- Joined
- Jan 5, 2020
Well it's not actually my feelings, it's yours. Although I do find it funny that you would backtrack on your "religious growth" of cutting off your evil goy family because it was financially beneficial for you.
There's nothing contradictory between the standards and values in The Torah and taking money or goos from a deceased parent that you had no affection for.
If you have legal standing to get a cut of the will why did you lose?
My mom didn't live a Will. I went to the courthouse to file against my ex-sister, and my other sibling stepped in and fixed the issue. So for now, it's postponed.
What's a tugboat?I wonder where she's gonna get her money from now that even Andrew ain't that interested in her anymore, she's got no income besides a tugboat sooooo
The dismissals read that in every single one of your attempts to sue, you never had a claim. I'm not sure if you even know what that is, but it means that when you file a suit, you must, with each action, cite a case that supports your action. The Judge Parker and his clerks have repeatedly advised you of this in each dismissal, yet you've responded in kind by repeatedly filing another suit without a claim. Fact enough?
That's not a set of FACTs. That's called another hypothesis.
Here, let me show you how to write FACTS.
FACT 1: I have filed 10 pro-se cases in the Federal Western District of VA.
FACT 2: Each of the 10 cases filed were in DIFFERENT subject matter. POP QUIZ: Can you name each of the bodies of case law/law that they each were about?
FACT 3: "Failure to State a Claim" is a broad term that means you don't have all of the ELEMENTS and FACTS alleged to support the SPECIFIC type of law you are filing under.
FACT 4: One of the dismissed cases was dismissed because I didn't reach the $75,000 minimum
FACT 5: One of the dismissed cases was because I filed upon a Criminal statute, and I cannot do that as a civilian
FACT 6: Each of the other dismissals in my cases were in DIFFERENT subject matters for DIFFERENT reasons.
FACT 7: Two of my cases had no prior case law in the fourth district to rely on for a judgment. I broke fresh ground.
POP QUIZ: Name the reasons the other eight were dismissed.
See, that's how you develop FACTS
Fact #2 You called me uneducated:
That is a fact. You can't even identify a fact from a hypothesis.
other than extremely unprofessional.
I've seen lawyers with terrible handwriting who make $$$,$$$. It's more than likely your gender bias that women should have fancy handwriting, rather than your view of what is "professional"
That we know of. I'd bet she has a few sad grifts going on in the Messianic/Hebrew Roots/'Netzarim' community. Probably not very successfully, the organized communities seem well aware of Melinda and individual cultists are generally poorer than dirt.
We don't call it "grifting". It's called צְדָקָה
Being open handed to fellow Israelites is a command in The Torah. But I know a stingy, laizze faire capitalist, Goy like yourself has no concept of any such things.
I've had all sorts of Israelites give me money throughout the years to help me fund my homeschooling operation and sustain my well being. May YHWH bless His people!