is a lot of legalese in that article. Not sure exactly what everything actually means, but the fact they are calling out their own biggest backers on the city council for wrong-doing is pretty telling. I'm wondering if that Antifa idiot who live-streamed his arson and arrest in WA is catapulting the need for BLM to now request this investigation as a way to start distancing themselves from the fires, death, and other shit they've done with Antifa. I think they're all terrified of going to prison now and the back-stabbing and infighting will get worse.
 
Well this is unexpected. Is BLM of Seattle/King Co distancing themselves from those troublesome Antifas? Even the socialist darling Sawant is put under suspicion for allowing protestors into city hall a few months ago. Antifa whiners are confused by this request for investigation coming from their BLM comrades. This will be an interesting story to follow.

This is just BLM complaining that any cops have been used against the riots at all and that the police haven't been abolished RIGHT NOW
 
The smartest thing trump could do (if possible) is have all compromised opposition's arrested. May it be due to pedophilia or collaboration with china. Clean the filth out before election
The smartest thing he could do is to not lift a finger. His enemies are begging for validation. Whatever he does, they'll reflect it back at him. Sorry to say that but Democrats are just better at exploiting opportunities and taking risks and that's the reason why Republicans lose so often.

Besides, if Trump sends a signal that he's only pretending to be retarded, every master of puppets burns all evidence with the speed of light and disappears. Yeah, people die and Trump might want to help them, but people die all the time and they're but straw dogs for sacrifice anyway.
 
I love the way shitlibs always behave like experts on guns and how real-life lethal-force encounters with guns play out IRL....

...when it's obvious from their very own statements that they literally have no fucking idea what they're talking about.

Whether it's calling AR-15s "assault rifles" or "machine guns"....or acting like lethal-force encounters with a firearm are akin to some video game where the cop has all the time in the world to rationally determine, with 100% veracity, what is going on in that encounter, and then can take time to aim and fire and "just shoot them in the leg"....

That never really happens; that is a fantasy.

In reality, these lethal force encounters happen so quickly that, by the time you fired your shots, you probably don't even realize what just happened. You simply reacted to the threat, and you had about 0.4 seconds to do so; you didn't have time to think about what to do, let alone think to yourself "ok...I will aim at his legs!!"
"You need proper training before owning a gun!"

....says the noguns soccer mom, or the green zone POG "veteran", to the guy who goes shooting twice a month and studies guns to an autistic degree.
 
"Instead of standing there and teaching a cop, when there's an unarmed person coming at them with a knife or something, you shoot them in the leg instead of in the heart is a very different thing. There's a lot of different things that could change,"
Biden said in a meeting with community leaders at Bethel AME Church in Wilmington, Del.
How long until white womyn of colour is a real thing to these people?
 
I love the way shitlibs always behave like experts on guns and how real-life lethal-force encounters with guns play out IRL....

...when it's obvious from their very own statements that they literally have no fucking idea what they're talking about.

Whether it's calling AR-15s "assault rifles" or "machine guns"....or acting like lethal-force encounters with a firearm are akin to some video game where the cop has all the time in the world to rationally determine, with 100% veracity, what is going on in that encounter, and then can take time to aim and fire and "just shoot them in the leg"....

That never really happens; that is a fantasy.

In reality, these lethal force encounters happen so quickly that, by the time you fired your shots, you probably don't even realize what just happened. You simply reacted to the threat, and you had about 0.4 seconds to do so; you didn't have time to think about what to do, let alone think to yourself "ok...I will aim at his legs!!"
The funny thing is, Kyle did manage to get a split-second perfect disabling shot on an arm through sheer dumb luck. But we can't all be Kyle and it's not like he's getting any credit for that from the 'why couldn't you just shoot him in the leg/the gun out of his hands' crowd anyway.
 
"Instead of standing there and teaching a cop, when there's an unarmed person coming at them with a knife or something, you shoot them in the leg instead of in the heart is a very different thing. There's a lot of different things that could change,"
Biden said in a meeting with community leaders at Bethel AME Church in Wilmington, Del.
But, but, but see- knife doesn’t have the word “arm” in it. With guns they’re also called “fire-arms”. So if someone doesn’t have a gun they aren’t “armed”

-some braniac on plebbit, probably.
 
I love the way shitlibs always behave like experts on guns and how real-life lethal-force encounters with guns play out IRL....

...when it's obvious from their very own statements that they literally have no fucking idea what they're talking about.

Whether it's calling AR-15s "assault rifles" or "machine guns"....or acting like lethal-force encounters with a firearm are akin to some video game where the cop has all the time in the world to rationally determine, with 100% veracity, what is going on in that encounter, and then can take time to aim and fire and "just shoot them in the leg"....

That never really happens; that is a fantasy.

In reality, these lethal force encounters happen so quickly that, by the time you fired your shots, you probably don't even realize what just happened. You simply reacted to the threat, and you had about 0.4 seconds to do so; you didn't have time to think about what to do, let alone think to yourself "ok...I will aim at his legs!!"
They either have no idea what they're talking about (implying they can't be bothered to do basic research or check facts) or they're outright lying to manipulate the narrative. Both point to them not being trustworthy.

Anyone that advocates shooting "in the leg" or anything like that has no idea what they're talking about. If you shoot, you shoot to kill. And you aim for center mass because you're less likely to miss and send a round to hit a bystander. That's how you end up missing the guy aggressor entirely and ventilating little Kenny riding his bike a few streets over.

No warning shots, no "shoot to wound" no action movie "shoot the gun out of their hands". If someone has a gun on you and you refuse the chance to stand down you're responsible for whatever comes next. Firearms should never be considered a non-lethal or less than lethal option. If a gun is out then the handler is ready to use lethal force.

Guns aren't jokes. And shooting in the leg...Biden has never heard of the femoral artery.
 
Last edited:
God, to be a fly on the wall when it dawns on these "unstoppable revolutionaries" that they were controlled opposition from the very, very beginning.
There is a lesson to be learned here. Any political movement in 21st century united states ( peaceful or violent) needs to stay quiet and hidden to be successful.

A peaceful protest gets the attention of all sorts of adversial elements. Prog hi jackers, rioters, law enforcement, astro turfers and attention seeking clowns. A violent one gets the attention of all the wrong people and gets everyone who means a damn to turn on you.

These lefties and democrats could have taken over is they just laid lower and kept their boiling the frog approach.

They couldve just have waited out trumps turn. If they didnt say anything trump would have been his own worst enemy.

But they had to freak the fuck out and throw a temper tantrum and blow up the whole thing.
 
Conservatives vote in person, overwhelmingly

Nope. Have voted by mail for years now. Hmmm...for some reason conservative ladies are usually much better looking than liberal sows.

1600109221379.png
 
I think Kenosha Kyle is a sobering reminder of exactly why we need 'weapons of war' in our communities. The fuck do 'assault weapons' have to do with the deputies' shootings anyway, for all we know the shooter could've tried to blast them with a CA-compliant Hi-Point with a 10-round mag.

Obligatory Anglocuckery
View attachment 1595127
Dammit, I liked that guy's videos. I guess typical britbongs have typical britbong takes. It's a little harder to blame them, an island nation is one of the few places you can make strict gun control "work", judging by how the criminals resort to knives.
 
Last edited:
That's what makes this the most interesting time. The antifa shot-callers have rich parents and/or cushy day jobs as lawyers or political operatives. When they get the order to shut things down they'll go back to their normal lives and await the next crisis.

Many of the front line troops are drug addicts, crazies and ex-cons who've jumped on board with this movement because their lives are in ruins and this is the first thing in forever that has made them feel like they belong. It also gives them convenient villains to blame all their problems on and a license to use all the violence they please to destroy that enemy.

If they're faced with a choice between watching the movement die or gloriously sacrificing themselves to prolong it they'll choose the latter. And with the leaders going to ground, there'll be no one around to rein them in. They won't listen if the higher-ups tell them "We need to slow things down for now, don't worry, this is all part of the plan, we'll start up again later." To them that just sounds like surrender.

Vaclav, a very wise poster here (not me) said it's time to start following the BLM/Antifa types home. They live somewhere, right? Think that just maybe some of these people are being followed and tracked already? Maybe they won't get the chance to resume any life at all, in due time. Could happen. The terrorists have no corner on intelligence/reconnaissance/surveillance.

(Mods, sorry for the double post. Things don't always fit.)
 
Vaclav, a very wise poster here (not me) said it's time to start following the BLM/Antifa types home. They live somewhere, right? Think that just maybe some of these people are being followed and tracked already? Maybe they won't get the chance to resume any life at all, in due time. Could happen. The terrorists have no corner on intelligence/reconnaissance/surveillance.

(Mods, sorry for the double post. Things don't always fit.)
This is done all the time over here, with very satisfactory results. Some of them have even moved house because of what follows. I highly recommend this
 
My actual solution is whats going happen despite being extreme. America being fractured into multiple geopolitical entities. A land of village states

You live in one place and get mad about the law being enforced? Then that person gets exiled. Go find some where else that will tolerate your Bullshit
Won't work. You don't exile if you're not sure the outcast will die. If he survives, he'll have a grudge and intel about you - If you exile enough people they'll raid you at some point. Hell, you can exile one person only for him to snitch on you to some raiders.

Just shoot him discretely.

What works is you have a frontier where anyone who's fed up with taxes, people or whatever can fuck off and claim some no man's land. There are no frontiers anymore, unless you want to live the dream someplace like the Gran Chaco. No joggers, but lots of interesting bugs Lovecraft never dreamt of.
 
People are just now being federally charged for events back in May. This is not lost on BLM or Antifa. I'm hopeful that with the rapes, assaults, and murders at Chaz still looming over them and now in the aftermath of the deadly wildfires, Big BLM is fearing major legal repercussions for a ton of illegal shit done to civilians and the community at large. There is a lot of legalese in that article. Not sure exactly what everything actually means, but the fact they are calling out their own biggest backers on the city council for wrong-doing is pretty telling. I'm wondering if that Antifa idiot who live-streamed his arson and arrest in WA is catapulting the need for BLM to now request this investigation as a way to start distancing themselves from the fires, death, and other shit they've done with Antifa. I think they're all terrified of going to prison now and the back-stabbing and infighting will get worse.

This is part of it, Another reason BLM is pissed at the council is that it's clear to them that they've been used from the get-go by the city council. The SCC has no intention of giving them the police abolition and unlimited gibs they want, instead they're using the crisis to funnel money and resources toward their own pet projects.

This is how the west coast leftist utopias have always worked. Seattle spends $100K per year for each homeless person in the city, over a billion a year. They could build apartments for the homeless outside the city with that money or offer comprehensive drug treatment programs, but they don't. The money disappears into a shadowy network of nonprofits run by people with political connections and the conditions on the street get worse and worse.

Covid gave them an excuse to pass the "Amazon tax" in an emergency session, and the riots have allowed them to greenlight a bunch of new programs, all of which are geared to funnel money into their political machine. BLM were never anything but useful idiots, they'll get a pittance out of appreciation but nothing else. The complaints boil down to "the council didn't do what we wanted and made us look bad." If the feds really start scrutinizing Seattle watch for the woke council to pin all the blame for crimes committed on BLM and leave them to twist in the wind. Talk about your white allies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back