Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died at 87. - 🦀

[Super-Chevy454]

We could give some kudos to RBG's daughter for giving us another reason to hate Queen Hillary, lol. https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ives_dems_another_reason_to_hate_hillary.html ( https://archive.vn/YBj2U )

September 24, 2020
RBG’s daughter gives Dems another reason to hate Hillary
By Thomas Lifson
One of the dark secrets of the Democrats is the degree of unspoken hatred against Hillary Clinton. Get a couple of drinks into a fanatic Democrat partisan, and in all likelihood you can elicit some of the anger and sense of betrayal against Herself for losing the presidency to Donald Trump. The Clinton Machine is still powerful (and mean) enough to squelch most outright expression of resentment, but it’s there. With a billion dollars or so more than Donald Trump had to spend, with support of 90% of the media, and with the allure of breaking the “glass ceiling,” the race was Hillary’s to lose.
And against the odds, she did.
Now, with the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the apparent ability of the Senate to confirm the successor President Trump will name on Saturday, the consequences of Hillary’s loss will last for decades.

That’s why the revelation her daughter Jane expressed to the The New York Times is so damning of Hillary.

“I think that Mother, like many others, expected that Hillary Clinton would win the nomination and the presidency, and she wanted the first female president to name her successor,” Jane Ginsburg emailed me [NYT reporter Emily Bazelon] on Sunday.

Up to now, such anger as has been expressed against Ginsburg for not stepping down when a Democrat, Barack Obama, could appoint her successor, has focused on her ego in wanting to hang onto her seat (and power). But now, we see that it was a desire for a feminist double triumph: a woman president appointing another female justice. It's a womyn thing.

 

[Random Internet Person]

We could give some kudos to RBG's daughter for giving us another reason to hate Queen Hillary, lol. https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ives_dems_another_reason_to_hate_hillary.html ( https://archive.vn/YBj2U )

That’s been the speculation for a while, but it’s still nice to hear it from the family themselves.

 

[Not Really Here]

Why not a woman? She's qualified.

The only qualifications for SCOTUS are a Presidential nomination and Senate approval, it could be literally anyone.
For Constitutional legal opinion, Cruz is far and away the most knowledgeable of the people mentioned thus far.

 

[Ponderous Pillock]

We could give some kudos to RBG's daughter for giving us another reason to hate Queen Hillary, lol. https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ives_dems_another_reason_to_hate_hillary.html ( https://archive.vn/YBj2U )

as Trump appoints a female justice who doesn’t love abortion.

Are... are women supposed to love abortions?

 

[HTTP Error 404]

Are... are women supposed to love abortions?

The left has redefined female empowerment as "wants to be able to fuck random strangers without consequence." So yes, in the leftist worldview, you can only be a strong independent woman if you love the idea of fucking a stranger and then having a doctor hoover vac that little clump of cells right out of your vag during a long weekend.

 

[grumble_bum]

More like Ruth Bader Deadsburg.

All right i'm done here, sorry it wasn't informative.

 

[Getting tard comed]

Cruz is Irish and Spaniard, he's 100% white. There's such a thing as a white hispanic.
Why does it have to be a woman and why is the Cubana the best pick? Aren't we supposed to hate identity politics, or is it OK as long as the person who does it wears a Trump hat (as long as they aren't white)?

I call her the Cubana because I forget Barbera Lagoa is her name. You play the game with the rules that exist not the rules you wish existed. And she is the best candidate. Barrett's is a pro corporate, pro authoritarian judge and the SC doesnt need another one of those. One Roberts is enough. We dont need two justices that are flake's. Look up Barrets decisions. I'll trust a child of immigrants from Cuba more than old money southerners who are embetted in the current fucked up system thank you very much.

Okay I dont have any issues with Barbara Lagoa, but if she is the pick she needs to be the pick because she is the best pick (for ease of getting through and likely to protect our rights down the road) NOT because she's a latina.
There is no problem with appointing women and/or minorities to goverment positions, the issue becomes if you are appointing them BECAUSE they are women and/or minorities.

The Republicans will never be able to out IDPOL the Democrats, so don't bother trying.

She is the best pick. It has to be a woman because its Ginsberg. And if you somehow think part of picking the right candidate for the job doesn't include idpol when idpol is the rule of the game then I've got a bridge to sell you.

As I said earlier, actually look up both of these judges decisions and work. Barrett clerked unders a SC judge which is one of the surefire insider ways to fast track you to the SC yourself. Theres a system and she has gamed it to make it look like she is farther right than her decisions if she ever makes the court actually will be. She went out of her way to virtue signal about being pro gun in a case that had very little to do with it for the sole purpose of publicity so she could get to the SC. She will end up being another Roberts. And she probably wont even pass the vote. Only 52/3 republicans in the senate have said they want a vote to happen. Not all of then are going to vote yes. Barrett has made political statements that make it very easy for Dems and some Pubs to vote no. Hell Barrett said in a judiciary hearing that a judges first duty is to the catholic church/Pope before the law and constitution when faced with a contradiction between the two. Ignoring the antipope in charge atm, while I'm cool with living in a theocracy I doubt you or most of the country is. That quote alone will sink her vote.


As opposed to Lagoa, who is also Catholic, and comes from the most based latino group that didn't have Pinochet, Cuban migrants who chose on her own to clerk for Gorsech when it didn't look like he was going to get to the SC at all. That alone indicates to me she isnt power hungry and is pro civil liberties legally speaking otherwise you dont clerk for a judge like Gorsech.

She would be the better pick of the two even without idpol. But throw in idpol and it has to be a woman, and this one is a latina it's not even close.

 

[Cheesy Toe Number 2]

Ran out of Highlights after page 113, has anything newsworthy happened since Sunday other than Tsar Bomba levels of salt explosions in twitter?

 

[RumblyTumbly]

We could give some kudos to RBG's daughter for giving us another reason to hate Queen Hillary, lol. https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ives_dems_another_reason_to_hate_hillary.html ( https://archive.vn/YBj2U )

So...what she's saying is that identity politics clouds judgment and leads to poor decision making? lol

 

[MrJokerRager]

DC has to be more degenerate than SF. And look at all them pozzed minorities wanting some fake narrative about RGB wishes respected. You know what, FUCK RGB for being a cunt to her own party when asked to step down and FUCK RGB for being a symbol of liberal hypocrisy.

 

[Slimy Time]

There is a certain Schadenfreud at taking the lefts Identarian Demands and flipping them around against them. Clarence Thomas filling the seat vacated by Thurgood Marshall is perhaps the most stunning example. They used the leftists identarian criteria and seated the most consistently Conservative legal scholar in almost a century. And one of the best written jurists in the modern court. Thomas just enrages them for reasons that they can't verbalize for fear of proving themselves to actually be what they accuse everyone else of being. Victory is not simply defeating your enemies, but doing so in a way which drives them into frothing madness while at the same time making a complete mockery of everything they profess. to hold as true.

They even tried the same shit with Thomas that they did with Kavanaugh (or rather the other way around). Anita Hill accusing him of sexual harassment in the office about how he would talk about his dick size and how good he was in bed 10 years before the confirmation, and then threw 4 women to corroborate the story. They produced a polygraph of her testimony which read as true (polygraphs are infamously shit and many countries and states don't use them as evidence), then asked Thomas to take one (he told them to fuck off) and so on. People forget or never learned this shit, Kavanaugh was not the first time they pulled a metoo a SC nominee.

It did lead to one of the best put downs of the left by Thomas I have seen that still holds up today.

Oh look, sniff man Biden was there too. What a coincidence.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

Because it's better to show some respect for the dead. But, considering you tell people they should "rot in hell", I can't say I'm surprised you don't really have respect for anybody, let alone Ginsberg. Pretty sad, honestly, even for a website like this. You don't have respect for anyone, and I can't imagine how you are in real life when this is the way you act on here.

You probably hide how you really feel about the people around you, like so many other cowards before you.

Dude, Ginsburg was Jewish. Letting her lie in-state is literally not showing respect for her as a dead person, but as an actual icon. I can quote the Hebrew to you, but for some reason I doubt that you'd care. Well, here it is anyways, for anyone who wants to prove their exceptionalism to their friends:

איסור הלנת המת ומתי מותר להלינו. ובו ב' סעיפים:
אסור להלין המת אלא אם כן הלינו לכבודו להביא לו ארון ותכריכין או מקוננות או כדי שיבאו קרובים או להשמיע עיירות:

It is prohibited to leave the corpse [unburied] over night, unless they left him over night for the sake of his honour, [viz.,] to provide for him a coffin or shrouds, or in order that relatives should [have time] to come, Who live in another locality. Sem(H). XI, or to assemble [surrounding] townships [for his funeral]. (ShAr YD 357:1)

Now, I know what you're thinking: "Weren't Jacob and Joseph mummified in Genesis 50?"

Yes, you clever exegete. They were mummified to ensure their return to the burial place of their ancestors in the Hittite territory. But that has nothing to do with public adoration, it had to do with the promises of YHWH that Jacob would be buried in the land promised to him and his descendants (Israel). Plus the Rabbinic traditions derive from the late antique Pharisees, who popularized conceptions of the Resurrection, something which obviously would be reflected in burial practices. Point being: the Genesis argument isn't very persuasive. It certainly has little bearing on Rabbinic practices in modern Jewry.

So you can rate this post autistic all you want but don't act like you have some respect for Ginsburg that is lacking on the right. If you did, you would understand how clearly disrespectful her idolization has become to the left and why some on the right find it distasteful. They've turned her into a golden calf necessary of worship, so don't be surprised when people come and try to smash it.

(((Posting))) over. If it makes you feel better, Ginsburg ain't in heaven or hell. She's blanked-out in Sheol doing and thinking and feeling nothing. Your sperging won't reach her.

 

[polyester]

HuffPost gonna HuffPost:


(article, archive)

 

[Ruin]

HuffPost gonna HuffPost:

View attachment 1618509
(article, archive)

Yea, I'm sure that's what an Orthodox Jew would have wanted you to be doing.

 

[Negative Nancy Drew]

So I got a dumbass question:
Why didn't she just retire when Obama was in charge in 2009 or 10? Hell, she got cancer again in 2009, so that'd be a good time to go.

I mean, sure, on the books she'd lose out on power and influence and money, but she could say to Obama: replace me with a thirty something, pay me a stipend for the rest of my days as a favor for setting us up with fifty years of another liberal in my seat.

 

[Slimy Time]

So I got a dumbass question:
Why didn't she just retire when Obama was in charge in 2009 or 10? Hell, she got cancer again in 2009, so that'd be a good time to go.

I mean, sure, on the books she'd lose out on power and influence and money, but she could say to Obama: replace me with a thirty something, pay me a stipend for the rest of my days as a favor for setting us up with fifty years of another liberal in my seat.

Waiting to see the first female president get into power I believe. We all know how that went.

 

[HandsomeDan]

So I got a dumbass question:
Why didn't she just retire when Obama was in charge in 2009 or 10? Hell, she got cancer again in 2009, so that'd be a good time to go.

I mean, sure, on the books she'd lose out on power and influence and money, but she could say to Obama: replace me with a thirty something, pay me a stipend for the rest of my days as a favor for setting us up with fifty years of another liberal in my seat.

Because as I said earlier in this thread she and everyone else there in the Imperial Capital are nothing more than "Skeksis" who's obsession is living forever and all their arrogance, degenerate practices and bizarre/revolting behavior is in service of that obsession. This includes doing everything possible to avoid acknowledging their own mortality. "Retiring" or living the life of a normal senior citizen would only acknowledge that death is approaching. Their arrogance and warped reality makes it impossile to give up their positions or perceived power. Sometimes we get lucky I guess and their demented gamble does not work out and we have the situation we currently have.

 

[polyester]

This has been discussed, both in the news (e.g. see this NYT article / archive) and here in this thread.

Some theories are:

1) She hoped Hillary would become the next president after Obama, and got infatuated with the idea of a historic "yass kween slay" moment of the first female president getting to pick a young female feminist as her replacement.

2) She had a specific TODO list for her judicial activism, and wasn't done yet. Being replaced by some random Democrat-approved judge wouldn't do, because her own goals were more specific than the Democratic Party's goals.

3) She mistrusted Obama, and didn't think he'd pick a good replacement.

4) She was selfish and simply couldn't let go of power.

 

[Not Really Here]

This has been discussed, both in the news (e.g. see this NYT article / archive) and here in this thread.

Some theories are:
3) She mistrusted Obama, and didn't think he'd pick a good replacement.

An old Jewish woman not trusting a half black?

Say it aint so.

 

[Oats12345]

Waiting to see the first female president get into power I believe. We all know how that went.

I won't lie, I do found the irony. That she wanted to be replace by Hillary and once Trump won. She tried her best to not step down. And as much as she tried, her health clearly started to decline and still refused. And now Trump will appoint her replacement.

I mean irony can't even describe this.