Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Pokemonquistador2 said:
I'm surprised schools aren't using shop class as a way to recruit women into big paying "non-traditional careers" like plumbing or car repair. That's because the people running schools look down on the blue collar professions. They'd rather women become unemployable SJW Studies majors or activists than let them do a job that's "beneath" them.
Click to expand...
The thing is that women don't really want those jobs either. I remember back in high school I took a welding class and we had some girls at the start and then they quit and transferred to other classes that they felt more comfortable with then.

It's just how it is, men want to do certain jobs while women want to do things their own speed by the way.

It is what it is then.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • DRINK!
Reactions: deeplyhigh, Qajinima022, Left Alone and 11 others
Bad_Guys_are_Good4EVER said:
Who the fuck is supposed to be Leia? AOC? Or is that a younger version of Ruth Ginsburg? Also you'd think Trump would be Palpatine instead of Jabba.
Click to expand...
It's RBG, if they wanted to do a little inside baseball, they would have RBG dress up as Jyn Erso since both were played by Felicity Jones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: More AWS-8Q Than You, Qajinima022, Ghostse and 2 others
1600959484705.png


Remember when we spent several years ruining lives by labeling the OK symbol a racist dogwhistle?
 
  • Like
  • Lunacy
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Donny Cheese, Fomo Hoire, 5t3n0g0ph3r and 39 others
Slap47 said:
View attachment 1618250

Remember when we spent several years ruining lives by labeling the OK symbol a racist dogwhistle?
Click to expand...

And another tool is thrown under the bus in a desperate ploy to keep Biden from doddering under it. I never in my wildest dreams imagined that they were this desperate to win this election, I really, honestly expected them to make a token effort and try again next time.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: deeplyhigh, Fanatical Pragmatist, GeneralFriendliness and 16 others
a9a6ecd194f7f6b61ff8661acbf3d6ed.png
a739a550372690d903c31927f2153f0c.png


The "context" that these journalists and Daniel are supplying is, ironically, actually out of context. The video is clipped to where we only hear the question framed as, "Will you commit to a peaceful transfer of power after the election?" To the shock of no one, there was actually significantly more to that question.
​
"Mr. President, real quickly: Win, lose, or draw in this election, will you commit here, today, for a peaceful transferal of power after the election? And there has been rioting in Louisville. There's been rioting in many cities across this country--red and--your so-called red and blue states. Will you commit to a peaceful transferal of power after the election?"​

Win, lose or draw. If it's a win or a draw, why the fuck would he commit to a transfer of power? Is he going to forcibly transfer power to himself if he wins? Is he going to aggressively transfer the power to Biden and himself if it's a draw? This is a completely fucking retarded question and the only reason that they asked it in the first place was so that they could pry this sound clip out of him.

Fuck journalists.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Donny Cheese, Fomo Hoire, din_far and 46 others
It's HK-47 said:
View attachment 1618356 View attachment 1618350

The "context" that these journalists and Daniel are supplying is, ironically, actually out of context. The video is clipped to where we only hear the question framed as, "Will you commit to a peaceful transfer of power after the election?" To the shock of no one, there was actually significantly more to that question.
​
"Mr. President, real quickly: Win, lose, or draw in this election, will you commit here, today, for a peaceful transferal of power after the election? And there has been rioting in Louisville. There's been rioting in many cities across this country--red and--your so-called red and blue states. Will you commit to a peaceful transferal of power after the election?"​

Win, lose or draw. If it's a win or a draw, why the fuck would he commit to a transfer of power? Is he going to forcibly transfer power to himself if he wins? Is he going to aggressively transfer the power to Biden and himself if it's a draw? This is a completely fucking retarded question and the only reason that they asked it in the first place was so that they could pry this sound clip out of him.

Fuck journalists.
Click to expand...
They made similar screeches when he responded to questions about military action against North Korea with "we'll see".

Projection is their Rosetta Stone. Hilldawg told Biden to not concede under any circumstances.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Fanatical Pragmatist, Exterminate Leftists, Qajinima022 and 2 others
Grog said:
Did anyone even know who that bitch was before she died?
Click to expand...
She was the old, aging Democrat on the Supreme Court who hated Trump and loved Roe v Wade and wouldn't resign in order to spite Trump.

That's really all there was to Ginsburg in the public consciousness even before she died.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Kujo Jotaro, ThatOneLurker, GeneralFriendliness and 13 others
It's HK-47 said:
View attachment 1618356 View attachment 1618350

The "context" that these journalists and Daniel are supplying is, ironically, actually out of context. The video is clipped to where we only hear the question framed as, "Will you commit to a peaceful transfer of power after the election?" To the shock of no one, there was actually significantly more to that question.
​
"Mr. President, real quickly: Win, lose, or draw in this election, will you commit here, today, for a peaceful transferal of power after the election? And there has been rioting in Louisville. There's been rioting in many cities across this country--red and--your so-called red and blue states. Will you commit to a peaceful transferal of power after the election?"​

Win, lose or draw. If it's a win or a draw, why the fuck would he commit to a transfer of power? Is he going to forcibly transfer power to himself if he wins? Is he going to aggressively transfer the power to Biden and himself if it's a draw? This is a completely fucking retarded question and the only reason that they asked it in the first place was so that they could pry this sound clip out of him.

Fuck journalists.
Click to expand...
Not sure why they didn't expect what they think is a stupid answer to their stupid question. They, for some reason, think Harris' election (what this really is) is all but guaranteed.
 
Iwasamwillbe said:
She was the old, aging Democrat on the Supreme Court who hated Trump and loved Roe v Wade and wouldn't resign in order to spite Trump.

That's really all there was to Ginsburg in the public consciousness even before she died.
Click to expand...
As for what legal analysts thought of her, just read what was said about her during her confirmation here (archive). Page 12 has the craziest stuff. She was the loudest voice on the Supreme Court pushing for the gender nonsense we see today, only she started doing it 40 years ago not just recently.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: GeneralFriendliness, Qajinima022, Exterminatus and 13 others
Collections Agent said:
I'd use that for advertising material for the helmet
Click to expand...
It's HK-47 said:
View attachment 1618356 View attachment 1618350

The "context" that these journalists and Daniel are supplying is, ironically, actually out of context. The video is clipped to where we only hear the question framed as, "Will you commit to a peaceful transfer of power after the election?" To the shock of no one, there was actually significantly more to that question.
​
"Mr. President, real quickly: Win, lose, or draw in this election, will you commit here, today, for a peaceful transferal of power after the election? And there has been rioting in Louisville. There's been rioting in many cities across this country--red and--your so-called red and blue states. Will you commit to a peaceful transferal of power after the election?"​

Win, lose or draw. If it's a win or a draw, why the fuck would he commit to a transfer of power? Is he going to forcibly transfer power to himself if he wins? Is he going to aggressively transfer the power to Biden and himself if it's a draw? This is a completely fucking retarded question and the only reason that they asked it in the first place was so that they could pry this sound clip out of him.

Fuck journalists.
Click to expand...
That's the go-to "Trump man bad" post I'm seeing all day. How do they interpret an ambiguous answer as "no I will absolutely not concede power peacefully if I lose. In fact I will be a dictator and not leave ever".

Also I was wondering why Trump did not just say "if I lose I'll concede power peacefully". But I'm thinking he CAN'T promise that because while he can control himself he can't control how everyone else will react to it. We've seen how people protest these days. We'll just have to see.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Qajinima022, Exterminatus, spiritofamermaid and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back